Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) first-quarter earnings call comes on the heels of a surprisingly powerful quarter that saw the electric car maker posting $5.985 billion in revenue and an earnings per share of $1.24, beating Wall Street’s estimates.
As revealed in the company’s Q1 2020 Update Letter, Tesla currently sits on $8.1 billion in cash, which should help the company weather the effects of the coronavirus pandemic. Tesla Model Y production has also outpaced the initial ramp of the Made-in-China Model 3. This is a notable feat considering the fact that Tesla China’s Model 3 ramp is already far quicker than the company’s push for the sedan in Fremont.
For today’s earnings call, Tesla executives are expected to address questions surrounding the company’s plans for the coming quarters, especially amidst the effects of the pandemic. Updates on future projects such as the Cybertruck, Semi, and Roadster may also be mentioned, as well as more details on future Tesla Energy projects.
The following are live updates from Tesla’s Q1 2020 earnings call. I will be updating this article in real-time, so please keep refreshing the page to view the latest updates on this story. The first entry starts at the bottom of the page.
16:36 PT – And that’s a wrap everyone! This earnings call got a bit intense thanks to Elon’s COVID-19 comments, but otherwise, it continued to emphasize that Tesla is well on its way towards optimizing its operations, from its production to the deployment of its new products to consumers.
16:35 PT – Pierre Ferragu from New Street Research asks for an update on Tesla’s gross margins. Kirkhorn stated that when Tesla looks at margins, credits are included. Shutdown inefficiencies in Fremont and Shanghai weighed down Tesla’s margins as well. The CFO did note that Tesla saw strength in gross margins across the board despite lower volumes.
Ferragu follows up with a question on energy storage and how demand is always outstripping supply. As with other battery questions asked during this earnings call, VP of Technology Drew Baglino noted that this inquiry will be addressed on Battery Day.
16:30 PT – Gene Munster from Loup Ventures asks about the Tesla Network and the company’s Robotaxi strategy. Elon states that much testing is needed for such capabilities to be rolled out. Musk discusses how Tesla rolls out its new Autopilot and FSD functionalities. He emphasized that each feature passes through several stages, from simulation to EAP to wide release.
Musk did state that he hopes full functionality of FSD will be released by the end of the year. After this point, it’s just a matter of refining the system. Initial Robotaxi services will likely start with human drivers to supervise the vehicles. But with more data, Tesla can propose a fully-autonomous ride-hailing service to regulators. Musk hopes to accomplish this to some degree next year.
16:20 PT – Ben Kallo of Baird takes the stage. He asks about Tesla’s cell strategy. The answer? Tesla does not have one specific model, though details of this would be discussed on Battery Day.
16:10 PT – Adam Jonas of Morgan Stanley takes the stage. He asks about updates on Tesla’s liquidity this April. CFO Kirkhorn stated that he doesn’t have much color to add, though he emphasized that Tesla has over $8 billion in cash. He also reiterated that Tesla has more inventory now due to the effects of the pandemic.
Elon did admit that he is a bit worried about the Fremont factory’s ongoing shutdown. He reiterates his recent controversial points on Twitter, criticizing the ongoing lockdown procedures in the Bay Area. He did state that it is not only Tesla that is at risk with the ongoing shutdown, as other companies are also in crisis now.
When asked about his message to lawmakers on how to handle the C-19 crisis, Musk stated that he believes people should be allowed to leave their homes. He does this with a number of choice words. These will be very controversial statements.
16:06 PT – Now for a question about Tesla’s plan to move into the residential HVAC business. Musk noted that Tesla actually does this well already with the Model S and Model X, since both vehicles have hospital-grade filters. He also mentioned that Tesla’s HVAC could be all-in-one water creator, hot water heater, and HVAC rolled into one device.
Musk also reiterated the demand for the company’s battery storage solutions. He stated that Tesla has enough demand for its battery storage systems, at least for 2020.
16:00 PT – Next up is the Solar Roof ramp and forecasts for 2021. Elon noted that before COVID-19 shut everything down, Tesla’s Solar Roof ramp was actually seeing a lot of momentum. He remains optimistic about the flagship product nonetheless. “I’m confident that maybe by the end of the year, we may be installing about a thousand a week,” Musk said.
