News
Tesla Model X shields owner from debris after gas explosion near Supercharger
A Tesla Model X owner was able to escape harm following a massive explosion at Plantation, FL this past Saturday. During the incident, which resulted in multiple stores at a shopping center getting completely destroyed and large chunks of concrete flying through the air, the electric car owner opted to seek shelter in his electric SUV, allowing him to escape the incident completely unscathed.
Tesla owner Guillermo Villa was about to charge his Model X at the Plantation, FL Supercharger when he heard a massive blast from a nearby shopping center. Looking at the explosion’s direction, Villa saw a bright light and a cloud of debris, which started falling on him. Looking for the closest shelter he can find, the Tesla owner opted to seek refuge underneath his Model X. From the bottom of the all-electric SUV, Villa saw people running and shouting. In a statement to ABC News, the Model X owner stated that the experience had been incredibly frightening.
On the scene of a building explosion in Plantation, FL. A witness just shared this video of the aftermath. He tells me he heard the explosion as he was about to charge his Tesla. He dove underneath the front of it as debris fell all around him. pic.twitter.com/RRJ9kEA8GE
— Victor Oquendo (@VictorOquendo) July 6, 2019
“I started seeing pieces of the building falling on my head. I went underneath my car because there was so much debris flying. It was like raining pieces of roof, wall, bricks. I was afraid. I thought it was a terrorist attack at the beginning,” he said. Fortunately for Villa, his Model X proved enough to shield him from falling debris, allowing him to escape from the harrowing experience without a scratch. “It was so close … I am blessed. I cannot believe nothing happened to me,” he added.
A video of the incident’s aftermath showed Villa’s Model X covered with debris from the nearby explosion. Other Teslas that were parked at the Supercharger also seemed to have been covered by debris. In a way, Villa was indeed lucky, considering that his Model X was parked close to a tree, which likely deflected some of the debris falling on the vehicle. The Model X also sits higher above the road than the Model S and Model 3, which made it easier for Villa to crawl underneath the SUV. An update on any damages that the Model X might have incurred from the accident has not been released, but based on the video of the explosion’s aftermath, it appears that the all-electric SUV was able to escape any major damages.
The massive explosion that rocked Plantation, FL on Saturday injured 23 people. An initial call from authorities stated that the incident was a gas explosion, particularly since a HAZMAT team from the Plantation Fire Department found a gas leak amidst the rubble of the damaged shopping center. Nevertheless, investigations are still underway to determine if the gas leak was indeed the reason behind the massive, catastrophic blast. Plantation Fire Deputy Chief Joel Gordon explained this in a statement to CNN. “At this point, we have not actually confirmed that it was an explosion due to gas. We believe that. That’s what it appears to be,” he said.
If there is one silver lining from the potentially deadly incident, it is the fact that there were no fatalities from the suspected gas explosion. Two people incurred serious injuries, but considering the scale of the blast and the extensive damages it caused to nearby buildings, it was practically a miracle that everyone in the area survived. “This could have been a lot worse,” the Fire Deputy Chief said.
Tesla just gave what is perhaps its biggest signal yet that the launch of the Cybercab, its autonomous ride-hailing-geared car, is imminent.
The Cybercab has been spotted outside of Gigafactory Texas in massive numbers over the past few days, with hundreds of units being stored on property just days after the vehicle received a Certificate of Conformity from the EPA.
Today, things were a bit different.
Cybercabs spotted on Giga Texas property today had an addition: a Cybercab decal on the side, reminiscent of the “Robotaxi” ones that were placed on Model Ys just as the company launched its ride-sharing platform about a year ago.
Giga Texas drone operator Joe Tegtmeyer noticed the change today:
Tesla Cybercabs are now getting “Cybercab” logos on the side of them!
Tesla did the same with Model Ys that were given “Robotaxi” logos: https://t.co/DanANtw1m7 pic.twitter.com/FqOhH0S9Ks
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) June 19, 2026
Tesla could be signaling that the Cybercab is preparing to enter the Robotaxi fleet in the coming weeks or months with this move. It seems more symbolic than anything; Tesla is ready to throw Cybercabs in the ride-hailing platform just as it did with Model Ys last year.
The addition of the Certificate of Conformity awarded to the Cybercab is another major factor working to Tesla’s advantage. The company now has permission from the EPA to allow the vehicle to operate on public roads and enter the chain of commerce. It’s officially street legal.
Tesla Cybercab specs revealed: range, curb weight, range ratings, and more
The big question that remains is whether Tesla will be able to operate the car without a safety monitor, especially considering it plans to put the car out there without a steering wheel or pedals. With the Cybercab only having a seating capacity of two, it is hard to believe Tesla will even consider putting a Safety Monitor in the car.
