News
Tesla earns nod of respect from legacy auto for pushing sustainable transportation
It took multiple bet-the-company situations, trips to “production hell,” and a massive push towards profitability in the third quarter, but Tesla has pretty much become the undeniable leader in premium electric mobility. With the Model 3 proving to be a success in the United States and getting a lot of interest in markets such as Europe and Asia, Tesla is practically becoming an inconvenient truth to traditional automakers — particularly those that have held off on the development of zero-emissions vehicles.
Earlier this year, Paul Sankey of Mizuho Securities noted during a segment on CNBC that the “Tesla Effect” is starting to spill over to industries beyond the car market. Sankey described the Tesla Effect as a trend that pushes the idea that the 21st century will be driven by clean electricity in the same way that the 20th century was driven by oil. Among legacy carmakers, this particular shift is starting to become notable.
Recently, executives from a number of established automakers acknowledged Tesla’s contribution to the evolution of sustainable transportation. In a recent interview with the Los Angeles Times, for example, Porsche North America Chief Executive Klaus Zellmer validated Tesla’s breakthroughs in the electric car market, praising the company for its “astonishing” work.
“If you look at what Tesla has done, if you look at their volume and look at their price level, it’s truly astonishing. If you can do that with one brand and a sales network that is not comprised of dealers and a real sales organization, it’s even more astonishing,” he said.
Hope King of Cheddar inquired about Tesla while speaking with executives from several legacy carmakers during the 2018 LA Auto Show as well. Just like Porsche’s Zellner, the execs from the establishes carmakers also admitted that Tesla’s progress over the years had affected their business and the industry as a whole.
Audi of America senior product manager Anthony Foulk noted that Tesla has “pushed the entire auto industry forward and broken ground for some different topics in the industry.” Foulk pointed out that Tesla is among the reasons why Audi opted to release the e-tron SUV, an electric vehicle that is “meant to be accessible to a wide portion” of the market. Volkswagen of America Sales and Marketing executive Derrick Hatami echoed Foulk’s observations, stating that Tesla has provided an “interesting window into what the possibilities could be for electric vehicles and future retail models for the auto industry.” Hatami further remarked that the electric car maker had given other automakers “something to look at and aim for” with regards to the development of EVs.
Masahiro Moro, the President and CEO of Mazda’s North American operations, lauded Tesla for its tendency to boldly break through conventions and adopt strategies that are experimental at best. Moro noted that with Tesla in the market, “we (legacy carmakers) have to look at ourselves to see if there are unmet needs of consumers so we can innovate our process.” Bugatti President Stephan Winkelmann also validated Tesla’s contributions to the car market, stating that the electric car maker has “pushed the car industry in one direction,” while allowing other companies to admit that “social acceptance is key for the future of every car manufacturer.”
Gorden Wagener, Chief Designer of Mercedes-Benz, was optimistic about Tesla’s breakthroughs, particularly when it comes to the features and capabilities of vehicles on the road. Wagener noted that Tesla’s approach to its electric cars is encouraging other companies to “change this industry in the next 10 years more than in the 100 years before” — something that the designer admitted is a “very exciting to do.”
Tesla’s mission has been clear since day one — it aims to accelerate the world’s transition to renewable energy. Elon Musk has reiterated this multiple times, and the company itself has admitted that Tesla cannot push the transition to sustainability on its own. In the auto sector, other companies — particularly legacy carmakers that already have large manufacturing infrastructures — have to commit to developing zero-emissions vehicles as well.
Several companies have already taken valuable steps towards this goal. Porsche announced earlier this year that it is abandoning its entire diesel lineup ahead of the release of the Taycan, its first all-electric sedan. Reports have also emerged that Jaguar is looking to transition itself into a company that exclusively produces all-electric cars.
Perhaps more importantly, though, is that a number of legacy carmakers are starting to realize that there is a very real demand for electric vehicles. Norwegian news agency Dagens Næringsliv, for one, noted that Audi’s sales dropped almost 80% in Norway last month. Inasmuch as the steep decline is rather alarming, Audi’s Head of Communications Morten Moum stated that a big reason behind the decline is that car buyers are waiting for the company’s electrified vehicles, such as the hybrid Q7 e-tron SUV.
In October, estimates indicate that Jaguar sold around 1,200 units of the I-PACE, accounting for 8.7% of the company’s overall vehicle sales. Hyundai also reported that sales of the Kona Electric, its budget electric crossover, rose to 2,473 units in October, 1,000 more than the company sold in September. Estimates also point to 46% of Kona buyers opting in for the vehicle’s electric variant over its more affordable gas-powered counterpart.
Tesla’s growth over the past 15 years has been notable. Amidst the changing tides of the auto industry, the electric car maker is poised to grow even more as it establishes its place as a first mover and leader in the EV movement. It took daring gambits and years of pain and stress, but it appears that finally, Tesla has reached the point where the auto industry’s veterans are not only recognizing, but also respecting, the company’s efforts in pushing towards sustainable transportation.
Investor's Corner
New drone video shows Tesla’s Optimus Factory reaching a turning point
New drone footage shows Tesla’s dedicated Optimus factory steel frame nearing completion at Giga Texas.
Tesla’s dedicated Optimus factory at Gigafactory Texas is closing in on a finished steel frame, according to drone footage posted Thursday afternoon by longtime site observer Joe Tegtmeyer. In the video, Tegtmeyer said structural steel assembly is now about five column grids away from reaching the building’s north perimeter beam, putting the primary skeleton in its final stretch roughly six months after Tesla broke ground on the North Campus site in late March.
The Giga Texas Optimus Factory latest update … construction keeps moving fast!
Steel assembly is now only about 5 column grids from the north perimeter beam. Concrete is going in on the three upper floors, rebar is still being laid for more pours, and footing / grade-beam work… pic.twitter.com/qvFPvwnYzW
— Joe Tegtmeyer 🚀 🤠🛸😎 (@JoeTegtmeyer) September 17, 2026
Tegtmeyer’s footage shows concrete already going in on three upper floors while crews continue laying rebar and pouring grade beam footings at ground level. That kind of parallel work, steel rising at one end of the site while concrete sets at the other, is a scheduling approach Tesla used at the original Giga Texas building and appears to be repeating here to save time before the plant’s targeted 2027 production start.
Teslarati has tracked the building’s progress since Tesla confirmed construction was officially underway in May, when the first steel structure went up on what was then bare, reclaimed land. The facility is part of a more than 5.2 million square foot expansion of Giga Texas’s North Campus that Tesla has said will eventually run nearly the length of the existing vehicle factory, over 4,000 feet, while sitting somewhat narrower. Musk has pegged the long term output target at 10 million Optimus units a year once the line is running at full capacity, a volume that would dwarf the one million unit pilot line Tesla is standing up separately at its Fremont, California factory.
Tesla Giga Texas to feature massive Optimus V4 production line
The Texas facility sits alongside another major buildout on the same campus. Terafab, the joint Tesla and SpaceX chip fabrication plant that will eventually supply the silicon running Optimus units in the field. Housing robot assembly and chip production on the same grounds is a deliberate supply chain decision, cutting down on the shipping and lead time that would otherwise sit between the two.
Tesla has not given an updated timeline beyond its previously stated goal of bringing high volume Optimus production online at the site in the summer of 2027. Fremont’s smaller pilot line began mass producing the current Gen 3 robot in January, with that plant expected to build tens of thousands of units this year primarily to generate the real world data Tesla needs to refine the robot’s software before Giga Texas ramps up. Six months of visible construction progress, tracked almost entirely through Tegtmeyer’s recurring drone flights, gives the clearest outside look yet at how seriously Tesla is treating that 2027 deadline.
Investor's Corner
Tesla and SpaceX take “Terafab” Trademark fight to Federal Court
Tesla and SpaceX sue a small Illinois firm after cease and desist letters over Terafab.
Tesla and SpaceX are asking a federal judge to rule that their planned Terafab chip factory does not infringe a small Illinois company’s trademark, a request that arrives only after months of quiet negotiation broke down this summer.
The dispute traces to May 18, when Tesla filed three U.S. trademark applications for “Terafab” and “Tesla Terafab,” covering semiconductor chips and related chip making services. TERA-print LLC, a nanotechnology company that has held a federal trademark for “Tera-Fab” since 2021, responded five days later with a cease and desist letter. According to the lawsuit, first reported by Reuters, TERA-print argued that Tesla and SpaceX’s use of “Terafab” would confuse consumers familiar with its own trademark, which covers a desktop photolithography printer sold to researchers for sensor and bioengineering work.
What stands out in the filing is the timing of TERA-print’s own paperwork. One day before sending that cease and desist letter, on May 22, TERA-print applied to expand its existing registration to cover semiconductor materials, silicon chips, nanoelectronic devices and AI design services, categories it had not previously claimed. Tesla and SpaceX call that filing opportunistic in their complaint, noting it arrived two months after Tesla’s public Terafab announcement and just days after Tesla’s own trademark applications went in.
Elon Musk launches TERAFAB: The $25B Tesla-SpaceXAI chip factory that will rewire the AI industry
By June 10, TERA-print was threatening to sue for federal trademark infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition, the complaint states. Rather than wait to be sued, Tesla, SpaceX and SpaceXAI met with TERA-print six separate times between June and August trying to resolve the dispute directly. Those talks collapsed, and the companies filed for declaratory judgment this week in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, asking a judge to find that “Terafab” does not infringe TERA-print’s mark before TERA-print can file a claim of its own.
TERA-print isn’t backing down. The company told PCMag it discussed a settlement with Tesla as recently as September 2 and feels misled by what it called Tesla’s professed interest in settling. Its CTO, Andrey Ivankin, said TERA-print holds a Defense Department contract to fabricate semiconductors and partially owns Mattiq Inc., an AI company built on TERA-print’s products, and that the company will vigorously defend its rights.
Tesla and SpaceX argue the overlap is superficial. Terafab is planned as a $16.8 billion complex spanning roughly 100 million square feet at the Grimes County site SpaceX confirmed last month, built to produce chips for Optimus robots, Tesla’s AI computing needs and SpaceX’s orbital data center ambitions, a scale and purpose the companies say no reasonable consumer would confuse with a tabletop lab printer. TERA-print’s product line has stayed focused on lithography tools for biological and sensor research since it registered its mark in 2021.
The trademark fight is the second legal dispute tied to the Terafab project in the past week, following a separate SpaceX suit aimed at keeping company records about the facility out of public view, as KBTX reported. Whether construction proceeds under the Terafab name now depends on a federal judge in Austin.
News
NHTSA just escalated its Tesla Cybercab investigation in a big way
NHTSA escalated its Cybercab audit into a sworn Special Order with a September 30 deadline.
Federal regulators have moved from asking Tesla questions about its Cybercab to demanding sworn answers. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a Special Order that requires a Tesla officer to sign an affidavit attesting to the completeness of the company’s responses, with a deadline of September 30.
The order builds on Audit Query AQ26002, which NHTSA opened on September 3, the same day Tesla began commercial Cybercab service in Austin. Teslarati covered that initial inquiry when it surfaced, noting the agency wanted to understand how Tesla certified a vehicle with no permanently attached steering wheel, pedals, or mirrors as compliant with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. A Special Order is a different tool and converts a fact finding review into a legally enforceable demand, the same mechanism NHTSA used against Tesla in 2023 during its Autopilot investigation.
Several of the 21 requests target a specific gap in Cybercab’s design. One asks whether Tesla used temporarily attached human controls at any point to help certify the vehicle, and if so, which standards depended on that equipment being present. Another quotes an existing rule directly: “The service brakes shall be activated by means of a foot control.” Cybercab has no foot pedal. NHTSA wants a detailed explanation of how the vehicle satisfies that requirement, and how it complies without the kind of exemption granted to Zoox in July under Part 555, the regulatory pathway built for steering wheel free vehicles.
The order does not claim Cybercab is unsafe or that Tesla broke a rule. It requires Tesla to explain, under oath, the reasoning behind decisions the company already made when it self-certified the vehicle. That distinction matters, but so does the exposure. Motor1’s reporting, summarized here, put potential civil penalty exposure as high as $139 million if NHTSA later finds the certification was flawed, on top of whatever criminal risk comes with a false sworn statement.
Tesla has not said publicly how it plans to respond. Cybercab is still carrying passengers in Austin through the Robotaxi app while the September 30 deadline approaches, and the company has continued expanding the vehicle’s footprint even as the regulatory question remains open. The Special Order does not pause any of that and just sets a date by which Tesla has to put its certification logic on the record, with a company officer’s name attached to it.
New drone video shows Tesla’s Optimus Factory reaching a turning point
Tesla and SpaceX take “Terafab” Trademark fight to Federal Court
