Investor's Corner
Tesla’s China factory can’t arrive soon enough amid escalating US-China trade war
Amidst the escalating trade war between the United States and China, American automakers such as Tesla have become the first victims of renewed, hefty tariffs on US-made products entering the country. In response to the 25% duties imposed by the United States government on $34 billion worth of Chinese imports last week, China has decided to strike back by placing a 40% levy on vehicles made in America.
The latest tariffs have forced Tesla to raise the prices of its Model S luxury sedan and its Model X SUV by 150,000 yuan ($22,647) to 250,000 yuan ($37,744). With the new duties in place, a fully-loaded Tesla Model S P100D now costs 1.47 million yuan ($221,937) in China, a far cry from the $147,000 price of the vehicle in the United States.
The latest tariffs come at a time when China implemented a reduction of its import duties for foreign-made vehicles from 20-25% to 15%. On the heels of the Chinese government’s announcement earlier this year, the response from Tesla’s customer base in the country was immediate. In Tesla’s Shanghai gallery alone, prospective buyers cleared out the store’s entire Model X 75D inventory in 24 hours after it was announced that the price of the vehicle would be reduced by $11,000 after the 15% tariffs were implemented.
While it is unfortunate to see the ongoing trade dispute between the United States and China once more affecting the prices of Tesla’s vehicles in the country, it is pertinent to note that even with hefty taxes placed on its electric cars, Tesla was fighting the good fight in China, and it was still thriving. The company, after all, established its presence and its reputation under an environment where its cars were priced far beyond its local competition.
Tesla’s story in China is one that showcases the learning curve that the California-based electric car and energy company continues to go through. Tesla began taking pre-orders for the Model S in China in August 2013. At that point in Tesla’s history, CEO Elon Musk was not even sure how much the production vehicle would cost. Deliveries were also expected to be eight months away. Anticipation among Chinese buyers, however, were high nonetheless, thanks to a combination of factors including Elon Musk’s rockstar status, as well as talks about the vehicle’s performance and supercar-worthy acceleration. Pre-orders for the Model S topped 5,000 that year.
Unfortunately, Tesla was not able to support these first Model S owners properly. Due to miscalculations on its business strategy, Tesla ended up with a lot of disgruntled Chinese owners. One Model S buyer even made national news after he smashed the windshield of his own Tesla after the car arrived months later than expected. To top it off, the Supercharger network, widely considered as Tesla’s ace in the electric car industry today, was still in its infancy then, and China only had a small system centered around key cities. Things changed, however, on January 2015, when Elon Musk flew to China and met with President Xi Jinping. Musk also admitted to Tesla’s “earlier mistakes,” stating that he was nonetheless “very optimistic” about the company’s chances in the country. Tesla also attended the Shanghai Auto Show, sparking more interest in its electric vehicles.
- Tesla’s grand opening of its Changsha, China store. [Credit: @vincent13031925/Twitter]
- Credit: Dennis Chang via Twitter
- Tesla’s grand opening of its Changsha, China store. [Credit: @vincent13031925/Twitter]
- Tesla’s grand opening of its Shenzhen, China store. [Credit: @vincent13031925/Twitter]
In the months that followed, Tesla expanded its Supercharger network, curbing the “range anxiety” of China’s electric car owners. Word-of-mouth about the company’s non-dealership sales model also started spreading. Tesla’s business in China experienced a massive boost when it introduced the Model X as well, considering the country’s obsession with SUVs. Government regulations, such as Shanghai’s electric-car friendly license plates gave even more benefits to Tesla. By the end of 2017, Tesla had already opened the largest Supercharger in the world in Shanghai. The company’s sales in the country in 2016 also helped boost its revenue enough to join the Fortune 500 list for the first time.
With Tesla’s history in mind, the renewed tariffs from the United States and China’s ongoing trade dispute could actually have little effect on Tesla’s overall operations in the country. The new duties will result in lost sales — that much is a given — but Tesla’s pedigree as a luxury automaker that makes cars that are the ultimate status symbols in China remain undaunted.

