News
Tesla’s marketing strategies in China could address the negative narrative in the US
Over the course of the massive roller coaster ride that was Tesla’s first and second quarters this year, it has become particularly evident that the electric car maker is dealing with a lot of misinformation. After the first quarter’s lower-than-expected results, for example, Tesla faced multiple narratives suggesting that the demand for the company’s vehicles was fast declining, and that its growth story was dead. It was not until Tesla revealed its higher-than-expected delivery and production numbers in the second quarter that the narrative surrounding the company shifted a little bit for the better.
Being one of the most shorted companies in the market, Tesla is no stranger to misinformation campaigns. The company’s vehicles consistently rank high with safety agencies, yet the idea that the Model 3, S, and X are dangerous and catch fire all the time continues to persist. Tesla’s quarterly safety reports have consistently shown that fewer accidents happen when Autopilot is activated, but the driver-assist system is perceived as dangerous by a notable demographic of would-be car buyers nonetheless — and these are but the tip of the iceberg.
One of the most striking portions of Tesla’s 2019 Annual Shareholder Meeting last month involved a number of retail investors brainstorming solutions to address the alarming amount of misinformation surrounding the company. Responding to the concerned shareholders, Elon Musk admitted that he is at a little bit of a loss when it comes to battling the negativity surrounding Tesla, though he expressed his dislike for advertising campaigns that are deceptive to consumers. Nevertheless, considering that the Tesla Model 3 is now breaking into a market that is larger than it has ever dealt with before, it would be wise for the electric car maker to find a solid, subtle strategy that allows it to reach a wider audience, while shifting the narrative to a more positive direction in the process.
What is pretty remarkable is that Tesla does not need to look far to find a marketing strategy that works without being deceptive. Over in China, there is a company that has shown a notable degree of cleverness with its marketing efforts, utilizing creative campaigns that help improve the perception of the public to its brand. That company is Tesla.
Tesla has been around in China since 2014, when it started delivering the Model S to the region. For the most part, Tesla has competed much like a niche carmaker in the country, with the Model S and Model X being high-priced premium vehicles that are, in some way, considered as status symbols for the wealthy. This is changing with the arrival of the Model 3, as the electric sedan’s lower price opens up the Tesla ecosystem to a far broader demographic. The buildout of Gigafactory 3 in Shanghai, which will be producing locally-made Model 3 and Model Y, will make Tesla’s vehicles even more accessible to the mainstream market in the near future.
With Model 3 deliveries already underway and with Gigafactory 3’s buildout progressing faster than expected, it is pertinent for Tesla to ensure that the company is well marketed for Chinese consumers. This is where things get particularly interesting, since Tesla has been conducting a subtle, clever, and likely effective marketing campaign for the Chinese market as of late. Immediately noticeable is the care that the company has taken to respect the country’s culture and traditions, as shown in the tastefully-designed cards Tesla sent out during last month’s Dragon Boat Festival, and the reviewers that the electric car maker released for high school students in the days leading up to the national college examination. These were simple gestures, but they showed that Tesla is a company that is respectful and grounded.
Other marketing campaigns that have raised Tesla’s visibility in the Chinese market have been equally tasteful. Just recently, Tesla and QQ Music, a popular music streaming service in the country, held a series of “Music Parties” in key cities. These were hip events that were aimed at the younger demographic, many of whom are or will be looking to buy their first vehicle in the near future. The company has also launched a Tesla Performance Driving School, which involves the company hiring professional drivers to teach Model 3 owners how to get the most fun out of their vehicles. This program promotes the capabilities of the Model 3 Performance, while giving the impression that Tesla is a responsible company that encourages high-speed driving in safe, regulated environments.
Also notable were Tesla-organized road trips, which are extended journeys over scenic routes that are aimed at promoting the company’s vehicles and the convenience of the Supercharger Network. Online, Tesla’s active marketing strategies in China are quite impressive as well, as evidenced by the spread of tutorials featuring its vehicles and their features. These pages, one which could be accessed here, feature clear guidelines about Autopilot’s proper utilization, its features, its limitations, and the responsibilities of the driver while the system is in use.
