Connect with us

News

Tesla Supercharger buildout seemingly underway in Gigafactory 3 site

(Credit: Chao Zhou/Twitter)

Published

on

Recent flyovers of Tesla’s Gigafactory 3 site in Shanghai, China reveal that several other structures surrounding the main general assembly building are now being built. Interestingly, one of these appears to be a Supercharger station, which would allow Tesla owners to charge their vehicles when visiting the electric car production facility. 

Images of the apparent Supercharger buildout were shared by Tesla community member and local resident Chao Zhou, who has been monitoring the site since its early days. A formal confirmation of the buildout being a charging station has not been released by Tesla China yet, though it should be noted that the outline of the structure is very similar to a number of Superchargers found in the United States. 

https://twitter.com/realChaoZhou/status/1161967060533907457?s=20

Tesla is currently rolling out its next-generation charging infrastructure in the US. Simply dubbed as the V3 Superchargers, the new stations are capable of supporting peak rates of up to 250 kW or around 1,000 mph per vehicle. This allows a car such as the Long Range Model 3 RWD to recharge 75 miles in just 5 minutes. In comparison, V2 Superchargers used to have peak rates of ~120 kW per vehicle, though recent updates from the carmaker have raised this to 150 kW per car

Considering that Gigafactory 3 represents the best and latest innovations of Tesla in terms of Model 3 production, there is a pretty good chance that the Supercharger under construction in the site will be fitted with V3 chargers as well. Elon Musk, after all, has previously expressed his intention for Tesla to roll out more Supercharger V3 stations across the globe. With this in mind, perhaps Gigafactory 3 could have the honor of being one of the first foreign locations that will be graced by the company’s most advanced charging technology to date. 

Tesla’s Gigafactory 3 will only be producing affordable versions of the Model 3 and Model Y for the local Chinese market. Both vehicles are designed to tap into the country’s growing mainstream EV segment, which has seen notable growth over the years as the country started adopting a more supportive stance on electric cars. 

Advertisement
-->

Production of the Model 3 in Gigafactory 3 is expected to begin sometime later this year, with Elon Musk noting during the facility’s groundbreaking ceremony last January that the first electric cars would likely roll out of the site by the end of 2019. Local reports have hinted at more aggressive targets than Musk’s estimate, with some reports stating that trial production runs of the Model 3 could begin as early as September. Once operational, Gigafactory 3 is estimated to adopt an annual run rate of 150,000 vehicles initially, before ramping to a rate of about 500,000 electric cars per year.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

Tesla CEO Elon Musk sends rivals dire warning about Full Self-Driving

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla CEO Elon Musk revealed today on the social media platform X that legacy automakers, such as Ford, General Motors, and Stellantis, do not want to license the company’s Full Self-Driving suite, at least not without a long list of their own terms.

“I’ve tried to warn them and even offered to license Tesla FSD, but they don’t want it! Crazy,” Musk said on X. “When legacy auto does occasionally reach out, they tepidly discuss implementing FSD for a tiny program in 5 years with unworkable requirements for Tesla, so pointless.”

Musk made the remark in response to a note we wrote about earlier today from Melius Research, in which analyst Rob Wertheimer said, “Our point is not that Tesla is at risk, it’s that everybody else is,” in terms of autonomy and self-driving development.

Wertheimer believes there are hundreds of billions of dollars in value headed toward Tesla’s way because of its prowess with FSD.

A few years ago, Musk first remarked that Tesla was in early talks with one legacy automaker regarding licensing Full Self-Driving for its vehicles. Tesla never confirmed which company it was, but given Musk’s ongoing talks with Ford CEO Jim Farley at the time, it seemed the Detroit-based automaker was the likely suspect.

Tesla’s Elon Musk reiterates FSD licensing offer for other automakers

Ford has been perhaps the most aggressive legacy automaker in terms of its EV efforts, but it recently scaled back its electric offensive due to profitability issues and weak demand. It simply was not making enough vehicles, nor selling the volume needed to turn a profit.

Musk truly believes that many of the companies that turn their backs on FSD now will suffer in the future, especially considering the increased chance it could be a parallel to what has happened with EV efforts for many of these companies.

