News
Tesla Giga Berlin expansion faces roadblocks, but officials determined to find solutions
Tesla’s planned expansion of its German production facility Giga Berlin faces roadblocks as the automaker will need more water and electricity for operation, which may be in short supply. However, officials are determined to find solutions to the problems.
Brandenburg Prime Minister Dietmar Woidke assured Tesla and its CEO Elon Musk that the unresolved supply issues will be solved, and the local government is committed to finding a fix.
Tesla has been such an overwhelming contributor to the economy in Brandenburg that officials are willing to do whatever it takes to assure the automaker that any issues will be met with solutions.
The company has 10,000 employees and 140 trainees, Woidke said, adding that “Tesla has become Brandenburg’s largest industrial employer in less than a year.”
Woidke said, “We are looking forward to the expansion with great anticipation,” according to a letter seen by German media outlet Moz.de, knowing that power and water are still potential issues for the planned expansion of the plant.
However, Woidke is not willing to take anything but solutions as an answer and assured Tesla that the government will remain “unchanged and as reliable as in the past” and that it would come up with solutions to support the automaker’s expansion before the Summer.
RELATED:
Tesla faces criminal charges in Germany related to piles driven at Giga Berlin
Woidke’s comments follow Economic Minister Jörg Steinbach’s meeting with Tesla brass in Texas. The two sides met earlier in March. Steinbach didn’t respond to Teslarati’s request for comment on the meeting, but it appears it was to assure the company that Brandenburg is committed to the company and the expansion of Giga Berlin.
“It was important to give Tesla the reassurance of the ongoing support of the Brandenburg government for the potential expansion,” Steinbach said in a Tweet.
Visiting our friends at Austin Gigafactory. It was important to give @Tesla the reassurance of the ongoing support of the Brandenburg government for the potential extension of #giga4 at Grünheide. Thx for the hospitality. @elonmusk @MarleneMehnert @rohanspatel pic.twitter.com/7BdS5kqJDU
— Jörg Steinbach (@joergstb) March 7, 2023
The Risks: Water and Electricity
Water and electricity are the main barriers to the expansion, with water being the largest concern. Tesla, while consuming far less than the industry average, still regularly deals with pushback from local citizens and the Strausberg-Erkner water association (WSE).
The major concerns are what the factory’s water usage could potentially do to the supply for the entire region.
Tesla’s usage, which has undercut other comparable companies in Brandenburg, has caused the State Environment Agency to lift the requirement that the WSE must be involved in groundwater-related issues, a report from rbb24 said.
Political groups have also called for Tesla’s operation to be restricted and do not feel as if the company should be given preferential treatment, criticizing Woidke and Steinbach for the support they’ve given the company.
Tesla Giga Berlin Expansion
Tesla has already started preparing the land it plans to build on for an expansion of the factory. At least 170 acres will be cleared to make way for new buildings that would support annual production of between 500,000 and 1 million vehicles per year.
The increased production would likely help Tesla alleviate reliance on imports from Gigafactory Shanghai, which has sent vehicles to Europe to support demand.
Giga Berlin has not struggled with production, however, and recently reached a run rate of 4,000 vehicles per week, a goal that was hit well ahead of schedule.
Tesla still must wait for a vote from government officials to approve the expansion plans. It was scheduled for December but delayed with no new date set.
I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at joey@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
Investor's Corner
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
News
Tesla door handle saga gets its latest chapter and a big change is coming
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
News
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 faces wrath of the Texas skies
SpaceX pushed Starship Flight 13 to Friday, blaming weather instead of the previous engine issues.
SpaceX called off Thursday’s launch attempt of Starship Flight 13, pushing the mission to Friday because of weather tied to Tropical Storm Bertha. The company confirmed the delay on X, noting “Now targeting Friday, July 24 for Starship’s thirteenth flight test, due to weather. A key objective for the flight test is to get clear imagery from the ground of Starship’s heatshield as it flies at a higher dynamic pressure during ascent, which won’t be possible with today’s weather conditions.”
This is the second delay for Flight 13 in two weeks. SpaceX first tried to launch the mission on July 16, but the countdown ended in an automated abort at T-0 when four of Super Heavy Booster 20’s 33 Raptor engines failed to ignite. Musk said at the time that two Raptors would need to be removed and replaced, as Teslarati reported. The company spent the following week destacking Ship 40 and Booster 20, swapping engines, and running leak checks before restacking the vehicle on Pad 2 Wednesday night, according to Spaceflight Now’s live coverage.
Unlike the engine problem, Thursday’s delay has nothing to do with the hardware. SpaceX wants clean footage of Starship’s heat shield captured from the ground as the vehicle flies through max dynamic pressure, something the storm’s cloud cover over South Texas would not allow. The company said visibility should improve for Friday’s attempt, with the same 90 minute window opening at 5:45 p.m. CT.
Flight 13 will be the second outing for the V3 versions of Starship and Super Heavy, following their debut on Flight 12 in May. The mission carries 20 production Starlink V3 satellites, the first time SpaceX has flown operational satellites rather than mass simulators on Starship. Six of those satellites are fitted with cameras to inspect the heat shield from a different angle during ascent, giving engineers a second data source beyond the ground imagery the weather is currently blocking.
Booster 20 will attempt a boostback burn and a splashdown landing burn in the Gulf of America, while Ship 40 follows a suborbital trajectory toward a landing in the Indian Ocean. The flight plan largely mirrors Flight 12, though the booster will run a more aggressive ascent burn after max Q this time, and the ship’s heat shield includes load sensing tiles meant to measure stress at the higher dynamic pressure SpaceX is targeting.
If Friday’s attempt succeeds, Flight 13 could be the last suborbital test in the program. SpaceX is already looking to push for an orbital flight on Flight 14.