“Demand is good, production is good. The hold up is the installation,” Musk stated, stating that installing the Solar Roof is the hard part, with 1,000 teams installing 1,000 roofs per week.
16:00 PT – Retail investors’ questions from Say are up. Next Giga announcement? Elon says that it will happen within the next three months. He did state that the next Gigafactory will be in the United States. That’s the Cybertruck facility. Perhaps that facility will also produce the Semi? It makes sense considering that Fremont is already at full capacity with Model S, 3, X, and Y.
15:55 PT – Ah, the Battery Day question. Elon states that there will be many exciting news to tell on Battery Day. It will likely be one of the most exciting days in Tesla’s history, Musk stated. The event will likely be held around the third week of May.
As for FSD commercialization, Kirkhorn explained that in North America, Tesla takes about half of the $7,000 FSD cost for revenue while the other half is dedicated for more feature development. Deferred revenue from autopilot a little over $600M as well. Musk notes that there is a tremendous untapped potential for Autopilot and FSD as in-app purchases as well. It looks like the subscription model is indeed happening, at least for existing customers.
15:53 PT – Now it’s the COVID-19 question and how Tesla will come out of the experience. Musk states that Tesla is focusing on investing in improving and developing its products. There is an uncertainty, and there is a bumpy road, but “long-term prospects are extremely good,” Musk noted. Kirkhorn stated that Tesla’s digital nature actually deals with the pandemic situation well, with touchless deliveries and other similar initiatives. “For most people, they would rather go to the dentist than to buy a car… For Tesla, it’s as easy as ordering something from Apple’s app store or Amazon,” he said.
15:50 PT – Next question is China’s subsidies, which the MIC Model 3 does not meet today. Elon announced that Tesla China will be reducing the price of the Standard Range Model 3, allowing the vehicle to meet the requirements of the government’s subsidies. Kirkhorn adds that the cost of producing the vehicle in Shanghai is already lower than the costs of production in Fremont, and there are still opportunities to optimize this further.
15:48 PT – Questions from Say begin. First off is the possibility of FSD subscriptions. Elon states that it makes sense to buy FSD an investment in the future, and Tesla is confident of its long-term value. Kirkhorn agreed, though he stated that a subscription model can allow owners to spread out the expenses for such an option. “Our goal is to do the best thing for customers,” Musk said.
15:45 PT – CFO Zach Kirkhorn takes the stage. He begins by highlighting how the Model Y started with profitability, something that has not been accomplished in the past. Kirkhorn stated that Tesla did not see much effects from the expiration of the federal regulatory credits. Model 3 production in China is going well too.
That being said, Kirkhorn mentioned that Tesla did meet some headwinds. Production inefficiencies still happened, such as with the ramp of Solar Roof V3. The CFO added that Model Y in Shanghai and Berlin are on track, and for now, Gigafactory 3 remains the one factory that is still operating fully.
15:40 PT – Musk also touched on the Model Y’s two-piece casting design, which will make production more optimized while saving weight and cost. He also mentioned the introduction of the Model Y’s heat pump, which helps the Model Y maintain its industry-leading range despite being larger than the Model 3. Musk also stated that the reception to the Model Y from customers has been “universally positive.”
In conclusion, Tesla will be continuing Model Y production at full speed in Fremont, Shanghai, and when it’s ready, Berlin. Musk lightly remarked that this is a forward-looking statement, though he stated that by next year, he believes Tesla can have a capacity of 1 million cars per year.
15:35 PT – Elon Musk states that Tesla was able to make a profit despite the ongoing headwinds in the market and a seasonally soft quarter. Model Y production in Fremont in Q1 was faster than the first two quarters of Model 3 production. The Y is also profitable from launch, something that has not happened before.
Elon also touched on Tesla’s Traffic Light and Stop Sign Control feature. He is very optimistic, stating that the feature is growing at a rapid rate. Each use of the feature trains Tesla’s Neural Net further. “I feel extremely confident that it will be possible to do a drive from your home to your office with minimal interventions by the end of the year,” Musk said.
Musk also spoke about the Model S and Model X range increases. Musk stated that the real Model S test was 400 miles, but the vehicle ended up losing 2% of its range before it was tested. “The true range of the Model S for the past two months is 400 miles. We’re not stopping now,” Musk added.
