News
Daimler CEO steps down weeks after unveiling Mercedes-Benz’s first Tesla Model X competitor
Just weeks after taking the wraps off the Mercedes-Benz EQC, the German automaker’s first all-electric vehicle that’s expected to compete in the same segment as the Tesla Model X, Daimler has confirmed that CEO Dieter Zetsche would be stepping down from his post. Zetsche, who has been with Daimler for 42 years, will return to the company and chair the supervisory board in 2021.
The Daimler CEO will be succeeded by Ola Källenius, a 49-year-old Swede who also has a long tenure in the legacy automaker. Prior to becoming CEO, Källenius served as the company’s head of R&D. He is expected to take over as CEO and head of Mercedes-Benz this May 2019, provided that his appointment is approved by shareholders. Zetsche, for his part, was originally signed on until December 2019, but he has opted to depart earlier amidst the company’s preparations for “fundamental changes taking place in the automotive industry.”
Daimler’s appointment of Källenius is considered as part of the company’s push to appoint a younger set of leaders that can effectively carry the company forward in a changing automotive landscape. Among these changes is the emerging wave of electrification, which is pushed by upstart electric car companies like Tesla and embraced by veteran carmakers like Porsche, which recently announced the cancellation of its diesel-powered line.
In this light, selecting Ola Källenius to succeed Dieter Zetsche seems to be the right direction for Daimler. Källenius, after all, is noted for being one of the company’s executives who pushed for the development of 10 electric vehicles that are planned for release. The Mercedes-Benz EQC, unveiled earlier this month, is the first of these vehicles.
The younger executive’s background is unlike Daimler’s other CEOs,’ considering that Källenius’ experience is not on engineering, but on finance. His experience is vast nonetheless, with stints in both McLaren Automotive and AMG, Mercedes-Benz’s performance-oriented sub-brand that grew and evolved under Dieter Zetsche’s leadership.
Daimler’s first foray into electric vehicles, the Mercedes-Benz EQC, is a premium SUV that would compete directly with vehicles like the Tesla Model X. In the EQC’s unveiling, Daimler CEO Dieter Zetsche announced that the vehicle kicks off the company’s $12 billion push towards the development of electric vehicles under the EQ brand. Zetsche also noted that Daimler would be investing another $1.2 billion in global battery production to support the growth of the company’s electrified offerings.
The Mercedes-Benz EQC features several compelling features that make it a contender in the premium electric SUV segment. It is equipped with dual electric drivetrains at each axle, which generate a combined 402 hp and 562 lb-ft of torque. Thanks to its electric motors, the EQC can sprint from 0-60 mph in 4.9 seconds and hit a top speed of 112 mph. The SUV is also equipped with an 80 kWh battery, which is expected to give the vehicle a range of over 200 miles per charge.
That said, Mercedes-Benz noted in a later update that it would adopt a gradual rollout for the EQC, to ensure that warranty costs for the vehicle don’t spike when customers start taking deliveries. Mercedes-Benz head of production and supply chain management Markus Schaefer described the company’s rationale in a statement.
“We want to be sure we deliver Mercedes quality from day one in all aspects, and we have to watch the warranty side for customers as well. We don’t want customers ending up at the mechanic later. Slowing down the ramp-up is a tool to make sure we do it right, to address all the unknowns that an electric car brings,” he said.
Tesla just gave what is perhaps its biggest signal yet that the launch of the Cybercab, its autonomous ride-hailing-geared car, is imminent.
The Cybercab has been spotted outside of Gigafactory Texas in massive numbers over the past few days, with hundreds of units being stored on property just days after the vehicle received a Certificate of Conformity from the EPA.
Today, things were a bit different.
Cybercabs spotted on Giga Texas property today had an addition: a Cybercab decal on the side, reminiscent of the “Robotaxi” ones that were placed on Model Ys just as the company launched its ride-sharing platform about a year ago.
Giga Texas drone operator Joe Tegtmeyer noticed the change today:
Tesla Cybercabs are now getting “Cybercab” logos on the side of them!
Tesla did the same with Model Ys that were given “Robotaxi” logos: https://t.co/DanANtw1m7 pic.twitter.com/FqOhH0S9Ks
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) June 19, 2026
Tesla could be signaling that the Cybercab is preparing to enter the Robotaxi fleet in the coming weeks or months with this move. It seems more symbolic than anything; Tesla is ready to throw Cybercabs in the ride-hailing platform just as it did with Model Ys last year.
The addition of the Certificate of Conformity awarded to the Cybercab is another major factor working to Tesla’s advantage. The company now has permission from the EPA to allow the vehicle to operate on public roads and enter the chain of commerce. It’s officially street legal.
Tesla Cybercab specs revealed: range, curb weight, range ratings, and more
The big question that remains is whether Tesla will be able to operate the car without a safety monitor, especially considering it plans to put the car out there without a steering wheel or pedals. With the Cybercab only having a seating capacity of two, it is hard to believe Tesla will even consider putting a Safety Monitor in the car.
