If there were any complaints about Tesla’s “We, Robot” event, it was the fact that the occasion was very light on details surrounding the Cybercab. Fortunately, a good number of Tesla staff and even some executives were reportedly willing to provide some details about the upcoming vehicle.
In a post on social media platform X, longtime Tesla shareholder and owner-enthusiast Matthew Donegan-Ryan noted he was able to speak with Tesla Design Chief Franz von Holzhausen and Vice President of Vehicle Engineering Lars Moravy following the “We, Robot” event. The executives reportedly provided some insights about the upcoming vehicle, some of which were not mentioned in Elon Musk’s presentation at the occasion.
For one, there are reportedly no plans to make a Cybercab with a steering wheel and pedals. This is not surprising as such a vehicle would likely adversely affect the sales of the Model 3, Tesla’s second best-selling vehicle. It does, however, highlight the idea that Tesla is betting a notable part of its future on the Robotaxi and its potential to change the way people commute.
?Big Tesla Cybercab photo dump thread ?
PLUS more details from @larsmoravy and @woodhaus2:
– There are no plans to make a Cybercab with a steering wheel and pedals (demand for the Robotsxi version will essentially be unlimited). pic.twitter.com/RGdf6NgovJ— Matthew Donegan-Ryan (@MatthewDR) October 11, 2024
The Cybercab’s production will reportedly start in Giga Texas, before moving to other factories. The vehicle will reportedly share parts with the Model 3 and the Model Y, making it easier to produce and ramp. Even the Robovan will reportedly share a surprising number of parts from the company’s other vehicles. As for cameras, the Cybercab will reportedly feature the same layout as the Model 3 and Model Y, with the addition of a front bumper camera similar to the one fitted in the Cybertruck.
– All Teslas on the road running hardware 3 or 4 will be able to function as robotaxis without needing any hardware retrofitting. pic.twitter.com/QRHCfWUvy4— Matthew Donegan-Ryan (@MatthewDR) October 11, 2024
Quite interestingly, Donegan-Ryan mentioned in his posts that all Teslas on the road running Hardware 3 or Hardware 4 would be able to function as Robotaxis without needing any hardware retrofits. These exact claims were echoed in a video posted by Tesla owner Kim Java, who was able to conduct a brief interview with von Holzhausen and Moravy following Musk’s keynote. In her interview, Java asked if her 2018 Model 3 with Hardware 3 could run as a Robotaxi. The executives confirmed that yes, such a vehicle could operate as an autonomous car.
– Cybercabs will not have Tesla logos (like Cybertruck). Everyone will know it’s a Tesla by the design. pic.twitter.com/J9HgWXpFcs— Matthew Donegan-Ryan (@MatthewDR) October 11, 2024
Interestingly enough, the Cybercab will reportedly follow in the Cybertruck’s footsteps when it comes to branding, with the vehicle not having a single Tesla badge. This is quite a bold decision, though considering that Tesla plans to mass produce the Cybercab in very large quantities, a badge for the vehicle may not be needed at all. Just like the Cybertruck, people will know it’s a Tesla just by looking at it.
– I have never seen Franz and Lars as excited and positive as they were tonight. They both displayed a great sense of accomplishment. pic.twitter.com/OdVw6Qs2TG— Matthew Donegan-Ryan (@MatthewDR) October 11, 2024
The Cybercab will reportedly feature just three interior buttons, comprised of two window switches and a dome light switch. Every other feature that commuters wish to access or activate would be done through the touchscreen. Finally, the Cybercab will reportedly not be made with steel like the Cybertruck to keep costs low, and the vehicle’s inductive charging system might actually prove cost-effective because it would require fewer materials and cabling.
-
Watch Kim Java’s video of Tesla’s “We, Robot” event below.
Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.
Elon Musk has updated his timeline for when humans will walk on Mars and for when ships will simply get there.
The objective of getting to Mars has been one of Musk’s biggest goals since becoming a serial entrepreneur and realizing that time on Earth is limited. Musk has said several times he hopes to die on Mars, and not by impact.
Musk now believes that people will be on Mars in “roughly 5 to 7 years.” He said that a Mars lander will get there “a few years sooner.”
People on Mars in roughly 5 to 7 years.
Mars lander a few years sooner.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 29, 2026
The response from Musk comes after NASA Administrator Jared Isaacman said that SpaceX’s biggest priority is the Moon and not Mars. Because of this, Isaacman conceded that he believes nuclear power and propulsion investments will provide “potentially the pathway with the fewest miracles required to put four people on Mars in the next 10 to 15 years.”
