Connect with us

Investor's Corner

Tesla shareholders urge Board to take legal action against misleading media reports

Credit: Tesla Asia/X

Published

on

Misleading reports about Tesla and its leadership have pretty much been the norm for a very long time, but a number of TSLA shareholders are drawing the line in the sand. 

As per the shareholders in a letter to the Tesla Board of Directors, now is the time to hold news media outlets that publish misleading reports about the electric vehicle maker accountable.

The trigger:

  • Last week, a Tesla Cybertruck loaded with explosives was detonated in front of a Trump hotel in Las Vegas. The vehicle’s driver died and seven others were injured.
  • Elon Musk quickly clarified on X that the incident was the result of explosives that were detonated from the bed of the Cybertruck. Thus, the explosion was not in any way related to a fault in the all-electric pickup. 
  • Authorities later credited the Cybertruck for containing the explosion and preventing more damage in the area.
  • Despite this, news reports about the incident framed the narrative as a Cybertruck explosion killing one person.
  • Some headlines included “1 dead after a Cybertruck explodes outside Trump Hotel in Las Vegas,” “Tesla Cybertruck explodes outside Trump Las Vegas Hotel, killing driver,” and “Tesla Cybertruck explosion in front of Trump Hotel in Las Vegas leaves 1 dead, 7 injured.”

Musk’s comments:

  • Amid complaints from users on X and some Tesla shareholders that the story of the Cybertruck’s detonation was being misrepresented, Elon Musk mused that perhaps it is time for the electric vehicle maker to take legal action against media outlets that seemingly sabotage Tesla.
  • “Maybe it is time to do so,” Musk wrote in a response to X user Robby Starbuck, who called out the headlines about the incident.

Tesla shareholders’ letter:

  • Tesla shareholders have supported the idea of holding news outlets accountable. 
  • In a letter, the shareholders called on the Board of Directors to file legal action against media outlets that misrepresent Tesla news. 
  • Following is the TSLA shareholders’ letter: 
    • Dear Members of the Board:
    • As concerned Tesla shareholders, we are writing to express our deep concern regarding what appears to be a pattern of materially misleading press coverage about Tesla, its products, and operations. We believe these articles are negatively impacting shareholder value and warrant the Board’s attention.
    • Of particular concern are recent articles regarding the criminal event where firework mortars and camp fuel canisters exploded in the bed of a Cybertruck in Las Vegas. The reporting contained numerous apparent inaccuracies. These three articles were the most mentioned by us shareholders with regards to inaccurate reporting:
    • [to be filled out with survey results]
    • [to be filled out with survey results]
    • [to be filled out with survey results]
    • These and other major media outlets have often published articles containing factual inaccuracies about Tesla’s business operations, product capabilities, and market position.
    • While we all fully support and value press freedom, we believe there is a clear distinction between protected speech and demonstrably false statements that harm shareholder interests and our company.
    • We respectfully request that the Board commissions an independent analysis of recent press coverage to identify potentially actionable cases of material misrepresentation and evaluates potential legal remedies available to protect shareholder interests. We understand that engaging in legal action against press outlets requires careful consideration of multiple factors, including First Amendment protections, litigation costs, and potential public relations implications. However, we believe the Board has a fiduciary duty to evaluate all available options to protect shareholder interests when faced with demonstrably false information that may be damaging to the company’s value.
    • We would appreciate the Board’s consideration of these concerns and look forward to hearing your response on how Tesla plans to address this issue moving forward.
    • Sincerely,
    • Tesla Shareholders

Don’t hesitate to contact us with news tips. Just send a message to simon@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Comments

Elon Musk

NYC Comptroller moves to sue Tesla for securities violations

Published

on

MINISTÉRIO DAS COMUNICAÇÕES, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

New York City Comptroller Brad Lander is urging the NYC Law Department to sue Tesla for securities violations related to CEO Elon Musk’s involvement in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE).

Lander said the basis for the potential litigation lies on “material misstatements from Tesla claiming that CEO Elon Musk spends significant time on the company and is highly active in its management, despite his helming the Trump Administration’s DOGE initiative.”

It is a common complaint amongst some Tesla shareholders who are less than enthusiastic about Musk’s involvement in DOGE. Some feel as if Musk is not concerned about Tesla, especially as the stock has dropped over 28 percent this year. However, Musk has continued to double down on his position within the U.S. government.

Nevertheless, Musk’s position in Tesla is still very apparent. He headed an All-Hands meeting just two weeks ago that showed his commitment to the company as he outlined future plans and even joked to employees that they should hold onto their stock.

However, Lander believes Musk’s involvement has hurt New York City pension systems, which have lost over $300 million so far this year. He said:

“In less than three months, Tesla stock has lost nearly 40% of its value, with losses over $300 million for the New York City pension systems. We have long expressed concerns that the Tesla board has failed to provide independent oversight, or to require that Musk – or someone else – serve as a full-time CEO.”

