Connect with us

News

Tesla Model 3 Dual Motor joins Performance variant in beating company 0-60 estimates

Published

on

Just like the Tesla Model 3 Performance, owners’ accounts and videos taken of the (non-performance) Model 3 Dual Motor AWD suggest that the vehicle is capable of performing better than Tesla’s own estimates.

Tesla lists the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD with a 0-60 mph time of 4.5 seconds, a top speed of 145 mph, and 310 miles of range, placing it midway between the Performance and the Long Range RWD version of the vehicle. The Model 3 Performance is rated with a 0-60 mph of 3.5 seconds, a top speed of 155 mph, and a range of 310 miles per charge, while the Long Range RWD Model 3 is listed with a 0-60 mph time of 5.1 seconds, a top speed of 140 mph, and a range of 310 miles on a full battery.

 Among the first Model 3 Dual Motor AWD owners that shared his experience online was r/TeslaMotors subreddit member u/Cynapse, who conducted two 0-60 mph runs in his electric car. In one run, the vehicle was able to hit 60 mph in 4.33 seconds, .17 seconds faster than Tesla’s estimates. More recently, another Dual Motor AWD owner who goes by the username Geek Hero on YouTube recorded another 4.3-second 0-60 mph run.

A comparative table of Tesla’s current Model 3 offerings. [Credit: Tesla]

So far, tests involving the acceleration of the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD involved the electric cars’ owners measuring sections of their videos frame-by-frame, similar to how Tesla owner-enthusiast DÆrik calculated his first tests of the Model 3 Performance.

These early tests from owners suggest that the electric car actually exceeds Tesla’s listed specs. Tesla appears to have done this to every vehicle in the Model 3 series so far. When the Long Range RWD variant was released, initial acceleration tests showed that the car was capable of hitting 60 mph in 4.6 seconds, half a second faster than Tesla’s estimates. Later updates on the Model 3 appear to have addressed this, with the Long Range RWD version now exhibiting 0-60 times more consistent with Tesla’s 5.1-second estimate.

Recent VBOX tests of the Model 3 Performance have also proven that the vehicle is much faster than Tesla’s figures. With a full battery, a VBOX-recorded run in the Model 3 Performance showed that the electric car was capable of hitting 60 mph in 3.18 seconds, even on stock tires. Without a full charge, VBOX runs of the Model 3 Performance showed a consistent 0-60 time of 3.3 seconds.

It remains to be seen if Tesla would eventually adjust the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD’s performance the same way it addressed the Long Range RWD variant’s speed. For now, at least, owners of the non-performance dual motor electric car can enjoy the fact that their vehicles seem to be faster than what they expected them to be.

Watch the Model 3 Dual Motor AWD sprint from 0-60 mph in the video below.

Advertisement
-
-

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

News

Tesla Roadster unveiling nears, and it will fly: The Information

Published

on

(Credit: Dami Kolz/Twitter)

Tesla is nearing its long-awaited unveiling of the all-electric Tesla Roadster, a new report from The Information claims, as the company has said several times this year that the event would take place “soon.”

Now, it appears there is movement on Tesla’s end regarding when it will happen.

The report says that Tesla will unveil the Roadster as soon as this month with a SpaceX version that will utilize cold-gas thrusters to help the vehicle float for a short period of time. This is something CEO Elon Musk has talked about with the Roadster for years.

Additionally, due to the delays, Tesla explored “a variety of designs” for the Roadster, potentially planning to abandon the design it showed off for the first time in 2017 and adopting an entirely new aesthetic.

Advertisement
-
-

According to The Information, Tesla considered utilizing a repurposed Model S Plaid and even wanted to upgrade the look to something like a Lamborghini Countach.

Elon Musk teases Tesla Roadster unveiling once again

We’ve heard all of these things before, including teases about the date and how “soon” the Roadster will finally be ready to be shown off to the world (for the second time). Musk said that the event would occur in April, then May, then Chief Designer Franz von Holzhausen continued to say it would be coming “soon.”

We do expect to see the Roadster by the end of the year, and now with this new report swirling, it appears it could be sooner rather than later.

The wait has been incredibly long, but there is likely a good reason for it. Tesla’s desire to make the Roadster the craziest vehicle on the road was non-negotiable, and it likely took a lot of time and resources to develop and perfect into something that was safe and suitable for a vehicle like this.

