Investor's Corner
Wall St’s reaction to Daimler’s reduced earnings guidance highlights critical eye on TSLA
German automaker Daimler AG had a pretty tough Monday. Following an announcement on Sunday that it is cutting its 2019 earnings guidance over the effects of an ongoing diesel emissions scandal at Mercedes-Benz, the company’s shares declined 3.6% in Frankfurt. The carmaker has noted that it is currently facing a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges related to the diesel scandal, which would likely result in its 2019 earnings being about the same as 2018’s.
Daimler’s diesel troubles were highlighted on Friday, when Germany’s vehicle authority, the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA), issued a forced recall against the automaker for allegedly using an illegal shut-off device for the diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz GLK 220. The KBA is looking to extend its investigation into the carmaker further, as the cheating devices were reportedly used in Daimler’s OM642 and OM651 engines, which are equipped in popular vehicles such as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class. The initial recall currently covers 60,000 units of the GLK, though the number could be as high as 700,000 vehicles if it covers other vehicles using the OM642 and OM651 engines, according to German publication Bild am Sonntag.
Apart from the KBA investigation in Germany, Daimler has noted in its first-quarter earnings release that it is facing an emissions probe by the US Justice Department. The company is also facing a consumer-class action lawsuit in the United States along with Bosch, one of its suppliers, for allegedly conspiring to deceive US regulators. These could prove to be a stumbling block for the company, particularly as it attempts to breach the premium electric vehicle market with the Mercedes-Benz EQC, which is expected to compete against EV veterans such as the Tesla Model X.
Amidst these recent headwinds, Wall St. analyst Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities noted in a statement to CNBC that Daimler currently needs to perform a “balancing act” as it attempts to weather these challenging times. “This really handcuffs them a bit. It’s going to be a balancing act, they really need to hold investor’s hands on this, and the question is ‘Can they navigate these headwinds?’ It’s an arms race in the electric vehicle world right now,” Ives said.
The Wedbush analyst’s reaction to the developments at Daimler is quite compelling. The automaker’s challenges today are serious, yet Ives’ comments were quite restrained. Considering that the automaker is facing another diesel emissions scandal and a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges that will result in reduced 2019 profits, the circumstances might very well handcuff Daimler more than “a bit.” Ives’ tempered response to the German automaker’s update ultimately stands in stark contrast with his reactions to Tesla. Following Tesla’s Q1 earnings call, which revealed yet another loss for the company, Ives practically bordered on the subjective, seemingly mocking Musk’s continued optimism in future quarters.
“We view this quarter as one of (the) top debacles we have ever seen, while Musk & Co., in an episode out of the Twilight Zone, act as if demand and profitability will magically return to the Tesla story. As such, we no longer can look investors in the eye and recommend buying this stock at current levels until Tesla starts to take its medicine and focus on (the) reality around demand issues which is the core focus of investors” Ives wrote in a note to Wedbush’s clients.
Following a leaked email from Elon Musk urging employees to cut costs, Ives also issued a note describing the electric car maker’s circumstances as a “code red situation,” adding that Tesla faces a “Kilimanjaro-like uphill climb” as it attempts to hit its profitability targets this 2019. Quite interestingly, Ives’ comments likely helped push TSLA stock down over 4% then, which was more than Daimler’s drop on Monday. It should be noted that none of these dramatic tones were present in Ives’ comments about the German automaker’s recent updates. This is quite ironic considering his colorful reactions to Tesla’s developments were rooted only in speculations, while Daimler’s current headwinds are the result of an actual investigation by Germany’s Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA).
During Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting, several TSLA shareholders brought up the issue of the negative narrative and misinformation surrounding the company. Elon Musk noted that these misconceptions are distressing, though he admitted that he is at a loss as to how to change the negative narrative surrounding Tesla. For the electric car maker, perhaps the best way to address all the skepticism is to simply hit its self-imposed, ambitious targets, such as delivering over 90,000 vehicles to customers this quarter, or reclaiming profitability in the second half of 2019.
Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of Tesla or Daimler, and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.
