News
Tesla should just amplify its electric motors’ sounds to invoke an EV’s true ‘soul’
Teslas may be among the most formidable vehicles on the road today, but even as each of the company’s electric cars continually leaves behind a trail of victims on the drag strip, there is a good chance that an old anti-EV talking point will get thrown out by critics: “electric cars have no soul.” This is due in no small part to the fact that electric cars are silent when they operate, making them feel almost like a roller coaster when they accelerate.
Yet inasmuch as this is cool in itself, a good number of vehicle enthusiasts would argue that there is just something primal and intimate about driving and the roar of an engine. Few sensations match the feeling of speeding through a road with a nicely growling engine beneath the hood, after all. This is likely one of the reasons why some carmakers like Porsche and Ford have taken it upon themselves to create sounds for their all-electric vehicles.
The Porsche Taycan, being the first modern all-electric vehicle from the sports car-maker, features a deep, futuristic whine that was specifically tuned by the company. While it costs $500 extra, Porsche’s “Sport Sound” option does provide some much needed “soul” to the Taycan, making it feel very similar to its gas-powered siblings.
The same is true for the Ford Mustang Mach-E, one of the most highly-anticipated EVs from veteran automakers. Ford was so intent on providing an aural experience to its drivers that the company is coming up with a feature that broadcasts engine noises into the Mach-E’s cabin. This, similar to the Taycan, is done to ensure that customers get the classic “Mustang experience” when operating the all-electric crossover.
Tesla’s electric cars, on the other hand, are known for being extremely silent. Government-mandated pedestrian noisemakers aside, Tesla’s electric cars like the Model S could accelerate from 0-60 mph without so much of a whine. The Model 3, when in Track Mode, has been noted to exhibit an audible whine of sorts from its electric motors. And this, in a way, lies a missed opportunity for Tesla.
The fact is that Tesla’s electric motors actually sound really good. When activated to full power, Tesla’s electric motors produce a sound that is nothing short of futuristic, and not at all out of place in sci-fi franchises like Star Wars. It does, in more ways than one, invoke that all-too-elusive “soul” referenced by avid drivers. That high-pitched whine that sounds like a jet engine taking off embodies the raw power of electric cars, after all, not unlike how a V8 or V12 invokes the ferocity of an internal combustion engine.
More importantly, it is a genuine sound that is coming from actual electric motors, not something manufactured like the Taycan’s Sport Sounds or the Mach-E’s broadcasted noises in the cabin. If Tesla could come up with a way to amplify the sounds of its vehicles’ electric motors to the point where it is audible both within the cabin and perhaps even outside, then even the “EVs have no soul” argument would likely fall flat. Such an update, if any, would likely result in more Teslas getting driven just a little bit harder than usual.
Hear the raw sound of a Tesla electric motor in the video below.
The sound of a Tesla motor from r/Damnthatsinteresting
Elon Musk
Tesla confirmed HW3 can’t do Unsupervised FSD but there’s more to the story
Tesla confirmed HW3 vehicles cannot run unsupervised FSD, replacing its free upgrade promise with a discounted trade-in.
Tesla has officially confirmed that early vehicles with its Autopilot Hardware 3 (HW3) will not be capable of unsupervised Full Self-Driving, while extending a path forward for legacy owners through a discounted trade-in program. The announcement came by way of Elon Musk in today’s Tesla Q1 2026 earnings call.
🚨 Our LIVE updates on the Tesla Earnings Call will take place here in a thread 🧵
Follow along below: pic.twitter.com/hzJeBitzJU
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) April 22, 2026
The history here matters. HW3 launched in April 2019, and Tesla sold Full Self-Driving packages to owners on the understanding that the hardware was sufficient for full autonomy. Some owners paid between $8,000 and $15,000 for FSD during that period. For years, as FSD’s AI models grew more demanding, HW3 vehicles fell progressively further behind, eventually landing on FSD v12.6 in January 2025 while AI4 vehicles moved to v13 and then v14. When Musk acknowledged in January 2025 that HW3 simply could not reach unsupervised operation, and alluded to a difficult hardware retrofit.
The near-term offering is more concrete. Tesla’s head of Autopilot Ashok Elluswamy confirmed on today’s call that a V14-lite will be coming to HW3 vehicles in late June, bringing all the V14 features currently running on AI4 hardware. That is a meaningful software update for owners who have been frozen at v12.6 for over a year, and it represents genuine effort to keep older hardware relevant. Unsupervised FSD for vehicles is now targeted for Q4 2026 at the earliest, with Musk describing it as a gradual, geography-limited rollout.
