Lifestyle
How could Tesla’s Sentry Mode be taken more seriously by law enforcement?
Tesla’s Sentry Mode has been making headlines since it launched in February this year, capturing outrageous acts of vandalism, theft, and even a hit-and-run by a local politician. Despite the publicity, however, it doesn’t seem as though the unique security feature is necessarily moving things along on the legal side.
Police reports made by Tesla owners after becoming burglary victims are seeing long delays before investigations are made, if they are made to begin with. Altogether, this means that Sentry Mode isn’t necessarily giving Tesla owners any advantage over not having the feature at all. What can be done to change this?
One effective route thus far has been media attention. A burglary captured by Sentry Mode in April, for instance, was reported by a local ABC news station, and the suspect was arrested afterwards arguably in response to the public pressure surrounding the event. When the car’s owner originally turned the footage into police, he was simply informed that an officer “might” look into the incident. Of course, every incident can’t be handled this way, and it’s only the most egregious ones that capture enough interest for major media attention.
Obviously, judicial systems vary by region as do police policies and resources, all affecting the outcome of a break in report to include whether public attention is required for a quick result. A fair assessment should acknowledge these facts. But a tool like Sentry Mode should be able to deliver a more consistent legal result for Tesla owners using the feature – that is its primary purpose, is it not? Not only that, but if justice is served effectively based on Sentry Mode’s unique tools, it can finally have its desired effect of acting as a deterrent to thieves and other criminals made aware of Tesla cars’ video recording capabilities.
Here’s the scenario that’s playing out right now.
Imagine that your Tesla was broken into while you were out shopping. Your car’s app notified you of an intrusion, but you missed the thief getting away. Thank goodness you have a Tesla, you might think next. Sentry Mode recorded the entire event and the idiot who smashed your rear quarter window gave the car’s cameras a clear image of their face and the license plate of their getaway vehicle. You take the footage to the police where you expect an easy path to justice, except that’s not what happens.
“Someone will review your report in about 20-30 days,” an employee at the police station tells you when you file your theft report. If that’s not difficult enough to hear, others who’ve had similar instances with their Tesla vehicles confirm to you that they’ve had the same thing happen to them. This example isn’t fictional, either. A Tesla owner recently posted the experience on Reddit, detailing their frustration with getting a Sentry Mode video to the correct desk at their local police department.
The same Reddit user cited above proposed another solution for helping move these kinds of theft investigations along. Tesla’s app could provide a feature that automates the police report process.
In concept, following a criminal incident recorded by Sentry Mode, a programming script could run on the Tesla app to gather all pertinent information about the event. GPS data for the break in location, the owner’s name, address, and VIN number would be pulled first, then the owner could be prompted to add photos of the damage along with any witness information. A PDF or similar document would be generated, ready for printing and submission to the proper police authorities.
The Tesla owner would initiate this process with the push of a button on the car’s center touchscreen or from their phone. This solution is based on the idea that complete information in the hands of the right people might help to bring quicker legal results. Most of the tedious footwork would be done at an advantage to police.
Even better, police departments could adopt ‘dash cam friendly’ policies that made this type of reporting procedure seamless, perhaps providing a fax number, email address, or online submission form specifically for these types of events. The police department in Moorestown, New Jersey, for instance, already has an online reporting portal enabling the submission of anonymous tips, property damage, identity theft, lost property, retail crimes, and vehicle burglary reports, among others. A few experiences with the Sentry Mode reports would make it clear to authorities how much easier the cases were to investigate given the amount of information available, which could help bring better (and faster) legal results for the owners.
Expanding on that idea, perhaps a database containing reporting requirements and local police data could be maintained by Tesla owners as a community effort to make the feature more helpful and kept up-to-date. Many reporting forms are already available online, but copies of blank reports could be provided by local police departments to further streamline the data generated as suggested previously. The crafted app-made police report would be tailored for the police department local to where the break in took place.