Elon Musk
SpaceX’s amended S-1 is sparking a major Tesla merger conversation
A single line in SpaceX’s amended S-1 just sent Tesla stock down 5% in one day.
A single line buried in SpaceX’s amended S-1 filing is doing more to move Tesla’s stock price than anything Tesla itself has announced in months. The clause, disclosed as SpaceX prepares for what could be the largest IPO in Wall Street history, states that the company “may issue a significant amount of equity in connection with future transactions.” While this may be seen as boilerplate language in S-1 filings, the historical ties between SpaceX and Tesla, and with Elon Musk reportedly discussing a possible merger with close colleagues, investors are interpreting it as something closer to a signal.
The concern among institutional investors like Gary Black, managing director of The Future Fund, pointed directly to the amended filing on X, saying it “strongly suggests more SPCX equity will be issued,” which could potentially be used to acquire Tesla. He estimated such a deal could be 28% dilutive to Tesla shareholders since SpaceX would likely command a significantly higher valuation multiple. Black added that institutional investors he knows hate the idea of a combination because they prefer pure plays over conglomerates, which he said “nearly always gravitate to the lowest common multiple.”
The Tesla and SpaceX merger everyone is talking about is quietly building
The bull case runs the math differently. Tesla influencer and retail shareholder advocate AleXandra Merz pushed back on what she called a widespread misunderstanding of how merger-of-equals deals actually work. Rather than simply splitting the difference between two market caps, a merger exchange ratio is negotiated based on relative fair market values, meaning the lower valued company typically sees its stock reprice upward toward the deal value.
Under her model, SpaceX enters at a $2.5 trillion valuation and Tesla at $1.6 trillion, producing a combined entity worth $4.1 trillion split evenly between both shareholder groups. That implies Tesla’s side of the deal would be valued at $2.05 trillion, a gain of roughly $450 billion from its current market cap. She cited Dow-DuPont and CBS-Viacom as historical examples of how markets reprice both companies toward the announced exchange ratio after a deal is unveiled.
What does a Merger of Equals mean to Elon’s compensation packages?
Well, it changes everything.
Enjoy https://t.co/uekCldyITw pic.twitter.com/kolq1C9qTu
— AleXandra Merz 🇺🇲 (@TeslaBoomerMama) June 1, 2026
The SpaceX S-1 amendments also revealed just how much financial infrastructure already binds the two companies together. As Teslarati has reported, SpaceX purchased $697 million in Tesla Megapacks, $131 million in Cybertrucks, and the two companies have shared supply chain resources, and semiconductor fabrication plans since well before any merger conversation became public. A retail poll by Tesla influencer Sawyer Merritt is finding that 36% of respondents do not plan to buy SpaceX shares at IPO and 15.3% saying their decision depends on the valuation.
Do you plan on buying @SpaceX stock at its IPO?
— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) June 1, 2026
Whether the merger happens or not, the amended filing is seemingly moving markets and sharpened a debate that is no longer theoretical. SpaceX is weeks away from trading publicly, and Tesla shareholders are now watching every word of every filing for clues about what Musk plans to do next.
Elon Musk has firmly denied recent media reports suggesting that SpaceX has reduced its target valuation for an upcoming initial public offering.
The denial came directly from the SpaceX and Tesla frontman on his social media platform X, where he responded with a single word, “False,” to a post from ZeroHedge that cited Bloomberg sources.
This swift rebuttal underscores Musk’s ongoing effort to manage speculation surrounding one of the most anticipated market debuts in recent history.
False
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 29, 2026
According to the disputed reports, SpaceX had lowered its IPO valuation goal to at least $1.8 trillion from previous ambitions exceeding $2 trillion.
The claims emerged amid growing anticipation for the company’s confidential S-1 filing, which positions it for a potential public listing as early as June.
Some had pointed to strong revenue growth, particularly from the Starlink satellite internet service, which contributed heavily to the firm’s 2025 figures of $18.7 billion. Yet challenges persist in other areas, including substantial investments and losses tied to ambitious projects like Starship development and artificial intelligence initiatives, which plan to make life multiplanetary eventually.
Musk’s response highlights a pattern in which he actively counters what he views as inaccurate portrayals of his companies’ trajectories.