Continue Reading

Featured

Tesla finally got its Nevada Robotaxi Permit but with a few catches hard to miss

Nevada granted Tesla’s robotaxi permit, but capped the fleet at just ten vehicles for now.

Published

on

By

Concept art of a Tesla Cybercab in Las Vegas Strip as rendered via Grok

Tesla has received its robotaxi permit in Nevada, more than two months after regulators closed the public comment period on the company’s application. News of the approval surfaced Wednesday night when Tesla investor and longtime company watcher Sawyer Merritt posted a copy of the interim order, and the Nevada Transportation Authority’s own carrier registry now lists the permit, AVNC Permit 002 under Docket 26-05015, as active for Tesla Robotaxi, LLC.

Tesla asked Nevada in June for authority to run up to 5,000 vehicles in Clark County within a year, however the permit the NTA issued is initially capping Tesla at ten fully autonomous vehicles and confines them to a defined geofence along the Las Vegas Strip corridor. Any expansion of that operating area, or any increase to the fleet size, requires the NTA’s approval first.

The order also sets rules that look more restrictive than what Tesla runs in Austin. Rides are barred on roads with posted speed limits above 45 miles per hour, pickups are off limits within a quarter mile of Harry Reid International Airport without separate authorization, and every vehicle has to carry visible “Robotaxi” markings while notifying riders before each trip that no one is driving. The order also requires “appropriate human supervision”, language that suggests Nevada isn’t ready to let Tesla offer the rides without a safety monitor that it has run in parts of Austin since January. As with standard protocol with robotaxi services, Tesla must report any accident, system failure, or vehicle that becomes stranded on a Nevada road within five business days.

Tesla is entering a market Nevada already knows well. Zoox, the Amazon owned robotaxi company, has run its own autonomous vehicle permit in the state since last year, building up to roughly 100 vehicles and 350,000 rides along the Strip. That history likely explains why the NTA started Tesla at ten cars rather than the fleet size the company asked for. The agency has a template for scaling a permit up once a company proves out its safety record.

Advertisement
-
-

Tesla’s Nevada application first surfaced in June, when the company filed for the permit alongside plans for a maintenance hub in southwest Las Vegas. The company has said it won’t meaningfully scale its robotaxi fleet anywhere until FSD v15 ships, expected in late 2026 or early 2027, which makes the ten vehicle cap less of a constraint today than it might look on paper. For now, Tesla has the legal right to start Nevada rides. Whether it starts before FSD v15 arrives is a separate question the permit doesn’t answer.

Continue Reading

Energy

Tesla launches Powerwall Lease for affordable home backup

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla Energy has introduced the Powerwall Lease in conjunction with Tesla Electric, making the service available in Texas. This new option delivers whole-home backup power using two Powerwall units for a net monthly cost of $35 after credits, accompanied by a low fixed electricity rate.

Under the lease terms, customers pay a one-time order fee of $100. The base lease payment for the two Powerwalls is approximately $122 per month during the first year, subject to a 3 percent annual escalator thereafter. Enrollment in a qualifying Tesla Electric Backup plan or Virtual Power Plant plan provides an $87 monthly credit.

This credit lowers the effective cost to roughly $35 per month plus applicable tax.

Advertisement
-
-

Installation of the standard system carries no additional charge. The package features Storm Watch for outage protection and allows complete management through a single Tesla application. The system supplies continuous whole-home backup capability.

The Powerwall system enables households to maintain electricity during severe storms that disrupt the utility grid. When outages occur, the batteries automatically provide seamless backup power to the home.

Tesla announces 100k Powerwalls are participating in Virtual Power Plants

Tesla Storm Watch monitors weather forecasts and ensures the units are fully charged ahead of anticipated severe weather events so that power remains available throughout the disruption, keeping lights, refrigeration, and other essential systems operating without interruption.

Availability is restricted to select Texas locations where retail electric choice exists. Participants must lease exactly two Powerwall units and maintain continuous enrollment with Tesla Electric. Solar panels cannot be included under this particular lease arrangement.

The monthly credit activates automatically once the system is installed, receives permission to operate, and enrollment is confirmed. To retain the credit, customers are required to stay enrolled in Tesla Electric and fulfill all program conditions.

Nonstandard installations that involve electrical upgrades or special permitting may lead to extra expenses and might impact eligibility for the credit, so be sure to check with either your installer or Tesla to ensure you will still qualify.

Advertisement
-
-
Continue Reading