Lander went on to say that “material misstatements from Tesla misled investors about his role at the company,” stating this was his reasoning for calling on the Law Department to file securities litigation against the company.

He believes taking it to court will force changes and will return Tesla shares back to a level that will benefit pension systems in New York City:

“Shareholder litigation could force the changes in governance and leadership that Tesla needs, and help recover some of our pension systems’ losses. Otherwise, we may need to consider divestment.”

The pension systems would be able to pursue financial damages to cover losses and seek governance changes, it says.

Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Tesla (TSLA) shares company-compiled Q1 2025 delivery consensus

Analysts are expecting the electric car maker to post 377,592 deliveries for Q1 2025.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla China

Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) has released its Q1 2025 company-compiled delivery consensus of sell-side analysts. Based on Tesla’s release, it appears that analysts are expecting Tesla to post conservative vehicle delivery results for the first quarter.

Images of Tesla’s Q1 2025 company-compiled consensus were shared recently on social media. 

The Consensus

As could be seen in Tesla’s first quarter 2025 company-compiled vehicle delivery consensus, analysts are expecting the electric car maker to post 377,592 deliveries for Q1 2025. Analysts expect this number to be comprised of 351,893 Model 3/Model Y and 21,241 other models.

The company-compiled consensus also suggests that Tesla will see total deliveries of 1,851,001 vehicles this Full Year 2025. From this number, analysts expect 1,693,397 units of the Model 3 and Model Y and 145,162 units of Tesla’s other models.

The sources

Tesla’s company-compiled consensus was based on estimates from 27 firms. These include Daiwa, DB, Wedbush, Cowen, OpCo, Canaccord, Baird, Wolfe, Exane, GS, Evercore ISI, Barclays, PSC, Mizuho, BofA, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley, Truist, UBS, Jefferies, Guggenheim, JPM, Redburn, Needham & Co, HSBC, Cantor Fitzgerald, and William Blair. 

Advertisement

FactSet expectations

As noted in an Investor’s Business Daily report, FactSet estimates suggest that Tesla will see vehicle deliveries of 407,900 units in Q1 2025. Such a number is quite optimistic considering that Tesla’s sales of its best-selling vehicle, the Model Y, were throttled during the quarter due to the company’s transition to the new Model Y. 

Beyond Q1 deliveries, Tesla’s first quarter vehicle delivery results could trigger revisions to the company’s full-year delivery and earnings forecasts. FactSet data shows Q1 earnings estimates hitting 48 cents per share, down from 57 cents in late January and 74 cents late last year. For 2025, analysts now see earnings per share climbing 13% to $2.74, a drop from $3.31 before the Q4 earnings release.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Elon Musk clarifies Trump tariff effect on Tesla: “The cost impact is not trivial”

The U.S. President has stated that Elon Musk stayed silent and provided no input in the administration’s tariffs.

Published

on

MINISTÉRIO DAS COMUNICAÇÕES, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

U.S. President Donald Trump’s plan to implement a 25% tariff on non-U.S.-made vehicles starting next week would affect American electric car maker Tesla. 

This was confirmed by CEO Elon Musk in a recent post on social media platform X.

Musk and Trump

While Elon Musk works closely with the Trump administration due to his role in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), the U.S. president has emphasized that the Tesla CEO never asks for favors. This was highlighted in his recent comments, when he stated that Elon Musk stayed silent and provided no input in the administration’s 25% auto tariffs.

When asked by reporters if the new tariffs would be good for Tesla, Trump noted that they may be “net neutral or they may be good.” The U.S. president also pointed to Tesla’s automotive plants in Fremont, California and Austin, Texas, which produce vehicles that are sold in the country. “Anybody that has plants in the United States — it’s going to be good for them,” Trump noted.

Tesla Affected

In a post on X, Elon Musk clarified that the Trump administration’s tariffs would affect the prices of vehicle parts that are sourced from other countries. This was a concern that Tesla previously outlined in a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative, which noted that even with “aggressive localization” of its supply chain, “certain parts and components are difficult or impossible to source within the United States.”

Advertisement

As per Musk in his recent post on X, the cost impact of the Trump administration’s tariffs is no joke. “To be clear, this will affect the price of parts in Tesla cars that come from other countries. The cost impact is not trivial,” Musk wrote in his post.

Potential Effects

Reactions to Musk’s comments from users of the social media platform were varied, with some speculating that the Trump auto tariffs could result in Teslas becoming more expensive in the United States. Despite this, the potential increases in Tesla’s vehicle prices might not be as notable as other cars, particularly those that are produced outside the country.

Continue Reading

Trending