A report released by the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute is showing the cost savings to the average vehicle owner versus those same owners driving electric. The report compares gasoline fuel costs state-by-state to the cost of electricity for equivalent miles driven. The differences are shown in both ratios and dollar figures, with owners in some specific states seeing much higher savings when driving electric versus those from other states.
The report is unique in that it ignores the often-politicized arguments for data of this nature; such as the “source-to-use” data often manipulated or argued. Instead, it looks purely from a consumer perspective, showing what kinds of cost savings could be had for the average vehicle owner in any given state.
By comparing the average fuel economy of cars sold with the average expected range of a battery-electric vehicle sold on the market, the report found that drivers in Washington State, Oregon, Idaho, Louisiana, and Utah would save the most by switching to an electric vehicle. Drivers in Hawaii, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts would save the least. Most of these differences are due to a lower disparity between gasoline costs and residential electricity costs in the latter list of states and a higher disparity between those in the former list.
The report’s data considered the average driving distance and amount per state (NHTSA data), the average fuel economy of vehicles sold in that state (per another UofM study), the average cost per gallon for gasoline state-by-state (according to AAA), and the average cost of electricity in each state (per EIA). The report then compared these to one another.
The average cost of gasoline in the United States, as of December 23, 2017, was $2.441 per gallon. The highest price was in Hawaii at $3.297 per gallon and the lowest was in Alabama at $2.169. High fuel costs, however, did not always translate directly into more savings with a battery electric vehicle. Similarly, lower fuel costs were not necessarily a guarantee that the payoff for going electric would be minimal. Electricity costs could change that.
And they did. The average price of residential electricity in the United States, as of October 2017, was $0.1284 per kilowatt hour. Hawaii had the highest price at $0.2929 per kWh and Louisiana had the lowest at $0.0972/kWh. The higher cost of electricity was more of an indicator of lower gains by going to an electric vehicle than were gasoline prices. Most of the states in the top five for benefiting the least by going electric were also within the top ten for the highest-priced electricity. Yet the states with the lowest-priced electricity were not likely to show up on the top five list for the best gains by getting an EV.
For overall averages nationwide, the cost of driving a gasoline vehicle was $1,117 per year while the average cost of driving a battery electric vehicle was $485. On the whole, most Americans can expect to save at least something if they go to an electric vehicle for most of their driving.
Also interesting was the average fuel economy required in order to meet or better the electric vehicle’s cost savings to the owner. Even in the worst states, where ratios were lowest, the average fuel economy was relatively high. In Hawaii, where a gasoline car owner can only expect to save about $400 per year for getting an EV, the required fuel economy to average that cost ratio out to $0 is 34.1 mpg. In the average state, the fuel economy required is around 57.6 mpg. In the state of Washington, a full 90 mpg is required to break even with an electric car.
These numbers are interesting and should speak directly to consumers at a bare-bones pocketbook level. Buying an EV can mean significant annual savings. The report, Relative Costs of Driving Electric and Gasoline Vehicles in the Individual U.S. States, can be found at this link.
Energy
Tesla’s new Megablock system can power 400,000 homes in under a month
Tesla also unveiled the Megapack 3, the latest iteration of its flagship utility scale battery.
Tesla has unveiled the Megablock and Megapack 3, the latest additions to its industrial-scale battery storage solution lineup.
The products highlight Tesla Energy’s growing role in the company, as well as the division’s growing efforts to provide sustainable energy solutions for industrial-scale applications.
Megablock targets speed and scale
During the “Las Megas” event in Las Vegas, Tesla launched Megablock, a pre-engineered medium-voltage block designed to integrate Megapack 3 units in a plug-and-play system. Capable of 20 MWh AC with a 25-year life cycle and more than 10,000 cycles, the Megablock could achieve 91% round-trip efficiency at medium voltage, inclusive of auxiliary loads.
Tesla emphasized that Megablock can be installed 23% faster with up to 40% lower construction costs. The platform eliminates above-ground cabling through a new flexible busbar assembly and delivers site-level density of 248 MWh per acre. With Megablock, Tesla is also aiming to commission 1 GWh in just 20 business days, or enough to power 400,000 homes in less than a month.
“With Megablock, we are targeting to commission 1 GWh in 20 business days, which is the equivalent of bringing power to 400,000 homes in less than a month. It’s crazy. How are we planning to do that? Like most things at Tesla, we are ruthlessly attacking every opportunity to save our customers time, simplify the process, remove steps, (and) automate as much as we can,” the company said.
Megapack 3 is all about simplicity
The Megapack 3 is Tesla’s next-generation utility battery, designed with a simplified architecture that cuts 78% of connections compared to the previous version. Its thermal bay is drastically simplified, and it uses a Model Y heat pump on steroids. The battery weighs about 86,000 pounds and holds 5 MWh of usable AC energy. Tesla engineers incorporated a larger battery module and a new 2.8-liter LFP cell co-developed with the company’s cell team.
The Megapack 3 is designed for serviceability, and it features easier front access and no roof penetrations. About 75% of Megapack 3’s total mass is battery cells, with individual modules weighing as much as a Cybertruck. It’s also tough, with an ambient operating temperature range from -40C to 60C. This should allow the Megapack 3 to operate optimally from the coldest to the hottest regions on the planet.
