Investor's Corner
Wall St’s reaction to Daimler’s reduced earnings guidance highlights critical eye on TSLA
German automaker Daimler AG had a pretty tough Monday. Following an announcement on Sunday that it is cutting its 2019 earnings guidance over the effects of an ongoing diesel emissions scandal at Mercedes-Benz, the company’s shares declined 3.6% in Frankfurt. The carmaker has noted that it is currently facing a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges related to the diesel scandal, which would likely result in its 2019 earnings being about the same as 2018’s.
Daimler’s diesel troubles were highlighted on Friday, when Germany’s vehicle authority, the Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA), issued a forced recall against the automaker for allegedly using an illegal shut-off device for the diesel-powered Mercedes-Benz GLK 220. The KBA is looking to extend its investigation into the carmaker further, as the cheating devices were reportedly used in Daimler’s OM642 and OM651 engines, which are equipped in popular vehicles such as the Mercedes-Benz C-Class and E-Class. The initial recall currently covers 60,000 units of the GLK, though the number could be as high as 700,000 vehicles if it covers other vehicles using the OM642 and OM651 engines, according to German publication Bild am Sonntag.
Apart from the KBA investigation in Germany, Daimler has noted in its first-quarter earnings release that it is facing an emissions probe by the US Justice Department. The company is also facing a consumer-class action lawsuit in the United States along with Bosch, one of its suppliers, for allegedly conspiring to deceive US regulators. These could prove to be a stumbling block for the company, particularly as it attempts to breach the premium electric vehicle market with the Mercedes-Benz EQC, which is expected to compete against EV veterans such as the Tesla Model X.
Amidst these recent headwinds, Wall St. analyst Dan Ives from Wedbush Securities noted in a statement to CNBC that Daimler currently needs to perform a “balancing act” as it attempts to weather these challenging times. “This really handcuffs them a bit. It’s going to be a balancing act, they really need to hold investor’s hands on this, and the question is ‘Can they navigate these headwinds?’ It’s an arms race in the electric vehicle world right now,” Ives said.
The Wedbush analyst’s reaction to the developments at Daimler is quite compelling. The automaker’s challenges today are serious, yet Ives’ comments were quite restrained. Considering that the automaker is facing another diesel emissions scandal and a “high three-digit million” euro increase in charges that will result in reduced 2019 profits, the circumstances might very well handcuff Daimler more than “a bit.” Ives’ tempered response to the German automaker’s update ultimately stands in stark contrast with his reactions to Tesla. Following Tesla’s Q1 earnings call, which revealed yet another loss for the company, Ives practically bordered on the subjective, seemingly mocking Musk’s continued optimism in future quarters.
“We view this quarter as one of (the) top debacles we have ever seen, while Musk & Co., in an episode out of the Twilight Zone, act as if demand and profitability will magically return to the Tesla story. As such, we no longer can look investors in the eye and recommend buying this stock at current levels until Tesla starts to take its medicine and focus on (the) reality around demand issues which is the core focus of investors” Ives wrote in a note to Wedbush’s clients.
Following a leaked email from Elon Musk urging employees to cut costs, Ives also issued a note describing the electric car maker’s circumstances as a “code red situation,” adding that Tesla faces a “Kilimanjaro-like uphill climb” as it attempts to hit its profitability targets this 2019. Quite interestingly, Ives’ comments likely helped push TSLA stock down over 4% then, which was more than Daimler’s drop on Monday. It should be noted that none of these dramatic tones were present in Ives’ comments about the German automaker’s recent updates. This is quite ironic considering his colorful reactions to Tesla’s developments were rooted only in speculations, while Daimler’s current headwinds are the result of an actual investigation by Germany’s Federal Motor Transport Authority (KBA).
