Investor's Corner
The ‘Tesla Effect’ is starting to extend from legacy carmakers to the oil industry
Back in February, self-made billionaire Don Gao from China mentioned that the “Tesla Effect” continues to grow even in markets beyond the California-based company’s reach. Gao, who owns Positec – a maker of power equipment – uses lithium-ion batteries for his company’s products, and they are steadily becoming a potent rival for heavyweight brands like Black & Decker. The billionaire entrepreneur noted that Tesla’s commitment to battery tech is spilling over into other industries, to the point where consumers’ perception of battery-powered devices is now changing.
“This Tesla Effect is a major trend and has really changed consumers’ perception of things that are battery driven and their capabilities,” he said.
Tesla did not come up with the electric car, nor did it come up with lithium-ion batteries. Both technologies were present even before the company was founded. That said, and partly thanks to the unraveling of Elon Musk’s first Master Plan, Tesla was able to capture an audience and a dedicated consumer base with its first vehicle – the Tesla Roadster. The small sports car was mostly a proof-of-concept, in the way that it was intended to show that electric cars need not be boring or limited in range. The car was successful enough that Tesla was able to follow it up with the Model S, a vehicle designed from the ground up to be a high-performance, long-range electric car. The rest is history.
Tesla’s electric cars were able to capture the interest of car buyers, even those that are particular about power and performance. It should be noted that Tesla’s electric cars were showing strong sales even before the company rolled out features like Autopilot. The company’s electric vehicles, from the Model S, to the Model X, to the Model 3, were desirable simply because they were excellent cars. They just happen to be powered by electricity instead of gas.
Since Tesla is still in the process of growing, its electric cars have been competing in the luxury segment. The electric vehicles themselves are not traditional luxury cars, with their minimalistic and almost spartan interiors, but they do provide a premium experience through their deep integration of software and hardware. Over the years, Tesla’s electric cars sold well, until such time that they started outselling mainstays from legacy carmakers like BMW and Mercedes-Benz. The Tesla Model 3, the company’s first attempt at a mass-market car, was recently listed as the 4th best-selling passenger car in the US, beating out competitors from the luxury midsize segment like the Mercedes-Benz C-Class.
In the same way that companies unrelated to Tesla are starting to explore the potential of lithium-ion batteries partly due to the electric car maker, a number of legacy automakers have accelerated their transition to electrified transport as well. Among the German carmakers, several have expressed their intent to come up with their own premium electric vehicles. Mercedes-Benz has the EQ program, Volkswagen just announced that it is investing ~$7 billion into e-mobility, and Porsche has the Taycan, a high-performance electric car that’s set to meet the Model S head-on in the premium EV market. Most of these carmakers would likely not acknowledge it, but there is little doubt that the transition to electrified transport was expedited by the efforts of a small electric car startup from Silicon Valley.
In a way, the Tesla Effect is happening at the perfect time. Several regions in the world are shifting towards cleaner forms of transportation. China plans to eventually ban diesel and gasoline-powered cars in its major cities. France and Britain have both committed to banning gas-powered automobiles in the future as well. Earlier this month, the EU Parliament voted for a 20% cut in CO2 emissions from new cars and vans in 2025 and a 40% reduction in 2030, accelerating the region’s transition towards cleaner transport. To effectively support the transition, carmakers, from startups like Tesla to pedigreed veterans like Mercedes-Benz, have to ramp their efforts at creating even more compelling, cost-effective electric vehicles.
In a recent segment on CNBC, Paul Sankey of Mizuho Securities mentioned that the “Tesla Effect” is starting to make its way to the oil industry as well. Last Thursday, oil prices tumbled as much as 4% amidst concerns about the fallout from the United States’ sanctions on Iran, the OPEC’s third-biggest crude oil producer. Wall St. analysts noted that oil could be in striking distance of $100 per barrel – an adjustment that would be felt by owners of fossil fuel-powered cars. The Mizuho analyst noted that part of the reasons behind the struggles of the oil industry is the shifting perception towards oil itself.
“Essentially, the big issue is the so-called “Tesla Effect,” the general “End of the Oil Age” theme that is a problem for these (oil) stocks. As the oil price goes up, especially to the levels we’re at now and potentially beyond, it’s almost as if the Tesla Effect could be exacerbated by the potential for higher oil prices to accelerate the end of the Oil Age. The Tesla Effect is the overall concept that (while) the 20th century was driven by oil, the 21st century will be driven by electricity. There’s a 30-year transition, and we’re somewhere probably 10 years into that transition. Ultimately, (the) terminal value of oil has been severely affected by the potential for us to change behavior,” the analyst said.
