News
Tesla Giga Berlin expansion faces roadblocks, but officials determined to find solutions
Tesla’s planned expansion of its German production facility Giga Berlin faces roadblocks as the automaker will need more water and electricity for operation, which may be in short supply. However, officials are determined to find solutions to the problems.
Brandenburg Prime Minister Dietmar Woidke assured Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk that the unresolved supply issues will be solved, and the local government is committed to finding a fix.
Tesla has been such an overwhelming contributor to the economy in Brandenburg that officials are willing to do whatever it takes to assure the automaker that any issues will be met with solutions.
The company has 10,000 employees and 140 trainees, Woidke said, adding that “Tesla has become Brandenburg’s largest industrial employer in less than a year.”
Woidke said, “We are looking forward to the expansion with great anticipation,” according to a letter seen by German media outlet Moz.de, knowing that power and water are still potential issues for the planned expansion of the plant.
However, Woidke is not willing to take anything but solutions as an answer and assured Tesla that the government will remain “unchanged and as reliable as in the past” and that it would come up with solutions to support the automaker’s expansion before the Summer.
RELATED:
Tesla faces criminal charges in Germany related to piles driven at Giga Berlin
Woidke’s comments follow Economic Minister Jörg Steinbach’s meeting with Tesla brass in Texas. The two sides met earlier in March. Steinbach didn’t respond to Teslarati’s request for comment on the meeting, but it appears it was to assure the company that Brandenburg is committed to the company and the expansion of Giga Berlin.
“It was important to give Tesla the reassurance of the ongoing support of the Brandenburg government for the potential expansion,” Steinbach said in a Tweet.
Visiting our friends at Austin Gigafactory. It was important to give @Tesla the reassurance of the ongoing support of the Brandenburg government for the potential extension of #giga4 at Grünheide. Thx for the hospitality. @elonmusk @MarleneMehnert @rohanspatel pic.twitter.com/7BdS5kqJDU
— Jörg Steinbach (@joergstb) March 7, 2023
The Risks: Water and Electricity
Water and electricity are the main barriers to the expansion, with water being the largest concern. Tesla, while consuming far less than the industry average, still regularly deals with pushback from local citizens and the Strausberg-Erkner water association (WSE).
The major concerns are what the factory’s water usage could potentially do to the supply for the entire region.
Tesla’s usage, which has undercut other comparable companies in Brandenburg, has caused the State Environment Agency to lift the requirement that the WSE must be involved in groundwater-related issues, a report from rbb24 said.
Political groups have also called for Tesla’s operation to be restricted and do not feel as if the company should be given preferential treatment, criticizing Woidke and Steinbach for the support they’ve given the company.
Tesla Giga Berlin Expansion
Tesla has already started preparing the land it plans to build on for an expansion of the factory. At least 170 acres will be cleared to make way for new buildings that would support annual production of between 500,000 and 1 million vehicles per year.
The increased production would likely help Tesla alleviate reliance on imports from Gigafactory Shanghai, which has sent vehicles to Europe to support demand.
Giga Berlin has not struggled with production, however, and recently reached a run rate of 4,000 vehicles per week, a goal that was hit well ahead of schedule.
Tesla still must wait for a vote from government officials to approve the expansion plans. It was scheduled for December but delayed with no new date set.
I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at joey@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
Tesla has officially launched public Robotaxi rides in Austin, Texas, without a Safety Monitor in the vehicle, marking the first time the company has removed anyone from the vehicle other than the rider.
The Safety Monitor has been present in Tesla Robotaxis in Austin since its launch last June, maintaining safety for passengers and other vehicles, and was placed in the passenger’s seat.
Tesla planned to remove the Safety Monitor at the end of 2025, but it was not quite ready to do so. Now, in January, riders are officially reporting that they are able to hail a ride from a Model Y Robotaxi without anyone in the vehicle:
I am in a robotaxi without safety monitor pic.twitter.com/fzHu385oIb
— TSLA99T (@Tsla99T) January 22, 2026
Tesla started testing this internally late last year and had several employees show that they were riding in the vehicle without anyone else there to intervene in case of an emergency.
Tesla has now expanded that program to the public. It is not active in the entire fleet, but there are a “few unsupervised vehicles mixed in with the broader robotaxi fleet with safety monitors,” Ashok Elluswamy said:
Robotaxi rides without any safety monitors are now publicly available in Austin.
Starting with a few unsupervised vehicles mixed in with the broader robotaxi fleet with safety monitors, and the ratio will increase over time. https://t.co/ShMpZjefwB
— Ashok Elluswamy (@aelluswamy) January 22, 2026
Tesla Robotaxi goes driverless as Musk confirms Safety Monitor removal testing
The Robotaxi program also operates in the California Bay Area, where the fleet is much larger, but Safety Monitors are placed in the driver’s seat and utilize Full Self-Driving, so it is essentially the same as an Uber driver using a Tesla with FSD.
