Connect with us

News

Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor joins Performance variant in beating company 0-60 estimates

Published

on

Just like the Tesla Model 3 Performance, owners’ accounts and videos taken of the (non-performance) Model 3 Dual Motor AWD suggest that the vehicle is capable of performing better than Tesla’s own estimates.

Tesla lists the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD with a 0-60 mph time of 4.5 seconds, a top speed of 145 mph, and 310 miles of range, placing it midway between the Performance and the Long Range RWD version of the vehicle. The Model 3 Performance is rated with a 0-60 mph of 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 155 mph, and a range of 310 miles per charge, while the Long Range RWD Model 3 is listed with a 0-60 mph time of 5.1 seconds, a top speed of 140 mph, and a range of 310 miles on a full battery.

 Among the first Model 3 Dual Motor AWD owners that shared his experience online was r/TeslaMotors subreddit member u/Cynapse, who conducted two 0-60 mph runs in his electric car. In one run, the vehicle was able to hit 60 mph in 4.33 seconds, .17 seconds faster than Tesla’s estimates. More recently, another Dual Motor AWD owner who goes by the username Geek Hero on YouTube recorded another 4.3-second 0-60 mph run.

A comparative table of Tesla’s current Model 3 offerings. [Credit: Tesla]

So far, tests involving the acceleration of the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD involved the electric cars’ owners measuring sections of their videos frame-by-frame, similar to how Tesla owner-enthusiast DÆrik calculated his first tests of the Model 3 Performance.

These early tests from owners suggest that the electric car actually exceeds Tesla’s listed specs. Tesla appears to have done this to every vehicle in the Model 3 series so far. When the Long Range RWD variant was released, initial acceleration tests showed that the car was capable of hitting 60 mph in 4.6 seconds, half a second faster than Tesla’s estimates. Later updates on the Model 3 appear to have addressed this, with the Long Range RWD version now exhibiting 0-60 times more consistent with Tesla’s 5.1-second estimate.

Recent VBOX tests of the Model 3 Performance have also proven that the vehicle is much faster than Tesla’s figures. With a full battery, a VBOX-recorded run in the Model 3 Performance showed that the electric car was capable of hitting 60 mph in 3.18 seconds, even on stock tires. Without a full charge, VBOX runs of the Model 3 Performance showed a consistent 0-60 time of 3.3 seconds.

It remains to be seen if Tesla would eventually adjust the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD’s performance the same way it addressed the Long Range RWD variant’s speed. For now, at least, owners of the non-performance dual motor electric car can enjoy the fact that their vehicles seem to be faster than what they expected them to be.

Advertisement
-

Watch the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD sprint from 0-60 mph in the video below.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

Elon Musk will give ‘every kid in America’ a SpaceX share in 2027

Published

on

Credit: Grok Imagine

Elon Musk said he is planning to give “every one of his SpaceX shares to every kid in America” in 2027, stating that “this will be the first of many.”

SpaceX went public earlier this year, and its stock price has been relatively stable since leveling off shortly after its IPO. Based on its current price, it’s a gift of just over $10 billion to children across the United States.

It appears to be closely related to President Donald Trump’s bank accounts for children, which were set up earlier this year as Trump Accounts.

Just hours earlier, Anthropic had announced the establishment of its Anthropic Public Benefit Fund, “a new wholly-owned entity dedicated entirely to public benefit.” Musk responded by stating he recommended “giving the shares directly to the public,” and that he would be doing it that way.

Just a little bit later, Musk said children across the U.S. would be getting a share from him:

Advertisement
-

There are roughly 70 million children, meaning someone under the age of 18, in the United States, according to the Federal Interagency Forum on Child and Family Statistics. Musk’s ownership of SpaceX stock shows he has around 849 million Class A shares of SpaceX stock, according to filings with the SEC.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Elon Musk reveals why Boring Co’s biggest East Coast project never happened

Published

on

(Credit: The Boring Company)

Elon Musk revealed in a post on X that “Permits were impossible to get,” explaining the fate of The Boring Company’s most ambitious East Coast proposal.

The comment responded to a query about what became of his July 20, 2017 announcement that he had “just received verbal govt approval” for an underground Hyperloop connecting New York City, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and Washington, D.C., capable of carrying passengers from the Big Apple to the Nation’s Capital in just 29 minutes.

