Investor's Corner
Wall St’s reaction to Daimler’s reduced earnings guidance highlights critical eye on TSLA
German automaker Daimler AG had a pretty tough Monday. Following an announcement on Sunday that it is cutting its 2019 earnings guidance over the effects of an ongoing diesel emissions scandal at Mercedes-Benz, the company’s shares declined 3.6% in Frankfurt. The carmaker has noted that it is currently facing a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges related to the diesel scandal, which would likely result in its 2019 earnings being about the same as 2018’s.
Daimler’s diesel troubles were highlighted on Friday, when Germany’s vehicle authority, the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA), issued a forced recall against the automaker for allegedly using an illegal shut-off device for the diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz GLK 220. The KBA is looking to extend its investigation into the carmaker further, as the cheating devices were reportedly used in Daimler’s OM642 and OM651 engines, which are equipped in popular vehicles such as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class. The initial recall currently covers 60,000 units of the GLK, though the number could be as high as 700,000 vehicles if it covers other vehicles using the OM642 and OM651 engines, according to German publication Bild am Sonntag.
Apart from the KBA investigation in Germany, Daimler has noted in its first-quarter earnings release that it is facing an emissions probe by the US Justice Department. The company is also facing a consumer-class action lawsuit in the United States along with Bosch, one of its suppliers, for allegedly conspiring to deceive US regulators. These could prove to be a stumbling block for the company, particularly as it attempts to breach the premium electric vehicle market with the Mercedes-Benz EQC, which is expected to compete against EV veterans such as the Tesla Model X.
Amidst these recent headwinds, Wall St. analyst Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities noted in a statement to CNBC that Daimler currently needs to perform a “balancing act” as it attempts to weather these challenging times. “This really handcuffs them a bit. It’s going to be a balancing act, they really need to hold investor’s hands on this, and the question is ‘Can they navigate these headwinds?’ It’s an arms race in the electric vehicle world right now,” Ives said.
The Wedbush analyst’s reaction to the developments at Daimler is quite compelling. The automaker’s challenges today are serious, yet Ives’ comments were quite restrained. Considering that the automaker is facing another diesel emissions scandal and a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges that will result in reduced 2019 profits, the circumstances might very well handcuff Daimler more than “a bit.” Ives’ tempered response to the German automaker’s update ultimately stands in stark contrast with his reactions to Tesla. Following Tesla’s Q1 earnings call, which revealed yet another loss for the company, Ives practically bordered on the subjective, seemingly mocking Musk’s continued optimism in future quarters.
“We view this quarter as one of (the) top debacles we have ever seen, while Musk & Co., in an episode out of the Twilight Zone, act as if demand and profitability will magically return to the Tesla story. As such, we no longer can look investors in the eye and recommend buying this stock at current levels until Tesla starts to take its medicine and focus on (the) reality around demand issues which is the core focus of investors” Ives wrote in a note to Wedbush’s clients.
Following a leaked email from Elon Musk urging employees to cut costs, Ives also issued a note describing the electric car maker’s circumstances as a “code red situation,” adding that Tesla faces a “Kilimanjaro-like uphill climb” as it attempts to hit its profitability targets this 2019. Quite interestingly, Ives’ comments likely helped push TSLA stock down over 4% then, which was more than Daimler’s drop on Monday. It should be noted that none of these dramatic tones were present in Ives’ comments about the German automaker’s recent updates. This is quite ironic considering his colorful reactions to Tesla’s developments were rooted only in speculations, while Daimler’s current headwinds are the result of an actual investigation by Germany’s Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA).
During Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting, several TSLA shareholders brought up the issue of the negative narrative and misinformation surrounding the company. Elon Musk noted that these misconceptions are distressing, though he admitted that he is at a loss as to how to change the negative narrative surrounding Tesla. For the electric car maker, perhaps the best way to address all the skepticism is to simply hit its self-imposed, ambitious targets, such as delivering over 90,000 vehicles to customers this quarter, or reclaiming profitability in the second half of 2019.
Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of Tesla or Daimler, and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.
Investor's Corner
Tesla’s flying Roadster just revealed something bigger than the car
Analysts say the Roadster demo puts a Tesla and SpaceX merger back on the table.
The Roadster unveiling near Waco ended Thursday night, and by Friday morning much of the investor reaction had less to do with the car than with who owns the rocket technology inside it.
Wedbush analyst Dan Ives said the event “puts the Tesla/SpaceX relationship on the table in a tangible way,” pointing to the propulsion, pressure vessel and control hardware sitting on a Tesla product. Gene Munster of Deepwater Asset Management called the demo “a ridiculous display of engineering” with “no commercial value” beyond embarrassing traditional automakers, though he said it showed Musk wants the two companies together.
The more specific forecast came a day earlier from Barclays. Analyst Dan Levy told clients a deal could be announced before Tesla’s annual meeting, which must happen by December 6, and that an announcement in late October or early November could make shareholder approval harder. Barclays expects SpaceX to be the buyer in an all stock deal, with Tesla holders receiving SpaceX shares at a premium, based on market values of roughly $2.1 trillion for SpaceX and $1.5 trillion for Tesla. If nothing lands around the meeting, the bank still sees an announcement within 6 to 12 months.
The Roadster demo just added more weight to merger speculations. Tesla’s demo used cold gas thrusters and pressure tanks of the kind SpaceX uses on Falcon 9, and Musk described the car as a collaboration between Tesla and SpaceX engineers, as we mentioned in our breakdown of the three Roadster configurations.
