News
Tesla China VP responds to reports of Giga Shanghai using defective parts
Tesla China Vice President Grace Tao has responded to reports of the automaker using defective parts from suppliers at the company’s Giga Shanghai production plant.
“In strict accordance with Chinese laws and regulations, there is no phenomenon of ‘lowering quality for production,’” Tao wrote on her Weibo account earlier today.
Tao’s response comes from an article that was posted by the Chinese media outlet PingWest on Christmas Day, which accused the automaker of sacrificing quality for production volume, which has been a major focus of Tesla this year as demand for EVs ramps up in the country.
In response to the FUD article by @pingwest, Grace Tao of @Teslacn VP says today “Tesla manufacturers in strict compliance with Chinese law. It’s not in existence to scale up prod by willfully sacrificing qualities”. Earlier @pingwest alleges defective parts are used in prod. pic.twitter.com/eOPraO1V3g
— Ray4Tesla⚡️?☀️? (@ray4tesla) December 30, 2020
The report contains several shocking claims, including several interviews with some of Tesla’s suppliers that claimed the company was willing to accept faulty equipment in parts for their vehicles. One supplier stated that their company “simply can’t make enough parts that meet the quality standard. It’s stressful.” The person interviewed wished to remain anonymous and stated that the solution to Tesla’s overwhelming need for parts has been to send whatever is available, regardless of quality.
However, Tesla maintains that it uses quality parts from suppliers and that it wouldn’t sacrifice quality for the goal of reaching production targets, which have been lofty in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Regardless, Tesla has held the title for most popular EV in China with the Model 3 and is set to reach its 500,000 vehicle target this year with the help of demand in Europe and China.
The PingWest article also claimed that Giga Shanghai is being operated as a “sweatshop,” where workers are forced to work long hours to handle the demand increases. No worker has publicly come forward against the company, and there is little evidence suggesting the company is violating any sort of labor laws.
Tesla has not made any statement regarding the article as a company, and Tao maintains the company’s innocence moving forward. “Obviously, it has not been carefully considered and does not conform to the facts,” Tao said in a statement. While Tesla has battled with quality issues in the past, the company has improved significantly through manufacturing techniques and quality assurance checks, and many owners have been happy with the positive changes in Tesla’s build quality.
Tesla Model 3 survey reveals much-improved build quality and a happier owners community
Moving forward, there is the possibility that a lawsuit from Tesla against PingWest could occur. “The report was flawed in details, and the article was immediately revised within an hour after the article was issued,” a statement said. Additionally, ChinaNews.com says that Tesla has sued the company, but there is no evidence to suggest that a lawsuit has been opened yet.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
