News
Tesla Model Y rigid wiring is a step towards Elon Musk’s ‘Alien Dreadnought’ factory
The Tesla Model Y’s wiring seems to hint that little by little, the electric car maker is still moving towards a production line that is so automated, it is worthy of being dubbed an “Alien Dreadnought” factory. The most recent hint of this came in a video from auto teardown expert Sandy Munro, who is currently engaged in a thorough analysis and teardown of the Tesla Model Y.
Munro’s Model Y teardown has reached a point where the auto veteran is now looking into the all-electric crossover’s wiring system. Much to his pleasant surprise, Munro found that some of the Model Y’s wiring has become very different from those found in an early-production Model 3 he tore down and studied back in 2018. One of the key differences could be found in the wiring that connects the Model Y’s charge port to its battery pack.
As noted by Sandy Munro in his video, the heavy cables that connect the Model Y’s charge port to its battery pack are fitted inside a metal pipe. The auto veteran noted that this strategy has several advantages. By using a metal pipe, Tesla can ensure that the Model Y’s wiring is always a perfect fit during the vehicle’s assembly. The system also saves up space and weight compared to traditional cables, such as those found in the early-production Model 3.
This novel wiring system echoes a lot of the discussions in a previous Tesla patent published back in late 2018. In that particular patent, Tesla discussed how flexible wires are not optimized for production processes that are heavily reliant on automated machinery. Tesla’s patent then suggested the use of rigid cables, which could be easily picked up and installed by machines with very little margin or error. Interestingly enough, the Model Y’s wiring system that Munro recently discovered seemed to be quite similar to the structural cabling design that Tesla described in its patent.
The fact that the Model Y’s wiring seems to be optimized for automated production lines bodes well for Tesla. Elon Musk has always envisioned that Tesla factories will eventually run with minimal human staff, as robots would dominate the manufacturing line. Prior to the Model 3 ramp, for one, Musk described his vision for a factory that was so automated, Tesla’s internal name for it was the “Alien Dreadnought,” a reference to the hyper-advanced extraterrestrial ships in science fiction.
The pursuit for the Alien Dreadnought factory eventually had to take a step back during the Model 3 ramp, after the vehicle’s hyper-automated lines ended up performing less effectively than a production line that employs both humans and machines. Elon Musk, for his part, later admitted that he overreached with the Model 3’s automation. The CEO even remarked later that ultimately, he learned that “humans are underrated.”
If Munro’s discoveries on the Model Y’s wiring are any indication, it appears that Tesla is still making a lot of headway in optimizing its vehicles for automated production and assembly. The Model Y’s rigid wiring may be a simple change from the Model 3, but it goes a long way in proving that little by little, Tesla is still focused on improving its vehicles, from one iteration to the next.
Watch Sandy Munro’s latest feature on the Tesla Model Y in the video below.
News
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system has now surpassed 8.4 billion cumulative miles.
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla has long emphasized that large-scale real-world data is central to improving its neural network-based approach to autonomy. Each mile driven with FSD (Supervised) engaged contributes additional edge cases and scenario training for the system.
The milestone also brings Tesla closer to a benchmark previously outlined by CEO Elon Musk. Musk has stated that roughly 10 billion miles of training data may be needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving at scale, citing the “long tail” of rare but complex driving situations that must be learned through experience.
The growth curve of FSD Supervised’s cumulative miles over the past five years has been notable.
As noted in data shared by Tesla watcher Sawyer Merritt, annual FSD (Supervised) miles have increased from roughly 6 million in 2021 to 80 million in 2022, 670 million in 2023, 2.25 billion in 2024, and 4.25 billion in 2025. In just the first 50 days of 2026, Tesla owners logged another 1 billion miles.
At the current pace, the fleet is trending towards hitting about 10 billion FSD Supervised miles this year. The increase has been driven by Tesla’s growing vehicle fleet, periodic free trials, and expanding Robotaxi operations, among others.
