Investor's Corner
Tesla – SolarCity merger: the devil is in the details
On Monday August 1st, Tesla announced that it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire SolarCity. Tesla provided investors with an Investor Presentation slide set, and a 180 pages long Form 8-K filing.
Investor Presentation
In the slide presentation titled Tesla to acquire SolarCity, the company provided details for the proposed transaction.
Tesla would acquire SolarCity in an all-stock transaction valued at $2.6 billion. SolarCity shareholders will receive 0.110 shares of Tesla stock for each share of SolarCity valued at $25.37 per share. The transaction is expected to close in Q4 2016 and subject to the approval by a majority of disinterested shareholders at both SolarCity and Tesla, to be voted upon at each respective shareholder meeting.
The Tesla SolarCity “strategic” combination would:
- Accelerate the transition to sustainable energy
- Create world’s only integrated sustainable energy company
- Drive products development and innovation
- Catalyze solar energy adoption
- [Provide] substantial cost efficiencies.
The presentation stated that SolarCity provides best-in-class rooftop solar installation costs of $1.92 per watt as of 4Q15, and is America’s #1 vertically integrated provider of residential and commercial solar, with a 35% share of the residential market and 14% share of the commercial market in 2015. Tesla is the world’s fastest growing car company, with an 18% market share of the “large Luxury sedans” in 2015 with its Model S.
The combined company would leverage Tesla’s design and manufacturing expertise:
- Speed development of beautiful, differentiated and technologically superior products
- Improve solar value proposition by integrating storage, reducing system cost and improving reliability
- Fully integrate product suite for a seamless user experience, delivering an improved, lower-cost product for customers
- Develop products for residential, commercial and grid-scale applications
- Take advantage of SolarCity’s industry-leading project finance capabilities
One of the major points of the slide presentation is that the combined companies would provide “substantial cost efficiencies”, with $150 million of direct cost synergies expected to be achieved in the first full year after closing the transaction.
The cost synergies would be driven by sales and marketing efficiencies, and corporate and overhead savings. The value proposition is improved by lowering hardware costs, reducing installation and service costs, improving manufacturing efficiency, reducing customer acquisition costs, and cutting capital costs.
-
Form 8-K Filing
The very long document filing includes the usual boilerplate for merger transactions, but also reveals quite a few interesting tidbits, buried into the document. These are quotes from the document.
Stockholders of SolarCity will be asked to vote on the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, and stockholders of Tesla will be asked to vote on the approval of the Merger and the Share Issuance, at special meetings of the stockholders of SolarCity and Tesla, respectively, that will be held on dates to be announced.
“The Merger Agreement and the Merger be adopted and approved by stockholders of SolarCity, including by the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of SolarCity common stock […] that are not owned by Mr. Elon Musk and the other directors. other than Nancy E. Pfund and Donald R. Kendall, Jr.”
Similarly, “the Merger and the Share Issuance be approved by the stockholders of Tesla, including by the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock […] that are not owned by Mr. Elon Musk and the other directors and the named executive officers of SolarCity and certain of their affiliates.”
This means that the approval will likely rely on mutual fund managers and banks that hold large chunks of both Tesla and SolarCity stock.
As part of the agreement, SolarCity has a 45-day period known as a “go-shop”, which runs through September 14, 2016. This means that SolarCity is allowed to solicit alternative proposals during that time.
-
The all-stock transaction, with an equity value of $2.6 billion, is based on the 5-day volume-weighted average price of Tesla shares as of July 29, 2016. Under the agreement, SolarCity stockholders will receive 0.110 Tesla common shares per SolarCity share, valuing SolarCity common stock at $25.37 per share based on the 5-day volume weighted average price of Tesla shares as of July 29, 2016.
The “Excluded Company Parties”, i.e. the directors and named executive officers other than Nancy E. Pfund and Donald R. Kendall, Jr., that will not be able to vote at the Company Stockholders Meeting include Lyndon R. Rive, Peter J. Rive, Tanguy V. Serra, Hayden D. Barnard, Seth R. Weissman, Elon Musk, John H.N. Fisher, Antonio Gracias and Jeffrey B. Straubel.
While most stock options equity awards of each company will be automatically converted into stock options of the “merged” company, the stock options set forth in a “Company disclosure letter” shall be cancelled for no consideration. It turns out that these options are the ones that were granted by SolarCity to Lyndon and Peter Rive, the CEO and CTO of SolarCity. These options amounted to about $128 million, and would have been earned over a 10 year period, based on achieving a set of goals of SolarCity stock price and operational results. For some unknown treason, Elon Musk’s cousins will get the shaft in the merger transaction related to their stock options.
But do not feel too bad for the cousins. According to a research report from Reuters, that analyzed the results of the merger, “three of Musk’s relatives, including brother Kimbal Musk and cousins Lyndon Rive and Peter Rive, will own a combined stake of 0.5 percent in Tesla. Kimbal Musk is a director of Tesla.”