15:33 PT – Senior investor relations officer Martin Viecha takes the floor. Elon Musk and Zachary Kirkhorn are present. Elon Musk takes the stage with his opening remarks.
15:30 PT – And the call begins, though Tesla seems to be a bit delayed. I’m strangely wondering if the call will be held using Skype or Zoom due to social distancing rules. That would make this earnings call extra interesting.
15:25 PT – T-5 minutes until the earnings call is scheduled to begin. Now it’s just a matter of seeing if Tesla will start in Elon Time V1.0 or Elon Time V2.0.
15:15 PT – It is time once more for Tesla’s quarterly earnings report! It’s pretty amazing that they were able to end the first quarter with a profit. Imagine that. A profit. In the first quarter. With some of it being under a literal global pandemic. The Q1 2020 Update Letter is full of interesting details. Fasten your seatbelts, everyone. This will be very interesting.
Tesla $TSLA Q1 2020 results: Beats on revenue, Model Y sets historic profit on launch https://t.co/0Z5Ym5t4eh
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) April 29, 2020
Elon Musk
Tesla FSD in Europe vs. US: It’s not what you think
Tesla FSD is approved in the Netherlands, but the European version differs from what US drivers use.
On April 10, 2026, the Dutch vehicle authority RDW granted Tesla the first European type approval for Full Self-Driving Supervised, making the Netherlands the first country on the continent to authorize Tesla’s semi-autonomous system for customer use on public roads.
As Teslarati reported, the RDW approval followed 18 months of testing, more than 1.6 million kilometers driven on EU roads, 13,000 customer ride-alongs, and documentation covering over 400 compliance requirements. Tesla Europe had been running public demo drives through cities like Amsterdam and Eindhoven since early 2026, giving passengers their first experience of the system on European streets.
The European version of FSD is not the same software US drivers use. The RDW’s own statement is direct, noting that the software versions and functionalities in the US and Europe “are therefore not comparable one-to-one.” We’ve compile a table below that captures the most significant differences between US-based Tesla FSD vs. European Tesla FSD that’s based on what regulators and Tesla have publicly confirmed.
| Feature | FSD US | FSD Europe (Netherlands) |
| Regulatory framework | Self-certification, post-market oversight | Pre-market type approval required (UN R-171 + Article 39) |
| Hands requirement | Hands-off permitted on highway | Hands must be available to take over immediately |
| Auto turning from stop lights | Available — navigates intersections, turns, and traffic signals autonomously | Available in EU build — confirmed in Amsterdam demo footage handling unprotected turns and signalized intersections |
| Driving modes | Multiple profiles including a more aggressive “Mad Max” mode | EU build is more conservative by default and errs on the side of restraint when it cannot confirm the limit |
| Summon | Available — Smart Summon navigates parking lots to driver | Status unclear — not confirmed as part of the RDW-approved feature set; urban FSD approval targeted separately for 2027 |
| Driver monitoring | Camera-based eye tracking | Stricter continuous monitoring with more frequent intervention alerts |
| Software version | FSD v14.3 | EU-specific builds that must be separately validated by RDW |
| Geographic restriction | US, Canada, China, Mexico, Australia, NZ, South Korea | Netherlands only; EU-wide vote pending summer 2026 |
| Subscription price | $99/month | €99/month |
| Full urban FSD scope | Available | Partial — separate urban application planned for 2027 |
The approval comes as Tesla is under real pressure to grow FSD subscriptions globally. Musk’s 2025 CEO compensation package, approved by shareholders, includes a milestone requiring 10 million active FSD subscriptions as one condition for his stock awards to vest. Tesla hit one million subscriptions during its Q4 2025 earnings call, which is a meaningful start, but still a long way from the target. Opening Europe as a market for subscriptions, rather than just hardware sales, directly accelerates that number.
Tesla has said it anticipates EU-wide recognition of the Dutch approval during summer 2026, which would extend FSD access to Germany, France, and other major markets through a mutual recognition process without each country repeating the full 18-month review. That timeline is Tesla’s projection, not a confirmed regulatory outcome. As Musk acknowledged at Davos in January 2026, “We hope to get Supervised Full Self-Driving approval in Europe, hopefully next month.”
