News
Tesla’s existence once again ignored by Ford in support of CA emissions regulations
Ford’s EV initiative has barely gotten off of the ground, but it still hasn’t stopped the American automaker from casting stones in the direction of Tesla. A billboard posting in Hollywood, California from Ford implies that it is the only American car company to support the State’s strict emissions regulations, which is simply untrue. Tesla is perhaps the biggest supporter, considering their entire vehicle lineup is all-electric, but Ford is unwilling to acknowledge the EV leader’s role in the transition to electrification.
The billboard is available near Fountain Avenue, which runs from Los Feliz all the way to West Hollywood. While virtually all areas of Los Angeles are considered “high traffic,” this billboard’s location runs through the heart of the city’s touristy-region in Hollywood. A photograph of the sign was spotted and posted to the Tesla Motors Club forum by user feigen66. It reads, “Proud to be the only American Automaker to stand with California for reduced greenhouse gas emissions,” with a sizeable Ford logo placed underneath the caption.
Tesla Motors Club | feigen66
Ford’s self-recognition as the sole American automaker to stand with California’s greenhouse gas standards is a case of the company ignoring Tesla’s dominating presence in the Golden State. Humorously, Tesla is based in the state where Ford’s satirical billboard is placed, making the statement more comedic than it is at face value.
The fact is, Ford is not the only American car company to support California’s emissions regulations. Tesla has been benefitting from supporting the State’s environmental plan for over a year. Last November, California announced that it would no longer purchase cars from General Motors, Toyota, or Fiat Chrysler because the companies did not agree to abide by the state’s rules regarding vehicle emissions.
Instead, companies that openly supported California’s greenhouse emissions policies would receive the State’s support. This would open the door for companies like Tesla to have their vehicles purchased by the State, but Ford is still suggesting that it is the only car company to side with California.
But to many people’s surprise, this is not the first time Ford has given Tesla the cold shoulder. The American company, based in Dearborn, Michigan, made the same statement in September 2020. Jim Farley, Ford’s current CEO, Tweeted the same message just two months ago, failing to acknowledge Tesla’s existence in an attempt to win over the politicians of California.
Ford seemingly denies Tesla’s existence as it supports CA’s zero-emissions initiative
While supportive of the transition to EVs, Ford still has not released a fully-electric car as of now. However, the company’s Mustang Mach-E will be released before the end of the year, introducing the public to the first all-electric car in Ford’s storied history as a carmaker. With that being said, the company’s non-acknowledgment of Tesla is questionable. With Tesla being the undisputed leader in electric vehicle production, credit should be given where it is due.
-
While car companies are undoubtedly competing with one another to sell the most vehicles, adopting all-electric vehicles is somewhat of a team effort. Tesla should receive the recognition it deserves for bringing top-performing EVs to the market and also highlighting the importance of transitioning away from petrol-powered engines.
H/t: @heydave7 on Twitter
Elon Musk has updated his timeline for when humans will walk on Mars and for when ships will simply get there.
The objective of getting to Mars has been one of Musk’s biggest goals since becoming a serial entrepreneur and realizing that time on Earth is limited. Musk has said several times he hopes to die on Mars, and not by impact.
Musk now believes that people will be on Mars in “roughly 5 to 7 years.” He said that a Mars lander will get there “a few years sooner.”
People on Mars in roughly 5 to 7 years.
Mars lander a few years sooner.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 29, 2026
The response from Musk comes after NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said that SpaceX’s biggest priority is the Moon and not Mars. Because of this, Isaacman conceded that he believes nuclear power and propulsion investments will provide “potentially the pathway with the fewest miracles required to put four people on Mars in the next 10 to 15 years.”
-
Of course, this is what NASA can do through taxpayer funding and nuclear investments, he added.
Musk’s grand ambitions are much more optimistic than most, and it is certainly a double-edged sword. This is not the first time timelines for Mars have been somewhat lofty, especially to those normal thinkers like you and me, not super geniuses like Musk.
In fact, the SpaceX and Tesla frontman has said on at least a dozen occasions that we could be on Mars in the coming years. Musk said 2020 would be the big year as early as 2009. In 2020, he was “highly confident” of a landing in 2026, and had even said 2024 in a best-case scenario.
