Connect with us

Investor's Corner

Debunking the story that Elon Musk “kept cash” from the recent stock offering

Published

on

Elon Musk talks about Autopilot

On Monday May 23, 2016, Tesla Motors e-mailed to TSLA registered investors a link to Elon Musk’s Form 4 SEC Filing, a.k.a. the Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership, detailing the transactions that are part of the recent stock offering that relate to Elon Musk.

Tesla Alert

Source: Tesla Motors

The Form is available also at Tesla Motors Investors website.

I will go through the major details shown in the form to understand how the transactions were executed. For the inquiring minds, the various SEC codes listed in FORM 4 can be found here.

First an assumption: prior to the offering and the changes in beneficial ownership of the listed securities, Elon Musk held 29,579,342 shares of stock in TSLA.

The first and second transactions (Table I, column 1, line 1 and 2) report the exercise of stock options (options that were awarded to Elon in previous years as part of a Non-Qualified Stock Options plan) to acquire 5,503,972 shares of Tesla’s common stock (2,147,986 + 3,355,986 shares). The options were originally awarded at $6.63, and Elon paid $36,491,334 or about $36 million to exercise them. After this purchase, Elon owned at total of 35,083,314 shares (Table I, column 5, line 2).

While the original offering was supposed to be priced at about $204 per share, the eventual offering price was raised to $215 per share. At the $215 stock value at the time of the offering, the value of the acquired shares was a whopping $1.18 billion!

Before actually paying for the option exercise transactions, Elon did two things.

Advertisement
-

First it disposed of 1.2 million shares as a “bona file gift to charity” (Table I, line 3 and Explanation of Responses (3)). This gift reduced Elon’s shares down to 33,883,314 shares (Table I, column 5, line 3).

Second, Elon disclosed that he intended to sell 2,782,670 of the purchased shares in the “registered offering solely in order to pay income tax related to these stock option exercises” (see Explanation of Responses (2) in FORM 4). The sale reduced Elon’s shares further down to 31,100,644 shares. At $215 / share, Elon Musk’s Tesla shares are worth a bit over $13 billion.

Interestingly, if these were Incentive Stock Options (ISO), the ones usually awarded to Executives, vs. Non-qualified Stock Options (NSO), usually awarded to regular employees, these options would have received special federal tax treatment, and there would be no taxable event reported at exercise, except for any exercised shares that were sold immediately after the exercise. But as one can see in Table II, Elon received “non-qualified stock options” like any other employee, that do not qualify for special tax treatment.

The gain or “bargain element” in a stock option exercise is calculated by subtracting the exercise price ($6.63) from the market price ($215) of the company stock on the date the option is exercised. So the gain per share is $208.70. The total bargain element (gain) in the options exercise transactions is $1,148,679,000 or about $1.14 billion, which is the “taxable gain.”

For the 2,782,670 shares that Elon sold in the registered offering, Elon collected $598,274,050 or about $580 million after accounting for the price paid for the shares. Since these shares were sold immediately after exercise, the gain will be reported as a short-term capital gain and will be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates. Assuming 39.6% ordinary federal income tax rate, and a 12.30% top individual rate for California, Elon would have to pay $596 million in tax, or 51.9% of the “taxable gain.”

Notice that the $580 and $596 million numbers above are close enough for the company to state in the FORM 8-K filing that “Mr. Musk will owe a significant amount of taxes from exercising these stock options and will fund this task obligation by selling only the amount of shares needed to do so.”

Advertisement
-

But we are not done. The rest of the stock exercised by Elon Musk, 2,731,302 shares, can be treated as long-term capital gain (with better tax treatment, likely at the 20% long-term capital gain rate, rather than at the 39.6% personal income tax rate) if the stock is held for 12 months after exercise. Assuming that Elon is smart (I think he is), he will wait, to get a combined Federal + California 32.3% tax rate, resulting in an additional $184 million in taxes (2,731,302 times $208.70 times 32.3%).

Finally, we need to consider the gift of 1.2 million shares of Tesla’s common stock given to charity (Table I, column 1, line 3). By donating shares, Elon avoids paying the capital gains tax, which would have to be paid if the shares were first sold and then the cash proceeds donated to charity.

Moreover, Elon can get a tax deduction for the current fair market value of the gifted shares. In general, the amount of the deduction is limited to 20%-30% of the adjusted gross income, but one can carry forward amounts above that for up to five years. Without knowing Elon’s adjusted gross income, it is difficult to guess what the deduction would amount to. The fair market value of the donated shares is $250 million. That would be the best case scenario for a charitable deduction, which is extremely unlikely, while 20% of the taxable gain is more likely ($218 million).

