Connect with us

Lifestyle

Tesla Model S P100D humbles tire-spinning, donut-making Dodge Demon

[Credit: DragTimes/YouTube]

Published

on

A Tesla Model S P100D recently raced a Dodge Demon on a drag and rolling street race, providing a brief idea about which car would come out on top in less-than-ideal road conditions. As could be seen in the video of the race, however, the Demon’s own hubris became its undoing, and it finished both races staring at the taillights of the Model S P100D.

The video of the Model S P100D vs. Dodge SRT Demon was uploaded by YouTube’s drag racing enthusiast, DragTimes. Brooks, the owner and host of the channel, initially believed that the Demon would have no problems overtaking his supercar-beating P100D, considering its raw power. As noted by the YouTube channel’s host, however, the owner of the Demon opted to change up the car a little bit, replacing the ICE monster’s OEM rear tires with a pair of Hoosier slicks. Racing slicks are perfect for the drag strip, but on everyday roads, they’re pretty much a hit-or-miss.

On paper, the Dodge Demon looked every bit like a car that is designed to dominate on the quarter-mile. The American muscle car is equipped with a 6.2-liter Supercharged V8 engine that makes 808 hp. The 4,280-pound, rear-wheel-drive vehicle is paired with an 8-speed automatic transmission. The owner of the Demon in DragTimes’ video gave his vehicle a Pump Gas Tune, however, in addition to the aforementioned Hoosier slicks for the rear wheels.

In comparison, the Model S P100D is equipped with dual motors that produce 920 ft-lbs of instant torque and 588 hp to its wheels. The 4,900-pound electric car is also all-wheel-drive, enhancing its traction and keeping the immense amount of torque from its electric motors under control.

Advertisement

Prior to the start of the race, the owner of the Dodge Demon opted to do some launches, seemingly showing off the car’s raw power. The driver of the ICE monster also opted to do some donuts for good effect, which, as Brooks immediately observed, resulted in the Hoosier slicks losing a lot of rubber. By the end of the donut-making, tire-shredding session, the Demon’s rear tires did not look good.

The race between the Tesla Model S P100D and the Dodge Challenger SRT Demon was quite painful to watch, if you’re a Demon fan. As soon as the race started, the full-sized electric family sedan shot off, thanks to its Ludicrous mode and instant torque. The Tesla pulled, and then it just got farther and farther. The Demon, on the other hand, could not control its power, and by the time its tires found some traction, the P100D was already several car lengths ahead.

A rolling race between the Model S P100D and the Dodge Demon was not that much better for the ICE car. As soon as the driver of the Demon floored the accelerator, the muscle car spun its wheels before gaining traction. By the time it hit its stride, the Tesla was already far ahead.

Overall, DragTimes’ recent video is a lesson in hubris. Had the driver of the Demon opted to keep the car’s OEM rear tires on, the results of the race would have been very different. Had the Demon’s owner decided against the donut-making session, the Hoosier slicks would have gripped the street just a little bit better. For now, however, DragTimes’ Model S P100D could walk away with a win against an ICE car that was made to dominate in a straight line.

Advertisement

As we noted in a previous report, the Model S P100D previously won Motor Trend’s World’s Greatest Drag Race, beating out vehicles such as the Aston Martin DB11, the Mercedes-AMG GT-R Nismo, the Porsche 911 Turbo S, and the McLaren 570GT. During that race, many of Motor Trend’s YouTube followers lamented that the Dodge Challenger SRT Demon should have been included in the event, and it would have handily beat the Model S P100D. As proven by DragTimes’ recent video, however, the Demon could probably beat the Model S P100D in the quarter mile, but it would have to control its power first.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

The FCC just said ‘No’ to SpaceX for now

SpaceX is fighting the FCC for spectrum that could put satellites inside every smartphone.

Published

on

By

SpaceX was dealt a new setback on April 23, 2006 by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) after the U.S. government agency dismissed the company’s petition to access a Mobile Satellite Service spectrum that would allow direct-to-device (D2D) capabilities.

The FCC regulates communications by radio, television, wire, and cable, which also includes regulating D2D technology that lets your existing smartphone connect directly to a satellite orbiting Earth, the same way it would connect to a cell tower.

Elon Musk’s SpaceX has been building toward this through its Starlink Mobile service, formerly called Direct-to-Cell, in partnership with T-Mobile. The service officially launched on July 23, 2025, starting with messaging and expanding to broadband data in October of that year.

T-Mobile Starlink Pricing Announced – Early Adopters Get Exclusive Discount

Advertisement

It’s worth noting that SpaceX is not alone in this race. AT&T and Verizon have their own satellite texting deals with AST SpaceMobile, while Verizon separately offers free satellite texting through Skylo on newer phones.

The regulatory foundation for all of this dates to March 14, 2024, when the FCC adopted the world’s first framework for what it called Supplemental Coverage from Space, allowing satellite operators to lease spectrum from terrestrial carriers and fill gaps in their coverage. On November 26, 2024, the FCC granted SpaceX the first-ever authorization under that framework, approving its partnership with T-Mobile to provide service in specific frequency bands. SpaceX then went further, completing a roughly $17 billion acquisition of wireless spectrum from EchoStar, which gave it the ability to negotiate with global carriers more independently.

Starlink’s EchoStar spectrum deal could bring 5G coverage anywhere

This recent ruling by the FCC blocked SpaceX from going further, protecting incumbent spectrum holders like Globalstar and Iridium. But the market momentum is already in motion. As Teslarati reported, SpaceX is targeting peak speeds of 150 Mbps per user for its next generation Direct-to-Cell service, compared to roughly 4 Mbps today, which would bring satellite connectivity close to standard carrier performance.

Advertisement

With a reported IPO targeting a $1.75 trillion valuation on the horizon, each spectrum fight, carrier deal, and regulatory win or loss now carries weight beyond just connectivity. SpaceX is quietly becoming the infrastructure layer underneath the phones of millions of people, and the FCC’s next move will help determine how much further that reach extends.

FCC Satellite Rule Makings can be found here.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Elon Musk talks Tesla Roadster’s future

Elon Musk confirmed the Roadster as Tesla’s last manually driven car, with a debut coming soon.

Published

on

By

Tesla Roadster driving along sunset cliff (Credit: Grok)

During Tesla’s Q1 2026 earnings call on April 22, Elon Musk made a brief but notable comment about the long-awaited next generation Roadster while describing Tesla’s future vehicle lineup. “Long term, the only manually driven car will be the new Tesla Roadster,” he said. “Speaking of which, we may be able to debut that in a month or so. It requires a lot of testing and validation before we can actually have a demo and not have something go wrong with the demo.”

That single statement is the entire Roadster update from yesterday’s call, and while it represents another timeline shift, it comes as no surprise with Tesla heads-down-at-work on the mass rollout of its Robotaxi service across US cities, and the industrial scale production of the humanoid Optimus.

The fact that Musk specifically framed the Roadster as the last manually driven Tesla is significant on its own. As the rest of the lineup moves toward full autonomy, the Roadster becomes something rare in the Tesla-sphere by keeping the driver in control. Driving enthusiasts who buy a $200,000 supercar are not doing so to be passengers. They want the physical connection to the road, the feel of acceleration under their own input, and the experience of controlling something with that level of performance. FSD, however capable it becomes, removes that entirely. The Roadster signals that Tesla understands this distinction and is building a car specifically for the people who consider driving itself the point.

Tesla isn’t joking about building Optimus at an industrial scale: Here we go

Advertisement

The specs for the Roadster Musk has teased over the years are genuinely unlike anything in production. The base model targets 0 to 60 mph in 1.9 seconds, a top speed above 250 mph, and up to 620 miles of range from a 200 kWh battery. The optional SpaceX package takes it further, rumored to add roughly ten cold gas thrusters operating at 10,000 psi, borrowed directly from Falcon 9 rocket technology. With thrusters, Musk has claimed 0 to 60 mph in as little as 1.1 seconds. In a 2021 Joe Rogan interview he went further, stating “I want it to hover. We got to figure out how to make it hover without killing people.” Tesla filed a patent for ground effect technology in August 2025, suggesting the hover concept has not been abandoned. The starting price remains $200,000, with the Founders Series requiring a $250,000 full deposit. Some reservation holders placed those deposits in 2017 and are approaching a full decade of waiting.

With production now targeted for 2027 or 2028 at the earliest, the Roadster remains Tesla’s most audacious promise and its longest-running delay. But if what Musk is testing lives up to even half of what he has described, the demo alone should be worth waiting for.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Tesla isn’t joking about building Optimus at an industrial scale: Here we go

Tesla’s Optimus factory in Texas targets 10 million robots yearly, with 5.2 million square feet under construction.

Published

on

By

Tesla’s Q1 2026 Update Letter, released today, confirms that first generation Optimus production lines are now well underway at its Fremont, California factory, with a pilot line targeting one million robots per year to start. Of bigger note is a shared aerial image of a large piece of land adjacent to Gigafactory Texas, that Tesla has prominently labeled “Optimus factory site preparation.”

Permit documents show Tesla is seeking to add over 5.2 million square feet of new building space to the Giga Texas North Campus by the end of 2026, at an estimated construction investment of $5 billion to $10 billion. The longer term production target for that facility is 10 million Optimus units per year. Giga Texas already sits on 2,500 acres with over 10 million square feet of existing factory floor, and the North Campus expansion is being built to support multiple projects, including the dedicated Optimus factory, the Terafab chip fabrication facility (a joint Tesla/SpaceX/xAI venture), a Cybercab test track, road infrastructure, and supporting facilities.

Credit: TESLA

Texas makes strategic sense beyond the existing infrastructure. The state’s tax structure, lower labor costs relative to California, and the proximity to Tesla’s AI training cluster Cortex 1 and 2, both located at Giga Texas and now totaling over 230,000 H100 equivalent GPUs, means the Optimus software stack and the factory producing the hardware will share the same campus. Tesla’s Q1 report also confirmed completion of the AI5 chip tape out in April, the inference processor designed specifically to power Optimus units in the field.

As Teslarati reported, the Texas facility is intended to house Optimus V4 production at full scale. Musk told the World Economic Forum in January that Tesla plans to sell Optimus to the public by end of 2027 at a price between $20,000 and $30,000, stating, “I think everyone on earth is going to have one and want one.” He has previously pegged long term demand for general purpose humanoid robots at over 20 billion units globally, citing both consumer and industrial use cases.

Advertisement
Continue Reading