Tesla’s approval for its China site from the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China. [Credit: vincent13031925/Twitter]
Tesla, after all, has not really started its mass market push in China. The Model 3 and the Model Y, the company’s two vehicles that are targeted to dominate in the midrange segment, have not arrived in the country as of yet. With Elon Musk confirming during the Q1 2018 earnings call that the next Gigafactory will be in China, and that the facility will incorporate vehicle production, the solely-owned factory should allow Tesla to avoid the import taxes imposed on its upcoming, more budget-friendly vehicles — trade war or no trade war.
Tesla’s China Gigafactory is expected to be the site where the electric car maker will manufacture the Model Y crossover SUV, as well as some of the Model 3. Both vehicles are targeted towards the mass-market, with Tesla estimating that the Model Y could see a demand of up to 1 million vehicles per year. With the Model Y and Model 3, Tesla could compete in China not only in the luxury segment, but on the more lucrative and more competitive midrange market as well. For now, however, Tesla’s efforts to establish its own factory in China seems to be going well, with the company being granted a final approval for its solely-owned electric car facility by the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.
Investor's Corner
Tesla investor Calpers opposes Elon Musk’s 2025 performance award
Musk’s 2025 pay plan will be decided at Tesla’s 2025 Annual Shareholder Meeting, which will be held on November 6 in Giga Texas.
One of the United States’ largest pension funds, the California Public Employees’ Retirement System (Calpers), has stated that it will be voting against Elon Musk’s 2025 Tesla CEO performance award.
Musk’s 2025 pay plan will be decided at Tesla’s 2025 Annual Shareholder Meeting, which will be held on November 6 in Giga Texas. Company executives have stated that the upcoming vote will decide Tesla’s fate in the years to come.
Why Calpers opposes Musk’s 2025 performance award
In a statement shared with Bloomberg News, a Calpers spokesperson criticized the scale of Musk’s proposed deal. Calpers currently holds about 5 million Tesla shares, giving its stance meaningful influence among institutional investors.
“The CEO pay package proposed by Tesla is larger than pay packages for CEOs in comparable companies by many orders of magnitude. It would also further concentrate power in a single shareholder,” the spokesperson stated.
This is not the first time Calpers has opposed a major Musk pay deal. The fund previously voted against a $56 billion package proposed for Musk and criticized the CEO’s 2018 performance-based plan, which was perceived as unrealistic due to its ambitious nature at the time. Musk’s 2018 pay plan was later struck down by a Delaware court, though Tesla is currently appealing the decision.
Musk’s 2025 CEO Performance Award
While Elon Musk’s 2025 performance award will result in him becoming a trillionaire, he would not be able to receive any compensation from Tesla unless aggressive operational and financial targets are met. For Musk to receive his full compensation, for example, he would have to grow Tesla’s market cap from today’s $1.1 trillion to $8.5 trillion, effectively making it the world’s most valuable company by a mile.
Musk has also maintained that his 2025 performance award is not about compensation. It’s about his controlling stake at Tesla. “If I can just get kicked out in the future by activist shareholder advisory firms who don’t even own Tesla shares themselves, I’m not comfortable with that future,” Musk wrote in a post on X.
Investor's Corner
Tesla enters new stability phase, firm upgrades and adjusts outlook
Dmitriy Pozdnyakov of Freedom Capital upgraded his outlook on Tesla shares from “Sell” to “Hold” on Wednesday, and increased the price target from $338 to $406.
Tesla is entering a new phase of stability in terms of vehicle deliveries, one firm wrote in a new note during the final week of October, backing its position with an upgrade and price target increase on the stock.
Dmitriy Pozdnyakov of Freedom Capital upgraded his outlook on Tesla shares from “Sell” to “Hold” on Wednesday, and increased the price target from $338 to $406.
While most firms are interested in highlighting Tesla’s future growth, which will be catalyzed mostly by the advent of self-driving vehicles, autonomy, and the company’s all-in mentality on AI and robotics, Pozdnyakov is solely focusing on vehicle deliveries.
