Lifestyle
Should I Buy the Tesla Extended Service Agreement?

Tesla’s basic warranty for the Model S covers 50,000 miles or 4 years, whichever comes first. Once that point is reached, you have 30 days to decide on whether you want to further extend warranty and sign up for the Tesla Extended Service Agreement (ESA).
With 48,000 miles under my belt and averaging 3,000 miles per month, I’m faced with the tough decision – to ESA, or not ESA, that is the question. I’ll describe my thoughts on Tesla’s ESA (as it relates to me), but ultimately you’ll want to make your own decision on what’s best for you.
Tesla Extended Service Agreement (ESA)
First it’s good to understand how Tesla describes its extended warranty program. According to Tesla,
“Tesla’s extended service program covers the repair or replacement of Model S parts due to defects in materials or workmanship provided by Tesla. Coverage lasts for four years or 50,000 miles (whichever comes first) and begins on the date your warranty expires, as long as you purchase this service within 30 days of your warranty’s expiration.”
There are really two main points to the statement:
- The duration for the additional coverage + timeframe for signing up
- Tesla ESA covers defects in materials or workmanship on parts by Tesla
Exclusions
As with most warranties, wear and tear is not covered by the extended service. Even a Model S with its limited number of moving parts, it still has every day items such as tires, shocks, door seals, fluids, 12V battery, brake pads/parts, filters, etc. that would wear over time, and thus require maintenance.
A key point to note when thinking about the ESA is that your Tesla is already covered for 8 years, and infinite miles, on the main battery and motor(s). Having an extended warranty to cover these items won’t matter.
Cost for Extending Warranty
The extended warranty costs $4,000 which is on par with the price charged by other premium car manufacturers. However, what’s different about Tesla’s ESA program is the additional $200 deductible.
While you will only have to pay for it once for the part being replaced, even if the same part were to fail multiple times, you have to keep in mind that the $200 is charged per part. For example, should a single Model S door handle fail, the deductible would be $200. However, in the unfortunate event that all four door handles fail, you might be shelling out an $800 deductible. (someone please confirm in the comments below)
The extended warranty can be transferred to a new owner for a $100 fee, but it cannot be transferred to a car dealer or third party reseller.
Grey Area with Coverage
The Tesla Extended Service Agreement states:
“Tampering with the Vehicle and its systems, including installation of non-Tesla accessories or parts or their installation, or any damage directly or indirectly caused by, due to or resulting from the installation or use of non-Tesla parts or accessories;”
Does this apply to Model S owners who have upgraded with aftermarket lighting accessories such as the popular “Lighted T” or even a dash cam?
Another passage on regular maintenance is a bit fuzzy to me. According to the ESA,
“If requested, proof of required service, including receipts showing date and mileage of the Vehicle at the time of service, must be presented before any repairs under this Vehicle ESA commence. Service within 1,000 miles and/or 30 days of Tesla’s recommended intervals shall be considered compliant with the terms of this Vehicle ESA.”
Tesla has been all over the place on what it recommends for its maintenance intervals. The official paperwork indicates annual maintenance is every 12,500 miles or 12 months, whichever comes first, although, depending on which Tesla Service Center you speak with, you may hear a different account on what the service interval should be.
My personal belief is that Tesla just intends owners to have an annual service regardless of mileage (and that’s the plan I’ve been following as suggested by my service center), but this frequency for maintenance technically wouldn’t meet Tesla’s requirement for extended warranty, especially given the number of miles I put on per year. I drive a lot, but I doubt I top those that embark on epic cross-country road trips in the Model S.
How Much Value Can I Get?
As with all insurance, trying to derive value from the plan really comes down to a “bet” on whether you think you might need coverage, and also whether coverage on the parts + labor would exceed the cost of the coverage itself.
Averaging 32,000 miles of driving per year, Tesla’s extended warranty will last me a whopping 18 months. It costs $4,000 which backs out to $222/month over 18 months, plus a $200 per item deductible.
I used my historical Model S service records as a sample to see what could potentially be covered down the road with the ESA. I should note that other than the annual service cost of $600 which I’ve already paid, I’ve spent $0 for service so far.
- 12V battery failure (7 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- 17″ screen reacting to static electricity (missing MCU ground) (7 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Sunroof rattle on back roads (shims added) (7 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- UMC failure (8 months) (may be covered by extended warranty)
- Front right tire rubbing wheel well (11 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Bad ball joint (11 months) (would be covered by extended warranty)
- Leaky sunroof seal (12 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Charge port rings discolored (12 months) (would be covered by extended warranty)
- Key fob falling apart (13 months) (wouldn’t be covered by extended warranty)
- Drive unit failure (15 months) (covered by infinite mile drive unit warranty)
Based on the above I would have had 2 or 3 of the 10 total issues that would have been covered by the extended warranty. One was purely cosmetic (charge port rings). The other two were not. A new UMC is $600, so paying $4,000 for warranty coverage for it makes no sense let alone it’s not clear if the UMC is even covered. The bad ball joint is really the only thing of significant value that would have been covered and I find it difficult to believe that it would cost more than $4,000 plus the $200 deductible to replace.
Based on my own history with needing repairs, it doesn’t seem to make sense for me to purchase the extended warranty. However there are big ticket items that could potentially go wrong and make the extended warranty bring tremendous value. Unfortunate (but rare) occurrences of Model S defects / failures as follows:
- The 17″ screen could develop bubbles (est. $2,900)
- The main control unit (MCU) could fail (est. $6,000)
I rarely hear about a Model S needing big repairs which I hope is a testament to how durable the vehicle is, or it could mean Tesla is covering it on their own through more discreet service bulletins. I started a discussion/poll over on TMC to see how many owners actually had to pay for their service.
Summary
What am I going to do? My high mileage driving greatly reduces any value for purchasing Tesla’s Extended Service Agreement.
Based on the data I’ve collected over the last 18 months and 50,000 miles of driving, the lack of having any major services leads me to believe that having a Tesla ESA is not a good investment for me.
Now, should I put my money aside for a just-in-case type of repair? Probably. But, let’s be real. The lack of servicing is truly a testament to how amazing the Tesla Model S is. No parts to worry about, no major issues, and no out-of-pocket surprises.
My plan is to take the $4,000 I had set aside for the extended warranty and put it in Tesla stock ($TSLA). I believe in the company, love the car, and I think it’s a far better investment than the Extended Service Agreement would be.
Lifestyle
Tesla Model S Plaid battles China’s 1500 hp monster Nurburgring monster, with surprising results
There is just something about Tesla’s tuning and refinement that makes raw specs seem not as game-changing.

The Tesla Model S Plaid has been around for some time. Today, it is no longer the world’s quickest four-door electric sedan, nor is it the most powerful. As per a recent video from motoring YouTube channel Carwow, however, it seems like the Model S Plaid is still more than a match for some of its newer and more powerful rivals.
The monster from China
The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is nothing short of a monster. Just like the Model S Plaid, it features three motors. It also has 1,548 hp and 1,770 Nm of torque. It’s All Wheel Drive and weighs a hefty 2,360 kg. The vehicle, which costs just about the equivalent of £55,000, has been recorded setting an insane 7:04.957 at the Nurburgring, surpassing the previous record held by the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT.
For all intents and purposes, the Model S Plaid looked outgunned in Carwow’s test. The Model S Plaid is no slouch with its three motors that produce 1,020 hp and 1,420 Nm of torque. It’s also a bit lighter at 2,190 kg despite its larger size. However, as the Carwow host pointed out, the Model S Plaid holds a 7:25.231 record in the Nurburgring. Compared to the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra’s record, the Model S Plaid’s lap time is notably slower.
Real-world tests
As could be seen in Carwow’s drag races, however, Tesla’s tech wizardry with the Model S Plaid is still hard to beat. The two vehicles competed in nine races, and the older Model S Plaid actually beat its newer, more powerful counterpart from China several times. At one point in the race, the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra hit its power limit due to its battery’s temperature, but the Model S Plaid was still going strong.
The Model S Plaid was first teased five years ago, in September 2020 during Tesla’s Battery Day. Since then, cars like the Lucid Air Sapphire and the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra have been released, surpassing its specs. But just like the Model Y ended up being the better all-rounder compared to the BYD Sealion 7 and the MG IM6, there is just something about Tesla’s tuning and refinement that makes raw specs seem not as game-changing.
Check out Carwow’s Model S Plaid vs Xiaomi SU7 drag race video below.
Lifestyle
500-mile test proves why Tesla Model Y still humiliates rivals in Europe
On paper, the BYD Sealion 7 and MG IM6 promised standout capabilities against the Model Y.

BYD is seeing a lot of momentum in Europe, so much so that mainstream media has taken every opportunity to argue that the Chinese automaker has beaten Tesla in the region. But while BYD sales this year in Europe are rising and Tesla’s registrations remain challenged, the raw capabilities of vehicles like the Model Y are difficult to deny.
This was highlighted in a 500-mile challenge by What Car? magazine, which showed that the new Tesla Model Y is more efficient, cheaper to run, and more reliable than rivals like the BYD Sealion 7, and even the nearly 400 KW-charging MG IM6.
Range and charging promises
On paper, the BYD Sealion 7 and MG IM6 promised standout capabilities against the Model Y. The Sealion 7 had more estimated range and the IM6 promised significantly faster charging. When faced with real-world conditions, however, it was still the Model Y that proved superior.
During the 500-mile test, the BYD nearly failed to reach a charging stop, arriving with less range than its display projected, as noted in a CarUp report. MG fared better, but its charging speeds never reached its promised nearly-400 kW charging speed. Tesla’s Model Y, by comparison, managed energy calculations precisely and arrived at each stop without issue.
Tesla leads in areas that matter
Charging times from 25% to 80% showed that the MG was the fastest at 17 minutes, while Tesla and BYD were close at 28 and 29 minutes, respectively. Overall efficiency and cost told a different story, however. The Model Y consumed 19.4 kWh per 100 km, compared to 22.2 for MG and 23.9 for BYD. Over the full trip, Tesla’s charging costs totaled just £82 thanks to its supercharger network, far below BYD’s £130 and MG’s £119.
What Car? Magazine’s testers concluded that despite BYD’s rapid sales growth and the MG IM6’s seriously impressive charging speeds, Tesla remains the more compelling real-world choice. The Model Y just offers stability, efficiency, and a proven charging infrastructure through its Supercharging network. And as per the magazine’s hosts, the Model Y is even the cheapest car to own among the three that were tested.
Watch What Car? Magazine’s 500-mile test in the video below.
Lifestyle
Tesla Cybertruck slapped with world’s least intimidating ticket, and it’s pure cringe
One cannot help but cringe and feel second-hand embarrassment at the idea of a person just driving around with a stack of these babies.

A Cybertruck parked at Stanford Shopping Center in California was recently hit with what might be the most try-hard piece of paper ever slipped under a wiper blade: a “fake citation” accusing the driver of supporting a “fascist car.”
The note, shared on X by Tesla staff program manager Ryan Torres, quickly made the rounds on X, where it quickly gained attention as an example of how not to protest.
The world’s least intimidating ticket
According to the citation, the supposed “violation” was “driving a fascist car.” The remedial action? Take the bus, call an Uber, or ride a bike. The note also dubbed Elon Musk a “chainsaw-wielding Nazi billionaire.” Now, protests against Tesla and Elon Musk have become commonplace this year, but one cannot help but cringe and feel second-hand embarrassment at the idea of a person just driving around with a stack of fake anti-Tesla/Musk citations.
Torres pointed out the irony himself in his post on X. Tesla currently employs over 140,000 Americans, and SpaceX has put the U.S. firmly back at the top of space technology. As Torres put it, maybe the person behind the world’s least intimidating ticket should “read a book on innovation before vandalizing” other people’s property.
Peak performative clownery
Not to mention that the fake ticket’s logic collapses under its own weight. EVs like the Cybertruck are literally designed to reduce emissions, not “destroy the economy.” If anything, Tesla has bolstered the United States’ economy by fueling jobs in engineering, manufacturing, and clean energy. It’s not the first time a Tesla has been the target of vandalism or politically charged notes, but this one stands out for sheer cringe value.
Torres summed it up neatly: “Peak clownery.” On that point, at least, the citation earns full marks. In a way, though, perhaps cringe fake tickets are not as bad as the literal firebombs that were being thrown at Tesla stores and cars earlier this year because some critics were gleefully misinformed about Elon Musk.
-
Elon Musk2 weeks ago
Tesla FSD V14 set for early wide release next week: Elon Musk
-
News2 weeks ago
Elon Musk gives update on Tesla Optimus progress
-
News2 weeks ago
Tesla has a new first with its Supercharger network
-
News2 weeks ago
Tesla job postings seem to show next surprise market entry
-
Investor's Corner2 weeks ago
Tesla gets new Street-high price target with high hopes for autonomy domination
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
500-mile test proves why Tesla Model Y still humiliates rivals in Europe
-
News1 week ago
Tesla Giga Berlin’s water consumption has achieved the unthinkable
-
Lifestyle1 week ago
Tesla Model S Plaid battles China’s 1500 hp monster Nurburgring monster, with surprising results