It did recently self-certify as Level 4 and has the ability to operate driverless vehicles in the State of Texas under a law that took effect on May 28. You can read more about that here:
Tesla’s Robotaxi dreams just took a massive step toward reality
We’d imagine Cybercabs will be on the roads as soon as July, but August will likely be a better estimate of when the car will be entered into the Cybercab fleet. It all depends at where Tesla is, as they’ve truly prioritized safety with the rollout of the Robotaxi platform.
Elon Musk has publicly questioned Moody’s credit assessments following the rating agency’s decision to assign SpaceX a Baa1 investment-grade rating, two notches above Tesla’s Baa3. The comments came amid discussions comparing the two companies’ financial profiles.
SpaceX earned its first-time Baa1 rating with a stable outlook from Moody’s. The agency highlighted the company’s leadership in orbital launches, the growing recurring revenue from its Starlink satellite network, strong vertical integration, U.S. government contracts, and emerging opportunities in AI infrastructure.
These factors were cited as supporting robust cash flows, margin expansion, and financial flexibility.
Musk responded directly: “Tesla’s credit rating is ridiculously low tbh,” and added, “Yeah, makes no sense. Tesla has over $40B in cash, no debt, and is consistently profitable!” His remarks underscored Tesla’s balance sheet strength and profitability at a time when many traditional automakers continue to report losses in the shift to electric vehicles.
Yeah, makes no sense.
Tesla has over $40B in cash, no debt and is consistently profitable!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 19, 2026
Tesla maintains a leading position in the global EV market, with diversification into energy and storage, battery technology, and robotics through projects like Optimus. Recent financial updates show the company generated positive free cash flow of $1.4 billion in Q1 2026, supported by operating cash flow of $3.9 billion. Cash and short-term investments stood at approximately $44.7 billion.
Moody’s has affirmed Tesla’s Baa3 issuer rating with a stable outlook in periodic reviews, acknowledging the company’s EV leadership, technology strengths, including AI for autonomous vehicles, solid profitability, and strong liquidity.
Tesla (TSLA) scores Baa3 Moody’s rating for ‘stable’ outlook
However, the agency has also noted challenges in the automotive segment and expectations for margin pressures.
Musk’s critique highlights a common debate about how traditional rating methodologies apply to high-growth, capital-intensive technology companies. SpaceX benefits from long-term government-backed contracts and diversified, recurring revenue streams, while Tesla’s valuation reflects heavy investment in future technologies such as autonomy and robotics.
Both ratings remain investment-grade, yet the one-notch difference has fueled online discussion about potential inconsistencies in evaluating innovative firms.
The exchange comes as SpaceX explores financing options following its recent valuation milestones, while Tesla continues executing on its multi-year roadmap. Musk’s pointed response serves as a reminder that credit ratings, though influential for borrowing costs, represent one lens through which markets assess corporate strength—and that company leaders often view their financial positions through the lens of long-term innovation and cash generation rather than short-term risk metrics alone.
A new report from Reuters claims that a transport authority in Sweden is pushing back against the approval of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving suite because it will travel over speed limits.
The report says the Swedish Transport Administration (TRV) recommends the European Union votes against FSD’s approval. TRV believes it should not be approved until Tesla disables FSD’s ability to speed.
TRV sent a letter to the European Union’s Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles (TCMV), which is set to meet on June 30 to discuss the potential approval of the Tesla FSD suite in the country. Tesla, which has received various approvals in Europe over the past two months, has not provided a comment.
Teslas operating on FSD do travel over the speed limit, depending on the Speed Profile that is chosen. Drivers have the ability to disengage FSD at any point; Tesla specifically states that those supervising the suite are responsible for its actions.
Let’s cut to the chase: humans operating any vehicle speed almost daily in the United States. Realistically, speed limits in the U.S. are more frequently treated as speed minimums. However, other countries are different, and driving behaviors are less aggressive.
TRV believes that “allowing automated systems to systematically exceed legal speed limits…risks undermining both the legal framework and the expected safety benefits of vehicle automation,” the report stated. It’s surprising that Tesla has not received this claim from other countries previously.
This could be a good argument to bring Max Speed back, the setting that previously allowed the driver to choose the absolute fastest the car would travel.
This would still put the responsibility of supervision in the hands of the driver. It would allow the driver to choose whether the car would travel over the speed limit or not, acknowledging that they set the speed, and if they get pulled over, there would be no ability to argue it.
However, it does not seem as if this is something Tesla will do, especially considering many U.S. drivers have requested the feature in an effort to eliminate speeding or at least tone it down. The company has not shown any interest in bringing it back.
Tesla has approvals for FSD in Europe in Estonia, Lithuania, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Belgium.
Tesla Cybercab launch is imminent after latest sighting at Giga Texas
Elon Musk says this part of Tesla ‘makes no sense’
