Investor's Corner
Tesla – SolarCity merger: the devil is in the details
On Monday August 1st, Tesla announced that it had reached a definitive agreement to acquire SolarCity. Tesla provided investors with an Investor Presentation slide set, and a 180 pages long Form 8-K filing.
Investor Presentation
In the slide presentation titled Tesla to acquire SolarCity, the company provided details for the proposed transaction.
Tesla would acquire SolarCity in an all-stock transaction valued at $2.6 billion. SolarCity shareholders will receive 0.110 shares of Tesla stock for each share of SolarCity valued at $25.37 per share. The transaction is expected to close in Q4 2016 and subject to the approval by a majority of disinterested shareholders at both SolarCity and Tesla, to be voted upon at each respective shareholder meeting.
The Tesla SolarCity “strategic” combination would:
- Accelerate the transition to sustainable energy
- Create world’s only integrated sustainable energy company
- Drive products development and innovation
- Catalyze solar energy adoption
- [Provide] substantial cost efficiencies.
The presentation stated that SolarCity provides best-in-class rooftop solar installation costs of $1.92 per watt as of 4Q15, and is America’s #1 vertically integrated provider of residential and commercial solar, with a 35% share of the residential market and 14% share of the commercial market in 2015. Tesla is the world’s fastest growing car company, with an 18% market share of the “large Luxury sedans” in 2015 with its Model S.
The combined company would leverage Tesla’s design and manufacturing expertise:
- Speed development of beautiful, differentiated and technologically superior products
- Improve solar value proposition by integrating storage, reducing system cost and improving reliability
- Fully integrate product suite for a seamless user experience, delivering an improved, lower-cost product for customers
- Develop products for residential, commercial and grid-scale applications
- Take advantage of SolarCity’s industry-leading project finance capabilities
One of the major points of the slide presentation is that the combined companies would provide “substantial cost efficiencies”, with $150 million of direct cost synergies expected to be achieved in the first full year after closing the transaction.
The cost synergies would be driven by sales and marketing efficiencies, and corporate and overhead savings. The value proposition is improved by lowering hardware costs, reducing installation and service costs, improving manufacturing efficiency, reducing customer acquisition costs, and cutting capital costs.
Form 8-K Filing
The very long document filing includes the usual boilerplate for merger transactions, but also reveals quite a few interesting tidbits, buried into the document. These are quotes from the document.
Stockholders of SolarCity will be asked to vote on the adoption and approval of the Merger Agreement and the Merger, and stockholders of Tesla will be asked to vote on the approval of the Merger and the Share Issuance, at special meetings of the stockholders of SolarCity and Tesla, respectively, that will be held on dates to be announced.
“The Merger Agreement and the Merger be adopted and approved by stockholders of SolarCity, including by the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of SolarCity common stock […] that are not owned by Mr. Elon Musk and the other directors. other than Nancy E. Pfund and Donald R. Kendall, Jr.”
Similarly, “the Merger and the Share Issuance be approved by the stockholders of Tesla, including by the holders of a majority of the total votes of shares of Tesla common stock […] that are not owned by Mr. Elon Musk and the other directors and the named executive officers of SolarCity and certain of their affiliates.”
This means that the approval will likely rely on mutual fund managers and banks that hold large chunks of both Tesla and SolarCity stock.
As part of the agreement, SolarCity has a 45-day period known as a “go-shop”, which runs through September 14, 2016. This means that SolarCity is allowed to solicit alternative proposals during that time.
The all-stock transaction, with an equity value of $2.6 billion, is based on the 5-day volume-weighted average price of Tesla shares as of July 29, 2016. Under the agreement, SolarCity stockholders will receive 0.110 Tesla common shares per SolarCity share, valuing SolarCity common stock at $25.37 per share based on the 5-day volume weighted average price of Tesla shares as of July 29, 2016.
The “Excluded Company Parties”, i.e. the directors and named executive officers other than Nancy E. Pfund and Donald R. Kendall, Jr., that will not be able to vote at the Company Stockholders Meeting include Lyndon R. Rive, Peter J. Rive, Tanguy V. Serra, Hayden D. Barnard, Seth R. Weissman, Elon Musk, John H.N. Fisher, Antonio Gracias and Jeffrey B. Straubel.
While most stock options equity awards of each company will be automatically converted into stock options of the “merged” company, the stock options set forth in a “Company disclosure letter” shall be cancelled for no consideration. It turns out that these options are the ones that were granted by SolarCity to Lyndon and Peter Rive, the CEO and CTO of SolarCity. These options amounted to about $128 million, and would have been earned over a 10 year period, based on achieving a set of goals of SolarCity stock price and operational results. For some unknown treason, Elon Musk’s cousins will get the shaft in the merger transaction related to their stock options.