With the fleet now past 8.4 billion cumulative miles, Tesla’s supervised system is approaching that threshold, even as regulatory approval for fully unsupervised deployment remains subject to further validation and oversight.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Elon Musk fired back at Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales after the longtime online encyclopedia leader dismissed xAI’s new AI-powered alternative, Grokipedia, as a “ridiculous” idea that is bound to fail.
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Wales made the comments while answering questions about Wikipedia’s neutrality. According to Wales, Wikipedia prides itself on neutrality.
“One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality. A neutral point of view is non-negotiable. It’s in the community, unquestioned… The idea that we’ve become somehow ‘Wokepidea’ is just not true,” Wales said.
When asked about potential competition from Grokipedia, Wales downplayed the situation. “There is no competition. I don’t know if anyone uses Grokipedia. I think it is a ridiculous idea that will never work,” Wales wrote.
After Grokipedia went live, Larry Sanger, also a co-founder of Wikipedia, wrote on X that his initial impression of the AI-powered Wikipedia alternative was “very OK.”
“My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury’s still out as to whether it’s actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say ‘maybe!’” Sanger stated.
Musk responded to Sanger’s assessment by saying it was “accurate.” In a separate post, he added that even in its V0.1 form, Grokipedia was already better than Wikipedia.
During a past appearance on the Tucker Carlson Show, Sanger argued that Wikipedia has drifted from its original vision, citing concerns about how its “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” framework categorizes publications by perceived credibility. As per Sanger, Wikipedia’s “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” list leans heavily left, with conservative publications getting effectively blacklisted in favor of their more liberal counterparts.
As of writing, Grokipedia has reportedly surpassed 80% of English Wikipedia’s article count.
News
Tesla Sweden appeals after grid company refuses to restore existing Supercharger due to union strike
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons.
Tesla Sweden is seeking regulatory intervention after a Swedish power grid company refused to reconnect an already operational Supercharger station in Åre due to ongoing union sympathy actions.
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons. A temporary construction power cabinet supplying the station had fallen over, described by Tesla as occurring “under unclear circumstances.” The power was then cut at the request of Tesla’s installation contractor to allow safe repair work.
While the safety issue was resolved, the station has not been brought back online. Stefan Sedin, CEO of Jämtkraft elnät, told Dagens Arbete (DA) that power will not be restored to the existing Supercharger station as long as the electric vehicle maker’s union issues are ongoing.
“One of our installers noticed that the construction power had been backed up and was on the ground. We asked Tesla to fix the system, and their installation company in turn asked us to cut the power so that they could do the work safely.
“When everything was restored, the question arose: ‘Wait a minute, can we reconnect the station to the electricity grid? Or what does the notice actually say?’ We consulted with our employer organization, who were clear that as long as sympathy measures are in place, we cannot reconnect this facility,” Sedin said.
The union’s sympathy actions, which began in March 2024, apply to work involving “planning, preparation, new connections, grid expansion, service, maintenance and repairs” of Tesla’s charging infrastructure in Sweden.
Tesla Sweden has argued that reconnecting an existing facility is not equivalent to establishing a new grid connection. In a filing to the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate, the company stated that reconnecting the installation “is therefore not covered by the sympathy measures and cannot therefore constitute a reason for not reconnecting the facility to the electricity grid.”
Sedin, for his part, noted that Tesla’s issue with the Supercharger is quite unique. And while Jämtkraft elnät itself has no issue with Tesla, its actions are based on the unions’ sympathy measures against the electric vehicle maker.
“This is absolutely the first time that I have been involved in matters relating to union conflicts or sympathy measures. That is why we have relied entirely on the assessment of our employer organization. This is not something that we have made any decisions about ourselves at all.
“It is not that Jämtkraft elnät has a conflict with Tesla, but our actions are based on these sympathy measures. Should it turn out that we have made an incorrect assessment, we will correct ourselves. It is no more difficult than that for us,” the executive said.
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
