Investor's Corner
Tesla – SolarCity merger: the devil is in the details
On Monday August 1st, Tesla announced that it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire SolarCity. Tesla provided investors with an Investor Presentation slide set, and a 180 pages long Form 8-K filing.
Investor Presentation
In the slide presentation titled Tesla to acquire SolarCity, the company provided details for the proposed transaction.
Tesla would acquire SolarCity in an all-stock transaction valued at $2.6 billion. SolarCity shareholders will receive 0.110 shares of Tesla stock for each share of SolarCity valued at $25.37 per share. The transaction is expected to close in Q4 2016 and subject to the approval by a majority of disinterested shareholders at both SolarCity and Tesla, to be voted upon at each respective shareholder meeting.
The Tesla SolarCity “strategic” combination would:
- Accelerate the transition to sustainable energy
- Create world’s only integrated sustainable energy company
- Drive products development and innovation
- Catalyze solar energy adoption
- [Provide] substantial cost efficiencies.
The presentation stated that SolarCity provides best-in-class rooftop solar installation costs of $1.92 per watt as of 4Q15, and is America’s #1 vertically integrated provider of residential and commercial solar, with a 35% share of the residential market and 14% share of the commercial market in 2015. Tesla is the world’s fastest growing car company, with an 18% market share of the “large Luxury sedans” in 2015 with its Model S.
The combined company would leverage Tesla’s design and manufacturing expertise:
- Speed development of beautiful, differentiated and technologically superior products
- Improve solar value proposition by integrating storage, reducing system cost and improving reliability
- Fully integrate product suite for a seamless user experience, delivering an improved, lower-cost product for customers
- Develop products for residential, commercial and grid-scale applications
- Take advantage of SolarCity’s industry-leading project finance capabilities
One of the major points of the slide presentation is that the combined companies would provide “substantial cost efficiencies”, with $150 million of direct cost synergies expected to be achieved in the first full year after closing the transaction.
The cost synergies would be driven by sales and marketing efficiencies, and corporate and overhead savings. The value proposition is improved by lowering hardware costs, reducing installation and service costs, improving manufacturing efficiency, reducing customer acquisition costs, and cutting capital costs.
Form 8-K Filing
The very long document filing includes the usual boilerplate for merger transactions, but also reveals quite a few interesting tidbits, buried into the document. These are quotes from the document.
Stockholders of SolarCity will be asked to vote on the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, and stockholders of Tesla will be asked to vote on the approval of the Merger and the Share Issuance, at special meetings of the stockholders of SolarCity and Tesla, respectively, that will be held on dates to be announced.
“The Merger Agreement and the Merger be adopted and approved by stockholders of SolarCity, including by the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of SolarCity common stock […] that are not owned by Mr. Elon Musk and the other directors. other than Nancy E. Pfund and Donald R. Kendall, Jr.”
Similarly, “the Merger and the Share Issuance be approved by the stockholders of Tesla, including by the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock […] that are not owned by Mr. Elon Musk and the other directors and the named executive officers of SolarCity and certain of their affiliates.”
This means that the approval will likely rely on mutual fund managers and banks that hold large chunks of both Tesla and SolarCity stock.
As part of the agreement, SolarCity has a 45-day period known as a “go-shop”, which runs through September 14, 2016. This means that SolarCity is allowed to solicit alternative proposals during that time.
The all-stock transaction, with an equity value of $2.6 billion, is based on the 5-day volume-weighted average price of Tesla shares as of July 29, 2016. Under the agreement, SolarCity stockholders will receive 0.110 Tesla common shares per SolarCity share, valuing SolarCity common stock at $25.37 per share based on the 5-day volume weighted average price of Tesla shares as of July 29, 2016.
The “Excluded Company Parties”, i.e. the directors and named executive officers other than Nancy E. Pfund and Donald R. Kendall, Jr., that will not be able to vote at the Company Stockholders Meeting include Lyndon R. Rive, Peter J. Rive, Tanguy V. Serra, Hayden D. Barnard, Seth R. Weissman, Elon Musk, John H.N. Fisher, Antonio Gracias and Jeffrey B. Straubel.