During Tesla’s annual shareholder meeting, several TSLA shareholders brought up the issue of the negative narrative and misinformation surrounding the company. Elon Musk noted that these misconceptions are distressing, though he admitted that he is at a loss as to how to change the negative narrative surrounding Tesla. For the electric car maker, perhaps the best way to address all the skepticism is to simply hit its self-imposed, ambitious targets, such as delivering over 90,000 vehicles to customers this quarter, or reclaiming profitability in the second half of 2019.
Disclosure: I have no ownership in shares of Tesla or Daimler, and have no plans to initiate any positions within 72 hours.
-
SpaceX stock did the opposite of what most of Wall Street expected this week, when the day designed to be its most dangerous turned into a rally, and the rally kept going.
Thursday marked the first major lockup expiration since SpaceX’s June IPO, making roughly 911.5 million insider held shares eligible to trade for the first time, more than doubling the company’s public float. Analysts and short sellers had spent weeks bracing for a flood of selling, especially after the stock fell 13 percent following its first earnings report as a public company on Tuesday. Instead, shares rose 6.1 percent Thursday to close at $114.92, and by Friday they were trading near $129, up more than another 12 percent on the day.
SpaceX shorts get warned by Musk ally, echoing Tesla’s early struggles
The setup made the outcome notable. Short interest had climbed to roughly 34 percent of the float heading into earnings, among the highest of any large cap stock, with about 95 percent of available shares to borrow already on loan. CEO Elon Musk warned short sellers twice in the weeks before the lockup, writing on X that “the survival probability of firms who maintain a significant short position in SpaceX over time is very low,” then following up on the morning of earnings with “I try to warn them, but they just double down.”
When the newly unlocked shares hit the market and the selloff never showed up, some of that short position appears to have started unwinding. TipRanks reported that options activity shifted toward bullish strategies like put selling and risk reversals following the rally, with roughly $600 million in options premium trading Thursday alone. Retail buyers also stepped in during the earnings dip, according to Vanda Research.
The fundamentals behind the stock have not changed much in a week. SpaceX’s revenue nearly doubled year over year to $7.8 billion, with Starlink subscribers doubling to 12 million and the company’s AI segment growing 247 percent. What spooked investors on Tuesday was the spending side. Capital expenditures jumped to more than $18 billion for the quarter, up from $2.8 billion a year earlier, with AI investment alone rising from $749 million to $15.8 billion. Wall Street remains split on whether that spending is building infrastructure SpaceX needs or outrunning what the business can currently support, a debate Teslarati has tracked since shares first came under pressure.
None of that resolves the bigger question hanging over the stock. Thursday’s release was only the first of nine staggered lockup tranches, with roughly $800 billion worth of additional shares scheduled to become eligible through October, and Musk’s own stake stays locked until next June. If this week is any indication, the market is treating that supply as something it can absorb rather than something to fear, at least for now.
Cybertruck
Tesla Cybertruck production snaps back after ugly supplier fight
Cybertrucks are piling up again at Giga Texas after Tesla’s court win against a parts supplier.
Cybertruck production at Giga Texas is showing its first visible recovery since Tesla sued a supplier last month over withheld manufacturing tooling.
Aerial observer Joe Tegtmeyer flew over the Austin factory Wednesday morning and counted roughly 100 or more Cybertrucks filling the outbound lot, a sharp jump from the thin numbers seen in recent weeks. The flyover came a day after a judge granted Tesla a temporary restraining order against Angstrom Automotive Group, the parts supplier at the center of the dispute.
Tesla filed an emergency lawsuit in late July after Angstrom told the automaker it planned to close the Troy, Texas facility where Tesla’s die-cast tools, trim dies and other Cybertruck stamping equipment were housed. According to Tesla’s complaint, a shipment of 700 finished parts never left the building, and when Tesla sent representatives to retrieve its equipment, accompanied by law enforcement, they were turned away. Angstrom allegedly then asked for an extra $250,000 a week to keep operating, which Tesla’s filing described as holding its own property for ransom.