The point is, the range has varied, and it’s anyone’s guess when we’ll get there. This latest adjustment to the timeline is typical of Musk, and while the Moon has seemingly taken priority over Mars, it is still worth mentioning that the ultimate goal is to make life multiplanetary, and it starts potentially with the Red Planet.
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) got an absolutely crazy price target rating from Raymond James after the company experienced a tough first few weeks following its Initial Public Offering (IPO).
Despite the tumultuous start, SpaceX has plenty of believers, and the company’s massively successful Starship launch last Friday, its 13th test flight of the massive rocket, went so smoothly that Raymond James analysts pushed its price target on the company to roughly 7 times its current trading level.
SpaceX Starship just nailed something it’s never done before
The firm officially put a “Strong Buy” rating and an $800 price target on the stock. It currently trades at around $113. Its all-time high is $225.64, reaching this trading level shortly after shares first went public.
Raymond James’ price target is tied to the firm’s confidence after Starship’s 13th test flight. Analysts at the firm said it was an incremental step that reduces engineering risks, citing the widely successful heat shield test that CEO Elon Musk recently detailed, the smooth deployment of Starlink V3 satellites, and a successful in-space engine relight.
SpaceX also managed to see Starship splash down safely in the Indian Ocean, while the Super Heavy Booster fell down to the Gulf of America with no incidents.
It is interesting to see these launches have such a tremendous impact on the stock and what investors think of it. After SpaceX initially delayed the Starship launch last week, shares fell tremendously. Most probably did not realize that the stand-down is a standard practice, especially if everything is not perfect.
-
The mission was initially aborted due to an issue with Raptor engines. This was resolved, and Starship launched last Friday after another delay on Thursday, which was caused by weather.
Now that analysts have seen what SpaceX launches are capable of and how impressive the feat is, firms are adjusting their price targets accordingly, making it known that they have high expectations for the space exploration company.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has responded to reports that Volvo is officially discontinuing the LiDAR sensor on two of its cars.
Volvo announced that it would officially scrap LiDAR systems on its EX90 and ES90 vehicles in various markets. In Norway, owners will get a €1,800 compensation for features that will never arrive due to this decision. There will be no option to remove the unit from vehicles, either.
The issue stems from Volvo’s supplier, Luminar, and its bankruptcy filing. Luminar will no longer be able to supply LiDAR units to Volvo for the EX90 and ES90, effectively axing any use the unit has on vehicles. Volvo will phase out the data collection processes via the LiDAR system, and it will not be utilized whatsoever.
Musk saw the story on X and responded, stating:
“I did try to warn them. Humans drive using neural nets and optical sensors. Same is true for robot cars.”
I did try to warn them.
Humans drive using neural nets and optical sensors. Same is true for robot cars.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 29, 2026
-
Musk has been publicly vocal about his disdain for LiDAR systems, once calling them “a fool’s errand,” as he has consistently kept the outlook that they are not needed for effective self-driving.
The typical example used as evidence for this by Musk is humans themselves: made with only eyes and memories, humans are capable of navigating a car by using what they can see and what they’ve personally experienced on the road.
Elon Musk argues lidar and radar make self driving cars more dangerous
“Same is true for robot cars,” Musk says, as Teslas have eight exterior cameras that help see everything surrounding the vehicle, and a neural network that analyzes behavior and tendencies with every mile driven.
Tesla is a vision-only self-driving company that ditched sensors and radar several years ago in favor of cameras. Behind this effort, the company has established a reputation for having one of the most robust self-driving platforms in the world.
Musk’s big bet with Tesla on its self-driving program’s strategy has widely paid off. Other companies continue to utilize things like LiDAR, radar, and sensors for effective self-driving, but Tesla has shown that there is more than one way to give consumers a strong and accurate driver assistance suite.
-
The real question is: who will be the first company to take Musk’s advice and attempt a self-driving platform based on cameras only, or even license FSD for themselves?
Elon Musk updates the SpaceX timeline for Mars
SpaceX gets an absolutely crazy price target after rough IPO