When it comes to battling misinformation, the best strategy is always to provide the right information. To shift a subjectively negative narrative, it is best to foster an objectively positive narrative. Contrary to Elon Musk’s statements during the Annual Shareholder Meeting, it appears that Tesla already has a pretty good strategy that has the potential to address, at least to some degree, the misconceptions and misinformation surrounding the company in the United States. Granted, Tesla currently enjoys widespread support from the Chinese government, and the United States is a far more challenging market than China, but considering what’s at stake, these marketing efforts might very well be worth a try.
Investor's Corner
Tesla and SpaceX take “Terafab” Trademark fight to Federal Court
Tesla and SpaceX sue a small Illinois firm after cease and desist letters over Terafab.
Tesla and SpaceX are asking a federal judge to rule that their planned Terafab chip factory does not infringe a small Illinois company’s trademark, a request that arrives only after months of quiet negotiation broke down this summer.
The dispute traces to May 18, when Tesla filed three U.S. trademark applications for “Terafab” and “Tesla Terafab,” covering semiconductor chips and related chip making services. TERA-print LLC, a nanotechnology company that has held a federal trademark for “Tera-Fab” since 2021, responded five days later with a cease and desist letter. According to the lawsuit, first reported by Reuters, TERA-print argued that Tesla and SpaceX’s use of “Terafab” would confuse consumers familiar with its own trademark, which covers a desktop photolithography printer sold to researchers for sensor and bioengineering work.
What stands out in the filing is the timing of TERA-print’s own paperwork. One day before sending that cease and desist letter, on May 22, TERA-print applied to expand its existing registration to cover semiconductor materials, silicon chips, nanoelectronic devices and AI design services, categories it had not previously claimed. Tesla and SpaceX call that filing opportunistic in their complaint, noting it arrived two months after Tesla’s public Terafab announcement and just days after Tesla’s own trademark applications went in.
Elon Musk launches TERAFAB: The $25B Tesla-SpaceXAI chip factory that will rewire the AI industry
By June 10, TERA-print was threatening to sue for federal trademark infringement, false designation of origin and unfair competition, the complaint states. Rather than wait to be sued, Tesla, SpaceX and SpaceXAI met with TERA-print six separate times between June and August trying to resolve the dispute directly. Those talks collapsed, and the companies filed for declaratory judgment this week in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas, asking a judge to find that “Terafab” does not infringe TERA-print’s mark before TERA-print can file a claim of its own.
TERA-print isn’t backing down. The company told PCMag it discussed a settlement with Tesla as recently as September 2 and feels misled by what it called Tesla’s professed interest in settling. Its CTO, Andrey Ivankin, said TERA-print holds a Defense Department contract to fabricate semiconductors and partially owns Mattiq Inc., an AI company built on TERA-print’s products, and that the company will vigorously defend its rights.
Tesla and SpaceX argue the overlap is superficial. Terafab is planned as a $16.8 billion complex spanning roughly 100 million square feet at the Grimes County site SpaceX confirmed last month, built to produce chips for Optimus robots, Tesla’s AI computing needs and SpaceX’s orbital data center ambitions, a scale and purpose the companies say no reasonable consumer would confuse with a tabletop lab printer. TERA-print’s product line has stayed focused on lithography tools for biological and sensor research since it registered its mark in 2021.
The trademark fight is the second legal dispute tied to the Terafab project in the past week, following a separate SpaceX suit aimed at keeping company records about the facility out of public view, as KBTX reported. Whether construction proceeds under the Terafab name now depends on a federal judge in Austin.
News
NHTSA just escalated its Tesla Cybercab investigation in a big way
NHTSA escalated its Cybercab audit into a sworn Special Order with a September 30 deadline.
Federal regulators have moved from asking Tesla questions about its Cybercab to demanding sworn answers. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration issued a Special Order that requires a Tesla officer to sign an affidavit attesting to the completeness of the company’s responses, with a deadline of September 30.
The order builds on Audit Query AQ26002, which NHTSA opened on September 3, the same day Tesla began commercial Cybercab service in Austin. Teslarati covered that initial inquiry when it surfaced, noting the agency wanted to understand how Tesla certified a vehicle with no permanently attached steering wheel, pedals, or mirrors as compliant with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards. A Special Order is a different tool and converts a fact finding review into a legally enforceable demand, the same mechanism NHTSA used against Tesla in 2023 during its Autopilot investigation.
Several of the 21 requests target a specific gap in Cybercab’s design. One asks whether Tesla used temporarily attached human controls at any point to help certify the vehicle, and if so, which standards depended on that equipment being present. Another quotes an existing rule directly: “The service brakes shall be activated by means of a foot control.” Cybercab has no foot pedal. NHTSA wants a detailed explanation of how the vehicle satisfies that requirement, and how it complies without the kind of exemption granted to Zoox in July under Part 555, the regulatory pathway built for steering wheel free vehicles.
The order does not claim Cybercab is unsafe or that Tesla broke a rule. It requires Tesla to explain, under oath, the reasoning behind decisions the company already made when it self-certified the vehicle. That distinction matters, but so does the exposure. Motor1’s reporting, summarized here, put potential civil penalty exposure as high as $139 million if NHTSA later finds the certification was flawed, on top of whatever criminal risk comes with a false sworn statement.
Tesla has not said publicly how it plans to respond. Cybercab is still carrying passengers in Austin through the Robotaxi app while the September 30 deadline approaches, and the company has continued expanding the vehicle’s footprint even as the regulatory question remains open. The Special Order does not pause any of that and just sets a date by which Tesla has to put its certification logic on the record, with a company officer’s name attached to it.
In a new interview on Wednesday, Tesla uber bull Ron Baron said that anyone looking to buy the company’s stock should do so as soon as they can.
Baron, founder and CEO of Baron Capital and one of Tesla’s most persistent institutional bulls, used a CNBC Squawk Box appearance on Wednesday to deliver a familiar message with fresh urgency: In his opinion, Tesla stock is a buy:
“The time to buy the stock is now. FSD is catching on, and it’s going to be bigger and bigger. 55% of new buyers are buying it (Teslas) with FSD. It’s going to be everywhere. It’s safer.”
The Baron Capital frontman’s case is built around Full Self-Driving. Tesla reported 1.48 million active FSD subscriptions in the second quarter, up 56 percent year over year, and company officials have said roughly 55 percent of new North American deliveries left with a subscription enabled.
Baron framed that attach rate as proof the product is moving from enthusiast extra to default expectation, and as a reason software, not just vehicle volume, should drive the next phase of value.
His conviction on Tesla shares is not theoretical, as Baron Capital made its first Tesla investment in 2014, after years of meetings that began around the 2010 IPO roadshow. The firm later built a large SpaceX position starting in 2017.
Ron Baron today in new interview on Tesla:
“The time to buy the stock is now. FSD is catching on, and it’s going to be bigger and bigger. 55% of new buyers are buying it (Teslas) with FSD. It’s going to be everywhere. It’s safer.” pic.twitter.com/Rv5PB0bVZ2
— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) September 16, 2026
Baron said those Musk-led bets have generated about $30 billion of the $71 billion in profits Baron Capital has produced for clients. He put the firm’s current exposure at roughly $25 billion in SpaceX and $5 billion in Tesla. Personally, he described SpaceX as his largest holding, at about $5 billion, with about $1.5 billion in Tesla and additional Tesla exposure through the firm’s funds.
That concentration is also a statement of loyalty. Asked about talk of a SpaceX-Tesla combination, Baron said he had already walked Elon Musk through arguments for and against a deal, then declined to repeat them on air. His public position was simpler: “Whatever you decide is better is what I’m going to support,” he said to Musk.
Baron also said that he picked up the farewell edition of the Model S after Tesla decided to sunset the vehicle earlier this year, calling it his favorite car he’s ever driven.
Tesla and SpaceX take “Terafab” Trademark fight to Federal Court
NHTSA just escalated its Tesla Cybercab investigation in a big way