In Austin, the removal of Safety Monitors marks a substantial achievement for Tesla moving forward. Now that it has enough confidence to remove Safety Monitors from Robotaxis altogether, there are nearly unlimited options for the company in terms of expansion.
While it is hoping to launch the ride-hailing service in more cities across the U.S. this year, this is a much larger development than expansion, at least for now, as it is the first time it is performing driverless rides in Robotaxi anywhere in the world for the public to enjoy.
Tesla has scheduled its Earnings Call for Q4 and Full Year 2025 for next Wednesday, January 28, at 5:30 p.m. EST, and investors are already preparing to get some answers from executives regarding a wide variety of topics.
The company accepts several questions from retail investors through the platform Say, which then allows shareholders to vote on the best questions.
Tesla does not answer anything regarding future product releases, but they are willing to shed light on current timelines, progress of certain projects, and other plans.
There are five questions that range over a variety of topics, including SpaceX, Full Self-Driving, Robotaxi, and Optimus, which are currently in the lead to be asked and potentially answered by Elon Musk and other Tesla executives:
- You once said: Loyalty deserves loyalty. Will long-term Tesla shareholders still be prioritized if SpaceX does an IPO?
- Our Take – With a lot of speculation regarding an incoming SpaceX IPO, Tesla investors, especially long-term ones, should be able to benefit from an early opportunity to purchase shares. This has been discussed endlessly over the past year, and we must be getting close to it.
- When is FSD going to be 100% unsupervised?
- Our Take – Musk said today that this is essentially a solved problem, and it could be available in the U.S. by the end of this year.
- What is the current bottleneck to increase Robotaxi deployment & personal use unsupervised FSD? The safety/performance of the most recent models or people to monitor robots, robotaxis, in-car, or remotely? Or something else?
- Our Take – The bottleneck seems to be based on data, which Musk said Tesla needs 10 billion miles of data to achieve unsupervised FSD. Once that happens, regulatory issues will be what hold things up from moving forward.
- Regarding Optimus, could you share the current number of units deployed in Tesla factories and actively performing production tasks? What specific roles or operations are they handling, and how has their integration impacted factory efficiency or output?
- Our Take – Optimus is going to have a larger role in factories moving forward, and later this year, they will have larger responsibilities.
- Can you please tie purchased FSD to our owner accounts vs. locked to the car? This will help us enjoy it in any Tesla we drive/buy and reward us for hanging in so long, some of us since 2017.
- Our Take – This is a good one and should get us some additional information on the FSD transfer plans and Subscription-only model that Tesla will adopt soon.
Tesla will have its Earnings Call on Wednesday, January 28.
Elon Musk shared an incredible detail about Tesla Cybercab’s potential efficiency, as the company has hinted in the past that it could be one of the most affordable vehicles to operate from a per-mile basis.
ARK Invest released a report recently that shed some light on the potential incremental cost per mile of various Robotaxis that will be available on the market in the coming years.
The Cybercab, which is detailed for the year 2030, has an exceptionally low cost of operation, which is something Tesla revealed when it unveiled the vehicle a year and a half ago at the “We, Robot” event in Los Angeles.
Musk said on numerous occasions that Tesla plans to hit the $0.20 cents per mile mark with the Cybercab, describing a “clear path” to achieving that figure and emphasizing it is the “full considered” cost, which would include energy, maintenance, cleaning, depreciation, and insurance.
Probably true
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) January 22, 2026
ARK’s report showed that the Cybercab would be roughly half the cost of the Waymo 6th Gen Robotaxi in 2030, as that would come in at around $0.40 per mile all in. Cybercab, at scale, would be at $0.20.
Credit: ARK Invest
This would be a dramatic decrease in the cost of operation for Tesla, and the savings would then be passed on to customers who choose to utilize the ride-sharing service for their own transportation needs.
The U.S. average cost of new vehicle ownership is about $0.77 per mile, according to AAA. Meanwhile, Uber and Lyft rideshares often cost between $1 and $4 per mile, while Waymo can cost between $0.60 and $1 or more per mile, according to some estimates.
Tesla’s engineering has been the true driver of these cost efficiencies, and its focus on creating a vehicle that is as cost-effective to operate as possible is truly going to pay off as the vehicle begins to scale. Tesla wants to get the Cybercab to about 5.5-6 miles per kWh, which has been discussed with prototypes.
Additionally, fewer parts due to the umboxed manufacturing process, a lower initial cost, and eliminating the need to pay humans for their labor would also contribute to a cheaper operational cost overall. While aspirational, all of the ingredients for this to be a real goal are there.
It may take some time as Tesla needs to hammer the manufacturing processes, and Musk has said there will be growing pains early. This week, he said regarding the early production efforts:
“…initial production is always very slow and follows an S-curve. The speed of production ramp is inversely proportionate to how many new parts and steps there are. For Cybercab and Optimus, almost everything is new, so the early production rate will be agonizingly slow, but eventually end up being insanely fast.”
BREAKING: Tesla launches public Robotaxi rides in Austin with no Safety Monitor
Tesla Earnings Call: Top 5 questions investors are asking