While most stock options equity awards of each company will be automatically converted into stock options of the “merged” company, the stock options set forth in a “Company disclosure letter” shall be cancelled for no consideration. It turns out that these options are the ones that were granted by SolarCity to Lyndon and Peter Rive, the CEO and CTO of SolarCity. These options amounted to about $128 million, and would have been earned over a 10 year period, based on achieving a set of goals of SolarCity stock price and operational results. For some unknown treason, Elon Musk’s cousins will get the shaft in the merger transaction related to their stock options.
But do not feel too bad for the cousins. According to a research report from Reuters, that analyzed the results of the merger, “three of Musk’s relatives, including brother Kimbal Musk and cousins Lyndon Rive and Peter Rive, will own a combined stake of 0.5 percent in Tesla. Kimbal Musk is a director of Tesla.”
According to Reuters “Elon Musk and key institutional investors will probably tighten their control over electric car maker Tesla Motors Inc after it acquires sister company SolarCity Inc.” “The largest institutional shareholder, Fidelity Management and Research, will see its stake grow from 12.2 percent to 13.4 percent. Two Fidelity-managed funds, Fidelity Contrafund and Fidelity OTC, together will control another 7.3 percent, up from 6.5 percent.”
Musk will remain the largest individual shareholder, boosting his stake from 23.2 percent to 25.0 percent according to Reuters.
Note that Fidelity has already come out in favor of the merger.
“Musk, eight major institutional investors and the two Fidelity funds control 45.7 percent of Tesla. After the merger, the same group’s combined stake will rise to 49.0 percent.” “Other major institutional shareholders include Scottish investment manager Bailie Gifford & Co, which will maintain an 8.9 percent stake in the combined companies; T. Rowe Price Associates, 5.5 percent, and Vanguard Group, 3.6 percent. Big banks, including several Tesla lenders, also will maintain significant stakes after the merger: Bank of Montreal, 4.1 percent; Morgan Stanley, 3.0 percent; Goldman Sachs, 2.2 percent, and J.P. Morgan Chase, 1.0 percent.”
What this all means is that individual investors will have no say in the approval of the merger, and only a few more institutional investors are needed, besides Fidelity, to approve the merger. The only thing that could derail the merger is a third party bid for SolarCity, during the go-shop period. Given how debt ridden is SolarCity, the chance of of such a bid are fairly remote.
Market Reaction
The initial market reaction to the details of the merger agreement was mixed, but eventually turned negative. On Monday the stock reached $236, but closed at $229. On Tuesday the stock initially sold off even more to $221, closing the session at $227.
Looking at the chart, The MACD has started pinching, indicating a possible end of the MACD-run that started on July 1st. Anyone selling today would have had a nice $11 gain, over a 1-month period, a very nice return. I personally closed my July 1st call option trade (I was long Sept 230 calls) when TSLA reached $236 on Monday. I was planning to close my trade before the Quarterly report is released on Wednesday, and the high point of Monday made it a perfect exit. Notice that I never hold options or stock before a quarterly report, especially for a volatile stock as TSLA, as the post report swings are so wide that one can easily lose their shirt in the the span of a few hours.
Source: Wall Street I/O
Elon Musk
SpaceX’s Anthropic deal has a catch, and Elon Musk just addressed it
Elon Musk says SpaceX’s Anthropic compute deal cuts both ways after Chamath floats higher prices.
Elon Musk pushed back on Sunday against the idea that SpaceX’s compute contract with Anthropic is a one way bet, after venture capitalist Chamath Palihapitiya argued the company could use a termination clause to charge the AI lab far more.
“It works both ways, of course. If compute becomes plentiful and cheap, SpaceX revenue will drop. No crying in the casino for either party,” Musk wrote on X Sunday evening, replying to a clip of Palihapitiya’s comments shared by AI commentator Rohan Paul.
