Investor's Corner
Tesla’s battery business expected to contribute to Panasonic’s profit starting October
Tesla’s exclusive battery supplier and partner Panasonic Corp announced on Tuesday that its fiscal first-quarter net profit saw an increase of 17.6% due to growth in its automotive-related business. Panasonic saw its net profits from April to June rise 17.6% to 57.4 billion yen ($515 million), up 15% from last year’s 48.8 billion yen ($440 million).
The Japanese battery maker and tech company credits the emerging market for clean energy vehicles as one of the key factors behind its profit increase during the first quarter of the fiscal year. In a briefing on Tuesday, Chief Financial Officer Hirokazu Umeda stated that Panasonic’s battery business with Tesla could contribute to the Japanese company’s profit starting October, thanks to the American carmaker’s ongoing production ramp of the Model 3 sedan.
“Production at Tesla is gaining momentum. We are ramping up a new battery production line now and expect the business to contribute not just to our revenue but also to our profit from the second half starting in October,” the Panasonic CFO said.
Being the exclusive battery provider for Tesla’s electric cars and energy products, Panasonic has experienced firsthand the “production hell” and bottlenecks that surrounded the American carmaker’s Model 3 ramp. During Tesla’s burst production week at the end of June alone, Panasonic reportedly had to convert cells intended for Tesla’s energy storage products to battery packs for the Model 3.
As Tesla aims to sustain its production rate for the Model 3, Panasonic is looking to add three new battery cell production lines at Gigafactory 1, which would allow the company to support the Model 3 ramp. Panasonic expects its battery output from Gigafactory 1 to increase by 30% with the addition of the three new lines. Yoshio Ito, the chief of Panasonic’s automotive business, also stated last month that the Japanese battery maker would consider additional investment in Tesla’s Gigafactory 1 if needed.
With Tesla’s target of building 5,000 Model 3 per week being met at the end of Q2 2018, it is now up to the electric car maker to prove that it can sustain its optimal level of the production from Q3 moving forward. If Tesla Senior Director of Investor Relations Aaron Chew’s meeting with investors and analysts last month is any indication, however, it appears that Tesla is looking to adopt a more gradual ramp for the Model 3 in the following quarters. During the meeting, Chew reportedly stated that Tesla is targeting a sustained production rate of 5,000-6,000 Model 3 per week in Q3, followed by an increase to 7,000 units per week on Q4 2018 and an even more gradual ramp to 10,000 vehicles per week by mid-2019.
Considering Tesla’s goals for the Model 3 and its plans to ramp the manufacturing of its residential energy products, Panasonic’s three additional production lines at Gigafactory 1 could very well be the tip of the iceberg in a long line of additional investments for the Nevada facility. After all, if there’s anything that the electric car maker proved during the end of Q2 2018, it is the fact that while its growth has been significant over the years, it is only getting started. As Tesla’s partner, Panasonic has to prove that it can adapt and ramp at the breakneck pace that the electric car maker has exhibited over the years.
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 aborted at Zero and Musk just told us what broke
Four Raptor engines failed to ignite at T-zero, forcing SpaceX to scrub Starship Flight 13 Thursday.
SpaceX scrubbed the Starship Flight 13 launch attempt Thursday evening at the last possible moment, after four of the Super Heavy booster’s 33 Raptor 3 engines failed to ignite during the startup sequence. The 90-minute window had opened at 6:45 p.m. EDT from Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, and the countdown had proceeded without issue all day, with more than 11.5 million pounds of liquid methane and liquid oxygen being fully loaded into the rocket before the automated abort triggered. SpaceX’s launch directors posted on X, “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt,” and shut down the livestream shortly after.
Musk confirmed the root cause within hours. “Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort,” he wrote on X. “To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed and replaced. Most probable launch timing is early next week.” SpaceX engineers began draining propellant tanks immediately and Booster 20 was rolled back to its hangar for inspection.
The timing adds a layer of significance that did not exist during any of the previous 12 Starship flights. This is the first time SpaceX has attempted to launch Starship since the company made its stock market debut in June, listing under ticker SPCX at $135 per share. Public investors are now watching every Starship outcome in real time, and a last-second abort carries more visibility than it would have six months ago.
Flight 13 was designed to be one of the most consequential tests in the program’s history. It was set to carry 20 Starlink V3 satellites, the first operational payload Starship has ever attempted to deploy. Six of those satellites carried external cameras to photograph Starship’s heat shield from the outside during flight, which would act as a self-inspection approach SpaceX has never attempted before. The mission also needed to complete a Raptor engine relight in space, a step SpaceX skipped on Flight 12 in May after losing an engine during ascent. That Flight 12 booster also flipped 90 degrees off course during its boostback burn when five engines failed to reignite.
SpaceX has not announced an official next launch date. Musk’s “early next week” window points to July 21 or 22 at the earliest, pending the engine swap and a return to the pad.
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Electric vehicle maker Lucid Group has denied rumors of an imminent bankruptcy after a report from this morning sent the stock on a dramatic drop on Wall Street, seeing losses of more than 40 percent during trading hours.
Lucid’s Director of Communications, Nick Twork, responded to the report from Eletric-Vehicles.com, which stated the company’s restructuring advisor, AlixPartners, was asked to review two decisions: taking Lucid shares private or filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The report also claims AlixPartners told the Lucid board to “concentrate on Gravity production while improving its quality, and to temporarily hold back the Lucid Air, the sedan that has defined the company since its launch.”
Twork said:
$LCID The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is…
— Nick Twork (@ntwork) July 14, 2026
Shares rebounded after the response to the report, halving its losses as the trading day neared 3 p.m. Eastern.
Lucid has struggled to get its sales off the ground and into more respectable numbers, but the company is in its early years, when things are hard to begin with. It is also backed by several notable investors, including the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which has nearly limitless money and likely would not ditch an investment of this size so soon.
Lucid shares were down just 14 percent at the time of publication, a far cry from the 55 percent its losses topped out at during the day.
Tesla reveals first vehicle model to receive Starlink integration
SpaceX adjusts Starship Flight 13 test launch target date once again
