Tesla cut prices again this morning, and competitors, who have decided to either take the same strategy by slashing prices themselves or have chosen not to play into Elon Musk’s game, are in a weird and awkward position.
Tesla Model S and Model X units were the most recent vehicles in the automaker’s lineup to receive price cuts. While these vehicles only make up roughly 5 percent of Tesla’s overall sales volume based on last year’s sales figures, the price cuts give automakers with competing models another thing to think about.
Tesla Model X and Model S get price reduction in the United States
For startups, there are few that can even think about cutting costs at this point. Companies like Rivian, Lucid, and Lordstown are unable to shave prices currently and at the drop of a hat like Tesla. Every dollar and every sale right now counts, and there is not much wiggle room.
For traditional companies, the wiggle room on pricing for EVs is also extremely small. Ford, for example, while announcing plans to increase production of popular EV models this weekend, is still struggling with availability.
If you went to a Ford, GM, or other legacy dealership right now and tried to order a car, it might be extremely difficult, and people who just bought cars don’t want to see that their vehicle was just subjected to a price cut of thousands of dollars. When Ford cut Mustang Mach-E prices earlier this year, owners who took delivery just before the decreases were not pleased, and the automaker couldn’t do much to appease them.
Tesla’s strengths are plentiful, and they expand across nearly every part of its business. Its charging infrastructure is strong, the company can get you a car in a matter of a few weeks, and its pricing can be adjusted at any moment.
If it needs to adjust prices to make margins a little more appealing to investors and analysts, it can. If it needs to spike demand with a dramatic cut like it did this morning, it can do that too. It’s not a perfect company, though. Service and Customer Communications for Tesla are incredibly weak; it is one of the most publicly-criticized portions of the company. Despite that, people continue to buy Teslas in droves.
With another Tesla price cut, companies are in a serious pickle. Tesla could decide in a week to cut prices again, making consumers more prone to choose their product over another. The advantages go past price, but what that number says is the first thing consumers look at when considering a vehicle. The lower they get, the more attractive they become to consumers.
Why Tesla dropped the prices of the Model S and Model X is unknown, but Gary Black seems to believe the move is to encourage more sales of the flagship vehicles, which, as previously mentioned, do not contribute to the company’s overall sales volume very much.
.@Tesla is cutting prices for the second time this year. But investor @garyblack00 tells @SaraEisen that he’s not worried about demand, explaining that they’re trying to adjust prices to encourage growth for the Model S & X vehicles. pic.twitter.com/zOobHZDRJE
— Squawk on the Street (@SquawkStreet) March 6, 2023
However, there are other things: Model X vehicles are being equipped with the new Hardware 4 computer, Tesla has tried to get Free Supercharging-equipped cars off the roads, and it could be another way to push sales upward.
Whatever the reasoning is, Tesla put competitors in another weird spot. With the constant price changes that occurred earlier this year, there was already doubt in place about what competitors could do to remain competitive. The most recent adjustment in prices makes things even more difficult and reminds everyone that Tesla is ultimately the king of the hill.
Disclosure: Joey Klender is a Tesla Shareholder.
I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at joey@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.
News
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla’s Full Self-Driving (Supervised) system has now surpassed 8.4 billion cumulative miles.
The figure appears on Tesla’s official safety page, which tracks performance data for FSD (Supervised) and other safety technologies.
Tesla has long emphasized that large-scale real-world data is central to improving its neural network-based approach to autonomy. Each mile driven with FSD (Supervised) engaged contributes additional edge cases and scenario training for the system.
The milestone also brings Tesla closer to a benchmark previously outlined by CEO Elon Musk. Musk has stated that roughly 10 billion miles of training data may be needed to achieve safe unsupervised self-driving at scale, citing the “long tail” of rare but complex driving situations that must be learned through experience.
The growth curve of FSD Supervised’s cumulative miles over the past five years has been notable.
As noted in data shared by Tesla watcher Sawyer Merritt, annual FSD (Supervised) miles have increased from roughly 6 million in 2021 to 80 million in 2022, 670 million in 2023, 2.25 billion in 2024, and 4.25 billion in 2025. In just the first 50 days of 2026, Tesla owners logged another 1 billion miles.
At the current pace, the fleet is trending towards hitting about 10 billion FSD Supervised miles this year. The increase has been driven by Tesla’s growing vehicle fleet, periodic free trials, and expanding Robotaxi operations, among others.