Unfortunately, they got started too late and are now playing catch-up with Tesla, XPeng, BYD, and the other dominating forces in EVs across the globe.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla backtracks on strange Nav feature after numerous complaints

Published

on

Credit: Tesla

Tesla is backtracking on a strange adjustment it made to its in-car Navigation feature after numerous complaints from owners convinced the company to make a change.

Tesla’s in-car Navigation is catered to its vehicles, as it routes Supercharging stops and preps your vehicle for charging with preconditioning. It is also very intuitive, and features other things like weather radar and a detailed map outlining points of interest.

However, a recent change to the Navigation by Tesla did not go unnoticed, and owners were really upset about it.

Tesla’s Navigation gets huge improvement with simple update

For trips that required multiple Supercharger stops, Tesla decided to implement a naming change, which did not show the city or state of each charging stop. Instead, it just showed the business where the Supercharger was located, giving many owners an unwelcome surprise.

However, Tesla’s Director of Supercharging, Max de Zegher, admitted the update was a “big mistake on our end,” and made a change that rolled out within 24 hours:

The lack of a name for the city where a Supercharging stop would be made caused some confusion for owners in the short term. Some drivers argued that it was more difficult to make stops at some familiar locations that were special to them. Others were not too keen on not knowing where they were going to be along their trip.

Tesla was quick to scramble to resolve this issue, and it did a great job of rolling it out in an expedited manner, as de Zegher said that most in-car touch screens would notice the fix within one day of the change being rolled out.

Additionally, there will be even more improvements in December, as Tesla plans to show the common name/amenity below the site name as well, which will give people a better idea of what to expect when they arrive at a Supercharger.

Continue Reading

News

Dutch regulator RDW confirms Tesla FSD February 2026 target

The regulator emphasized that safety, not public pressure, will decide whether FSD receives authorization for use in Europe.

Published

on

The Dutch vehicle authority RDW responded to Tesla’s recent updates about its efforts to bring Full Self-Driving (Supervised) in Europe, confirming that February 2026 remains the target month for Tesla to demonstrate regulatory compliance. 

While acknowledging the tentative schedule with Tesla, the regulator emphasized that safety, not public pressure, will decide whether FSD receives authorization for use in Europe.

RDW confirms 2026 target, warns Feb 2026 timeline is not guaranteed

In its response, which was posted on its official website, the RDW clarified that it does not disclose details about ongoing manufacturer applications due to competitive sensitivity. However, the agency confirmed that both parties have agreed on a February 2026 window during which Tesla is expected to show that FSD (Supervised) can meet required safety and compliance standards. Whether Tesla can satisfy those conditions within the timeline “remains to be seen,” RDW added.

RDW also directly addressed Tesla’s social media request encouraging drivers to contact the regulator to express support. While thanking those who already reached out, RDW asked the public to stop contacting them, noting these messages burden customer-service resources and have no influence on the approval process. 

“In the message on X, Tesla calls on Tesla drivers to thank the RDW and to express their enthusiasm about this planning to us by contacting us. We thank everyone who has already done so, and would like to ask everyone not to contact us about this. It takes up unnecessary time for our customer service. Moreover, this will have no influence on whether or not the planning is met,” the RDW wrote. 

Advertisement
-->

The RDW shares insights on EU approval requirements

The RDW further outlined how new technology enters the European market when no existing legislation directly covers it. Under EU Regulation 2018/858, a manufacturer may seek an exemption for unregulated features such as advanced driver assistance systems. The process requires a Member State, in this case the Netherlands, to submit a formal request to the European Commission on the manufacturer’s behalf.

Approval then moves to a committee vote. A majority in favor would grant EU-wide authorization, allowing the technology across all Member States. If the vote fails, the exemption is valid only within the Netherlands, and individual countries must decide whether to accept it independently.

Before any exemption request can be filed, Tesla must complete a comprehensive type-approval process with the RDW, including controlled on-road testing. Provided that FSD Supervised passes these regulatory evaluations, the exemption could be submitted for broader EU consideration.

Continue Reading