What is quite remarkable is that Tesla is nowhere close to reaching the company’s overall goals. Elon Musk once noted that Tesla would not stop until all cars in the road are electric. And the truth is, even if the company reaches its production targets for the Model 3 and the Model Y and its future Truck and compact sedan, Tesla would not be able to transition the auto industry towards electrification on its own. What Tesla could do, though, is to accelerate this transition, and if recent projects by legacy carmakers are any indication, it appears that the Silicon Valley-based company is doing just that.
Elon Musk
Tesla analyst: ‘near zero chance’ Elon Musk’s $1T comp package is rejected
“There is a near-zero chance that $TSLA shareholders will vote down Elon’s new proposed comp plan at the Nov 6 shareholders’ meeting.”
A Tesla analyst says there is “zero chance” that CEO Elon Musk’s new compensation package is rejected, a testament to the loyalty and belief many shareholders and investors have in the frontman.
Tesla investors will vote on November 6 at the annual Shareholder Meeting to approve a new compensation package for Musk, revealed by the company’s Board of Directors earlier this month.
The package, if approved, would give Musk the opportunity to earn $1 trillion in stock, an ownership concentration of over 27 percent (a major request of Musk’s), and a solidified future at the company.
The Tesla Community on X, the social media platform Musk bought in 2023, is overwhelmingly in favor of the pay package, though a handful of skeptics remain.
Nevertheless, the big pulls of this vote are held by proxy firms and other large-scale investors. Two of them, Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS) and Glass Lewis, said they would be voting against Musk’s proposed compensation plan.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package hits first adversity from proxy firm
Today, the State Board of Administration of Florida (SBA) said it would vote in favor of Musk’s newly-proposed pay day, making it the first large-scale shareholder to announce it would support the CEO’s pay.
One analyst said that Musk’s payday is inevitable. Gary Black of the Future Fund said today there is a “near-zero chance” that shareholders will allow Musk’s pay package to be rejected:
“There is a near-zero chance that $TSLA shareholders will vote down Elon’s new proposed comp plan at the Nov 6 shareholders’ meeting.”
He added an alternative perspective from Wedbush’s Dan Ives, who said that he had a better chance of starting for the New York Yankees than the comp package not being approved.
There is a near zero chance that $TSLA shareholders will vote down Elon’s new proposed comp plan at the Nov 6 shareholders’ meeting. As Wedbush analyst Dan Ives (@divestech) colorfully put it in a Yahoo Finance interview on October 23rd: “I have a better chance of starting for…
— Gary Black (@garyblack00) October 27, 2025
Black’s the Future Fund sold its Tesla holdings earlier this year. He explained that the firm believed the company’s valuation was too disconnected from fundamentals, citing the P/E ratio of 188x and declining earnings estimates.
The firm maintained its $310 price target, and shares were trading at $356.90 that day.
Shares closed at $452.42 today.
The latest predictions from betting platform Kalshi have shown Musk’s comp package has a 94 percent chance of being approved:
— Kalshi (@Kalshi) October 20, 2025
Tesla analysts are expecting big things from the stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) after many firms made price target adjustments following the Q3 Earnings Call.
Last Wednesday, Tesla reported earnings with record revenue but missed EPS estimates.
It blew delivery expectations out of the water with its strongest quarter in company history, but Tesla’s future relies on the development of autonomous vehicles, robotics, and AI, which many bullish firms highlight as major strengths.
The earnings call reiterated those points, along with the belief that Tesla CEO Elon Musk should be rewarded with a newly proposed pay package that would enable him to gain $1 trillion in wealth if he comes through on a lengthy list of performance tranches.
Nine Wall Street firms made adjustments to their outlook on Tesla shares in the form of price target increases since last Wednesday’s call, all of which are indications of big expectations for the stock moving forward.
Here are the nine firms that made moves:
- Truist – $280 to $406, reiterated Hold rating
- Roth MKM – $395 to $404, reiterated Buy rating
- Cantor Fitzgerald – $355 to $510, reiterated Overweight rating
- Deutsche Bank – $435 to $440, reiterated Buy rating
- Mizhuo – $450 to $485, reiterated Outperform rating
- New Street Research – $465 to $520, reiterated Buy rating
- Evercore ISI – $235 to $300, reiterated In Line rating
- Freedom Capital Markets – $338 to $406, upgraded to Hold rating
- China Renaissance – $349 to $380, reiterated Hold rating
The boosts in price target are largely due to Tesla’s future projects, as Roth MKM, Cantor Fitzgerald, Mizuho, New Street Research, and Evercore ISI all explicitly mention Tesla’s autonomy, robotics, and AI potential as the main factors for its price target boosts.