Production is set to begin at Tesla’s Houston Megafactory in late 2026, with planned capacity of 50 GWh per year. Additional supply will come from Tesla’s 7 GWh LFP facility in Nevada, which is expected to open in 2025, as well as with third-party partners.
Energy
Tesla Energy is the world’s top global battery storage system provider again
Tesla Energy captured 15% of the battery storage segment’s global market share in 2024.
Tesla Energy held its top position in the global battery energy storage system (BESS) integrator market for the second consecutive year, capturing 15% of global market share in 2024, as per Wood Mackenzie’s latest rankings.
Tesla Energy’s lead, however, is shrinking, as Chinese competitors like Sungrow are steadily increasing their global footprint, particularly in European markets.
Tesla Energy dominates in North America, but its lead is narrowing globally
Tesla Energy retained its leadership in the North American market with a commanding 39% share in 2024. Sungrow, though still ranked second in the region, saw its share drop from 17% to 10%. Powin took third place, even if the company itself filed for bankruptcy earlier this year, as noted in a Solar Power World report.
On the global stage, Tesla Energy’s lead over Sungrow shrank from four points in 2023 to just one in 2024, indicating intensifying competition. Chinese firm CRRC came in third worldwide with an 8% share.
Wood Mackenzie ranked vendors based on MWh shipments with recognized revenue in 2024. According to analyst Kevin Shang, “Competition among established BESS integrators remains incredibly intense. Seven of the top 10 vendors last year struggled to expand their market share, remaining either unchanged or declining.”
Chinese integrators surge in Europe, falter in U.S.
China’s influence on the BESS market continues to grow, with seven of the global top 10 BESS integrators now headquartered in the country. Chinese companies saw a 67% year-over-year increase in European market share, and four of the top 10 BESS vendors in Europe are now based in China. In contrast, Chinese companies’ market share in North America dropped more than 30%, from 23% to 16% amid Tesla Energy’s momentum and the Trump administration’s policies.
Wood Mackenzie noted that success in the global BESS space will hinge on companies’ ability to adapt to divergent regulations and geopolitical headwinds. “The global BESS integrator landscape is becoming increasingly complex, with regional trade policies and geopolitical tensions reshaping competitive dynamics,” Shang noted, pointing to Tesla’s maintained lead and the rapid ascent of Chinese rivals as signs of a shifting industry balance.
“While Tesla maintains its global leadership, the rapid rise of Chinese integrators in Europe and their dominance in emerging markets like the Middle East signals a fundamental shift in the industry. Success will increasingly depend on companies’ ability to navigate diverse regulatory environments, adapt to local market requirements, and maintain competitive cost structures across multiple regions,” the analyst added.
Energy
Tesla inks multi-billion-dollar deal with LG Energy Solution to avoid tariff pressure
Tesla has reportedly secured a sizable partnership with LGES for LFP cells, and there’s an extra positive out of it.
Tesla has reportedly inked a multi-billion-dollar deal with LG Energy Solution in an effort to avoid tariff pressure and domesticate more of its supply chain.
Reuters is reporting that Tesla and LGES, a South Korean battery supplier of the automaker, signed a $4.3 billion deal for energy storage system batteries. The cells are going to be manufactured by LGES at its U.S. factory located in Michigan, the report indicates. The batteries will be the lithium iron phosphate, or LFP, chemistry.
Tesla delivers 384,000 vehicles in Q2 2025, deploys 9.6 GWh in energy storage
It is a move Tesla is making to avoid buying cells and parts from overseas as the Trump White House continues to use tariffs to prioritize domestic manufacturing.
LGES announced earlier today that it had signed a $4.3 billion contract to supply LFP cells over three years to a company, but it did not identify the customer, nor did the company state whether the batteries would be used in automotive or energy storage applications.
The deal is advantageous for both companies. Tesla is going to alleviate its reliance on battery cells that are built out of the country, so it’s going to be able to take some financial pressure off itself.
For LGES, the company has reported that it has experienced slowed demand for its cells in terms of automotive applications. It planned to offset this demand lag with more projects involving the cells in energy storage projects. This has been helped by the need for these systems at data centers used for AI.
During the Q1 Earnings Call, Tesla CFO Vaibhav Taneja confirmed that the company’s energy division had been impacted by the need to source cells from China-based suppliers. He went on to say that the company would work on “securing additional supply chain from non-China-based suppliers.”
It seems as if Tesla has managed to secure some of this needed domestic supply chain.
Analyst: Elon Musk’s $1 trillion Tesla pay deal modest against robot market potential
Tesla China posts strongest registrations of Q3 so far with first Model Y L deliveries
Tesla launches MultiPass to simplify charging at non-Tesla stations
-
News2 weeks agoTesla is overhauling its Full Self-Driving subscription for easier access
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoElon Musk shares unbelievable Starship Flight 10 landing feat
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoElon Musk reveals when SpaceX will perform first-ever Starship catch
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoSpaceX Starship Flight 10 was so successful, it’s breaking the anti-Musk narrative
-
Elon Musk6 days agoTesla’s next-gen Optimus prototype with Grok revealed
-
News3 days agoTesla launches new Supercharger program that business owners will love
-
Elon Musk3 days agoTesla Board takes firm stance on Elon Musk’s political involvement in pay package proxy
-
News1 week agoTesla appears to be mulling a Cyber SUV design