The Boring Company receives verbal ‘approval’ to build NY to DC Hyperloop tunnel

The 2017 post, which envisioned city-center stations and multiple elevators in each city, sparked immediate scrutiny. Local and state officials in New York, Philadelphia, Baltimore, and D.C. said they had no knowledge of any approval. A White House spokesperson confirmed only “promising conversations” about the transformative infrastructure.

Musk clarified shortly after that there was “still a lot of work” to do for formal approvals.

Limited progress followed, as Maryland Governor Larry Hogan’s administration issued a conditional utility permit and supported work near Fort Meade. In 2018, Washington, D.C., granted a preliminary permit for site preparation and excavation on a vacant lot at 53 New York Ave. NE in the NoMa neighborhood, which The Boring Company said could become a station.

A draft environmental assessment for a D.C.-Baltimore segment was released in 2019. Yet, by April 2021, the company had removed the project from its website, and the Federal Highway Administration reported receiving no indication of further interest. Communication with Maryland officials had ceased.

The full corridor would have required coordination among the District of Columbia, Maryland, Pennsylvania, New York, the Federal Highway Administration, the Army Corps of Engineers, the National Park Service, and other agencies.

Environmental reviews under the National Environmental Policy Act, utility clearances, and approvals for novel infrastructure added to the overall complexity of the project and its approval.

Speculation on the permitting barriers centers around a few factors, but a multi-state, multi-level route involving unproven high-speed vacuum-tube technology inherently triggers exhaustive safety, environmental, and engineering reviews that can stretch for years, even for conventional projects.

Advertisement
-

There are also other elements, of course, like officials who may face political exposure if a privately funded, untested system encountered anything such as cost overruns, delays, or safety issues. On the outset of this project, there were limited things such as engineering plans or demonstrated technology maturity, which also added to the potential skepticism.

The East Coast vision for Boring Co., once framed as a privately funded revolution that could reshape Northeast travel, quietly ended without construction of the promised network. Musk’s recent statement frames the outcome as a regulatory impasse, unfortunate but not unexpected.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Tesla CEO Elon Musk reminds everyone about Roadster’s true meaning

Published

on

Elon Musk addresses the crowd next to the new Tesla Roadster, which Tesla offers in Performance, Thrust and Rocket versions. (Image: Tesla/X)
Elon Musk addresses the crowd next to the new Tesla Roadster, which Tesla offers in Performance, Thrust and Rocket versions. (Image: Tesla/X)

Tesla CEO Elon Musk took to his social media platform X on Sunday to remind everyone that the Roadster’s true meaning is not about company growth or adding dollars to shareholders’ pockets. Sometimes, you just do things because you can.

Following the Roadster’s epic unveiling event last Thursday, skeptics and critics of the company or the project itself came out to say that the vehicle is a pointless project because it is not geared toward growing the company, delivering supreme margins for profitability, nor does it contribute to the big picture of Artificial/Super Intelligence.

But that’s just the thing: Roadster is not meant to be some shareholder dream; it’s meant to be a vehicle that people buy just because it is something awesome, unique, and the first of its kind.

Tesla Roadster: Three configs, one can fly, 0-60 in 0.8 seconds

Musk had to remind those who are skeptical about the Roadster’s importance to the company mission that while it is not a major contributor to Tesla’s long-term goals, it is something that is being built just because it can be:

“Optimus and Cybercab will be the vast majority of Tesla’s value. The only things that will scale to incredible size (K2 and beyond) economically are super intelligence, robots, solar power, and mass to space. And, of course, if you have the first two, the rest will follow. But Roadster is super cool, so we’re doing it anyway.”

Advertisement
-

Musk has said on many occasions that Optimus would be the project that would make up the vast majority of Tesla’s value in the coming years.

Robotics will be a major focus of Tesla over the coming years, especially as Musk believes Optimus will enable work to be optional for humans and will enable what he calls “High Universal Income.”

Cybercab will be a passive income opportunity for owners, Musk and Tesla have said for a very long time, as a fleet of self-driving vehicles will operate within a ride-hailing Robotaxi service that won’t require a human driver to be present.

Tesla investors are more than enthusiastic about the company’s future projects, at least from a general consensus perspective. However, it is important to note that the Roadster is a fun and cool project that pushes the boundaries of what people thought was possible for an automobile.

What we saw last week was the first true example of a flying car, and despite the backlash about how it might not contribute to Tesla’s grand ambitions, it’s okay to have fun sometimes, too.

Continue Reading