Connect with us
Anti-Tesla law Anti-Tesla law

News

Tesla subpoenas Michigan governor and others’ records for ‘Anti-Tesla’ law

Published

on

Tesla is going toe-to-toe with the state of Michigan over the state’s “Anti-Tesla” bill, now law, that prevents the company from selling directly to car buyers in the state.

The electric automaker has subpoenaed records from Governor Rick Snyder, Senator Joe Hune and Representative Jason Sheppard and others in its federal lawsuit against Snyder. The lawsuit is also against Michigan’s Secretary of State Ruth Johnson and Attorney General Bill Schuette.

According to news outlet mlive.com, Tesla wants records ranging from internal communications to phone logs regarding the bill from Hune, who has received contributions from the Michigan Automobile Dealers Association. The lawsuit also alleges that Hune’s wife’s firm lobbies for auto dealers, creating a conflict of interest.

The lawsuit dates back to an October 2014 Michigan state law which bans automakers from selling vehicles directly to consumers. The Michigan legislature, backed by the state’s new-car dealership lobby, voted in favor of the amendment. Tesla’s complaint outlines that the law’s purpose is “to reward the dealers’ generous lobbying efforts by handing them a monopoly,” as we previously reported.

Tesla is seeking two things from the lawsuit: a declaratory judgment that Michigan’s ban on direct-sales violates the Due Process, Equal Protection, and Commerce Clauses of the Constitution as applied to Tesla and a permanent injunction preventing state officials from enforcing the law, including the October 2014 amendment.

Advertisement

Assistant Attorney General Rock Wood called the subpoena “burdensome,” and in a footnote said, “It may come as no surprise that Plaintiff [Tesla] is apparently hostile to or comments unfavorably towards certain legislators, given the claims pled by the Plaintiff. This type of fishing expedition, if permitted, would set a dangerous precedent whereby a legislator’s opponents/adversaries could use or manipulate the judicial process to embarrass, harass, distract or undermine legislators or the legislature.”

Assistant Attorney General Matthew Payok said Tesla acknowledges the lawsuit is essentially against the state and he wrote that “the fatal flaw in this position is that the Eleventh Amendment bars all suits against states in federal court, regardless of the relief requested,” according to mlive.com.

As for Tesla, they had the following statement via attorney John Bursch.

“Tesla is entitled to documents that evidence the intent and coordination that took place behind the scenes while the Legislature effectively gave franchised dealers a state-sponsored monopoly on car sales within Michigan – all while engineering the legislative process to steadfastly remove any public attention or scrutiny.”

This comes after yesterday’s news that Louisiana signed a bill into law blocking direct-to consumer sales in their state. No word yet on if Tesla will challenge that law in court.

Advertisement

The hearing for the Michigan subpoenas is set for a week from today, June 15, in Grand Rapids, Michigan.

Interim East Coast Editor for Teslarati, contributor for NextMobility. Share tips at mdolzer@teslarati.com

Comments

News

Rivian startup spinoff raises $105M in funding for micro EV production

Meet Also, Rivian’s micro EV spinoff, now a full-fledged startup with $105M in funding. It’s adapting Rivian’s tech for compact EVs.

Published

on

(Credit: Rivian)

Rivian’s skunkworks program has turned into a full-blown startup called Also. The new startup, which is separate from Rivian, raised $105 million from Eclipse Ventures. Also will focus on micromobility or the development of micro electric vehicles.

Also started within Rivian, aiming to figure out if the electric vehicle company’s technology could be condensed to fit smaller EVs, including vans, trucks, and SUVs. Eventually, the skunkworks program discovered it could, indeed, fit Rivian’s technology in smaller, more compact electric vehicles, but the project was bigger than Rivian.

“We’ve been taking the Rivian technology stack and adapting it to much smaller form factors and then coming up with some incredibly exciting embodiments of that technology in these very small form factors,” Rivian CEO RJ Scaringe told Reuters.