Cantor Fitzgerald raises Tesla PT To $510, citing Cybercab, Semi, and AI momentum
It is no surprise that many firms are adjusting their outlook on Tesla shares considerably in an effort to prepare for the company’s transition to even more of a tech company than a car company.
The issue with many analysts is that they treat the company’s vehicle deliveries as the main indicator of value.
However, Tesla has a robust energy division, which was a major contributor to the company’s strong margins and gross profit in Q3, as well as its prowess in robotics and AI.
Additionally, the company is seen as a key player in the autonomy field, especially after launching driverless rides on a Robotaxi platform in Austin and expanding a similar program in the Bay Area.
Tesla shares were up over 5 percent at 12:18 p.m. on the East Coast.
Investor's Corner
Tesla warns Elon Musk could step down if shareholders reject pay plan
Denholm’s letter emphasized Tesla is at a “critical inflection point” as it scales AI-driven projects such as Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Optimus.
Tesla Board Chair Robyn Denholm has urged shareholders to approve CEO Elon Musk’s new 2025 Performance Award ahead of the November 6 Annual Meeting, warning that rejecting it could risk losing his leadership.
In a letter posted on Tesla’s official handle on X, Denholm stated that the company must “foster an environment that motivates Elon to achieve great things,” or risk losing “his time, talent, and vision,” which she described as essential to Tesla’s success.
Retaining Musk amid Tesla’s critical transition
Denholm’s letter emphasized Tesla is at a “critical inflection point” as it scales AI-driven projects such as Full Self-Driving (FSD) and Optimus. She argued that Musk’s leadership remains vital as Tesla pushes toward becoming “the leading provider of autonomous solutions and the most valuable company in the world.” Without a new performance-based plan, Denholm warned, Musk could step away, potentially costing Tesla significant long-term value.
“If we fail to foster an environment that motivates Elon to achieve great things through an equitable pay-for-performance plan, we run the risk that he gives up his executive position, and Tesla may lose his time, talent, and vision, which have been essential to delivering extraordinary shareholder returns,” the Tesla Board Chair stated.
The board’s proposed 2025 Performance Award aligns Musk’s compensation with ambitious targets while extending his commitment for at least 7.5 more years. Denholm stated that the vote is a defining moment for Tesla’s future direction, adding that the plan was designed to keep Musk focused on innovation while maintaining governance discipline. “A vote here is both an endorsement of Elon’s vision and a vote for Tesla’s carefully tailored strategy,” she said.
Musk’s pay history is rooted in performance
Elon Musk’s pay history with Tesla has long been unconventional. For years, he has declined a regular salary, instead directly tying his earnings to Tesla’s ability to meet ambitious production and market-value goals. His 2018 performance award, approved by shareholders at a time when Tesla had a market cap of just about $59 billion, granted him stock options only when Tesla reached aggressive growth milestones, such as growing the company’s market cap to $650 billion.
At the time, the milestones included $50 billion additions to Tesla’s market cap, which were considered by many to be unrealistic. Those goals were ultimately met by the electric vehicle maker, but a Delaware court later rescinded the plan in January 2024, calling it an “unfathomable sum.”
Tesla shareholders reaffirmed support for Musk’s pay in 2024, even as legal disputes continued. The board then issued an interim equity package valued around $29 billion while developing a new long-term plan earlier this year. Since then, Tesla’s Board has proposed Musk’s 2025 CEO Performance Award, which could be worth nearly $1 trillion, but only if Musk were to grow Tesla into the world’s most valuable company with a market cap of $8.5 trillion, among other aggressive and ambitious targets.
Tesla Model Y on FSD saves couple after encountering King of edge cases
“Foundation:” Elon Musk wants to send a record of Grokipedia to space
Tesla Cybertrucks to save Las Vegas police thousands in fuel and maintenance
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoSpaceX posts Starship booster feat that’s so nutty, it doesn’t even look real
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoTesla Full Self-Driving gets an offer to be insured for ‘almost free’
-
News2 weeks agoElon Musk confirms Tesla FSD V14.2 will see widespread rollout
-
News2 weeks agoTesla is adding an interesting feature to its centerscreen in a coming update
-
News2 weeks agoTesla launches new interior option for Model Y
-
News2 weeks agoTesla widens rollout of new Full Self-Driving suite to more owners
-
Elon Musk2 weeks agoTesla CEO Elon Musk’s $1 trillion pay package hits first adversity from proxy firm
-
News1 week agoTesla might be doing away with a long-included feature with its vehicles