Elon Musk
Tesla Supercharger for Business exposes jaw-dropping ROI gap between best and worst locations
Tesla’s new Supercharger for Business calculator reveals an eye-opening all-in cost and location-based ROI projections.
Tesla has launched an online calculator for its Supercharger for Business program, giving property owners their first transparent look at what it really costs to install Superchargers on site and what kind of return they can expect.
The program itself launched in September 2025, allowing businesses to purchase and operate Supercharger hardware on their own property while Tesla handles installation, maintenance, software, and 24/7 driver support. As Teslarati reported at launch, hosts also get their logo placed on the chargers and their location integrated into Tesla’s in-car navigation, meaning drivers are actively routed there. The stalls are open to all EVs, not just Teslas.
We launched Supercharger for Business in 2025 to help companies get charging right. We found simplicity and transparency to be a problem in this industry.
We’re now sharing pricing and a financial calculator to help make informed decisions. The goal is to accelerate investments,…
— Tesla Charging (@TeslaCharging) April 8, 2026
The new online calculator, announced by Tesla on Wednesday with the note that “simplicity and transparency” have been a problem in the industry, lets any business enter a U.S. address and get a real cost and revenue model. A standard 8-stall V4 Supercharger site runs approximately $500,000 in hardware and $55,000 per post for installation, bringing an all-in price just shy of $1 million. Tesla charges a flat $0.10 per kWh fee to cover software, billing, and network operations. Businesses set their own retail price and keep the margin above that fee.
Taking a look at Tesla’s Supercharger for Business online calculator, we can see that ROI is not uniform, and the gap between a strong location and a poor one can stretch the breakeven point by several years.
The biggest driver is foot traffic and how long people stay. A busy rest station, hotel, or outlet mall brings in repeat visitors who need to charge while they’re already stopped, pushing utilization numbers higher and shortening payback time.
Tesla Supercharger for Business ROI calculator
Local electricity rates matter just as much on the cost side. Markets like California carry some of the highest commercial electricity rates in the country, which eats into the margin between what a host pays per kWh and what they charge drivers. At the same time, dense urban areas with high EV adoption tend to support higher retail charging prices, which can offset that cost if demand is strong enough. Weather also plays a role. Cold climates reduce battery efficiency and increase charging frequency, but they can also suppress utilization in winter months if drivers avoid stopping in exposed outdoor locations. Suburban and rural sites face a different problem: lower baseline EV traffic, which means a site with cheaper power and lower operating costs can still take longer to pay back simply because the stalls sit idle more often. Tesla’s calculator uses real fleet data to pre-fill utilization estimates by ZIP code, so businesses can run their specific address against these variables rather than relying on averages.
The program has seen real adoption. Wawa, already the largest host of Tesla Superchargers with over 2,100 stalls across 223 locations, opened its first fully owned and branded site in Alachua, Florida earlier this year. Francis Energy of Oklahoma and the city of Alpharetta, Georgia have also deployed branded stations through the program, as Teslarati covered in January.
Tesla now exceeds 80,000 Supercharger stalls worldwide, and the calculator makes the economic case for accelerating that number through private investment rather than company-owned sites alone.
Investor's Corner
Tesla stock gets hit with shock move from Wall Street analysts
Despite Tesla not being an automotive company exclusively, the Wall Street firms and analysts covering its shares are widely dialed in on its performance regarding quarterly deliveries. While it holds some importance, Tesla, from an internal perspective, is more focused on end-to-end AI, Robotaxi, self-driving, and its Optimus robot.
Tesla price targets (NASDAQ: TSLA) have received several cuts over the past few days as Wall Street firms are adjusting their forecast for the company’s stock following a miss in quarterly delivery figures for the first quarter.
Despite Tesla not being an automotive company exclusively, the Wall Street firms and analysts covering its shares are widely dialed in on its performance regarding quarterly deliveries. While it holds some importance, Tesla, from an internal perspective, is more focused on end-to-end AI, Robotaxi, self-driving, and its Optimus robot.
