Investor's Corner
Wall St’s reaction to Daimler’s reduced earnings guidance highlights critical eye on TSLA
German automaker Daimler AG had a pretty tough Monday. Following an announcement on Sunday that it is cutting its 2019 earnings guidance over the effects of an ongoing diesel emissions scandal at Mercedes-Benz, the company’s shares declined 3.6% in Frankfurt. The carmaker has noted that it is currently facing a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges related to the diesel scandal, which would likely result in its 2019 earnings being about the same as 2018’s.
Daimler’s diesel troubles were highlighted on Friday, when Germany’s vehicle authority, the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA), issued a forced recall against the automaker for allegedly using an illegal shut-off device for the diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz GLK 220. The KBA is looking to extend its investigation into the carmaker further, as the cheating devices were reportedly used in Daimler’s OM642 and OM651 engines, which are equipped in popular vehicles such as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class. The initial recall currently covers 60,000 units of the GLK, though the number could be as high as 700,000 vehicles if it covers other vehicles using the OM642 and OM651 engines, according to German publication Bild am Sonntag.
Apart from the KBA investigation in Germany, Daimler has noted in its first-quarter earnings release that it is facing an emissions probe by the US Justice Department. The company is also facing a consumer-class action lawsuit in the United States along with Bosch, one of its suppliers, for allegedly conspiring to deceive US regulators. These could prove to be a stumbling block for the company, particularly as it attempts to breach the premium electric vehicle market with the Mercedes-Benz EQC, which is expected to compete against EV veterans such as the Tesla Model X.
Amidst these recent headwinds, Wall St. analyst Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities noted in a statement to CNBC that Daimler currently needs to perform a “balancing act” as it attempts to weather these challenging times. “This really handcuffs them a bit. It’s going to be a balancing act, they really need to hold investor’s hands on this, and the question is ‘Can they navigate these headwinds?’ It’s an arms race in the electric vehicle world right now,” Ives said.
The Wedbush analyst’s reaction to the developments at Daimler is quite compelling. The automaker’s challenges today are serious, yet Ives’ comments were quite restrained. Considering that the automaker is facing another diesel emissions scandal and a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges that will result in reduced 2019 profits, the circumstances might very well handcuff Daimler more than “a bit.” Ives’ tempered response to the German automaker’s update ultimately stands in stark contrast with his reactions to Tesla. Following Tesla’s Q1 earnings call, which revealed yet another loss for the company, Ives practically bordered on the subjective, seemingly mocking Musk’s continued optimism in future quarters.
“We view this quarter as one of (the) top debacles we have ever seen, while Musk & Co., in an episode out of the Twilight Zone, act as if demand and profitability will magically return to the Tesla story. As such, we no longer can look investors in the eye and recommend buying this stock at current levels until Tesla starts to take its medicine and focus on (the) reality around demand issues which is the core focus of investors” Ives wrote in a note to Wedbush’s clients.
Following a leaked email from Elon Musk urging employees to cut costs, Ives also issued a note describing the electric car maker’s circumstances as a “code red situation,” adding that Tesla faces a “Kilimanjaro-like uphill climb” as it attempts to hit its profitability targets this 2019. Quite interestingly, Ives’ comments likely helped push TSLA stock down over 4% then, which was more than Daimler’s drop on Monday. It should be noted that none of these dramatic tones were present in Ives’ comments about the German automaker’s recent updates. This is quite ironic considering his colorful reactions to Tesla’s developments were rooted only in speculations, while Daimler’s current headwinds are the result of an actual investigation by Germany’s Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA).
During Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting, several TSLA shareholders brought up the issue of the negative narrative and misinformation surrounding the company. Elon Musk noted that these misconceptions are distressing, though he admitted that he is at a loss as to how to change the negative narrative surrounding Tesla. For the electric car maker, perhaps the best way to address all the skepticism is to simply hit its self-imposed, ambitious targets, such as delivering over 90,000 vehicles to customers this quarter, or reclaiming profitability in the second half of 2019.
Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of Tesla or Daimler, and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.
-
Elon Musk
The real reason Elon Musk wants every car connected to space
Elon Musk says all cars will eventually need Starlink to handle massive AI bandwidth demand.
Elon Musk is making the case that satellite internet, not fiber or cellular towers, will end up wired into every car on the road. In a string of posts on X, the SpaceX CEO wrote that all cars will have Starlink in the future and called satellite connectivity the only way to get super high bandwidth to billions of vehicles.
The posts started with Musk endorsing a Cloudflare forecast that traffic generated by autonomous AI agents will soon dwarf traffic generated by humans browsing the internet, a shift he described as not a close call at all. From there he narrowed the argument to infrastructure, writing that the only system that can support the insanely fast bandwidth growth needed by AI is Starlink, before extending the logic to cars specifically.
AI agentic Internet traffic will obviously VASTLY exceed human usage. Not a close call at all.
Cloudflare’s forecast is accurate. https://t.co/VztgrinN5k pic.twitter.com/Wo4FiRKjPU
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 9, 2026
The timing lines up with Tesla’s own hardware decisions. On July 20, Tesla confirmed the Cybercab would ship with a Starlink V5 terminal built into its roof, the first time the company had put satellite hardware in a production vehicle. A day later, Tesla’s head of AI, Ashok Elluswamy, explained the connection wasn’t there for safety and that Cybercab’s driving stack runs entirely on onboard cameras and compute, while the satellite link exists for navigation, customer service, and fleet management instead. Musk followed with his own post about the feature, saying riders would be able to watch 4K streaming video during rides.