According to Reuters “Elon Musk and key institutional investors will probably tighten their control over electric car maker Tesla Motors Inc after it acquires sister company SolarCity Inc.” “The largest institutional shareholder, Fidelity Management and Research, will see its stake grow from 12.2 percent to 13.4 percent. Two Fidelity-managed funds, Fidelity Contrafund and Fidelity OTC, together will control another 7.3 percent, up from 6.5 percent.”
Musk will remain the largest individual shareholder, boosting his stake from 23.2 percent to 25.0 percent according to Reuters.
Note that Fidelity has already come out in favor of the merger.
-
“Musk, eight major institutional investors and the two Fidelity funds control 45.7 percent of Tesla. After the merger, the same group’s combined stake will rise to 49.0 percent.” “Other major institutional shareholders include Scottish investment manager Bailie Gifford & Co, which will maintain an 8.9 percent stake in the combined companies; T. Rowe Price Associates, 5.5 percent, and Vanguard Group, 3.6 percent. Big banks, including several Tesla lenders, also will maintain significant stakes after the merger: Bank of Montreal, 4.1 percent; Morgan Stanley, 3.0 percent; Goldman Sachs, 2.2 percent, and J.P. Morgan Chase, 1.0 percent.”
What this all means is that individual investors will have no say in the approval of the merger, and only a few more institutional investors are needed, besides Fidelity, to approve the merger. The only thing that could derail the merger is a third party bid for SolarCity, during the go-shop period. Given how debt ridden is SolarCity, the chance of of such a bid are fairly remote.
Market Reaction
The initial market reaction to the details of the merger agreement was mixed, but eventually turned negative. On Monday the stock reached $236, but closed at $229. On Tuesday the stock initially sold off even more to $221, closing the session at $227.
Looking at the chart, The MACD has started pinching, indicating a possible end of the MACD-run that started on July 1st. Anyone selling today would have had a nice $11 gain, over a 1-month period, a very nice return. I personally closed my July 1st call option trade (I was long Sept 230 calls) when TSLA reached $236 on Monday. I was planning to close my trade before the Quarterly report is released on Wednesday, and the high point of Monday made it a perfect exit. Notice that I never hold options or stock before a quarterly report, especially for a volatile stock as TSLA, as the post report swings are so wide that one can easily lose their shirt in the the span of a few hours.
Source: Wall Street I/O
SpaceX stock did the opposite of what most of Wall Street expected this week, when the day designed to be its most dangerous turned into a rally, and the rally kept going.
Thursday marked the first major lockup expiration since SpaceX’s June IPO, making roughly 911.5 million insider held shares eligible to trade for the first time, more than doubling the company’s public float. Analysts and short sellers had spent weeks bracing for a flood of selling, especially after the stock fell 13 percent following its first earnings report as a public company on Tuesday. Instead, shares rose 6.1 percent Thursday to close at $114.92, and by Friday they were trading near $129, up more than another 12 percent on the day.
SpaceX shorts get warned by Musk ally, echoing Tesla’s early struggles
The setup made the outcome notable. Short interest had climbed to roughly 34 percent of the float heading into earnings, among the highest of any large cap stock, with about 95 percent of available shares to borrow already on loan. CEO Elon Musk warned short sellers twice in the weeks before the lockup, writing on X that “the survival probability of firms who maintain a significant short position in SpaceX over time is very low,” then following up on the morning of earnings with “I try to warn them, but they just double down.”
When the newly unlocked shares hit the market and the selloff never showed up, some of that short position appears to have started unwinding. TipRanks reported that options activity shifted toward bullish strategies like put selling and risk reversals following the rally, with roughly $600 million in options premium trading Thursday alone. Retail buyers also stepped in during the earnings dip, according to Vanda Research.
The fundamentals behind the stock have not changed much in a week. SpaceX’s revenue nearly doubled year over year to $7.8 billion, with Starlink subscribers doubling to 12 million and the company’s AI segment growing 247 percent. What spooked investors on Tuesday was the spending side. Capital expenditures jumped to more than $18 billion for the quarter, up from $2.8 billion a year earlier, with AI investment alone rising from $749 million to $15.8 billion. Wall Street remains split on whether that spending is building infrastructure SpaceX needs or outrunning what the business can currently support, a debate Teslarati has tracked since shares first came under pressure.
None of that resolves the bigger question hanging over the stock. Thursday’s release was only the first of nine staggered lockup tranches, with roughly $800 billion worth of additional shares scheduled to become eligible through October, and Musk’s own stake stays locked until next June. If this week is any indication, the market is treating that supply as something it can absorb rather than something to fear, at least for now.
-
Cybertruck
Tesla Cybertruck production snaps back after ugly supplier fight
Cybertrucks are piling up again at Giga Texas after Tesla’s court win against a parts supplier.