Rivian will always be part of Also. It holds a minority stake in Also and Rivian’s VP of future programs, Chris Yu, will be the startup’s president.

According to Scaringe, Also plans to debut its first vehicle designs later this year. One of the designs seems to be a bike, as Scringe described it having a seat, two wheels, and a screen with a few computers and a battery.

Advertisement

Also aims to start producing its flagship product by 2026 for customers in the United States and Europe. In addition, it plans to launch consumer and commercial vehicles made for Asia and South America.

Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Financial Times retracts report on Tesla’s alleged shady accounting

“Turns out FT can’t do finance,” Tesla CEO Elon Musk quipped on X.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla Asia/X

The Financial Times has issued a retraction for an article it recently published that accused the electric vehicle maker of shady accounting practices.

The FT’s retraction has been appreciated by the electric vehicle community in social media, though many highlighted the fact that the publication’s initial erroneous allegations have already been spread across numerous other media outlets.

The Allegations

In an article published on March 19, the Financial Times pointed out that if one were to compare “Tesla’s capital expenditure in the last six months of 2024 to its valuation of the assets that money was spent on,” “$1.4 billion appears to have gone astray.”

The FT article highlighted that Tesla reported spending $6.3 billion on “purchases of property and equipment excluding finance leases, net of sales” in the second half of 2024. However, in that period, the company’s property, plant, and equipment only rose by $4.9 billion. As noted by members of the r/Accounting subreddit, this appeared to be the basis of the FT‘s article, which seemed careless at best.

Unfortunately, the publication’s allegations were quickly echoed by other news outlets, many of which proceeded to accuse Tesla of implementing shady accounting practices.

Advertisement

The Retraction

In its retraction, the Financial Times explained that Tesla’s payments for assets already purchased and the possible disposal of depreciated property could help explain the alleged discrepancy in the company’s numbers. With these in consideration, the publication noted that the “crack we’re left with at Tesla is now small enough — just under half a billion dollars — to be filled with some combination of foreign exchange movements, non-material asset write-offs, or the sale of machinery or equipment close to its not-fully depreciated value.”

“As we sound the Alphaville bugle while lowering this particular red flag, one unavoidable conclusion is that at a certain point it’s necessary to trust the auditor’s judgment,” the publication noted.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk has responded to the Financial Times‘ retraction, commenting, “Turns out FT can’t do finance” in a post on social media platform X.

Continue Reading

News

Starlink gets green light to launch internet services in Vietnam

Vietnam has given Starlink the green light. With mobile & aviation plans in the mix, SpaceX continues its push into Asia.

Published

on

(Credit: SpaceX)

Starlink received the green light to launch its internet services in Vietnam.

The Vietnamese government noted SpaceX’s permission to launch Starlink services in the country is on a trial basis. Starlink’s trial period will last until the end of 2030. SpaceX has a subscriber limit of 600,000 within the trial period.

SpaceX can provide Starlink’s fixed and mobile internet service plans throughout Vietnam. It may also offer Starlink Aviation service plans.   

According to Reuters, the Vietnamese government noted that there is no limit to foreign ownership of a service. It is uncertain if SpaceX has applied for a license to launch Starlink services in Vietnam.

Advertisement

Vietnam’s decision to permit Starlink services in the country differs from Italy’s decision to pause discussions regarding SpaceX’s internet service. According to Italy’s Defense Minister Guido Crosetto, discussions of a Starlink deal with SpaceX have “come to a standstill. Crosetto cites the controversy surrounding Elon Musk as the reason for the pause on a Starlink deal. Italy was discussing a potential $1.6 billion, 5-year Starlink contract with SpaceX.

SpaceX is also trying to launch Starlink in India. The aerospace company has already signed deals with two of India’s top telecom companies for Starlink services. However, Starlink is still waiting for regulatory approval.

While waiting for regulatory approvals and license processing, SpaceX continues to improve its Starlink services. Recently, news broke that the Elon Musk-led company has plans to launch a new Starlink dish with gigabit speeds.

Continue Reading

Trending