In a notable shift underscoring mounting caution on Wall Street, three prominent investment banks slashed their price targets on Tesla Inc. shares over the past two weeks following the electric-vehicle giant’s disappointing first-quarter 2026 delivery numbers. The revisions highlight softening EV sales figures and, according to some, execution challenges.
Tesla delivered 358,023 vehicles in the January-to-March period, a 14 percent sequential decline and a miss versus consensus forecasts of roughly 365,000 to 370,000 units.
Production hit 408,000 vehicles, yet the delivery shortfall, paired with limited updates on autonomous-driving progress and new-model timelines, rattled investors. Shares fell about 8.7 percent since April 1.
Wall Street analysts are now adjusting their forecasts accordingly, as several firms have made adjustments to price targets.
Goldman Sachs
Goldman Sachs cut its target from $405 to $375 while maintaining a Hold rating. Analyst Mark Delaney pointed to soft EV sales trends and margin pressures.
Truist Financial followed on April 2, lowering its target from $438 to $400 (Hold unchanged), with analyst William Stein citing misses in both auto deliveries and energy-storage deployments, plus a lack of fresh details on AI initiatives and upcoming vehicles.
It is a strange drop if using AI initiatives and upcoming vehicles as a justification is the primary focus here. Tesla has one of the most optimistic outlooks in terms of AI, and CEO Elon Musk recently hinted that the company is developing something for the U.S. market that will be good for families.
Baird
Baird’s Ben Kallo made a very modest trim, reducing its target from $548 to $538, keeping and maintaining the ‘Outperform’ rating it holds on shares. Kallo said the price target adjustment was a prudent recalibration tied to near-term risks.
Truist
Truist analyst William Stein pointed to deliveries and energy storage missing expectations, and cut his price target to $400 from $438. He maintained the ‘Hold’ rating the firm held on the stock previously.
JPMorgan
Adding to the bearish tone on Monday, April 6, JPMorgan’s Ryan Brinkman reiterated an Underweight (Sell) rating and $145 price target, implying roughly 60 percent downside from recent levels.
Brinkman highlighted a “record surge in unsold vehicles” that adds to free-cash-flow woes, with inventory swelling to an estimated 164,000 units.
Tesla’s comfort level taking risks makes the stock a ‘must own,’ firm says
He lowered his Q1 2026 EPS estimate to $0.30 from $0.43 and full-year 2026 EPS to $1.80 from $2.00, both below consensus. Brinkman noted that expectations for Tesla’s performance have “collapsed” across financial and operating metrics through the end of the decade, yet the stock has risen 50 percent, and average price targets have increased 32 percent.
This disconnect, he argued, prices in an unrealistic sharp pivot to stronger results beyond the decade, while near-term realities remain materially weaker.
He advised investors to approach TSLA shares with a “high degree of caution,” citing elevated execution risk, competition, and valuation concerns in lower-price, higher-volume segments.
The revisions have pulled the overall consensus lower. Aggregators show the average 12-month price target now ranging from approximately $394 to $416 across roughly 32 analysts, with a prevailing Hold rating and a mixed split of Buy, Hold, and Sell recommendations.
Brinkman’s $145 target stands as a notable outlier on the bearish side.
Not Everyone Has Turned Bearish on Tesla Shares
Not all firms turned more pessimistic. Wedbush Securities held its bullish $600 target, stressing that AI and full self-driving technology represent the core value drivers, with current delivery softness viewed as temporary.
These moves reflect a broader Wall Street recalibration: near-term EV demand faces pressure from high interest rates, intensifying competition, especially from lower-cost Chinese rivals, and slower adoption.
At the same time, many analysts continue to see Tesla’s technology leadership in software-defined vehicles, autonomy, robotaxis, and energy storage as pathways to outsized long-term gains once macro conditions ease and new models launch.
With Tesla’s first-quarter earnings report due later this month, upcoming details on cost discipline, Cybertruck ramp-up, and AI roadmaps will likely shape whether these target adjustments prove prescient or overly cautious. Investors remain divided between immediate delivery realities and the company’s ambitious vision.
Tesla shares are trading at $348.82 at the time of publishing.
The Starship V3 static fire everyone was waiting for just happened
Tesla Full Self-Driving shows stunning maneuver in Europe to silence skeptics