Musk has not publicly addressed a deal since the event, as far as we have seen. His most direct answer remains the one he gave at the All In Summit, when he said that with so much collaboration, “who can imagine what action one might take” without ruling anything out. Ives has held to a 2027 timeline since his March note, and Musk pushed back on the China piece of the speculation when ARK floated a year end announcement in August.
The next test is Tesla’s third quarter earnings call on October 21. However, we recall in July that Musk told analysts, “we can’t talk about combining companies and that kind of thing on an earnings call,” so a clear answer wouldn’t be expected.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk breaks his silence on the Starlink impact to Ukraine drones
Musk says the US military and president set Starshield limits, not SpaceX, amid Ukraine complaints.
Elon Musk says the speed limit cutting out Ukraine’s military Starlink terminals is not SpaceX’s decision. In a post on X Wednesday, Musk wrote that “Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.” He added that Starlink is a commercial service limited to civilian or defensive activities and “cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.”
He was replying to Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s former defense minister, who had thanked Musk for restoring connectivity at speeds up to 160 km/h and said removing the Starshield limit entirely is “now critical for Ukraine’s defense.”
Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.
Starlink is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX. Usage of Starlink is limited to civilian or defensive activities and cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) October 14, 2026
The complaint started Tuesday night, when Ukrainian officials said military terminals began losing service above roughly 100 mph. Presidential adviser Serhiy Beskrestnov said the defense forces got no warning and several missions were disrupted, as Teslarati reported earlier Wednesday. The 7th Rapid Reaction Corps told Reuters connections dropped for 10 to 20 seconds at speeds well below the limit, which made drones harder to control. Poland’s foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, asked Musk on X whether he is “playing politics with your products again.”
That is why the Starlink and Starshield distinction matters. SpaceX introduced Starshield in 2022 as the government version of Starlink, with an initial focus on Earth observation, communications and hosted payloads. It won a Space Force contract in 2023 with a $70 million ceiling. In December 2024, the Pentagon moved Ukraine’s terminals onto Starshield, covering about 3,000 units across two contracts. Ukraine’s military connections therefore run through a service that Musk now says sits under Washington’s control.
While Musk’s post describes who holds authority, it does not infer that anyone ordered the limit, and neither SpaceX nor the US government has confirmed who set it. Ukrainian officials have pointed to the timing, which follows President Trump’s push for an energy ceasefire and Musk’s Saturday post that “Zelensky has gone too far.” The BBC noted Trump denied threatening to restrict intelligence sharing with Kyiv, and no evidence has been presented that Washington requested the cap.
The episode also revives a promise from 2025. After Poland accused him of threatening Ukraine’s access, Musk said Starlink “will never turn off its terminals” and would not be used as a bargaining chip. Poland has since supplied more than 29,000 terminals to Ukraine. Teslarati also covered Kyiv’s search for Starlink alternatives in 2025, and the latest dispute gives that search new urgency.
Investor's Corner
Tesla opens the Q&A for its biggest earnings call yet
Tesla opens its Q3 earnings Q&A, and Cybercab, Robotaxi, Optimus and regulators loom over October 21.
Tesla has opened its shareholder question portal for the Q3 2026 earnings call, with the Say Q&A page already listing questions. Investors have until 4:00 p.m. EDT on October 20 to submit and vote on what management should answer.
The call is set for Wednesday, October 21. Tesla will post results after the market closes, with a live webcast at 4:30 p.m. CT, or 5:30 p.m. ET, through its investor relations site.
Say ranks questions by the number of shares behind the votes, which gives institutional holders extra weight over the retail crowd.
Ahead of Q2, retail investors asked why Robotaxi growth had stalled, when Cybercab would start customer rides, and where the Optimus Gen 3 ramp stood, while an institutional holder asked how Tesla and SpaceX would split Terafab duties. Cybercab has since answered one of those. Tesla said last week it has 300 plus Cybercabs serving Austin, up eightfold in 30 days, with Dallas named as the next city. The questions now are likely to move from when to how fast.
There is also a regulatory question hanging over the call. NHTSA has demanded sworn answers on how the pedal free Cybercab was certified against federal safety standards, with responses due October 30, nine days after the call. Whether an analyst raises it live is unknown, but it is the kind of exposure that tends to find its way into a Q&A.
The numbers will not be the main draw. Tesla already reported 486,532 deliveries and 13.7 GWh of storage for the quarter. Consensus sits around 43 to 45 cents per share on roughly $27.8 billion in revenue, according to Zacks, after a Q2 report that missed on EPS. Goldman Sachs, which holds a Neutral rating and a $360 target, argues the outlook for Robotaxi, FSD and Optimus will matter more to the stock than the quarter itself.
The call also lands six days after the rescheduled Roadster event, which Tesla will stream on X on Thursday, October 15, at 7:55 p.m. CT. If the Roadster shows up with a production date or a SpaceX thruster package, expect it to climb the voting list before the deadline.
Tesla’s flying Roadster just revealed something bigger than the car
How Tesla’s Roadster fan system and thrusters are built to dominate the corners
Tesla Roadster: Three configs, one can fly, 0-60 in 0.8 seconds
SpaceX reveals how its 1 Million AI satellite network will work and prevent space collisions
Elon Musk’s Boring Company lands a new Middle East deal, and Nashville is about to get faster