Cybertruck production at Giga Texas is showing its first visible recovery since Tesla sued a supplier last month over withheld manufacturing tooling.
Aerial observer Joe Tegtmeyer flew over the Austin factory Wednesday morning and counted roughly 100 or more Cybertrucks filling the outbound lot, a sharp jump from the thin numbers seen in recent weeks. The flyover came a day after a judge granted Tesla a temporary restraining order against Angstrom Automotive Group, the parts supplier at the center of the dispute.
Tesla filed an emergency lawsuit in late July after Angstrom told the automaker it planned to close the Troy, Texas facility where Tesla’s die-cast tools, trim dies and other Cybertruck stamping equipment were housed. According to Tesla’s complaint, a shipment of 700 finished parts never left the building, and when Tesla sent representatives to retrieve its equipment, accompanied by law enforcement, they were turned away. Angstrom allegedly then asked for an extra $250,000 a week to keep operating, which Tesla’s filing described as holding its own property for ransom.
TESLA: U.S. District Judge Christopher R. Wolfe of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, Waco Division granted Tesla a Temporary Restraining Order and Writ of Replevin in its dispute with Angstrom Automotive (Case No. 6:26-cv-00477).
The order authorizes… https://t.co/E1DKcQSxMn pic.twitter.com/LR8aAiV2Og
— S.E. Robinson, Jr. (@SERobinsonJr) August 5, 2026
-
The restraining order gives Tesla immediate right of entry to Angstrom’s facility to recover the tooling. It is temporary, with a fuller hearing still to come, but the speed of Wednesday’s rebound suggests the Angstrom shortage was indeed the main bottleneck limiting Cybertruck output. Outbound lot counts are an imperfect measure of actual production, since finished trucks can sit for days before shipping, but a lot that full after a lean stretch is a meaningful signal.
Cybertruck output at Giga Texas has fluctuated all year as Tesla worked through supply issues and introduced new trims, including a cheaper Dual Motor AWD version that drew strong early demand.
Venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya has cautioned investors shorting SpaceX shares, drawing a direct parallel to the intense short-selling pressure Tesla faced in its early public years.
Responding to reports of elevated short interest in the newly public rocket, satellite, and AI company, Palihapitiya noted that similar dynamics played out with Tesla, where aggressive short sellers ultimately “went broke.”
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) went public on June 12, 2026, in the largest IPO on record, pricing at $135 per share. Shares quickly surged to an all-time high of $225.64 just days later, briefly implying a valuation exceeding $2 trillion. The stock has since retreated sharply amid valuation concerns, lockup expiration fears, and broader market dynamics.
By early August, it traded near $108–$125, representing a roughly 50 percent decline from the peak and bringing the market capitalization closer to the $1.5–1.7 trillion range. On August 4, shares closed up more than 9 percent at $125.33 ahead of earnings before facing pressure in after-hours and premarket trading.
Short interest has climbed dramatically. According to S3 Partners data widely cited in market reports, short positions reached approximately 219.3 million shares by late July, about 34 percent of the limited public float of roughly 640 million shares, and represented a notional value of around $24.6 billion.
Utilization of shares available to borrow hit 95 percent, with borrow fees rising. This level of shorting exceeded the dollar value of short bets against Tesla at the time and built rapidly ahead of two catalysts: the company’s first post-IPO earnings and an August 6 lockup expiration that could free up to 911.5 million additional shares.
-
CEO Elon Musk has issued warnings of his own. In mid-July, as short interest approached one-third of the float, he posted that “the survival probability of firms who maintain a significant short position in SpaceX over time is very low,” reiterating his view that the company could ultimately be worth more than Earth if it achieves its goals.
On August 4, just before earnings, Musk responded to the latest short-interest data by saying, “I try to warn them, but they just double down.”
SpaceX delivered its first quarterly results as a public company after the close on August 4. Second-quarter revenue rose 92 percent year-over-year to $7.8 billion, beating consensus estimates near $6.8–6.9 billion.
The net loss narrowed to $541 million, or 9 cents per share, better than the roughly 23–24 cent loss expected. Starlink/connectivity contributed about $4.3 billion (up 66 percent), while the AI business generated $2.6 billion (up roughly 250 percent). Capital expenditures were heavy at $18.4 billion, largely tied to AI infrastructure. Management projected a $100 billion annualized revenue run rate by year-end 2026 and outlined a path toward $1 trillion in annual revenue by 2030.
The combination of Chamath’s historical reminder, Musk’s repeated alerts, and the company’s ambitious growth targets underscores the high-stakes debate surrounding SPCX. Short sellers are positioned for near-term supply pressure from the lockup, while long-term bulls point to Starlink scale, Starship progress, and AI compute expansion as reasons the bears may ultimately face the same fate as many early Tesla skeptics.
Inside Tesla’s secretive $10 Billion “Project Crystal Sun” filing
The Boring Company’s newest tunnel vehicle runs on Tesla parts and no one is driving it
