Investor's Corner
Sorry Jim Chanos, but the Tesla Model 3 is definitely not ‘looking to be a lemon’
A lot of Tesla’s immediate future is tied to the Model 3. Elon Musk said as much in an interview last July, when he accurately described the Model 3 ramp as a “bet-the-company” situation. This means that if the Model 3 proves a success, Tesla could take a definitive step towards Elon Musk’s Master Plan; but if the vehicle fails, it would be catastrophic for the company.
The Model 3’s failure is something that Jim Chanos, arguably the most high-profile of Tesla’s short-sellers, is looking forward to. Chanos has taken an aggressive stance against the electric car company, never hesitating to express his belief that TSLA stock is worth $0. Over the years, the prominent short-seller has frequently attacked the electric car maker, pointing out Elon Musk’s alleged fraudulent activities and Tesla’s weaknesses as a company.
So far, Chanos’ bet against Tesla has not been paying off. His hedge fund, Kynikos Capital Partners, has not done very well since 2015, a time in which he held a short position against Solar City, and not long before he announced that he was shorting Tesla. Including a 9% loss through July of this year, Kynikos exhibited a net annualized return of 4.86% since 2015, compared with the S&P 500’s return of 12.17% during the same period.
Considering the high-stakes bet that Tesla took with the Model 3, the success of the electric car is something that would not do any favors for Kynikos’ already-embattled year. Chanos, for his part, noted in a recent interview with Institutional Investor that he still likes his odds on Tesla. He does, for one, believe that Elon Musk “handcuffed” himself by promising profitability during the second-half of 2018. He also believes that there are inherent problems with the Model 3, as shown in its production slowdowns in August and alleged issues with the vehicle.
“It’s looking to be a lemon,” Chanos said.
As the third quarter draws to a close, the prominent short-seller’s thesis against Tesla would be put to the test. The electric car maker, after all, has set aggressive targets for itself this Q3, aiming to build 50,000-55,000 Model 3 during the quarter while attaining profitability. Whether Tesla could accomplish its ambitious objectives remains to be seen, but there is one thing that is starting to become evident — the Model 3 does not seem to be a lemon at all.
The electric car’s production issues are well-known, and the teething problems that Tesla exhibited in the vehicle’s initial run were evident, as shown by the first observations of teardown specialist Sandy Munro when he started tearing down an early-production Model 3. But even Sandy Munro eventually admitted that behind the inconsistent panel gaps and imperfect fit and finish issues of the early production Model 3 he tested, he was thoroughly impressed with Tesla’s battery technology, electronics, performance, and ride quality. Tesla’s fit and finish on the Model 3 has improved since the car that Munro tested rolled off the assembly line, and the vehicle has only gotten more praise since then.
The electric car, particularly the Model 3 Performance, has practically garnered unanimous praise from professional auto reviewers. Various auto journalists, from the Wall Street Journal to Car & Driver to Road & Track (to name a few), have praised the vehicle, with the consensus being that it is a car that can disrupt the high-performance sedan market dominated by longtime legends such as the BMW M3.
-
- The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
-
- The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
-
- The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
The Model 3 was given a flawless 5-Star safety rating by the Highway Traffic Safety Administration as well, garnering perfect scores in all categories and subcategories. Videos of the vehicle’s frontal crash, side crash, and rollover crash depicted the electric sedan providing ample protection for its driver and passengers during collisions. With the Model 3’s rating, all of Tesla’s vehicles currently in production now have the distinction of having 5-Star safety ratings from the NHTSA.
Recent reports from the Tesla community in both the United States and abroad also indicate that the company has adopted an aggressive delivery schedule for reservation holders, with centers reportedly conducting handovers until 10 p.m. Other reports further suggest that Tesla’s delivery centers are handing over up to 100 cars per day.
Tesla’s capability to become profitable is linked to the Model 3, which would comprise the majority of its sales this quarter. A vote of confidence for this came in the form of analyses from a German teardown firm and Detroit’s Munro and Associates, both of which concluded that Tesla could make a profit with the Model 3. Munro, for one, noted after his teardown of the Long Range RWD Model 3 that the vehicle could give Tesla a 36% profit. More expensive trims, such as the Long Range Model 3 AWD and the Model 3 Performance, are likely even more profitable.
The third quarter is not yet finished, and much of Tesla’s production and delivery progress remains unknown. But all things considered, Jim Chanos’ bet against the Model 3 as a vehicle could very well end up being a disappointment for the esteemed short-seller.
Elon Musk
Tesla stock gets latest synopsis from Jim Cramer: ‘It’s actually a robotics company’
“Turns out it’s actually a robotics and Cybercab company, and I want to buy, buy, buy. Yes, Tesla’s the paper that turned into scissors in one session,” Cramer said.
Tesla stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) got its latest synopsis from Wall Street analyst Jim Cramer, who finally realized something that many fans of the company have known all along: it’s not a car company. Instead, it’s a robotics company.
In a recent note that was released after Tesla reported Earnings in late January, Cramer seemed to recognize that the underwhelming financials and overall performance of the automotive division were not representative of the current state of affairs.
Instead, we’re seeing a company transition itself away from its early identity, essentially evolving like a caterpillar into a butterfly.
The narrative of the Earnings Call was simple: We’re not a car company, at least not from a birds-eye view. We’re an AI and Robotics company, and we are transitioning to this quicker than most people realize.
Tesla stock gets another analysis from Jim Cramer, and investors will like it
Tesla’s Q4 Earnings Call featured plenty of analysis from CEO Elon Musk and others, and some of the more minor details of the call were even indicative of a company that is moving toward AI instead of its cars. For example, the Model S and Model X will be no more after Q2, as Musk said that they serve relatively no purpose for the future.