With the fleet now past 8.4 billion cumulative miles, Tesla’s supervised system is approaching that threshold, even as regulatory approval for fully unsupervised deployment remains subject to further validation and oversight.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Elon Musk fired back at Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales after the longtime online encyclopedia leader dismissed xAI’s new AI-powered alternative, Grokipedia, as a “ridiculous” idea that is bound to fail.
Musk’s response to Wales’ comments, which were posted on social media platform X, was short and direct: “Famous last words.”
Wales made the comments while answering questions about Wikipedia’s neutrality. According to Wales, Wikipedia prides itself on neutrality.
“One of our core values at Wikipedia is neutrality. A neutral point of view is non-negotiable. It’s in the community, unquestioned… The idea that we’ve become somehow ‘Wokepidea’ is just not true,” Wales said.
When asked about potential competition from Grokipedia, Wales downplayed the situation. “There is no competition. I don’t know if anyone uses Grokipedia. I think it is a ridiculous idea that will never work,” Wales wrote.
After Grokipedia went live, Larry Sanger, also a co-founder of Wikipedia, wrote on X that his initial impression of the AI-powered Wikipedia alternative was “very OK.”
“My initial impression, looking at my own article and poking around here and there, is that Grokipedia is very OK. The jury’s still out as to whether it’s actually better than Wikipedia. But at this point I would have to say ‘maybe!’” Sanger stated.
Musk responded to Sanger’s assessment by saying it was “accurate.” In a separate post, he added that even in its V0.1 form, Grokipedia was already better than Wikipedia.
During a past appearance on the Tucker Carlson Show, Sanger argued that Wikipedia has drifted from its original vision, citing concerns about how its “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” framework categorizes publications by perceived credibility. As per Sanger, Wikipedia’s “Reliable sources/Perennial sources” list leans heavily left, with conservative publications getting effectively blacklisted in favor of their more liberal counterparts.
As of writing, Grokipedia has reportedly surpassed 80% of English Wikipedia’s article count.
News
Tesla Sweden appeals after grid company refuses to restore existing Supercharger due to union strike
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons.
Tesla Sweden is seeking regulatory intervention after a Swedish power grid company refused to reconnect an already operational Supercharger station in Åre due to ongoing union sympathy actions.
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons. A temporary construction power cabinet supplying the station had fallen over, described by Tesla as occurring “under unclear circumstances.” The power was then cut at the request of Tesla’s installation contractor to allow safe repair work.
While the safety issue was resolved, the station has not been brought back online. Stefan Sedin, CEO of Jämtkraft elnät, told Dagens Arbete (DA) that power will not be restored to the existing Supercharger station as long as the electric vehicle maker’s union issues are ongoing.
“One of our installers noticed that the construction power had been backed up and was on the ground. We asked Tesla to fix the system, and their installation company in turn asked us to cut the power so that they could do the work safely.
“When everything was restored, the question arose: ‘Wait a minute, can we reconnect the station to the electricity grid? Or what does the notice actually say?’ We consulted with our employer organization, who were clear that as long as sympathy measures are in place, we cannot reconnect this facility,” Sedin said.
The union’s sympathy actions, which began in March 2024, apply to work involving “planning, preparation, new connections, grid expansion, service, maintenance and repairs” of Tesla’s charging infrastructure in Sweden.
Tesla Sweden has argued that reconnecting an existing facility is not equivalent to establishing a new grid connection. In a filing to the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate, the company stated that reconnecting the installation “is therefore not covered by the sympathy measures and cannot therefore constitute a reason for not reconnecting the facility to the electricity grid.”
Sedin, for his part, noted that Tesla’s issue with the Supercharger is quite unique. And while Jämtkraft elnät itself has no issue with Tesla, its actions are based on the unions’ sympathy measures against the electric vehicle maker.
“This is absolutely the first time that I have been involved in matters relating to union conflicts or sympathy measures. That is why we have relied entirely on the assessment of our employer organization. This is not something that we have made any decisions about ourselves at all.
“It is not that Jämtkraft elnät has a conflict with Tesla, but our actions are based on these sympathy measures. Should it turn out that we have made an incorrect assessment, we will correct ourselves. It is no more difficult than that for us,” the executive said.
Tesla FSD (Supervised) fleet passes 8.4 billion cumulative miles
Elon Musk fires back after Wikipedia co-founder claims neutrality and dubs Grokipedia “ridiculous”