By July 22, Musk had already said Starlink would extend beyond Cybercab to Tesla’s full lineup. Sunday’s posts push that same logic outward again, this time framed as a requirement across the industry rather than a feature specific to Tesla, and tied directly to the bandwidth AI systems are expected to consume.
SpaceX’s newest Starmind will make earth data centers obsolete
The AI argument has been building on SpaceX’s side for months. The company has an FCC filing pending for a third generation Starlink constellation, and it has separately proposed Starmind, a constellation of up to a million satellites designed to run AI computation directly in orbit rather than just relay data. Musk has said he expects space to become the cheapest place to deploy AI compute within two to three years. Starlink and Starmind serve different jobs inside that vision, one moving data and the other processing it, but Sunday’s posts treat vehicles as one more category of hardware that will eventually need both.
None of this changes anything for Tesla owners today. Cars already on the road keep running on LTE and Wi-Fi, and Tesla hasn’t outlined a retrofit path for existing vehicles. The July 22 commitment applies to future production, not the fleet already delivered. What Musk added on Sunday is the reasoning: satellite connectivity isn’t a Cybercab novelty, it’s a bet that ground based networks won’t keep up with how much data cars, robots, and AI systems are about to generate.
SpaceX stock did the opposite of what most of Wall Street expected this week, when the day designed to be its most dangerous turned into a rally, and the rally kept going.
Thursday marked the first major lockup expiration since SpaceX’s June IPO, making roughly 911.5 million insider held shares eligible to trade for the first time, more than doubling the company’s public float. Analysts and short sellers had spent weeks bracing for a flood of selling, especially after the stock fell 13 percent following its first earnings report as a public company on Tuesday. Instead, shares rose 6.1 percent Thursday to close at $114.92, and by Friday they were trading near $129, up more than another 12 percent on the day.
SpaceX shorts get warned by Musk ally, echoing Tesla’s early struggles
The setup made the outcome notable. Short interest had climbed to roughly 34 percent of the float heading into earnings, among the highest of any large cap stock, with about 95 percent of available shares to borrow already on loan. CEO Elon Musk warned short sellers twice in the weeks before the lockup, writing on X that “the survival probability of firms who maintain a significant short position in SpaceX over time is very low,” then following up on the morning of earnings with “I try to warn them, but they just double down.”
When the newly unlocked shares hit the market and the selloff never showed up, some of that short position appears to have started unwinding. TipRanks reported that options activity shifted toward bullish strategies like put selling and risk reversals following the rally, with roughly $600 million in options premium trading Thursday alone. Retail buyers also stepped in during the earnings dip, according to Vanda Research.
The fundamentals behind the stock have not changed much in a week. SpaceX’s revenue nearly doubled year over year to $7.8 billion, with Starlink subscribers doubling to 12 million and the company’s AI segment growing 247 percent. What spooked investors on Tuesday was the spending side. Capital expenditures jumped to more than $18 billion for the quarter, up from $2.8 billion a year earlier, with AI investment alone rising from $749 million to $15.8 billion. Wall Street remains split on whether that spending is building infrastructure SpaceX needs or outrunning what the business can currently support, a debate Teslarati has tracked since shares first came under pressure.
None of that resolves the bigger question hanging over the stock. Thursday’s release was only the first of nine staggered lockup tranches, with roughly $800 billion worth of additional shares scheduled to become eligible through October, and Musk’s own stake stays locked until next June. If this week is any indication, the market is treating that supply as something it can absorb rather than something to fear, at least for now.
Cybertruck
Tesla Cybertruck production snaps back after ugly supplier fight
Cybertrucks are piling up again at Giga Texas after Tesla’s court win against a parts supplier.
Cybertruck production at Giga Texas is showing its first visible recovery since Tesla sued a supplier last month over withheld manufacturing tooling.
Aerial observer Joe Tegtmeyer flew over the Austin factory Wednesday morning and counted roughly 100 or more Cybertrucks filling the outbound lot, a sharp jump from the thin numbers seen in recent weeks. The flyover came a day after a judge granted Tesla a temporary restraining order against Angstrom Automotive Group, the parts supplier at the center of the dispute.
Tesla filed an emergency lawsuit in late July after Angstrom told the automaker it planned to close the Troy, Texas facility where Tesla’s die-cast tools, trim dies and other Cybertruck stamping equipment were housed. According to Tesla’s complaint, a shipment of 700 finished parts never left the building, and when Tesla sent representatives to retrieve its equipment, accompanied by law enforcement, they were turned away. Angstrom allegedly then asked for an extra $250,000 a week to keep operating, which Tesla’s filing described as holding its own property for ransom.
TESLA: U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Wolfe of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division granted Tesla a Temporary Restraining Order and Writ of Replevin in its dispute with Angstrom Automotive (Case No. 6:26-cv-00477).
The order authorizes… https://t.co/E1DKcQSxMn pic.twitter.com/LR8aAiV2Og
— S.E. Robinson, Jr. (@SERobinsonJr) August 5, 2026
The restraining order gives Tesla immediate right of entry to Angstrom’s facility to recover the tooling. It is temporary, with a fuller hearing still to come, but the speed of Wednesday’s rebound suggests the Angstrom shortage was indeed the main bottleneck limiting Cybertruck output. Outbound lot counts are an imperfect measure of actual production, since finished trucks can sit for days before shipping, but a lot that full after a lean stretch is a meaningful signal.
Cybertruck output at Giga Texas has fluctuated all year as Tesla worked through supply issues and introduced new trims, including a cheaper Dual Motor AWD version that drew strong early demand.
The real reason Elon Musk wants every car connected to space
Inside Tesla’s secretive $10 Billion “Project Crystal Sun” filing