On the All-In podcast released Sunday, Palihapitiya said either side can walk away from the agreement on 90 days’ notice. If data center supply tightens, he argued, SpaceX could exercise that option and bring the contract back at two to three times the current price, and Anthropic would have little choice but to accept. He called it “the kingmaking move,” according to BigGo Finance.
The clause itself is not new. SpaceX disclosed in its IPO filings in May that Anthropic would pay $1.25 billion per month for dedicated capacity at its Colossus clusters through May 2029, nearly $45 billion in total, with both companies able to terminate on 90 days’ notice, as Teslarati reported at the time. SpaceX’s later compute deals with Google and Reflection AI carry similar exit terms.
What has changed is the political backdrop. Palihapitiya’s thesis rests on incoming Democratic governors pulling tax incentives for data centers and slowing new construction. In Texas, Gov.-elect Gina Hinojosa campaigned on a moratorium on new data center approvals, and Deutsche Bank analysts warned last week that SpaceX’s Texas compute capacity could face delays. SpaceX and Tesla shares both fell after the midterm results.
A slowdown would favor companies that already own capacity. SpaceX acquired xAI in February and has been renting data centers to outside AI labs before the space is needed for Grok. At the Baron Investment Conference on Friday, Musk said SpaceX was “getting 50 billion a year for 35 billion dollar investments” and that it can bring a data center online in eight or nine months, compared to two and a half years for competitors. He also said SpaceX is tracking toward an annualized revenue rate above $100 billion in December, with a “best guess” of $500 billion by December 2027.
Musk’s reply points to the other side of the clause. Anthropic has signed large compute agreements with Amazon, Google and Microsoft, and if that capacity comes online faster than new construction slows, the AI lab would have its own leverage to renegotiate or leave. Musk has called Anthropic “obviously currently the leader in AI,” and it remains one of SpaceX’s largest compute customers.
SpaceX shares rose more than 2 percent in overnight trading late Sunday after closing Friday at $134.27, according to Stocktwits.
Tesla and SpaceX shares fell on Wednesday after Democrats swept both chambers of Congress. The decline stood out as broader market securities recovered and turned positive, while both of Musk’s publicly traded companies lagged.
CEO Elon Musk already joked about the unsuccessful campaigning for the Republicans, but now the new party will make pretty drastic changes to how it handles Tesla and SpaceX, and those companies will adjust their outlook.
Let’s take a deeper look.
Tesla ($TSLA)
Tesla shares traded lower during the regular session after Democrats secured both the House and Senate. The stock was down 2.32 percent at around 1:45 p.m. on the East Coast, trading at around $389.30.
The pressure is tied to more than the raw scale of Musk’s political spending, estimated at $450–474 million this cycle with roughly $224 million directed at Texas. In that state, Tesla now faces a Democratic governor and a Democratic senator after Gina Hinojosa unseated Greg Abbott and James Talarico defeated Ken Paxton.
The Austin Gigafactory, Robotaxi pilot programs in multiple Texas cities, and any related AI compute expansion sit under a new state executive who campaigned against certain corporate subsidies and floated a moratorium on new data-center construction.
Federally, Democratic control of key committees opens the door to deeper examination of Tesla’s autonomous-driving safety record, federal energy-storage and manufacturing incentives, and the national-security implications of any combination with SpaceX.
Investors are also weighing whether the company’s historically close alignment with the prior Republican leadership will invite slower permitting, additional hearings, or tighter rules on Full Self-Driving deployment.
For Tesla, the political shift adds near-term friction around state permitting and federal regulatory approvals for autonomy and energy storage. A potential merger with SpaceX may face slower review even if it proceeds.
Core growth drivers such as vehicle deliveries, energy deployments, and robotaxi rollout remain intact, yet the stock now carries a higher political-risk premium that could weigh on valuation until the company demonstrates workable relationships with the new Texas leadership and congressional majorities.
SpaceX ($SPCX)
SpaceX shares also declined in live trading on November 4 following the Democratic midterm sweep. The stock traded at $134.97, down 4.49 percent. The drop occurred even as broader indexes stabilized, highlighting a company-specific reaction to the election outcome.
Musk’s large contributions, concentrated in Texas races that both companies lost, place SpaceX’s Starbase launch facility and headquarters under a new Democratic governor.
At the federal level, Democratic control of Congress enables greater scrutiny of NASA, the Department of Defense, and other contracts that support a meaningful share of revenue, along with reviews of Starlink national-security uses and any Tesla merger. Analysts have noted that empowered committees can hold hearings and request documents on these relationships.
For SpaceX, the results raise the risk of delayed contract awards, higher compliance costs, and tighter constraints on AI and satellite infrastructure expansion, particularly in Texas where a data-center moratorium has been discussed.
A merger with Tesla could encounter political friction that slows integration of launch, connectivity, and autonomy capabilities.
While Starlink growth and launch cadence continue as primary drivers, the company faces a more contested path for federal funding and state-level operations, requiring management to rebuild ties with the new congressional majorities and Texas leadership to limit the overhang.
Elon Musk
Elon Musk calls Earth’s data centers “peanuts” next to what SpaceX is planning in orbit
Elon Musk says SpaceX capex efficiency is underestimated as orbital data centers loom by 2028.
Elon Musk is pushing back on one of the biggest worries hanging over SpaceX stock. In a reply on X on Sunday, Musk said the company’s capital expenditure efficiency is severely underestimated. He was responding to a Milk Road Stocks post citing analyst Kyle Reidhead, who estimates SpaceX will need to spend roughly $470 billion over the next five quarters.
Reidhead built that figure around the target SpaceX set on its third quarter earnings call: 13 gigawatts or more of compute by the end of 2027. In his breakdown, Nvidia captures 83 to 89 percent of the spending. SpaceX ended the quarter with 1.7 GW of nameplate compute and guided to $35 billion to $40 billion in fourth quarter capex, as Teslarati reported.
Musk did not attach a number to his claim, but the earnings call shows the argument. CFO Bret Johnsen said new compute currently pays for itself in under a year at today’s pricing, and Musk said that window could shrink to six months next year. Using that pace, Reidhead argues about $230 billion of the $470 billion could come from operating cash flow and about $60 billion from SpaceX’s roughly $90 billion cash pile, leaving around $180 billion to borrow. Musk confirmed last week that SpaceX had already closed a new $40 billion debt raise to buy GPUs.
The ground buildout is not the end goal. It is what is meant to pay for the move to orbit. Replying on Friday to charts built from Sequoia partner Shaun Maguire’s SpaceX model, Musk wrote that “Terrestrial compute will be peanuts compared to orbital compute,” adding that orbital compute deployed per month “probably exceeds terrestrial around the end of 2028 and then far exceeds it in 2029.”
Maguire’s model shows how steep that path is. It has capex climbing from $88 billion this year to $290 billion in 2027 and $369 billion in 2028, with SpaceX burning $77.8 billion in cash this year and $122.6 billion next year before turning $114.9 billion cash positive in 2028. Musk’s response to the model was, “I think we can do better.”
The orbital half runs through Starmind. SpaceX plans to operate up to 1 million AI satellites flying in clusters of about 10, linked by roughly 10 terabits of bandwidth, with deployment of thousands of units starting as soon as late 2027 out of its Gigasat factory in Bastrop, Texas, according to SpaceX’s space safety page. Musk has said each Starmind spacecraft will carry more than 250 kW of solar power.
Getting there depends on launch volume. Maguire’s model assumes 250 Starship flights in 2028, up from two this year and 38 next year. The nearer test is financial: SpaceX guided to $33 billion to $37 billion in first quarter 2027 revenue, more than double the $14.58 billion it booked in Q3, and Musk reposted that guidance again on Sunday morning.
SpaceX’s Anthropic deal has a catch, and Elon Musk just addressed it
Elon Musk spotlights the Starlink rescue that got through where no cell tower could
