News

Why Tesla wants to open its Supercharger to the competition

Published

11 years ago

June 11, 2014

In a very bold move, Musk is considering opening the company’s intellectual property (IP) for its Superchargers inviting the competition in, breaking away from outmoded fights.

Just when you think you had Tesla figured out, Elon Musk, Tesla Motors’ CEO, throws in another bit to the overall electric vehicle (EV) picture, once again, changes the background.

Tesla embraces openness

The one thing almost all companies have in common is secrecy. Carmakers are no different and jealously keep trade secrets. What makes Tesla Motors unique and part of its success, is its engineering, which is off limit to GM, Ford and the rest. Companies edge out their products and services by keeping their know-how in-house in order to dominate a market, or a part of it. Even if some things are off limits, all carmakers pull apart others’ cars to see how they were engineered. If this was an effective strategy until now, it has its limits. Pushed to the maximum, it strangles markets and consumers are left to pay the price. There is less choice and innovations. Eventually, someone has to break the trends and breath new life. Is this what Tesla is trying to do? Not so fast.

Supercharge me and everyone else

Elon Musk says someone has to take the first step and Tesla Motors is the company to show the way forward. We couldn’t agree more. We’re tired of living in the stone age, we want a modern world that holds up to its promise and potential.

A company opening up the IP of its Supercharger network to create a “standard technical specification that other electric car makers can adopt,” as Engadget puts it, is a bold move forward.

But is it naïve, or simply a brilliant move forward when the competition is locked in a futile fight? The question is, who stands to gain the most from such a move.

Tesla is willing give away some of its IP in order for other makers to charge at its Superchargers. It also hopes to by-pass the CHAdeMO and SAE fight, as well as the upcoming Chinese charging network with its own protocol. Tesla might charge a modest fee return, but that is nothing for such a juggernaut. Musk sees, as most of us do, that the automobile industry is in disarray and still grapples over how to create a thriving business model with electric vehicles (EV). If the industry, used to making internal combustion engines (ICE), it doesn’t know what to do with an electric motor and batteries, even less with a charging network. Luckily, Tesla took a lead early there.

So far Nissan is one of the only carmaker to grow the network with CHAdeMO chargers at its dealerships. Then, there is the SAE Combo standard trying to muscle its way in, fighting against CHAdeMO. The absurd fight ended last year with a standstill, forcing once again consumers to choose one or the other, losing in the short run. So what can Tesla Motors do with its own Supercharger system watching another Chinese charger standard take advantage of the confusion? Open its doors and leapfrog the infighting competitors. It works to everyone’s advantage and the company comes out on top. Simple, brilliant, and so Tesla.

Standards come in two ways, officially, or de facto. For those of you seasoned enough to remember, we once had a choice between a good quality Betamax, and a rather inferior VHS system. VHS became a de facto standard after a deep pocket campaigns turned a generation on to it. The same almost happened to DVD recording, and there are plenty of other examples still. Tesla opening its IP doors to the competition is a bold move above the fray, and one we can be happy about since it will benefit the entire EV community. Hopefully, it will also stop this infighting caveman mentality companies have, pushing their visions on consumers. When you get down to it, what’s important is to have a nationwide charging network that works for as many cars as possible, regardless of makers, backers or other financial interests. Tesla does it again.

News

Tesla removed from Charlotte’s approved EV list due to ‘safety issues’

City reps say it’s not because of Elon Musk’s political involvement, but instead because of safety issues.

Published

3 hours ago

June 24, 2025

Joey Klender

Credit: Tesla

Tesla has been removed from the Charlotte, North Carolina, City Council’s list of pre-approved electric vehicles that the city can purchase.

It’s not because of Elon Musk, Democratic council member LaWana Mayfield said, who urged her colleagues to remove Tesla. Instead, she claims it is because of “safety issues.”

She said (via WFAE):

“So it is not just the particular owner of this product. It is the fact that this product has been in multiple lawsuits because of safety issues, and there are multiple concerns.”

Recent data from Tesla shows that its vehicles are about half as likely to be involved in an accident when being driven normally. When Autopilot technology is used, it is about ten times safer than the average driver in the U.S., statistically.

Tesla Vehicle Safety Report shows Autopilot is 10x better than humans

Republican City Council member Ed Driggs stood up for Tesla, saying that:

“I think we just set a dangerous precedent if we have reasons that aren’t related to the cost and the performance of purchased items for excluding them. We already have Teslas in the fleet.”

If they’re so dangerous, why are they already in the fleet?

The NHTSA also shows that Ford is the most recalled car company in 2025, with 81 total recalls. Tesla has just five for the year.

Driggs said to Mayfield during the meeting:

“We are not identifying names on this list. You are singling out one name on this list for political reasons. You don’t have enough data on Tesla compared to the other car companies to suggest they shouldn’t be here. I object to trying to disguise this as anything other than a politically motivated desire to not have this name on this list.”

