Investor's Corner
The ‘Tesla Effect’ is starting to extend from legacy carmakers to the oil industry
Back in February, self-made billionaire Don Gao from China mentioned that the “Tesla Effect” continues to grow even in markets beyond the California-based company’s reach. Gao, who owns Positec – a maker of power equipment – uses lithium-ion batteries for his company’s products, and they are steadily becoming a potent rival for heavyweight brands like Black & Decker. The billionaire entrepreneur noted that Tesla’s commitment to battery tech is spilling over into other industries, to the point where consumers’ perception of battery-powered devices is now changing.
“This Tesla Effect is a major trend and has really changed consumers’ perception of things that are battery driven and their capabilities,” he said.
Tesla did not come up with the electric car, nor did it come up with lithium-ion batteries. Both technologies were present even before the company was founded. That said, and partly thanks to the unraveling of Elon Musk’s first Master Plan, Tesla was able to capture an audience and a dedicated consumer base with its first vehicle – the Tesla Roadster. The small sports car was mostly a proof-of-concept, in the way that it was intended to show that electric cars need not be boring or limited in range. The car was successful enough that Tesla was able to follow it up with the Model S, a vehicle designed from the ground up to be a high-performance, long-range electric car. The rest is history.
Tesla’s electric cars were able to capture the interest of car buyers, even those that are particular about power and performance. It should be noted that Tesla’s electric cars were showing strong sales even before the company rolled out features like Autopilot. The company’s electric vehicles, from the Model S, to the Model X, to the Model 3, were desirable simply because they were excellent cars. They just happen to be powered by electricity instead of gas.
Since Tesla is still in the process of growing, its electric cars have been competing in the luxury segment. The electric vehicles themselves are not traditional luxury cars, with their minimalistic and almost spartan interiors, but they do provide a premium experience through their deep integration of software and hardware. Over the years, Tesla’s electric cars sold well, until such time that they started outselling mainstays from legacy carmakers like BMW and Mercedes-Benz. The Tesla Model 3, the company’s first attempt at a mass-market car, was recently listed as the 4th best-selling passenger car in the US, beating out competitors from the luxury midsize segment like the Mercedes-Benz C-Class.
In the same way that companies unrelated to Tesla are starting to explore the potential of lithium-ion batteries partly due to the electric car maker, a number of legacy automakers have accelerated their transition to electrified transport as well. Among the German carmakers, several have expressed their intent to come up with their own premium electric vehicles. Mercedes-Benz has the EQ program, Volkswagen just announced that it is investing ~$7 billion into e-mobility, and Porsche has the Taycan, a high-performance electric car that’s set to meet the Model S head-on in the premium EV market. Most of these carmakers would likely not acknowledge it, but there is little doubt that the transition to electrified transport was expedited by the efforts of a small electric car startup from Silicon Valley.
In a way, the Tesla Effect is happening at the perfect time. Several regions in the world are shifting towards cleaner forms of transportation. China plans to eventually ban diesel and gasoline-powered cars in its major cities. France and Britain have both committed to banning gas-powered automobiles in the future as well. Earlier this month, the EU Parliament voted for a 20% cut in CO2 emissions from new cars and vans in 2025 and a 40% reduction in 2030, accelerating the region’s transition towards cleaner transport. To effectively support the transition, carmakers, from startups like Tesla to pedigreed veterans like Mercedes-Benz, have to ramp their efforts at creating even more compelling, cost-effective electric vehicles.
In a recent segment on CNBC, Paul Sankey of Mizuho Securities mentioned that the “Tesla Effect” is starting to make its way to the oil industry as well. Last Thursday, oil prices tumbled as much as 4% amidst concerns about the fallout from the United States’ sanctions on Iran, the OPEC’s third-biggest crude oil producer. Wall St. analysts noted that oil could be in striking distance of $100 per barrel – an adjustment that would be felt by owners of fossil fuel-powered cars. The Mizuho analyst noted that part of the reasons behind the struggles of the oil industry is the shifting perception towards oil itself.
“Essentially, the big issue is the so-called “Tesla Effect,” the general “End of the Oil Age” theme that is a problem for these (oil) stocks. As the oil price goes up, especially to the levels we’re at now and potentially beyond, it’s almost as if the Tesla Effect could be exacerbated by the potential for higher oil prices to accelerate the end of the Oil Age. The Tesla Effect is the overall concept that (while) the 20th century was driven by oil, the 21st century will be driven by electricity. There’s a 30-year transition, and we’re somewhere probably 10 years into that transition. Ultimately, (the) terminal value of oil has been severely affected by the potential for us to change behavior,” the analyst said.
What is quite remarkable is that Tesla is nowhere close to reaching the company’s overall goals. Elon Musk once noted that Tesla would not stop until all cars in the road are electric. And the truth is, even if the company reaches its production targets for the Model 3 and the Model Y and its future Truck and compact sedan, Tesla would not be able to transition the auto industry towards electrification on its own. What Tesla could do, though, is to accelerate this transition, and if recent projects by legacy carmakers are any indication, it appears that the Silicon Valley-based company is doing just that.
Elon Musk
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 aborted at Zero and Musk just told us what broke
Four Raptor engines failed to ignite at T-zero, forcing SpaceX to scrub Starship Flight 13 Thursday.