Summarizing the transactions:

  • Cost of exercising options: $36 million
  • Taxes on short-term capital gain for shares sold at offering: $596 million
  • Taxes on long-term capital gains for shares held 12-months: $184 million

Total outlay: $ 816 million

  • Registered offering sale: $580 million
  • Gifted shares tax deduction (max): $250 million, (likely): $218 million

So after all is said and done, Elon will still owe Uncle Sam between $18 and $236 million. I have seen reports from “TSLA bears”  (or TSLA haters, same thing) indicating that Elon would actually “keep cash” on this sale.

Obviously he does not, and I would expect that he would eventually have to sell a portion of the remaining $1.5 million (to be exact 1,521,302 shares) from the offering that Elon is not selling or donating to charity, to cover the additional tax, unless he’s got cash in the bank to pay for it.

This offering dilutes the total outstanding shares of TSLA with an additional 1.4 million from Tesla Motors and the 5.5 million from Elon Musk (for a total on 6.9 million new shares diluting the TSLA public pool of shares), while Elon adds about 1.5 million to his total, ending with about 31 million shares (to be exact 31,100,644).  So Elon adds some shares but loses a bit in Tesla ownership percentage, from 26.2% to 22.7%.

Advertisement
-

Technical Analysis

Looking at this week TSLA action, we are now after my predicted breakout,  looking at bullish pay-day-cycles (6 consecutive green Heikin Ashi bars), the MACD gone positive, and the MACD moving averages “crossed to the bulls”.

Screen Shot 2016-05-25 at 7.50.08 AM

Source: Wall Street I/O

We are coming close to an important point: the stock price is advancing toward the 200-day moving average (around $221.90), which will act as “resistance”. If the stock fails to cross the 200-day moving average, it would usually move down and fast afterwards (“bounce” off the average); this morning  it traded as high as $220.75 and “bounced”. If otherwise it eventually crosses the 200-day moving average, we will have an additional bullish indicator and the stock will be header for new tops.

I entered my option trades last week (Sept. 215 calls), before the breakout and have added and cashed in already once to take profits. I have also progressively moved up my conditional stop from 205, to 210 and 215, to protect my profits, and will likely move it even higher as the stock approaches the 221 level and tests the resistance. If the stock crosses the 200-day moving average, I will add again to my TSLA calls holdings, as I will have 4 bullish indicators flying high. Obviously not a good time for short sellers in $TSLA.

Advertisement
Comments

Elon Musk

Elon Musk breaks his silence on the Starlink impact to Ukraine drones

Musk says the US military and president set Starshield limits, not SpaceX, amid Ukraine complaints.

Published

on

By

Elon Musk says the speed limit cutting out Ukraine’s military Starlink terminals is not SpaceX’s decision. In a post on X Wednesday, Musk wrote that “Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government. Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.” He added that Starlink is a commercial service limited to civilian or defensive activities and “cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.”

He was replying to Mykhailo Fedorov, Ukraine’s former defense minister, who had thanked Musk for restoring connectivity at speeds up to 160 km/h and said removing the Starshield limit entirely is “now critical for Ukraine’s defense.”

The complaint started Tuesday night, when Ukrainian officials said military terminals began losing service above roughly 100 mph. Presidential adviser Serhiy Beskrestnov said the defense forces got no warning and several missions were disrupted, as Teslarati reported earlier Wednesday. The 7th Rapid Reaction Corps told Reuters connections dropped for 10 to 20 seconds at speeds well below the limit, which made drones harder to control. Poland’s foreign minister, Radoslaw Sikorski, asked Musk on X whether he is “playing politics with your products again.”

Advertisement
-

That is why the Starlink and Starshield distinction matters. SpaceX introduced Starshield in 2022 as the government version of Starlink, with an initial focus on Earth observation, communications and hosted payloads. It won a Space Force contract in 2023 with a $70 million ceiling. In December 2024, the Pentagon moved Ukraine’s terminals onto Starshield, covering about 3,000 units across two contracts. Ukraine’s military connections therefore run through a service that Musk now says sits under Washington’s control.

SpaceX pitches subscription model for Trump’s Golden Dome

While Musk’s post describes who holds authority, it does not infer that anyone ordered the limit, and neither SpaceX nor the US government has confirmed who set it. Ukrainian officials have pointed to the timing, which follows President Trump’s push for an energy ceasefire and Musk’s Saturday post that “Zelensky has gone too far.” The BBC noted Trump denied threatening to restrict intelligence sharing with Kyiv, and no evidence has been presented that Washington requested the cap.