SpaceX, already valued privately at extraordinary levels, stands as a cornerstone of Musk’s empire alongside Tesla and xAI. The entrepreneur has long emphasized the transformative potential of reusable rockets and global broadband access, factors that fuel investor enthusiasm despite operational hurdles.
By rejecting the valuation downgrade narrative, Musk signals confidence in SpaceX’s fundamentals and its readiness for public markets on terms favorable to its long-term vision. People have been waiting a very long time to invest in SpaceX, and the valuation, as well as the introductory share price, is not going to need adjusting.
They’ll have plenty of suitors.
This episode reflects broader dynamics in the technology sector, where rumors often swirl around high-profile entities. Musk’s direct engagement with media narratives serves to maintain transparency and control the narrative around his ventures.
As SpaceX prepares for greater scrutiny in public markets, the founder’s denial reinforces optimism about its prospects. Supporters argue that the company’s innovative edge positions it for enduring success, far beyond short-term valuation debates. With the denial now public, attention turns to forthcoming regulatory filings that could provide clearer insights into SpaceX’s strategy and financial health.
The coming weeks promise to reveal more about how SpaceX will transition into a publicly traded powerhouse.
Elon Musk
The Tesla and SpaceX merger everyone is talking about is quietly building
Tesla and SpaceX may be closer to merging than Wall Street or either company is admitting.
Elon Musk has reportedly discussed merging Tesla and SpaceX with people close to him, according to CNBC, which cited sources familiar with the conversation. Tesla employees have long expected such a transaction and the topic is openly discussed internally, according to internal sources. With SpaceX is days away from kicking off its Wall Street roadshow for what could be the largest IPO in market history, this would be the first time the company will have public market currency to execute a stock-for-stock deal with Tesla.
The financial logic for a merger would make sense. A combined SpaceX and Tesla would create a conglomerate spanning rockets, satellites, electric vehicles, AI infrastructure, and energy storage valued at roughly $3.35 trillion to $3.6 trillion based on SpaceX’s IPO target range and Tesla’s current market capitalization. The two companies are already more intertwined than most people realize. SpaceX bought $697 million worth of Tesla Megapack systems for xAI data centers and $131 million worth of Cybertrucks. Tesla invested $2 billion in xAI, which subsequently merged with SpaceX. Past transactions also include Tesla selling solar equipment and parts to SpaceX, and SpaceX helping with Cybertruck materials.
Will Tesla join the fold? Predicting a triple merger with SpaceX and xAI
Musk himself signaled where this was heading in November 2025 when he posted on X, “My companies are, surprisingly in some ways, trending towards convergence.” Tesla and SpaceX announced a joint semiconductor fabrication facility in Austin called Terafab on the Gigafactory Texas campus, covering two advanced chip factories, with one serving Tesla’s AI needs for vehicles and Optimus robots, the other targeting space-based data centers under SpaceX’s infrastructure vision.
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives places the probability of a merger at 80% to 90% with a target completion in the first half of 2027. The mechanics of a deal became possible the moment SpaceX filed its S-1. Legal experts said a merger likely would not spark antitrust issues but would raise concerns among shareholders in each company, with questions around which company would be the parent, how a stock swap would take place, and who determines the appropriate price. Musk holds about 20% of Tesla’s equity but controls 85.1% of SpaceX’s voting power through a super-voting share class, meaning he would largely be negotiating the terms with himself.
Not everyone is convinced the timing is imminent. Traders on Kalshi place only 33% odds that a merger will happen before May 2027. The more immediate concern for Tesla shareholders is whether the SpaceX IPO pulls capital and Musk’s attention away from Tesla before any merger consolidates the upside for both.
What is clear is that the structural groundwork is already being laid. The Terafab announcement, the xAI merger, the shared supply chain, the cross-company balance sheet transactions, and now the IPO all point in the same direction. Whether the merger follows in 2027 or later, the two companies are already operating more like divisions of a single entity than independent competitors.
Tesla improves Dashcam playback with awesome addition
Tesla Full Self-Driving attempts 150-mile stress test: the good and the bad
