A few days ago, the Texas Public Utility Commission (PUC) said that it was creating a memo to address issues that Commissioner McAdams touched upon in the July 11 workshop. To recap, Tesla Energy has been working with the PUC and the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT).
The focus is on educating the utility and the commission about the benefits of allowing Tesla Powerwall customers in Texas to participate in virtual power plants (VPPs).
Tesla’s U.S. Energy Markets Policy Lead, Arushi Sharma Frank has been present at every meeting and has been working diligently to advocate for clean energy and Tesla Energy’s Texas customers.
The Memo
The previously mentioned future memo addresses some of the issues that Commissioner McAdams brought up in the July 11 workshop. He and Commissioner Glotfelty co-authored the memo.
The memo reads as follows:
As discussed during the June 16, 2022, Open Meeting and July 11, 2022, Aggregated Distributed Energy Resources (DER) Pilot Workshop, we support efforts to create a pilot project to test impacts of small-scale DER aggregation in the ERCOT market.
The pilot will answer questions related to how aggregated distributed generation can support reliability, enhance the wholesale market, incentivize investment, potentially reduce transmission and distribution investments, and support better load management during emergencies.
-
In the short term, we expect the pilot will bring in vital megawatts (MWs) of resources for participation in the ERCOT market.
ERCOT staff are required to prepare and present a governing document detailing the project scope to ERCOT’s board of directors.
The PUC will form a Task Force to identify operational obstacles to launching a pilot program and to assist ERCOT in drafting the governing document.
The next meeting to discuss the purpose and structure of the Task Force will be held on July 28, 2022. The governing document should be presented to the ERCOT board by October 11, 2022, so that it can meet a desired pilot start in the first quarter of 2023.
The Guiding Principles
The memo included five guiding principles that the commissioners want the pilot project to consider. They are:
- Understand the impact of having ancillary services carried on the distribution system.
- Create a structure that incentivizes competition and attracts broad DER participation through load-serving entities (LSEs).
- Measure the impacts of relieving or causing congestion on the distribution system, and study how to transition distribution-level aggregations to more granular dispatch and settlement.
- Ensure adequate customer protection is in place and information is anonymized.
- Start simple while ensuring economies of scale exist on a MW [megawatt] basis to attract broad participation. The pilot parameters should have the flexibility to progress to more complex scenarios as participation increases.
Project Scope.
This next section of the memo addresses the governing document that shares the project scope with ERCOT’s board of directors. These topics are scale, duration, transmission and distribution utilities participation, interchange of customers, and reliability.
-
The following is from the memo detailing each topic:
- Scale – Aggregations should be constrained within a load zone, with a single LSE, and served by the same transmission and distribution service provider (TDSP) with the potential for DER Management Systems (DERMS) aggregators to participate in the future. Participating TDSPs may limit pilot area based on feeder availability and information provided by LSEs related to their DER customers.
- Duration – The pilot should continue until implementation of ERCOT market rules to accommodate aggregation or until ERCOT deems the pilot project unnecessary. We expect a minimum of 3 years which will allow for incorporation of EMS upgrades, testing of customer migration, and qualifying resources for ERCOT services.
- TDSP Participation – It is imperative that competitive area transmission and distribution utilities (TDUs) and non-opt-in entities (NOIEs) participating in the pilot are willing participants and actively engaged to ensure safety and quality of experience to their customers. We expect reliability to be the ultimate consideration by TDSPs for qualifying DER customers.
- Interchange of Customers – The acquisition of customers should be handled by the LSE with terms and conditions to provide relevant operational data and a good customer experience that prioritizes affordability and reliability.
- Reliability – TDSPs should have the ability to manage participation considering system constraints, regular maintenance, and emergency situations. ERCOT in participation with the TDSPs shall be enabled to mitigate operational hazards and demands in this new era of transmission and distribution management.
You can read the full memo here. Have tips? You can email them to johnna@teslarati.com.
Tesla Energy has introduced the Powerwall Lease in conjunction with Tesla Electric, making the service available in Texas. This new option delivers whole-home backup power using two Powerwall units for a net monthly cost of $35 after credits, accompanied by a low fixed electricity rate.
Under the lease terms, customers pay a one-time order fee of $100. The base lease payment for the two Powerwalls is approximately $122 per month during the first year, subject to a 3 percent annual escalator thereafter. Enrollment in a qualifying Tesla Electric Backup plan or Virtual Power Plant plan provides an $87 monthly credit.
Powerwall Lease is now available with Tesla Electric in Texas
Whole-home backup for $35/month, with a low fixed electricity rate
– Two Powerwalls, $0 installation
– Storm Watch outage protection
– One app to manage it all pic.twitter.com/oTzqc6K3aF— Tesla Energy (@teslaenergy) August 13, 2026
This credit lowers the effective cost to roughly $35 per month plus applicable tax.
-
Installation of the standard system carries no additional charge. The package features Storm Watch for outage protection and allows complete management through a single Tesla application. The system supplies continuous whole-home backup capability.
The Powerwall system enables households to maintain electricity during severe storms that disrupt the utility grid. When outages occur, the batteries automatically provide seamless backup power to the home.
Tesla announces 100k Powerwalls are participating in Virtual Power Plants
Tesla Storm Watch monitors weather forecasts and ensures the units are fully charged ahead of anticipated severe weather events so that power remains available throughout the disruption, keeping lights, refrigeration, and other essential systems operating without interruption.
Availability is restricted to select Texas locations where retail electric choice exists. Participants must lease exactly two Powerwall units and maintain continuous enrollment with Tesla Electric. Solar panels cannot be included under this particular lease arrangement.
The monthly credit activates automatically once the system is installed, receives permission to operate, and enrollment is confirmed. To retain the credit, customers are required to stay enrolled in Tesla Electric and fulfill all program conditions.
Nonstandard installations that involve electrical upgrades or special permitting may lead to extra expenses and might impact eligibility for the credit, so be sure to check with either your installer or Tesla to ensure you will still qualify.
-
Elon Musk
Inside Tesla’s secretive $10 Billion “Project Crystal Sun” filing
Tesla filed for a $10.1 billion Fort Bend solar factory, but the site isn’t confirmed.
Tesla has filed paperwork in Texas for a second massive manufacturing project in the same week it locked down its chip fabrication site, this time for a $10.1 billion solar cell plant in Fort Bend County. The filing, submitted July 22 under the state’s Jobs, Energy, Technology and Innovation Act and first surfaced by Sawyer Merritt on X, lists an internal project name of “Project Crystal Sun” and targets a site off FM 762 and FM 1994 near Richmond, about 40 minutes outside Houston.
Tesla is planning to build a $10.1 billion vertically integrated solar cell manufacturing facility in Fort Bend County, Texas, about 40 minutes from Houston, according to a new public application filing.
Tesla is aiming to start construction this year and finish in 2028, with… pic.twitter.com/f3HIK5HGST
— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) August 7, 2026
The application, prepared by Kroll Tax Services on Tesla’s behalf, spans five parcels totaling roughly 3,000 acres within the Lamar Consolidated Independent School District. Tesla wants a 10 year property tax limitation in exchange for the investment, split as $1.5 billion in real property and $8.6 billion in equipment and personal property. The company projects 9,712 permanent jobs once the plant reaches full operation, with 1,147 peak construction jobs during a build window running from this year through 2028 and commercial operations targeted for the first quarter of 2029.
Tesla is not fully committed to Fort Bend County yet. The filing states the company is weighing the site against an unnamed out of state alternative, and frames the tax abatement as what would make Texas competitive against that option. If the district and county decline the incentive, Tesla says it may build elsewhere.
Tesla Megapack Megafactory in Texas advances with major property sale
-
The plant would handle the full solar cell production chain in one facility, according to the filing, covering wafer and ingot manufacturing, coating, metallization and printing lines, cell testing, automated material handling and cleanroom infrastructure. That scope points to Tesla vertically integrating a part of its supply chain it currently sources largely from overseas partners, mirroring the approach behind its expanding Megapack production in Brookshire, Texas, where Tesla has already built out two buildings for its grid battery business.
The timing lines up closely with Tesla and SpaceX’s other big Texas commitment this month. SpaceX confirmed its Terafab chip factory would land in Grimes County days before this filing surfaced, with construction on that $16.8 billion project starting almost immediately after local officials met with residents. Terafab is meant to produce the AI chips running Tesla’s Optimus robots and Full Self-Driving software, while a solar cell plant would feed a different part of the business, the panels and storage systems Tesla sells to homeowners, businesses and utilities, and increasingly needs to power its own data centers.
Musk has talked about building domestic solar manufacturing capacity before, tying it to the amount of power Tesla’s AI ambitions will require.
Tesla just trademarked ‘MEGAPOD’ with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO), its latest move in what seems to be a hint that the company is incredibly focused on its AI efforts and storage needs as compute increases.
The application carries serial number 99893717 and lists the applicant as Tesla, Inc., located at 1 Tesla Road, Austin, Texas 78725.
The filing remains in ‘live pending’ status, and it is a new application waiting for assignment to an examining attorney. It has not yet been published or registered.
Tesla just trademarked MEGAPOD
Summary:
“Modular data center hardware systems for artificial intelligence computing, comprised of computer servers, computer hardware for artificial intelligence processing, computer networking hardware, electrical power distribution units, and… pic.twitter.com/3l85DsKadl— Robin (@xdNiBoR) June 19, 2026
According to the official goods and services description in the application, Tesla describes ‘MEGAPOD’ as:
-
“Modular data center hardware systems for artificial intelligence computing, comprised of computer servers, computer hardware for artificial intelligence processing, computer networking hardware, electrical power distribution units, and cooling systems, sold as a unit; self-contained modular computing hardware systems for artificial intelligence workloads; integrated computer hardware platforms for artificial intelligence computing, namely, enclosures containing computer hardware, power distribution hardware, and cooling hardware, sold as a unit; downloadable software for monitoring, managing, optimizing, and regulating modular artificial intelligence computing hardware systems.”
This description specifies complete, self-contained modular units that integrate servers and specialized AI processing hardware with networking components, power distribution, and cooling systems. It also includes associated downloadable software for oversight and optimization of these systems. The language emphasizes hardware sold “as a unit” and enclosures that combine the necessary elements for AI computing workloads.
Tesla has an established history of developing and commercializing modular hardware systems. Its Megapack product line, for example, consists of utility-scale battery energy storage systems designed as containerized units for grid applications. The MEGAPOD filing follows a similar pattern of protecting a name for modular, integrated hardware platforms, this time focused on artificial intelligence computing infrastructure.
This could be an early move, especially as Tesla did not have trademark rights to the word ‘Cybercab,’ the name of its self-driving, ride-hailing-focused vehicle.
Trademark applications of this type allow companies to secure priority rights to a name for defined categories of goods and services. The USPTO examines applications for compliance with legal requirements, including distinctiveness and absence of conflicts with prior marks. If the application proceeds successfully through examination, publication, and any opposition period, it could result in a federal trademark registration providing nationwide protection. This is what Tesla’s obvious intention is with ‘MEGAPOD.’
Public reports and analysis suggest MEGAPOD could represent modular, container-style AI computing pods designed for easy deployment. These would bundle servers, AI accelerators, power systems, and cooling into self-contained units suitable for distributed AI workloads. This approach aligns with Tesla’s announced AI compute strategy.
In March 2026, Elon Musk outlined plans for “Digital Optimus” (also referred to as Macrohard), a joint Tesla-xAI project for AI agents capable of handling complex digital tasks. The plans include running these agents on Tesla’s AI4 hardware in parked vehicles as well as dedicated compute units installed at Supercharger stations, which collectively offer substantial unused electrical capacity.
-
What is Digital Optimus? The new Tesla and xAI project explained
A modular hardware platform like the one described in the ‘MEGAPOD’ filing would support scalable, rapid deployment of such distributed compute resources. It could complement Tesla’s other AI infrastructure efforts, including the Dojo supercomputer used for training models and the development of AI systems for autonomous driving and robotics, by enabling edge or regional AI inference without reliance on traditional centralized data centers.
Tesla launches V2L Outlet Adapter for Premium Model Y in the U.S.
Tesla Roadster unveiling nears, and it will fly: The Information