It did recently self-certify as Level 4 and has the ability to operate driverless vehicles in the State of Texas under a law that took effect on May 28. You can read more about that here:
Tesla’s Robotaxi dreams just took a massive step toward reality
We’d imagine Cybercabs will be on the roads as soon as July, but August will likely be a better estimate of when the car will be entered into the Cybercab fleet. It all depends at where Tesla is, as they’ve truly prioritized safety with the rollout of the Robotaxi platform.
Elon Musk has publicly questioned Moody’s credit assessments following the rating agency’s decision to assign SpaceX a Baa1 investment-grade rating, two notches above Tesla’s Baa3. The comments came amid discussions comparing the two companies’ financial profiles.
SpaceX earned its first-time Baa1 rating with a stable outlook from Moody’s. The agency highlighted the company’s leadership in orbital launches, the growing recurring revenue from its Starlink satellite network, strong vertical integration, U.S. government contracts, and emerging opportunities in AI infrastructure.
These factors were cited as supporting robust cash flows, margin expansion, and financial flexibility.
Musk responded directly: “Tesla’s credit rating is ridiculously low tbh,” and added, “Yeah, makes no sense. Tesla has over $40B in cash, no debt, and is consistently profitable!” His remarks underscored Tesla’s balance sheet strength and profitability at a time when many traditional automakers continue to report losses in the shift to electric vehicles.
Yeah, makes no sense.
Tesla has over $40B in cash, no debt and is consistently profitable!
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 19, 2026
Tesla maintains a leading position in the global EV market, with diversification into energy and storage, battery technology, and robotics through projects like Optimus. Recent financial updates show the company generated positive free cash flow of $1.4 billion in Q1 2026, supported by operating cash flow of $3.9 billion. Cash and short-term investments stood at approximately $44.7 billion.
Moody’s has affirmed Tesla’s Baa3 issuer rating with a stable outlook in periodic reviews, acknowledging the company’s EV leadership, technology strengths, including AI for autonomous vehicles, solid profitability, and strong liquidity.
Tesla (TSLA) scores Baa3 Moody’s rating for ‘stable’ outlook
However, the agency has also noted challenges in the automotive segment and expectations for margin pressures.
Musk’s critique highlights a common debate about how traditional rating methodologies apply to high-growth, capital-intensive technology companies. SpaceX benefits from long-term government-backed contracts and diversified, recurring revenue streams, while Tesla’s valuation reflects heavy investment in future technologies such as autonomy and robotics.
Both ratings remain investment-grade, yet the one-notch difference has fueled online discussion about potential inconsistencies in evaluating innovative firms.
The exchange comes as SpaceX explores financing options following its recent valuation milestones, while Tesla continues executing on its multi-year roadmap. Musk’s pointed response serves as a reminder that credit ratings, though influential for borrowing costs, represent one lens through which markets assess corporate strength—and that company leaders often view their financial positions through the lens of long-term innovation and cash generation rather than short-term risk metrics alone.
A new report from Reuters claims that a transport authority in Sweden is pushing back against the approval of Tesla’s Full Self-Driving suite because it will travel over speed limits.
The report says the Swedish Transport Administration (TRV) recommends the European Union votes against FSD’s approval. TRV believes it should not be approved until Tesla disables FSD’s ability to speed.
TRV sent a letter to the European Union’s Technical Committee on Motor Vehicles (TCMV), which is set to meet on June 30 to discuss the potential approval of the Tesla FSD suite in the country. Tesla, which has received various approvals in Europe over the past two months, has not provided a comment.
Teslas operating on FSD do travel over the speed limit, depending on the Speed Profile that is chosen. Drivers have the ability to disengage FSD at any point; Tesla specifically states that those supervising the suite are responsible for its actions.
Let’s cut to the chase: humans operating any vehicle speed almost daily in the United States. Realistically, speed limits in the U.S. are more frequently treated as speed minimums. However, other countries are different, and driving behaviors are less aggressive.
TRV believes that “allowing automated systems to systematically exceed legal speed limits…risks undermining both the legal framework and the expected safety benefits of vehicle automation,” the report stated. It’s surprising that Tesla has not received this claim from other countries previously.
This could be a good argument to bring Max Speed back, the setting that previously allowed the driver to choose the absolute fastest the car would travel.
This would still put the responsibility of supervision in the hands of the driver. It would allow the driver to choose whether the car would travel over the speed limit or not, acknowledging that they set the speed, and if they get pulled over, there would be no ability to argue it.
However, it does not seem as if this is something Tesla will do, especially considering many U.S. drivers have requested the feature in an effort to eliminate speeding or at least tone it down. The company has not shown any interest in bringing it back.
Tesla has approvals for FSD in Europe in Estonia, Lithuania, Denmark, the Netherlands, and Belgium.
Tesla Cybercab launch is imminent after latest sighting at Giga Texas
Elon Musk says this part of Tesla ‘makes no sense’