Instead, Tesla is shifting its focus to the vehicles catered for autonomy and its Robotaxi and self-driving efforts.
Cramer recognizes this:
“…we got results from Tesla, which actually beat numbers, but nobody cares about the numbers here, as electric vehicles are the past. And according to CEO Elon Musk, the future of this company comes down to Cybercabs and humanoid robots. Stock fell more than 3% the next day. That may be because their capital expenditures budget was higher than expected, or maybe people wanted more details from the new businesses. At this point, I think Musk acolytes might be more excited about SpaceX, which is planning to come public later this year.”
He continued, highlighting the company’s true transition away from vehicles to its Cybercab, Optimus, and AI ambitions:
“I know it’s hard to believe how quickly this market can change its attitude. Last night, I heard a disastrous car company speak. Turns out it’s actually a robotics and Cybercab company, and I want to buy, buy, buy. Yes, Tesla’s the paper that turned into scissors in one session. I didn’t like it as a car company. Boy, I love it as a Cybercab and humanoid robot juggernaut. Call me a buyer and give me five robots while I’m at it.”
Cramer’s narrative seems to fit that of the most bullish Tesla investors. Anyone who is labeled a “permabull” has been echoing a similar sentiment over the past several years: Tesla is not a car company any longer.
Instead, the true focus is on the future and the potential that AI and Robotics bring to the company. It is truly difficult to put Tesla shares in the same group as companies like Ford, General Motors, and others.
Tesla shares are down less than half a percent at the time of publishing, trading at $423.69.
There are a lot of Tesla bulls out there who have astronomical expectations for the company, especially as its arm of reach has gone well past automotive and energy and entered artificial intelligence and robotics.
However, some of the most bullish Tesla investors believe the company could become worth $100 trillion, and CEO Elon Musk does not believe that number is completely out of the question, even if it sounds almost ridiculous.
To put that number into perspective, the top ten most valuable companies in the world — NVIDIA, Apple, Alphabet, Microsoft, Amazon, TSMC, Meta, Saudi Aramco, Broadcom, and Tesla — are worth roughly $26 trillion.
Will Tesla join the fold? Predicting a triple merger with SpaceX and xAI
Cathie Wood of ARK Invest believes the number is reasonable considering Tesla’s long-reaching industry ambitions:
“…in the world of AI, what do you have to have to win? You have to have proprietary data, and think about all the proprietary data he has, different kinds of proprietary data. Tesla, the language of the road; Neuralink, multiomics data; nobody else has that data. X, nobody else has that data either. I could see $100 trillion. I think it’s going to happen because of convergence. I think Tesla is the leading candidate [for $100 trillion] for the reason I just said.”
Musk said late last year that all of his companies seem to be “heading toward convergence,” and it’s started to come to fruition. Tesla invested in xAI, as revealed in its Q4 Earnings Shareholder Deck, and SpaceX recently acquired xAI, marking the first step in the potential for a massive umbrella of companies under Musk’s watch.
SpaceX officially acquires xAI, merging rockets with AI expertise
Now that it is happening, it seems Musk is even more enthusiastic about a massive valuation that would swell to nearly four-times the value of the top ten most valuable companies in the world currently, as he said on X, the idea of a $100 trillion valuation is “not impossible.”
It’s not impossible
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) February 6, 2026
Tesla is not just a car company. With its many projects, including the launch of Robotaxi, the progress of the Optimus robot, and its AI ambitions, it has the potential to continue gaining value at an accelerating rate.
Musk’s comments show his confidence in Tesla’s numerous projects, especially as some begin to mature and some head toward their initial stages.
Elon Musk
Tesla director pay lawsuit sees lawyer fees slashed by $100 million
The ruling leaves the case’s underlying settlement intact while significantly reducing what the plaintiffs’ attorneys will receive.
The Delaware Supreme Court has cut more than $100 million from a legal fee award tied to a shareholder lawsuit challenging compensation paid to Tesla directors between 2017 and 2020.
The ruling leaves the case’s underlying settlement intact while significantly reducing what the plaintiffs’ attorneys will receive.
Delaware Supreme Court trims legal fees
As noted in a Bloomberg Law report, the case targeted pay granted to Tesla directors, including CEO Elon Musk, Oracle founder Larry Ellison, Kimbal Musk, and Rupert Murdoch. The Delaware Chancery Court had awarded $176 million to the plaintiffs. Tesla’s board must also return stock options and forego years worth of pay.
As per Chief Justice Collins J. Seitz Jr. in an opinion for the Delaware Supreme Court’s full five-member panel, however, the decision of the Delaware Chancery Court to award $176 million to a pension fund’s law firm “erred by including in its financial benefit analysis the intrinsic value” of options being returned by Tesla’s board.
The justices then reduced the fee award from $176 million to $70.9 million. “As we measure it, $71 million reflects a reasonable fee for counsel’s efforts and does not result in a windfall,” Chief Justice Seitz wrote.
Other settlement terms still intact
The Supreme Court upheld the settlement itself, which requires Tesla’s board to return stock and options valued at up to $735 million and to forgo three years of additional compensation worth about $184 million.
Tesla argued during oral arguments that a fee award closer to $70 million would be appropriate. Interestingly enough, back in October, Justice Karen L. Valihura noted that the $176 award was $60 million more than the Delaware judiciary’s budget from the previous year. This was quite interesting as the case was “settled midstream.”
The lawsuit was brought by a pension fund on behalf of Tesla shareholders and focused exclusively on director pay during the 2017–2020 period. The case is separate from other high-profile compensation disputes involving Elon Musk.
Tesla ends Full Self-Driving purchase option in the U.S.
Musk bankers looking to trim xAI debt after SpaceX merger: report
