News
Tesla Model S and Model X snubbed in favor of diesel cars by Australian officials
Tesla vehicles were snubbed in favor of diesel cars by the Australian federal government’s COMCAR fleet earlier this week. The government agency has decided to opt for BMW’s powered by diesel fuel and Toyota Camry Hybrids.
The decision came from the Department of Finance, who initially had plans to include two separate models of Tesla vehicles in its fleet used to carry politicians, senior bureaucrats, and senior judges around Australian cities.
In the past, the fleet has been comprised of Australian-made Holden Caprice sedans. A decline in Holden’s production and manufacturing in Australia was the main influence behind the decision to seek out new vehicles from international manufacturers. Kia, BMW, Nissan, Hyundai, Mercedes, and Toyota were all among the potential candidates, according to The Driven.
The Tesla Model S and Model X were the two potential vehicles considered to comprise the new array of vehicles but ultimately did not make the final shortlist of the seven vehicles that were selected. The Model 3 was not considered as it was not yet available in the country when new vehicles were being tested.
The reasoning for not including sustainable electric vehicles in the fleet had to do with purpose due to available space for cargo. “COMCAR undertook a preliminary assessment of a wide range of vehicles, including a number of all-electric vehicles, which were not considered fit-for-purpose for COMCAR’s operations, due to their size and capacity,” a spokesperson said for the department said.
Interestingly enough, the Model X offers more cargo space than both the BMW 6 Series GT sedan and Toyota Camry Hybrid vehicles that the department chose to purchase. The Model X has a best-in-class 88 cubic feet of space, while the BMW and Toyota have 65 cubic feet and 15.1 cubic feet, respectively. While the Model S does not offer as much cargo room as the BMW, it does offer more than the Toyota with 28 cubic feet of space.
Price also seemed to be a factor in what vehicles were ultimately purchased. Both the Tesla Model S ($115,600) and Model X ($122,812) would have cost the Australian government back over $100,000 per vehicle. However, the 6 Series GT sedan from BMW also eclipses the six-figure mark at $102,900, making it ironic that they had chosen a diesel-powered vehicle over the electric options from Tesla that ultimately would have saved the government money through low operating costs.
Tesla has had a considerable presence in Australia as its Model 3 is the most popular electric car in the country. The government’s decision could have been because of the initial financial cost, but over time the Tesla vehicles would have been cheaper due to significantly less routine maintenance compared to gas and diesel-powered cars. Hopefully, Australia’s Department of Finance will reconsider when they update the fleet again in a few years and make a decision that will benefit both the environment and their pockets in the long run.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner in Los Angeles dominated the company’s global usage rankings after just one year, proving the concept is more than just a one-off novelty location that will fade away.
The performance could incite the company to build more locations, something that CEO Elon Musk has hinted at for some time.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner delivered 21.2 GWh of energy in its first year of operation, the company’s head of Charging, Max de Zegher, revealed on X. Of the top 10 most utilized Supercharger locations in Tesla’s global infrastructure, the Diner in Los Angeles was the most used by drivers, and it wasn’t particularly close:
Tesla Diner opened exactly 1 year ago. Inspiring that futuristic places like this exist.
It’s our highest usage Supercharger in the world: 21.2 GWh delivered in a year, 1.6k sessions/day.
Top 10 Superchargers by energy delivered: https://t.co/9YvJ8lw696 pic.twitter.com/koB3AUJHws
— Max (@MdeZegher) July 21, 2026
On its launch day one year ago, nobody was too sure what the Tesla Diner would be about. It seemed like an interesting concept, and considering it had been in the works for years, it was a highly anticipated launch that many were looking forward to.
Based on its success, we could see additional Diners with Superchargers built throughout the United States, and potentially beyond. Musk has said on several occasions that the company would be willing to bring the Diner idea to more markets.
Tesla makes major change at Supercharger Diner amid epic demand
Of the markets that Musk has mentioned, both Palo Alto and Austin have come to be perceived as ideal selections. However, there are no concrete plans as of now to build new Supercharger Diners anywhere; the location on Santa Monica Boulevard will remain the exclusive spot to pick up Tesla-inspired eats, at least for the time being.
Tesla short sellers won big following the company’s massive fall on Wall Street after it reported subpar Earnings on Wednesday.
Tesla short sellers collected about $4.12 billion in single-day profits on Thursday, according to Bloomberg. Shares fell as much as 15 percent during Thursday’s session. It closed as one of the worst days for Tesla on Wall Street in the past three years.
Investors sold off the stock after Tesla said it would aggressively direct its spending toward AI and its Optimus robot project. The company had record revenues, which were driven by one of the strongest quarters in terms of vehicle deliveries in company history.
However, it missed EPS estimates by reporting just $0.33, a far cry from the $0.53 analysts expected.
S3 Partners reported that about 3 percent of Tesla’s outstanding stock is sold short. Managing Director at S3, Ihor Dusaniwsky, provided the short seller’s potential profit, as well as another figure: shorts have likely had paper gains of $8.92 billion this year, as Tesla shares are down 30 percent in 2026.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla has burned short sellers many times in the past, but the company’s latest Earnings Call was a chance for those skeptics to taste some payback. Although the company gave some very transparent information regarding future projects, the rollout of Robotaxi, Optimus, and Semi, many investors took their profits on Thursday.
Notable short sellers like Michael Burry have been transparent about their skepticism around Tesla shares. Burry just revealed three weeks ago that he had opened up a new short on the stock, stating he shorted Tesla shares at $416.22. “Happy it jumped back to this level,” he said in a blog post.
At the time of publication, Tesla shares were down about 3 percent and the stock was trading at $309.92.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
Tesla’s Supercharger Diner probably just secured more locations
Tesla short sellers win big after shares fall after earnings