The analyst wrote in a note to investors that he believes Tesla’s updated vehicle lineup, which includes its new affordable “Standard” trims of the Model 3 and Model Y, is going to stabilize the company’s delivery volumes and return the company to annual growth.
Tesla launches two new affordable models with ‘Standard’ Model 3, Y offerings
Tesla launched the new affordable Model 3 and Model Y “Standard” trims on October 7, which introduced two stripped-down, less premium versions of the all-electric sedan and crossover.
They are both priced at under $40,000, with the Model 3 at $37,990 and the Model Y at $39,990, and while these prices may not necessarily be what consumers were expecting, they are well under what Kelley Blue Book said was the average new car transaction price for September, which swelled above $50,000.
Despite the rollout of these two new models, it is interesting to hear that a Wall Street firm would think that Tesla is going to return to more stable delivery figures and potentially enter a new growth phase.
Many Wall Street firms have been more focused on AI, Robotics, and Tesla’s self-driving project, which are the more prevalent things that will drive investor growth over the next few years.
Wedbush’s Dan Ives, for example, tends to focus on the company’s prowess in AI and self-driving. However, he did touch on vehicle deliveries in the coming years in a recent note.
Ives said in a note on October 2:
“While EV demand is expected to fall with the EV tax credit expiration, this was a great bounce-back quarter for TSLA to lay the groundwork for deliveries moving forward, but there is still work to do to gain further ground from a delivery perspective.”
Tesla has some things to figure out before it can truly consider guaranteed stability from a delivery standpoint. Initially, the next two quarters will be a crucial way to determine demand without the $7,500 EV tax credit. It will also begin to figure out if its new affordable models are attractive enough at their current price point to win over consumers.
Investor's Corner
Bank of America raises Tesla PT to $471, citing Robotaxi and Optimus potential
The firm also kept a Neutral rating on the electric vehicle maker, citing strong progress in autonomy and robotics.
Bank of America has raised its Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) price target by 38% to $471, up from $341 per share.
The firm also kept a Neutral rating on the electric vehicle maker, citing strong progress in autonomy and robotics.
Robotaxi and Optimus momentum
Bank of America analyst Federico Merendi noted that the firm’s price target increase reflects Tesla’s growing potential in its Robotaxi and Optimus programs, among other factors. BofA’s updated valuation is based on a sum-of-the-parts (SOTP) model extending through 2040, which shows the Robotaxi platform accounting for 45% of total value. The model also shows Tesla’s humanoid robot Optimus contributing 19%, and Full Self-Driving (FSD) and the Energy segment adding 17% and 6% respectively.
“Overall, we find that TSLA’s core automotive business represents around 12% of the total value while robotaxi is 45%, FSD is 17%, Energy Generation & Storage is around 6% and Optimus is 19%,” the Bank of America analyst noted.
Still a Neutral rating
Despite recognizing long-term potential in AI-driven verticals, Merendi’s team maintained a Neutral rating, suggesting that much of the optimism is already priced into Tesla’s valuation.
“Our PO revision is driven by a lower cost of equity capital, better Robotaxi progress, and a higher valuation for Optimus to account for the potential entrance into international markets,” the analyst stated.
Interestingly enough, Tesla’s core automotive business, which contributes the lion’s share of the company’s operations today, represents just 12% of total value in BofA’s model.
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoSpaceX posts Starship booster feat that’s so nutty, it doesn’t even look real
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoTesla Full Self-Driving gets an offer to be insured for ‘almost free’
-
News2 weeks agoElon Musk confirms Tesla FSD V14.2 will see widespread rollout
-
News2 weeks agoTesla is adding an interesting feature to its centerscreen in a coming update
-
News2 weeks agoTesla launches new interior option for Model Y
-
News2 weeks agoTesla widens rollout of new Full Self-Driving suite to more owners
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoTesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package hits first adversity from proxy firm
-
News2 weeks agoTesla might be doing away with a long-included feature with its vehicles





