A report released by the University of Michigan’s Transportation Research Institute is showing the cost savings to the average vehicle owner versus those same owners driving electric. The report compares gasoline fuel costs state-by-state to the cost of electricity for equivalent miles driven. The differences are shown in both ratios and dollar figures, with owners in some specific states seeing much higher savings when driving electric versus those from other states.
The report is unique in that it ignores the often-politicized arguments for data of this nature; such as the “source-to-use” data often manipulated or argued. Instead, it looks purely from a consumer perspective, showing what kinds of cost savings could be had for the average vehicle owner in any given state.
By comparing the average fuel economy of cars sold with the average expected range of a battery-electric vehicle sold on the market, the report found that drivers in Washington State, Oregon, Idaho, Louisiana, and Utah would save the most by switching to an electric vehicle. Drivers in Hawaii, New Hampshire, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Massachusetts would save the least. Most of these differences are due to a lower disparity between gasoline costs and residential electricity costs in the latter list of states and a higher disparity between those in the former list.
The report’s data considered the average driving distance and amount per state (NHTSA data), the average fuel economy of vehicles sold in that state (per another UofM study), the average cost per gallon for gasoline state-by-state (according to AAA), and the average cost of electricity in each state (per EIA). The report then compared these to one another.
The average cost of gasoline in the United States, as of December 23, 2017, was $2.441 per gallon. The highest price was in Hawaii at $3.297 per gallon and the lowest was in Alabama at $2.169. High fuel costs, however, did not always translate directly into more savings with a battery electric vehicle. Similarly, lower fuel costs were not necessarily a guarantee that the payoff for going electric would be minimal. Electricity costs could change that.
And they did. The average price of residential electricity in the United States, as of October 2017, was $0.1284 per kilowatt hour. Hawaii had the highest price at $0.2929 per kWh and Louisiana had the lowest at $0.0972/kWh. The higher cost of electricity was more of an indicator of lower gains by going to an electric vehicle than were gasoline prices. Most of the states in the top five for benefiting the least by going electric were also within the top ten for the highest-priced electricity. Yet the states with the lowest-priced electricity were not likely to show up on the top five list for the best gains by getting an EV.
For overall averages nationwide, the cost of driving a gasoline vehicle was $1,117 per year while the average cost of driving a battery electric vehicle was $485. On the whole, most Americans can expect to save at least something if they go to an electric vehicle for most of their driving.
Also interesting was the average fuel economy required in order to meet or better the electric vehicle’s cost savings to the owner. Even in the worst states, where ratios were lowest, the average fuel economy was relatively high. In Hawaii, where a gasoline car owner can only expect to save about $400 per year for getting an EV, the required fuel economy to average that cost ratio out to $0 is 34.1 mpg. In the average state, the fuel economy required is around 57.6 mpg. In the state of Washington, a full 90 mpg is required to break even with an electric car.
These numbers are interesting and should speak directly to consumers at a bare-bones pocketbook level. Buying an EV can mean significant annual savings. The report, Relative Costs of Driving Electric and Gasoline Vehicles in the Individual U.S. States, can be found at this link.
Energy
Tesla meets Giga New York’s Buffalo job target amid political pressures
Giga New York reported more than 3,460 statewide jobs at the end of 2025, meeting the benchmark tied to its dollar-a-year lease.
Tesla has surpassed its job commitments at Giga New York in Buffalo, easing pressure from lawmakers who threatened the company with fines, subsidy clawbacks, and dealership license revocations last year.
The company reported more than 3,460 statewide jobs at the end of 2025, meeting the benchmark tied to its dollar-a-year lease at the state-built facility.
As per an employment report reviewed by local media, Tesla employed 2,399 full-time workers at Gigafactory New York and 1,060 additional employees across the state at the end of 2025. Part-time roles pushed the total headcount of Tesla’s New York staff above the 3,460-job target.
The gains stemmed in part from a new Long Island service center, a Buffalo warehouse, and additional showrooms in White Plains and Staten Island. Tesla also said it has invested $350 million in supercomputing infrastructure at the site and has begun manufacturing solar panels.
Empire State Development CEO Hope Knight said the agency was “very happy” with Giga New York’s progress, as noted in a WXXI report. The current lease runs through 2029, and negotiations over updated terms have included potential adjustments to job requirements and future rent payments.
Some lawmakers remain skeptical, however. Assemblymember Pat Burke questioned whether the reported job figures have been fully verified. State Sen. Patricia Fahy has also continued to sponsor legislation that would revoke Tesla’s company-owned dealership licenses in New York. John Kaehny of Reinvent Albany has argued that the project has not delivered the manufacturing impact originally promised as well.
Knight, for her part, maintained that Empire State Development has been making the best of a difficult situation.