Of course, this is what NASA can do through taxpayer funding and nuclear investments, he added.
Musk’s grand ambitions are much more optimistic than most, and it is certainly a double-edged sword. This is not the first time timelines for Mars have been somewhat lofty, especially to those normal thinkers like you and me, not super geniuses like Musk.
In fact, the SpaceX and Tesla frontman has said on at least a dozen occasions that we could be on Mars in the coming years. Musk said 2020 would be the big year as early as 2009. In 2020, he was “highly confident” of a landing in 2026, and had even said 2024 in a best-case scenario.
The point is, the range has varied, and it’s anyone’s guess when we’ll get there. This latest adjustment to the timeline is typical of Musk, and while the Moon has seemingly taken priority over Mars, it is still worth mentioning that the ultimate goal is to make life multiplanetary, and it starts potentially with the Red Planet.
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) got an absolutely crazy price target rating from Raymond James after the company experienced a tough first few weeks following its Initial Public Offering (IPO).
Despite the tumultuous start, SpaceX has plenty of believers, and the company’s massively successful Starship launch last Friday, its 13th test flight of the massive rocket, went so smoothly that Raymond James analysts pushed its price target on the company to roughly 7 times its current trading level.
SpaceX Starship just nailed something it’s never done before
The firm officially put a “Strong Buy” rating and an $800 price target on the stock. It currently trades at around $113. Its all-time high is $225.64, reaching this trading level shortly after shares first went public.
Raymond James’ price target is tied to the firm’s confidence after Starship’s 13th test flight. Analysts at the firm said it was an incremental step that reduces engineering risks, citing the widely successful heat shield test that CEO Elon Musk recently detailed, the smooth deployment of Starlink V3 satellites, and a successful in-space engine relight.
SpaceX also managed to see Starship splash down safely in the Indian Ocean, while the Super Heavy Booster fell down to the Gulf of America with no incidents.
It is interesting to see these launches have such a tremendous impact on the stock and what investors think of it. After SpaceX initially delayed the Starship launch last week, shares fell tremendously. Most probably did not realize that the stand-down is a standard practice, especially if everything is not perfect.
The mission was initially aborted due to an issue with Raptor engines. This was resolved, and Starship launched last Friday after another delay on Thursday, which was caused by weather.
Now that analysts have seen what SpaceX launches are capable of and how impressive the feat is, firms are adjusting their price targets accordingly, making it known that they have high expectations for the space exploration company.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk has responded to reports that Volvo is officially discontinuing the LiDAR sensor on two of its cars.
Volvo announced that it would officially scrap LiDAR systems on its EX90 and ES90 vehicles in various markets. In Norway, owners will get a €1,800 compensation for features that will never arrive due to this decision. There will be no option to remove the unit from vehicles, either.
The issue stems from Volvo’s supplier, Luminar, and its bankruptcy filing. Luminar will no longer be able to supply LiDAR units to Volvo for the EX90 and ES90, effectively axing any use the unit has on vehicles. Volvo will phase out the data collection processes via the LiDAR system, and it will not be utilized whatsoever.
Musk saw the story on X and responded, stating:
“I did try to warn them. Humans drive using neural nets and optical sensors. Same is true for robot cars.”
I did try to warn them.
Humans drive using neural nets and optical sensors. Same is true for robot cars.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 29, 2026
Musk has been publicly vocal about his disdain for LiDAR systems, once calling them “a fool’s errand,” as he has consistently kept the outlook that they are not needed for effective self-driving.
The typical example used as evidence for this by Musk is humans themselves: made with only eyes and memories, humans are capable of navigating a car by using what they can see and what they’ve personally experienced on the road.
Elon Musk argues lidar and radar make self driving cars more dangerous
“Same is true for robot cars,” Musk says, as Teslas have eight exterior cameras that help see everything surrounding the vehicle, and a neural network that analyzes behavior and tendencies with every mile driven.
Tesla is a vision-only self-driving company that ditched sensors and radar several years ago in favor of cameras. Behind this effort, the company has established a reputation for having one of the most robust self-driving platforms in the world.
Musk’s big bet with Tesla on its self-driving program’s strategy has widely paid off. Other companies continue to utilize things like LiDAR, radar, and sensors for effective self-driving, but Tesla has shown that there is more than one way to give consumers a strong and accurate driver assistance suite.
The real question is: who will be the first company to take Musk’s advice and attempt a self-driving platform based on cameras only, or even license FSD for themselves?
Elon Musk updates the SpaceX timeline for Mars
SpaceX gets an absolutely crazy price target after rough IPO