This is something that would take time and effort, but once it became known that Tesla vehicles were being specifically targeted for theft, a major part of what drove the creation of Sentry Mode, the community came together to advise one another on preventing incidents, even compiling tip sheets on Internet forums and creating 3D-printable locking devices. It wouldn’t be a far stretch to see the community come together again to help bring justice for the break ins it previously worked together to prevent. A third-party app providing this report generation service is also a possibility.
The original rallying cry for a tool to help against break ins made its way up to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, and the response was eventually met with Bach’s Toccata and Fugue in D Minor. Perhaps a handy police report button is another possibility?
Lifestyle
Tesla Model S Plaid battles China’s 1500 hp monster Nurburgring monster, with surprising results
There is just something about Tesla’s tuning and refinement that makes raw specs seem not as game-changing.
The Tesla Model S Plaid has been around for some time. Today, it is no longer the world’s quickest four-door electric sedan, nor is it the most powerful. As per a recent video from motoring YouTube channel Carwow, however, it seems like the Model S Plaid is still more than a match for some of its newer and more powerful rivals.
The monster from China
The Xiaomi SU7 Ultra is nothing short of a monster. Just like the Model S Plaid, it features three motors. It also has 1,548 hp and 1,770 Nm of torque. It’s All Wheel Drive and weighs a hefty 2,360 kg. The vehicle, which costs just about the equivalent of £55,000, has been recorded setting an insane 7:04.957 at the Nurburgring, surpassing the previous record held by the Porsche Taycan Turbo GT.
For all intents and purposes, the Model S Plaid looked outgunned in Carwow’s test. The Model S Plaid is no slouch with its three motors that produce 1,020 hp and 1,420 Nm of torque. It’s also a bit lighter at 2,190 kg despite its larger size. However, as the Carwow host pointed out, the Model S Plaid holds a 7:25.231 record in the Nurburgring. Compared to the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra’s record, the Model S Plaid’s lap time is notably slower.
Real-world tests
As could be seen in Carwow’s drag races, however, Tesla’s tech wizardry with the Model S Plaid is still hard to beat. The two vehicles competed in nine races, and the older Model S Plaid actually beat its newer, more powerful counterpart from China several times. At one point in the race, the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra hit its power limit due to its battery’s temperature, but the Model S Plaid was still going strong.
The Model S Plaid was first teased five years ago, in September 2020 during Tesla’s Battery Day. Since then, cars like the Lucid Air Sapphire and the Xiaomi SU7 Ultra have been released, surpassing its specs. But just like the Model Y ended up being the better all-rounder compared to the BYD Sealion 7 and the MG IM6, there is just something about Tesla’s tuning and refinement that makes raw specs seem not as game-changing.
Check out Carwow’s Model S Plaid vs Xiaomi SU7 drag race video below.
Lifestyle
500-mile test proves why Tesla Model Y still humiliates rivals in Europe
On paper, the BYD Sealion 7 and MG IM6 promised standout capabilities against the Model Y.
BYD is seeing a lot of momentum in Europe, so much so that mainstream media has taken every opportunity to argue that the Chinese automaker has beaten Tesla in the region. But while BYD sales this year in Europe are rising and Tesla’s registrations remain challenged, the raw capabilities of vehicles like the Model Y are difficult to deny.
This was highlighted in a 500-mile challenge by What Car? magazine, which showed that the new Tesla Model Y is more efficient, cheaper to run, and more reliable than rivals like the BYD Sealion 7, and even the nearly 400 KW-charging MG IM6.
Range and charging promises
On paper, the BYD Sealion 7 and MG IM6 promised standout capabilities against the Model Y. The Sealion 7 had more estimated range and the IM6 promised significantly faster charging. When faced with real-world conditions, however, it was still the Model Y that proved superior.
During the 500-mile test, the BYD nearly failed to reach a charging stop, arriving with less range than its display projected, as noted in a CarUp report. MG fared better, but its charging speeds never reached its promised nearly-400 kW charging speed. Tesla’s Model Y, by comparison, managed energy calculations precisely and arrived at each stop without issue.