“(Empire State Development) has tried to make the best of a very difficult situation. There hasn’t been another use that has come forward that would replace this one, and so to the extent that we’re in this place, the fact that 2,000 families at (Giga New York) are being supported through the activity of this employer. It’s the best that we can have happen,” the CEO noted.
Energy
Tesla launches Cybertruck vehicle-to-grid program in Texas
The initiative was announced by the official Tesla Energy account on social media platform X.
Tesla has launched a vehicle-to-grid (V2G) program in Texas, allowing eligible Cybertruck owners to send energy back to the grid during high-demand events and receive compensation on their utility bills.
The initiative, dubbed Powershare Grid Support, was announced by the official Tesla Energy account on social media platform X.
Texas’ Cybertruck V2G program
In its post on X, Tesla Energy confirmed that vehicle-to-grid functionality is “coming soon,” starting with select Texas markets. Under the new Powershare Grid Support program, owners of the Cybertruck equipped with Powershare home backup hardware can opt in through the Tesla app and participate in short-notice grid stress events.
During these events, the Cybertruck automatically discharges excess energy back to the grid, supporting local utilities such as CenterPoint Energy and Oncor. In return, participants receive compensation in the form of bill credits. Tesla noted that the program is currently invitation-only as part of an early adopter rollout.
The launch builds on the Cybertruck’s existing Powershare capability, which allows the vehicle to provide up to 11.5 kW of power for home backup. Tesla added that the program is expected to expand to California next, with eligibility tied to utilities such as PG&E, SCE, and SDG&E.
Powershare Grid Support
To participate in Texas, Cybertruck owners must live in areas served by CenterPoint Energy or Oncor, have Powershare equipment installed, enroll in the Tesla Electric Drive plan, and opt in through the Tesla app. Once enrolled, vehicles would be able to contribute power during high-demand events, helping stabilize the grid.
Tesla noted that events may occur with little notice, so participants are encouraged to keep their Cybertrucks plugged in when at home and to manage their discharge limits based on personal needs. Compensation varies depending on the electricity plan, similar to how Powerwall owners in some regions have earned substantial credits by participating in Virtual Power Plant (VPP) programs.
Tesla is updating Cybertruck owners on its timeline of a massive feature that has yet to ship: Powershare with Powerwall.
Powershare is a bidirectional charging feature exclusive to Cybertruck, which allows the vehicle’s battery to act as a portable power source for homes, appliances, tools, other EVs, and more. It was announced in late 2023 as part of Tesla’s push into vehicle-to-everything energy sharing, and acting as a giant portable charger is the main advantage, as it can provide backup power during outages.
Cybertruck’s Powershare system supports both vehicle-to-load (V2L) and vehicle-to-home (V2H), making it flexible and well-rounded for a variety of applications.
However, even though the feature was promised with Cybertruck, it has yet to be shipped to vehicles. Tesla communicated with owners through email recently regarding Powershare with Powerwall, which essentially has the pickup act as an extended battery.
Powerwall discharge would be prioritized before tapping into the truck’s larger pack.
However, Tesla is still working on getting the feature out to owners, an email said:
“We’re writing to let you know that the Powershare with Powerwall feature is still in development and is now scheduled for release in mid-2026.
This new release date gives us additional time to design and test this feature, ensuring its ability to communicate and optimize energy sharing between your vehicle and many configurations and generations of Powerwall. We are also using this time to develop additional Powershare features that will help us continue to accelerate the world’s transition to sustainable energy.”
Owners have expressed some real disappointment in Tesla’s continuous delays in releasing the feature, as it was expected to be released by late 2024, but now has been pushed back several times to mid-2026, according to the email.
Foundation Series Cybertruck buyers paid extra, expecting the feature to be rolled out with their vehicle upon pickup.
Cybertruck’s Lead Engineer, Wes Morrill, even commented on the holdup:
As a Cybertruck owner who also has Powerwall, I empathize with the disappointed comments.
To their credit, the team has delivered powershare functionality to Cybertruck customers who otherwise have no backup with development of the powershare gateway. As well as those with solar…
— Wes (@wmorrill3) December 12, 2025
He said that “it turned out to be much harder than anticipated to make powershare work seamlessly with existing Powerwalls through existing wall connectors. Two grid-forming devices need to negotiate who will form and who will follow, depending on the state of charge of each, and they need to do this without a network and through multiple generations of hardware, and test and validate this process through rigorous certifications to ensure grid safety.”
It’s nice to see the transparency, but it is justified for some Cybertruck owners to feel like they’ve been bait-and-switched.
Tesla announces crazy new Full Self-Driving milestone
Tesla Cybercab production begins: The end of car ownership as we know it?