Tesla was successfully removed by a 6-3 vote. Democrats Danté Anderson, Malcolm Graham, Renee Johnson, Victoria Watlington, and Tiawana Brown supported Tesla’s removal. Republican Edwin Peacock, along with Driggs and Democrat Dimple Ajmera, all voted no on removing Tesla.

The City of Charlotte will buy 45 new electric vehicles, and Teslas would likely be the best option. Many local law enforcement agencies across the U.S. have utilized them and have shown that the vehicles contribute to massive maintenance and cost of ownership reductions due to the lack of overall upkeep.

Tesla police fleet is saving taxpayers $80k per year on fuel costs: report

This is not the first time that a city in the U.S. has chosen to go in a different direction with its EV fleet plans. Tesla was chosen over Ford by the City of Baltimore for a $5 million expenditure that would bolster its fleet with EVs.

However, earlier this year, Baltimore said it “decided to go in a different direction,” and although it was not directly confirmed, the move seemed to be political.

News

Tesla threatened in France with claims of ‘deceptive’ practices

Tesla has been threatened by the Competition, Consumer Affairs, and Fraud Control Office in France after the agency said it is participating in “deceptive business practices” related to its semi-autonomous driving capabilities.

Published

5 hours ago

June 24, 2025

Joey Klender

(Credit: Tesla)

Investigators in the government office said that Tesla has engaged in deceptive commercial practices over the capabilities of its cars. In the past, other agencies and even some skeptics have said that Tesla’s use of the phrases “Autopilot” and “Full Self-Driving” is inaccurate in terms of its capabilities.

Tesla Autopilot gets stone cast in its direction by Pete Buttigieg

However, Tesla has been transparent with consumers and regulatory agencies that its cars are not yet fully autonomous, meaning drivers could sleep, play on their phones, or pay no attention to the road. The car would take care of steering and speed.

Tesla has never maintained that its cars are capable of this. On its website and in its Owner’s Manuals, it says that drivers are required to pay attention and be prepared to take over in case of an emergency.

The office began the investigation back in 2023 and, this week, ordered Tesla to comply with regulations within the next four months. If it does not, it will face fines of €50,000 per day.

This is not the first time Tesla has had some pushback from regulators regarding the naming of its semi-autonomous driving platforms. Back in 2023, then Secretary of Transportation in the United States, Pete Buttigieg, said the name “Autopilot” was not accurate because it is still a hands-on system:

“I don’t think that something should be called, for example, an Autopilot, when the fine print says you need to have your hands on the wheel and eyes on the road at all times. We call balls and strikes. I view it as something where it’s very important to be very objective. But anytime a company does something wrong or a vehicle needs to be recalled or a design isn’t safe, we’re going to be there.”

He then said that Autopilot and its interaction with the person operating the car is a “real concern.”

Elon Musk

Tesla Robotaxi launch draws attention from regulators, mainstream media milks it

The Tesla Robotaxi launch has resulted in some questions from the NHTSA, a typical thing for early launches. Media is milking it as a huge thing.

Published

7 hours ago

June 24, 2025

Joey Klender

Credit: @AdanGuajardo/X

Tesla launched its Robotaxi platform in a limited capacity earlier this week in Austin, Texas, and after hundreds of rides have been taken, some instances have caught the attention of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA).

However, the information the NHTSA is requesting is routine and totally normal for the early stages of a rollout of this magnitude. But that did not stop mainstream media from milking it into something controversial, when it really is not.

Tesla Robotaxi riders tout ‘smooth’ experience in first reviews of driverless service launch

Various outlets reported on the NHTSA’s request to Tesla for additional information regarding things seen in videos online.

The NHTSA said it is “aware of the referenced incidents and is in contact with the manufacturer to gather additional information.” Bloomberg initially reported on the NHTSA’s request for information.

The thing is, the NHTSA has often reached out to companies right after it launches a driverless vehicle service. Both Waymo and GM’s Cruise, as well as Amazon’s Zoox, have had the NHTSA reach out to them regarding the launch of their driverless ride-hailing services.

The headlines for Tesla are significantly different:

Reviews from riders in Austin have stated the Robotaxi platform is “smooth” and “comfortable,” with many ranting and raving about the advantages the new ride-hailing service has over others. Not only is it being monitored by a safety monitor in the passenger seat, but there are also other things that make it unique.

One of the most notable is that your Robotaxi will automatically sync entertainment and streaming settings.

The sensationalism that the media tends to use with Tesla is a big reason the company did not invite mainstream outlets to the event. Instead, reporters were seen waiting for Early Access invitees to exit their cars to ask them questions.

Many denied the inquiries: