News
Tesla earns nod of respect from legacy auto for pushing sustainable transportation
It took multiple bet-the-company situations, trips to “production hell,” and a massive push towards profitability in the third quarter, but Tesla has pretty much become the undeniable leader in premium electric mobility. With the Model 3 proving to be a success in the United States and getting a lot of interest in markets such as Europe and Asia, Tesla is practically becoming an inconvenient truth to traditional automakers — particularly those that have held off on the development of zero-emissions vehicles.
Earlier this year, Paul Sankey of Mizuho Securities noted during a segment on CNBC that the “Tesla Effect” is starting to spill over to industries beyond the car market. Sankey described the Tesla Effect as a trend that pushes the idea that the 21st century will be driven by clean electricity in the same way that the 20th century was driven by oil. Among legacy carmakers, this particular shift is starting to become notable.
Recently, executives from a number of established automakers acknowledged Tesla’s contribution to the evolution of sustainable transportation. In a recent interview with the Los Angeles Times, for example, Porsche North America Chief Executive Klaus Zellmer validated Tesla’s breakthroughs in the electric car market, praising the company for its “astonishing” work.
“If you look at what Tesla has done, if you look at their volume and look at their price level, it’s truly astonishing. If you can do that with one brand and a sales network that is not comprised of dealers and a real sales organization, it’s even more astonishing,” he said.
Hope King of Cheddar inquired about Tesla while speaking with executives from several legacy carmakers during the 2018 LA Auto Show as well. Just like Porsche’s Zellner, the execs from the establishes carmakers also admitted that Tesla’s progress over the years had affected their business and the industry as a whole.
Audi of America senior product manager Anthony Foulk noted that Tesla has “pushed the entire auto industry forward and broken ground for some different topics in the industry.” Foulk pointed out that Tesla is among the reasons why Audi opted to release the e-tron SUV, an electric vehicle that is “meant to be accessible to a wide portion” of the market. Volkswagen of America Sales and Marketing executive Derrick Hatami echoed Foulk’s observations, stating that Tesla has provided an “interesting window into what the possibilities could be for electric vehicles and future retail models for the auto industry.” Hatami further remarked that the electric car maker had given other automakers “something to look at and aim for” with regards to the development of EVs.
Masahiro Moro, the President and CEO of Mazda’s North American operations, lauded Tesla for its tendency to boldly break through conventions and adopt strategies that are experimental at best. Moro noted that with Tesla in the market, “we (legacy carmakers) have to look at ourselves to see if there are unmet needs of consumers so we can innovate our process.” Bugatti President Stephan Winkelmann also validated Tesla’s contributions to the car market, stating that the electric car maker has “pushed the car industry in one direction,” while allowing other companies to admit that “social acceptance is key for the future of every car manufacturer.”
Gorden Wagener, Chief Designer of Mercedes-Benz, was optimistic about Tesla’s breakthroughs, particularly when it comes to the features and capabilities of vehicles on the road. Wagener noted that Tesla’s approach to its electric cars is encouraging other companies to “change this industry in the next 10 years more than in the 100 years before” — something that the designer admitted is a “very exciting to do.”
Tesla’s mission has been clear since day one — it aims to accelerate the world’s transition to renewable energy. Elon Musk has reiterated this multiple times, and the company itself has admitted that Tesla cannot push the transition to sustainability on its own. In the auto sector, other companies — particularly legacy carmakers that already have large manufacturing infrastructures — have to commit to developing zero-emissions vehicles as well.
Several companies have already taken valuable steps towards this goal. Porsche announced earlier this year that it is abandoning its entire diesel lineup ahead of the release of the Taycan, its first all-electric sedan. Reports have also emerged that Jaguar is looking to transition itself into a company that exclusively produces all-electric cars.
Perhaps more importantly, though, is that a number of legacy carmakers are starting to realize that there is a very real demand for electric vehicles. Norwegian news agency Dagens Næringsliv, for one, noted that Audi’s sales dropped almost 80% in Norway last month. Inasmuch as the steep decline is rather alarming, Audi’s Head of Communications Morten Moum stated that a big reason behind the decline is that car buyers are waiting for the company’s electrified vehicles, such as the hybrid Q7 e-tron SUV.
In October, estimates indicate that Jaguar sold around 1,200 units of the I-PACE, accounting for 8.7% of the company’s overall vehicle sales. Hyundai also reported that sales of the Kona Electric, its budget electric crossover, rose to 2,473 units in October, 1,000 more than the company sold in September. Estimates also point to 46% of Kona buyers opting in for the vehicle’s electric variant over its more affordable gas-powered counterpart.
Tesla’s growth over the past 15 years has been notable. Amidst the changing tides of the auto industry, the electric car maker is poised to grow even more as it establishes its place as a first mover and leader in the EV movement. It took daring gambits and years of pain and stress, but it appears that finally, Tesla has reached the point where the auto industry’s veterans are not only recognizing, but also respecting, the company’s efforts in pushing towards sustainable transportation.
Elon Musk flew under the radar with his recent purchase of a $1 billion energy company, according to Federal Trade Commission (FTC) documents.
Transaction number 202612350 listed Tesla and SpaceX frontman Elon Musk as the acquiring party and CF APR Super Holdings LLC as the seller, with New APR Energy, LLC as the acquired entity. The deal, which closed without public announcement, came to light on May 14.
BREAKING: Elon Musk acquires Jacksonville power company APR Energy in a deal valued at more than $1,000,000,000.00.
— Polymarket Money (@PolymarketMoney) July 15, 2026
Analysts inferred the deal’s scale from minority stakeholder disclosures, including one report of a 5 percent interest sold for approximately $50.4 million. Fortress Investment Group had purchased APR’s assets in late 2024, rebranded the operation as New APR Energy, and subsequently transferred ownership to Musk.
APR Energy specializes in rapidly deployable power infrastructure. The company maintains one of the world’s largest fleets of mobile gas and diesel turbines, with more than 1.1 gigawatts of generation capacity. Its modular units, which are often trailer-mounted, enable turnkey installations ranging from 20 MW to over 500 MW.
APR provides full engineering, procurement, construction, operation, and maintenance services for behind-the-meter power plants, serving everything from data centers, utilities, and industrial clients.
The firm has expanded aggressively to meet surging demand, recently adding turbines and deploying over 100 MW for a major AI hyperscaler. Its solutions bridge critical gaps where grid interconnections face delays of two to five years, according to Yahoo.
The acquisition means something more for Musk. As he continues to expand projects in artificial intelligence, especially xAI, his AI venture, there is a greater need to supply energy-intensive supercomputing clusters, including the Colossus project, with what they need: reliable and high-capacity power.
Ownership of APR provides immediate access to flexible generation assets that can be deployed adjacent to data centers, reducing dependence on a strained infrastructure. It also complements Tesla’s energy storage business, so Musk will be able to pull from his own entities to address the rapid scaling demands of AI training and compute.
Tesla had a petition protesting a recall to fix a potential issue with 2017-2023 Model Y and Model 3 vehicles’ headlights was denied, as the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) disagreed with the company’s opinion of things.
The recall covers approximately 19,917 Model Y and Model 3 vehicles built from 2017 to 2023. Tesla initially submitted a noncompliance report for the headlights on these vehicles on March 15, 2024. Tesla then petitioned for an exemption from the fix, which violated FMVSS No. 108 (40 CFR 571.108), arguing that the “noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
🚨 Tesla was denied a petition by the NHTSA to avoid a recall of 19,900 2017-2023 Model 3 and Model Y vehicles.
The NHTSA found that the vehicles’ headlights may exceed maximum lighting levels. Tesla argued it was inconsequential and did not require a recall. pic.twitter.com/m8Jmm1teLL
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 16, 2026
The NHTSA disagreed, stating that Tesla’s conclusion that the headlights do not increase any risk was not an opinion it shared. The agency said it disagreed with Tesla’s assumption that glare is not increased to surrounding traffic. This issue could be highlighted even more in certain weather conditions.
Tesla will be required to remedy the issue, the NHTSA ruled:
“In consideration of the foregoing, NHTSA has decided that Tesla has not met its burden of persuasion that the subject FMVSS No. 108 noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety. Accordingly, Tesla’s petition is hereby denied, and Tesla is consequently obligated to provide notification of and free remedy for that noncompliance under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120.”
The issue here appears to be the angle of the headlights and the brightness they emit during operation. The NHTSA report states that:
“Tesla’s headlamp supplier, Marelli Automotive Lighting, tested 25 right-hand and 25 left-hand lamps, and for this sample, found the maximum photometric intensity measured in the 10°U to 90°U and 90°L to 90°R zone was between 136.2 cd and 230.1 cd for the right-hand lamps and between 117.5 cd and 160.3 cd for the left-hand lamps. According to Tesla, these tests revealed that the photometric intensity of the right-hand and left-hand headlamp lower beam on the subject vehicles may measure as much as 230.1 cd in the 10°U to 90°U and 90°L to 90°R zone, exceeding the maximum photometric intensity by 105.1 cd. Additionally, Tesla states that a left-hand lamp tested by a Transport Canada recognized laboratory measured a maximum of 171.27 cd in the 10°U to 90°U and 90°L to 90°R zone. Despite these measurements exceeding the allowed photometric maximum of 125 cd, Tesla believes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety.”
Tesla also argued at some points that the headlights had not been deemed responsible for any complaints, accidents, or injuries related to the noncompliance.
Lifestyle
NTSB findings on fatal Tesla crash tell a very different story
The NTSB confirmed the driver, not Tesla’s FSD, caused the fatal Texas house crash.
The National Transportation Safety Board released preliminary findings Wednesday confirming that a Tesla driver, not the vehicle’s software, caused a fatal crash in Katy, Texas in June. The driver, 44-year-old Michael Butler, had engaged Full Self-Driving Supervised mode on Rose Hollow Lane, a residential street with a 30 mph speed limit, before manually overriding the system by pressing the accelerator pedal all the way to 100%. Data recovered from the 2025 Tesla Model 3 showed the vehicle was traveling over 70 miles per hour when it struck a home and killed 76-year-old Martha Avila, who was inside. Weather was clear, the road was dry, and it was daylight.
Texas man charged in fatal Tesla crash where he blamed Autopilot
Butler told authorities he had passed out at the wheel. But security camera footage obtained by the NTSB told a different story, and showed the car accelerating through an intersection before leaving the road entirely. Police also found that Butler’s phone had Google searches including the terms “Tesla FSD not aggressive enough 2026” and “Tesla FSD too timid,” raising serious questions about how he was using the system before the crash. Butler has since been charged with manslaughter. The victim’s family has filed a lawsuit against both Butler and Tesla, alleging negligence.
The NTSB findings aligned directly with what Tesla VP of AI Software Ashok Elluswamy had already stated publicly on X in the weeks after the crash, writing that “the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100%.” The data confirmed his account.
Yup. In this case, the driver manually overrode self-driving by pressing the accelerator all the way to 100% of the accel pedal in this residential area. They reached a speed of 73 mph during the crash, and had the accelerator pressed even after the crash.
— Ashok Elluswamy (@aelluswamy) June 22, 2026
Elon Musk secretly acquires $1B energy company to power the AI future
Tesla has to fix a big problem with its old headlights, NHTSA says