But do not feel too bad for the cousins. According to a research report from Reuters, that analyzed the results of the merger, “three of Musk’s relatives, including brother Kimbal Musk and cousins Lyndon Rive and Peter Rive, will own a combined stake of 0.5 percent in Tesla. Kimbal Musk is a director of Tesla.”
According to Reuters “Elon Musk and key institutional investors will probably tighten their control over electric car maker Tesla Motors Inc after it acquires sister company SolarCity Inc.” “The largest institutional shareholder, Fidelity Management and Research, will see its stake grow from 12.2 percent to 13.4 percent. Two Fidelity-managed funds, Fidelity Contrafund and Fidelity OTC, together will control another 7.3 percent, up from 6.5 percent.”
Musk will remain the largest individual shareholder, boosting his stake from 23.2 percent to 25.0 percent according to Reuters.
Note that Fidelity has already come out in favor of the merger.
“Musk, eight major institutional investors and the two Fidelity funds control 45.7 percent of Tesla. After the merger, the same group’s combined stake will rise to 49.0 percent.” “Other major institutional shareholders include Scottish investment manager Bailie Gifford & Co, which will maintain an 8.9 percent stake in the combined companies; T. Rowe Price Associates, 5.5 percent, and Vanguard Group, 3.6 percent. Big banks, including several Tesla lenders, also will maintain significant stakes after the merger: Bank of Montreal, 4.1 percent; Morgan Stanley, 3.0 percent; Goldman Sachs, 2.2 percent, and J.P. Morgan Chase, 1.0 percent.”
What this all means is that individual investors will have no say in the approval of the merger, and only a few more institutional investors are needed, besides Fidelity, to approve the merger. The only thing that could derail the merger is a third party bid for SolarCity, during the go-shop period. Given how debt ridden is SolarCity, the chance of of such a bid are fairly remote.
Market Reaction
The initial market reaction to the details of the merger agreement was mixed, but eventually turned negative. On Monday the stock reached $236, but closed at $229. On Tuesday the stock initially sold off even more to $221, closing the session at $227.
Looking at the chart, The MACD has started pinching, indicating a possible end of the MACD-run that started on July 1st. Anyone selling today would have had a nice $11 gain, over a 1-month period, a very nice return. I personally closed my July 1st call option trade (I was long Sept 230 calls) when TSLA reached $236 on Monday. I was planning to close my trade before the Quarterly report is released on Wednesday, and the high point of Monday made it a perfect exit. Notice that I never hold options or stock before a quarterly report, especially for a volatile stock as TSLA, as the post report swings are so wide that one can easily lose their shirt in the the span of a few hours.
Source: Wall Street I/O
Elon Musk
Tesla stock gets latest synopsis from Jim Cramer: ‘It’s actually a robotics company’
“Turns out it’s actually a robotics and Cybercab company, and I want to buy, buy, buy. Yes, Tesla’s the paper that turned into scissors in one session,” Cramer said.
Tesla stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) got its latest synopsis from Wall Street analyst Jim Cramer, who finally realized something that many fans of the company have known all along: it’s not a car company. Instead, it’s a robotics company.
In a recent note that was released after Tesla reported Earnings in late January, Cramer seemed to recognize that the underwhelming financials and overall performance of the automotive division were not representative of the current state of affairs.
Instead, we’re seeing a company transition itself away from its early identity, essentially evolving like a caterpillar into a butterfly.
The narrative of the Earnings Call was simple: We’re not a car company, at least not from a birds-eye view. We’re an AI and Robotics company, and we are transitioning to this quicker than most people realize.
Tesla stock gets another analysis from Jim Cramer, and investors will like it
Tesla’s Q4 Earnings Call featured plenty of analysis from CEO Elon Musk and others, and some of the more minor details of the call were even indicative of a company that is moving toward AI instead of its cars. For example, the Model S and Model X will be no more after Q2, as Musk said that they serve relatively no purpose for the future.
Instead, Tesla is shifting its focus to the vehicles catered for autonomy and its Robotaxi and self-driving efforts.
Cramer recognizes this:
“…we got results from Tesla, which actually beat numbers, but nobody cares about the numbers here, as electric vehicles are the past. And according to CEO Elon Musk, the future of this company comes down to Cybercabs and humanoid robots. Stock fell more than 3% the next day. That may be because their capital expenditures budget was higher than expected, or maybe people wanted more details from the new businesses. At this point, I think Musk acolytes might be more excited about SpaceX, which is planning to come public later this year.”
He continued, highlighting the company’s true transition away from vehicles to its Cybercab, Optimus, and AI ambitions:
“I know it’s hard to believe how quickly this market can change its attitude. Last night, I heard a disastrous car company speak. Turns out it’s actually a robotics and Cybercab company, and I want to buy, buy, buy. Yes, Tesla’s the paper that turned into scissors in one session. I didn’t like it as a car company. Boy, I love it as a Cybercab and humanoid robot juggernaut. Call me a buyer and give me five robots while I’m at it.”
Cramer’s narrative seems to fit that of the most bullish Tesla investors. Anyone who is labeled a “permabull” has been echoing a similar sentiment over the past several years: Tesla is not a car company any longer.
Instead, the true focus is on the future and the potential that AI and Robotics bring to the company. It is truly difficult to put Tesla shares in the same group as companies like Ford, General Motors, and others.
Tesla shares are down less than half a percent at the time of publishing, trading at $423.69.
There are a lot of Tesla bulls out there who have astronomical expectations for the company, especially as its arm of reach has gone well past automotive and energy and entered artificial intelligence and robotics.
However, some of the most bullish Tesla investors believe the company could become worth $100 trillion, and CEO Elon Musk does not believe that number is completely out of the question, even if it sounds almost ridiculous.
To put that number into perspective, the top ten most valuable companies in the world — NVIDIA, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, TSMC, Meta, Saudi Aramco, Broadcom, and Tesla — are worth roughly $26 trillion.
Will Tesla join the fold? Predicting a triple merger with SpaceX and xAI
Cathie Wood of ARK Invest believes the number is reasonable considering Tesla’s long-reaching industry ambitions:
“…in the world of AI, what do you have to have to win? You have to have proprietary data, and think about all the proprietary data he has, different kinds of proprietary data. Tesla, the language of the road; Neuralink, multiomics data; nobody else has that data. X, nobody else has that data either. I could see $100 trillion. I think it’s going to happen because of convergence. I think Tesla is the leading candidate [for $100 trillion] for the reason I just said.”
Musk said late last year that all of his companies seem to be “heading toward convergence,” and it’s started to come to fruition. Tesla invested in xAI, as revealed in its Q4 Earnings Shareholder Deck, and SpaceX recently acquired xAI, marking the first step in the potential for a massive umbrella of companies under Musk’s watch.
SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise
Now that it is happening, it seems Musk is even more enthusiastic about a massive valuation that would swell to nearly four-times the value of the top ten most valuable companies in the world currently, as he said on X, the idea of a $100 trillion valuation is “not impossible.”
It’s not impossible
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 6, 2026
Tesla is not just a car company. With its many projects, including the launch of Robotaxi, the progress of the Optimus robot, and its AI ambitions, it has the potential to continue gaining value at an accelerating rate.
Musk’s comments show his confidence in Tesla’s numerous projects, especially as some begin to mature and some head toward their initial stages.
Elon Musk
Tesla director pay lawsuit sees lawyer fees slashed by $100 million
The ruling leaves the case’s underlying settlement intact while significantly reducing what the plaintiffs’ attorneys will receive.
The Delaware Supreme Court has cut more than $100 million from a legal fee award tied to a shareholder lawsuit challenging compensation paid to Tesla directors between 2017 and 2020.
The ruling leaves the case’s underlying settlement intact while significantly reducing what the plaintiffs’ attorneys will receive.
Delaware Supreme Court trims legal fees
As noted in a Bloomberg Law report, the case targeted pay granted to Tesla directors, including CEO Elon Musk, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, Kimbal Musk, and Rupert Murdoch. The Delaware Chancery Court had awarded $176 million to the plaintiffs. Tesla’s board must also return stock options and forego years worth of pay.
As per Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. in an opinion for the Delaware Supreme Court’s full five-member panel, however, the decision of the Delaware Chancery Court to award $176 million to a pension fund’s law firm “erred by including in its financial benefit analysis the intrinsic value” of options being returned by Tesla’s board.
The justices then reduced the fee award from $176 million to $70.9 million. “As we measure it, $71 million reflects a reasonable fee for counsel’s efforts and does not result in a windfall,” Chief Justice Seitz wrote.
Other settlement terms still intact
The Supreme Court upheld the settlement itself, which requires Tesla’s board to return stock and options valued at up to $735 million and to forgo three years of additional compensation worth about $184 million.
Tesla argued during oral arguments that a fee award closer to $70 million would be appropriate. Interestingly enough, back in October, Justice Karen L. Valihura noted that the $176 award was $60 million more than the Delaware judiciary’s budget from the previous year. This was quite interesting as the case was “settled midstream.”
The lawsuit was brought by a pension fund on behalf of Tesla shareholders and focused exclusively on director pay during the 2017–2020 period. The case is separate from other high-profile compensation disputes involving Elon Musk.
Tesla ends Full Self-Driving purchase option in the U.S.
Musk bankers looking to trim xAI debt after SpaceX merger: report