TESLA: U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Wolfe of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division granted Tesla a Temporary Restraining Order and Writ of Replevin in its dispute with Angstrom Automotive (Case No. 6:26-cv-00477).
The order authorizes… https://t.co/E1DKcQSxMn pic.twitter.com/LR8aAiV2Og
— S.E. Robinson, Jr. (@SERobinsonJr) August 5, 2026
The restraining order gives Tesla immediate right of entry to Angstrom’s facility to recover the tooling. It is temporary, with a fuller hearing still to come, but the speed of Wednesday’s rebound suggests the Angstrom shortage was indeed the main bottleneck limiting Cybertruck output. Outbound lot counts are an imperfect measure of actual production, since finished trucks can sit for days before shipping, but a lot that full after a lean stretch is a meaningful signal.
Cybertruck output at Giga Texas has fluctuated all year as Tesla worked through supply issues and introduced new trims, including a cheaper Dual Motor AWD version that drew strong early demand.
Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has cautioned investors shorting SpaceX shares, drawing a direct parallel to the intense short-selling pressure Tesla faced in its early public years.
Responding to reports of elevated short interest in the newly public rocket, satellite, and AI company, Palihapitiya noted that similar dynamics played out with Tesla, where aggressive short sellers ultimately “went broke.”
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) went public on June 12, 2026, in the largest IPO on record, pricing at $135 per share. Shares quickly surged to an all-time high of $225.64 just days later, briefly implying a valuation exceeding $2 trillion. The stock has since retreated sharply amid valuation concerns, lockup expiration fears, and broader market dynamics.
By early August, it traded near $108–$125, representing a roughly 50 percent decline from the peak and bringing the market capitalization closer to the $1.5–1.7 trillion range. On August 4, shares closed up more than 9 percent at $125.33 ahead of earnings before facing pressure in after-hours and premarket trading.
Short interest has climbed dramatically. According to S3 Partners data widely cited in market reports, short positions reached approximately 219.3 million shares by late July, about 34 percent of the limited public float of roughly 640 million shares, and represented a notional value of around $24.6 billion.
Utilization of shares available to borrow hit 95 percent, with borrow fees rising. This level of shorting exceeded the dollar value of short bets against Tesla at the time and built rapidly ahead of two catalysts: the company’s first post-IPO earnings and an August 6 lockup expiration that could free up to 911.5 million additional shares.
CEO Elon Musk has issued warnings of his own. In mid-July, as short interest approached one-third of the float, he posted that “the survival probability of firms who maintain a significant short position in SpaceX over time is very low,” reiterating his view that the company could ultimately be worth more than Earth if it achieves its goals.
On August 4, just before earnings, Musk responded to the latest short-interest data by saying, “I try to warn them, but they just double down.”
SpaceX delivered its first quarterly results as a public company after the close on August 4. Second-quarter revenue rose 92 percent year-over-year to $7.8 billion, beating consensus estimates near $6.8–6.9 billion.
The net loss narrowed to $541 million, or 9 cents per share, better than the roughly 23–24 cent loss expected. Starlink/connectivity contributed about $4.3 billion (up 66 percent), while the AI business generated $2.6 billion (up roughly 250 percent). Capital expenditures were heavy at $18.4 billion, largely tied to AI infrastructure. Management projected a $100 billion annualized revenue run rate by year-end 2026 and outlined a path toward $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030.
The combination of Chamath’s historical reminder, Musk’s repeated alerts, and the company’s ambitious growth targets underscores the high-stakes debate surrounding SPCX. Short sellers are positioned for near-term supply pressure from the lockup, while long-term bulls point to Starlink scale, Starship progress, and AI compute expansion as reasons the bears may ultimately face the same fate as many early Tesla skeptics.
The Boring Company’s newest tunnel vehicle runs on Tesla parts and no one is driving it
Elon Musk and SpaceX shrugs off the trading day Wall Street feared most