The episode also revives a promise from 2025. After Poland accused him of threatening Ukraine’s access, Musk said Starlink “will never turn off its terminals” and would not be used as a bargaining chip. Poland has since supplied more than 29,000 terminals to Ukraine. Teslarati also covered Kyiv’s search for Starlink alternatives in 2025, and the latest dispute gives that search new urgency.

Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Tesla opens the Q&A for its biggest earnings call yet

Tesla opens its Q3 earnings Q&A, and Cybercab, Robotaxi, Optimus and regulators loom over October 21.

Published

on

By

Tesla has opened its shareholder question portal for the Q3 2026 earnings call, with the Say Q&A page already listing questions. Investors have until 4:00 p.m. EDT on October 20 to submit and vote on what management should answer.

The call is set for Wednesday, October 21. Tesla will post results after the market closes, with a live webcast at 4:30 p.m. CT, or 5:30 p.m. ET, through its investor relations site.

Say ranks questions by the number of shares behind the votes, which gives institutional holders extra weight over the retail crowd.

Ahead of Q2, retail investors asked why Robotaxi growth had stalled, when Cybercab would start customer rides, and where the Optimus Gen 3 ramp stood, while an institutional holder asked how Tesla and SpaceX would split Terafab duties. Cybercab has since answered one of those. Tesla said last week it has 300 plus Cybercabs serving Austin, up eightfold in 30 days, with Dallas named as the next city. The questions now are likely to move from when to how fast.

There is also a regulatory question hanging over the call. NHTSA has demanded sworn answers on how the pedal free Cybercab was certified against federal safety standards, with responses due October 30, nine days after the call. Whether an analyst raises it live is unknown, but it is the kind of exposure that tends to find its way into a Q&A.

The numbers will not be the main draw. Tesla already reported 486,532 deliveries and 13.7 GWh of storage for the quarter. Consensus sits around 43 to 45 cents per share on roughly $27.8 billion in revenue, according to Zacks, after a Q2 report that missed on EPS. Goldman Sachs, which holds a Neutral rating and a $360 target, argues the outlook for Robotaxi, FSD and Optimus will matter more to the stock than the quarter itself.

Advertisement
-

The call also lands six days after the rescheduled Roadster event, which Tesla will stream on X on Thursday, October 15, at 7:55 p.m. CT. If the Roadster shows up with a production date or a SpaceX thruster package, expect it to climb the voting list before the deadline.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

FAA kicks off review of SpaceX’s bid to fly Starship nearly every day

FAA is reviewing SpaceX’s plan for 456 Starship launches a year, up from 25 today.

Published

on

By

Rendering of Elon Musk overlooking a Starship fleet (Credit: Grok)

The FAA said Tuesday that it will prepare an environmental impact statement on SpaceX’s proposal to run as many as 456 Starship launches and 912 landings a year from Starbase, Texas. SpaceX is currently authorized for 25 launches and 50 landings annually, which makes the request roughly 18 times the existing ceiling. The notice of intent is set to publish in the Federal Register on Wednesday.

The plan comes in two phases. Phase 1 would allow up to 100 launches and 200 landings a year, on any day and at any hour. Phase 2, which the FAA says could arrive within several years, would raise the limit to the full 456 launches, still at any hour but only on weekdays. The agency noted that 912 landings is the upper limit for the Texas facility no matter where a given mission begins, and that Starship and Super Heavy could come down at the launch site or in the Gulf and open ocean.

A draft statement will be released for public comment at a later date, and the FAA has not said when. According to the Federal Registar, written comments are due November 30 on regulations.gov under docket FAA-2026-12808, with in person scoping meetings on November 17 in Brownsville and November 19 in Port Isabel, plus a virtual session on November 18. The review will weigh air quality, wildlife, coastal resources, water, noise, and aviation, and the FAA said any increase beyond this proposal would need its own separate review.

The numbers look large next to what Starbase has actually done. Starship has flown three times from Texas this year, including Flight 14 on September 28, the first orbital flight, which deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites. Bloomberg reported that Starbase has never launched more than five times in a calendar year. The current cap of 25 comes from an FAA approval in May 2025. In February, the agency also approved up to 44 Starship launches a year from Launch Complex 39A in Florida, so Phase 1 in Texas alone would more than double that allowance.

Musk has said Starship could eventually fly more than once per hour within less than a decade, per Bloomberg. The nearer term target is Flight 15. Musk said on October 10 that it is hopefully four to six weeks away and will try to catch the ship with the tower, as Teslarati covered. That flight still runs under the existing 25 launch limit, and so would every Starbase launch for as long as the new review takes.

Advertisement
-

As of mid morning Pacific time on Tuesday, SpaceX had not posted about the filing on its own account.

Continue Reading