Tesla leads in areas that matter
Charging times from 25% to 80% showed that the MG was the fastest at 17 minutes, while Tesla and BYD were close at 28 and 29 minutes, respectively. Overall efficiency and cost told a different story, however. The Model Y consumed 19.4 kWh per 100 km, compared to 22.2 for MG and 23.9 for BYD. Over the full trip, Tesla’s charging costs totaled just £82 thanks to its supercharger network, far below BYD’s £130 and MG’s £119.
What Car? Magazine’s testers concluded that despite BYD’s rapid sales growth and the MG IM6’s seriously impressive charging speeds, Tesla remains the more compelling real-world choice. The Model Y just offers stability, efficiency, and a proven charging infrastructure through its Supercharging network. And as per the magazine’s hosts, the Model Y is even the cheapest car to own among the three that were tested.
Watch What Car? Magazine’s 500-mile test in the video below.
Lifestyle
Tesla Cybertruck slapped with world’s least intimidating ticket, and it’s pure cringe
One cannot help but cringe and feel second-hand embarrassment at the idea of a person just driving around with a stack of these babies.
A Cybertruck parked at Stanford Shopping Center in California was recently hit with what might be the most try-hard piece of paper ever slipped under a wiper blade: a “fake citation” accusing the driver of supporting a “fascist car.”
The note, shared on X by Tesla staff program manager Ryan Torres, quickly made the rounds on X, where it quickly gained attention as an example of how not to protest.
The world’s least intimidating ticket
According to the citation, the supposed “violation” was “driving a fascist car.” The remedial action? Take the bus, call an Uber, or ride a bike. The note also dubbed Elon Musk a “chainsaw-wielding Nazi billionaire.” Now, protests against Tesla and Elon Musk have become commonplace this year, but one cannot help but cringe and feel second-hand embarrassment at the idea of a person just driving around with a stack of fake anti-Tesla/Musk citations.
Torres pointed out the irony himself in his post on X. Tesla currently employs over 140,000 Americans, and SpaceX has put the U.S. firmly back at the top of space technology. As Torres put it, maybe the person behind the world’s least intimidating ticket should “read a book on innovation before vandalizing” other people’s property.
Peak performative clownery
Not to mention that the fake ticket’s logic collapses under its own weight. EVs like the Cybertruck are literally designed to reduce emissions, not “destroy the economy.” If anything, Tesla has bolstered the United States’ economy by fueling jobs in engineering, manufacturing, and clean energy. It’s not the first time a Tesla has been the target of vandalism or politically charged notes, but this one stands out for sheer cringe value.
Torres summed it up neatly: “Peak clownery.” On that point, at least, the citation earns full marks. In a way, though, perhaps cringe fake tickets are not as bad as the literal firebombs that were being thrown at Tesla stores and cars earlier this year because some critics were gleefully misinformed about Elon Musk.
‘I don’t understand TSLAQ:’ notable investor backs Tesla, Elon Musk
Tesla will let you bring back this removed Model 3 part for a price
Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.1 first impressions: Robotaxi-like features arrive
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoTesla FSD V14 set for early wide release next week: Elon Musk
-
News2 weeks agoElon Musk gives update on Tesla Optimus progress
-
News2 weeks agoTesla has a new first with its Supercharger network
-
News2 weeks agoTesla job postings seem to show next surprise market entry
-
Investor's Corner2 weeks agoTesla gets new Street-high price target with high hopes for autonomy domination
-
Lifestyle2 weeks ago500-mile test proves why Tesla Model Y still humiliates rivals in Europe
-
News1 week agoTesla Giga Berlin’s water consumption has achieved the unthinkable
-
Lifestyle2 weeks agoTesla Model S Plaid battles China’s 1500 hp monster Nurburgring monster, with surprising results