SpaceX scrubbed the Starship Flight 13 launch attempt Thursday evening at the last possible moment, after four of the Super Heavy booster’s 33 Raptor 3 engines failed to ignite during the startup sequence. The 90-minute window had opened at 6:45 p.m. EDT from Starbase in Boca Chica, Texas, and the countdown had proceeded without issue all day, with more than 11.5 million pounds of liquid methane and liquid oxygen being fully loaded into the rocket before the automated abort triggered. SpaceX’s launch directors posted on X, “Standing down from today’s flight test attempt,” and shut down the livestream shortly after.
Musk confirmed the root cause within hours. “Some of the engines didn’t start, triggering an automatic launch abort,” he wrote on X. “To be confident of a good flight, 2 Raptors will be removed and replaced. Most probable launch timing is early next week.” SpaceX engineers began draining propellant tanks immediately and Booster 20 was rolled back to its hangar for inspection.
The timing adds a layer of significance that did not exist during any of the previous 12 Starship flights. This is the first time SpaceX has attempted to launch Starship since the company made its stock market debut in June, listing under ticker SPCX at $135 per share. Public investors are now watching every Starship outcome in real time, and a last-second abort carries more visibility than it would have six months ago.
Flight 13 was designed to be one of the most consequential tests in the program’s history. It was set to carry 20 Starlink V3 satellites, the first operational payload Starship has ever attempted to deploy. Six of those satellites carried external cameras to photograph Starship’s heat shield from the outside during flight, which would act as a self-inspection approach SpaceX has never attempted before. The mission also needed to complete a Raptor engine relight in space, a step SpaceX skipped on Flight 12 in May after losing an engine during ascent. That Flight 12 booster also flipped 90 degrees off course during its boostback burn when five engines failed to reignite.
SpaceX has not announced an official next launch date. Musk’s “early next week” window points to July 21 or 22 at the earliest, pending the engine swap and a return to the pad.
Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli responded to rumors of an imminent bankruptcy that was reportedly being mulled after a report stated the automaker was working with the firm AlixPartners to iron out its next steps.
The company felt a massive loss on Wall Street yesterday, as the report essentially pushed the stock down as much as 55 percent on Tuesday.
The report, published initially by Eletric-Vehicles.com, claimed Lucid was essentially in dire straits and was told by AlixPartners, a commonly used restructuring advisor, to either take shares private or file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
Lucid’s head of Communications, Nick Twork, immediately challenged the report and stated the company “has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year.”
Now, the company’s CEO is chiming in as well, stating that the report is “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Napoli said:
“Lucid is not considering bankruptcy or a transaction to take the company private. Those reports are false. The Board did not explore either scenario. Period.
As disclosed in our most recent quarterly filing, Lucid has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations well into next year.
We work with outside advisors to improve operational performance and execution. They are not advising Lucid on a take-private transaction or bankruptcy, and any suggestion that they have recommended either course of action to management or the Board is false.
My priority is clear: turn this company around. That is where the leadership team and I are focused.
I look forward to providing a full update during our quarterly earnings call on August 4th.”
🚨 Lucid CEO Silvio Napoli calls rumors of financial issues “so far from the facts that they require a direct response.”
Read his full remarks here: https://t.co/t3Pg1NHvzy pic.twitter.com/LvHUPhO4Qf
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 15, 2026
It seems pretty clear that Lucid is confident things will be okay, and, to be honest, they should not have much to worry about, especially considering the company has been backed by the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF) for years. It has solid financial backing, and its sales, while weak, are pretty much right on par with a company of this age.
Lucid also sent a Cease & Desist letter to the publication for their report.
Lucid shares have rebounded nicely and are up nearly 21 percent at the time of publication. As soon as the company dispelled the rumors of bankruptcy yesterday, the stock began to climb back toward more reasonable levels.
Electric vehicle maker Lucid Group has denied rumors of an imminent bankruptcy after a report from this morning sent the stock on a dramatic drop on Wall Street, seeing losses of more than 40 percent during trading hours.
Lucid’s Director of Communications, Nick Twork, responded to the report from Eletric-Vehicles.com, which stated the company’s restructuring advisor, AlixPartners, was asked to review two decisions: taking Lucid shares private or filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection.
The report also claims AlixPartners told the Lucid board to “concentrate on Gravity production while improving its quality, and to temporarily hold back the Lucid Air, the sedan that has defined the company since its launch.”
Twork said:
$LCID The rumors are completely false. The company has sufficient liquidity to carry its operations well into next year, as recently published in its last quarterly filings, and it has not formed any special Board committee to explore the scenarios reported today. Our focus is…
— Nick Twork (@ntwork) July 14, 2026
Shares rebounded after the response to the report, halving its losses as the trading day neared 3 p.m. Eastern.
Lucid has struggled to get its sales off the ground and into more respectable numbers, but the company is in its early years, when things are hard to begin with. It is also backed by several notable investors, including the Saudi Public Investment Fund (PIF), which has nearly limitless money and likely would not ditch an investment of this size so soon.
Lucid shares were down just 14 percent at the time of publication, a far cry from the 55 percent its losses topped out at during the day.
Tesla enters two new markets on two different continents in one week
SpaceX announces new Starship 13 test flight target date