For HW3 owners, the over-the-air V14-lite update is welcomed, and the discounted trade-in path at least acknowledges an old obligation. What happens next with the trade-in pricing will define how this chapter ultimately gets written. If Tesla prices the hardware path fairly, acknowledges what early adopters are owed, and delivers V14-lite on the June timeline it committed to today, it has a real opportunity to convert one of the longest-running sore subjects among early adopters into a loyalty story.
Elon Musk
Tesla isn’t joking about building Optimus at an industrial scale: Here we go
Tesla’s Optimus factory in Texas targets 10 million robots yearly, with 5.2 million square feet under construction.
Tesla’s Q1 2026 Update Letter, released today, confirms that first generation Optimus production lines are now well underway at its Fremont, California factory, with a pilot line targeting one million robots per year to start. Of bigger note is a shared aerial image of a large piece of land adjacent to Gigafactory Texas, that Tesla has prominently labeled “Optimus factory site preparation.”
Permit documents show Tesla is seeking to add over 5.2 million square feet of new building space to the Giga Texas North Campus by the end of 2026, at an estimated construction investment of $5 billion to $10 billion. The longer term production target for that facility is 10 million Optimus units per year. Giga Texas already sits on 2,500 acres with over 10 million square feet of existing factory floor, and the North Campus expansion is being built to support multiple projects, including the dedicated Optimus factory, the Terafab chip fabrication facility (a joint Tesla/SpaceX/xAI venture), a Cybercab test track, road infrastructure, and supporting facilities.
Credit: TESLA
Texas makes strategic sense beyond the existing infrastructure. The state’s tax structure, lower labor costs relative to California, and the proximity to Tesla’s AI training cluster Cortex 1 and 2, both located at Giga Texas and now totaling over 230,000 H100 equivalent GPUs, means the Optimus software stack and the factory producing the hardware will share the same campus. Tesla’s Q1 report also confirmed completion of the AI5 chip tape out in April, the inference processor designed specifically to power Optimus units in the field.
As Teslarati reported, the Texas facility is intended to house Optimus V4 production at full scale. Musk told the World Economic Forum in January that Tesla plans to sell Optimus to the public by end of 2027 at a price between $20,000 and $30,000, stating, “I think everyone on earth is going to have one and want one.” He has previously pegged long term demand for general purpose humanoid robots at over 20 billion units globally, citing both consumer and industrial use cases.
Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) reported its earnings for the first quarter of 2026 on Wednesday afternoon. Here’s what the company reported compared to what Wall Street analysts expected.
The earnings results come after Tesla reported a miss on vehicle deliveries for the first quarter, delivering 358,023 vehicles and building 408,386 cars during the three-month span.
As Tesla transitions more toward AI and sees itself as less of a car company, expectations for deliveries will begin to become less of a central point in the consensus of how the quarter is perceived.
Nevertheless, Tesla is leaning on its strong foundation as a car company to carry forward its AI ambitions. The first quarter is a good ground layer for the rest of the year.
Tesla Q1 2026 Earnings Results
Tesla’s Earnings Results are as follows:
- Non-GAAP EPS – $0.41 Reported vs. $0.36 Expected
- Revenues – $22.387 billion vs. $22.35 billion Expected
- Free Cash Flow – $1.444 billion
- Profit – $4.72 billion
Tesla beat analyst expectations, so it will be interesting to see how the stock responds. IN the past, we’ve seen Tesla beat analyst expectations considerably, followed by a sharp drop in stock price.
On the same token, we’ve seen Tesla miss and the stock price go up the following trading session.
Tesla will hold its Q1 2026 Earnings Call in about 90 minutes at 5:30 p.m. on the East Coast. Remarks will be made by CEO Elon Musk and other executives, who will shed some light on the investor questions that we covered earlier this week.
You can stream it below. Additionally, we will be doing our Live Blog on X and Facebook.
Q1 2026 Earnings Call at 4:30pm CT https://t.co/pkYIaGJ32y
— Tesla (@Tesla) April 22, 2026
Tesla confirmed HW3 can’t do Unsupervised FSD but there’s more to the story
Tesla isn’t joking about building Optimus at an industrial scale: Here we go
