Investor's Corner
LIVE BLOG: Tesla (TSLA) Q4 and Full Year 2020 earnings call summary
Tesla’s (NASDAQ:TSLA) fourth-quarter and full year earnings call comes on the heels of an impressive quarter that saw the electric car maker post $10.7 billion in revenue and $903 million non-GAAP net income. With these results, Tesla has now maintained its profitability for six consecutive quarters.
As revealed in the company’s Q4 FY 2020 Update Letter, Tesla currently sits on $19.4 billion in cash, thanks to a capital raise of $5 billion that further strengthened the company’s war chest. This should allow Tesla to pursue its projects in the United States and abroad, particularly in Texas and Berlin, where two Gigafactories are currently being built. Tesla has also taken the wraps off the Model S and Model X refresh, ending a long period of speculation among electric vehicle enthusiasts.

The following are live updates from Tesla’s Q4 FY 2020 earnings call. I will be updating this article in real-time, so please keep refreshing the page to view the latest updates on this story. The first entry starts at the bottom of the page.
16:34 PT – And that’s it for the Q4 FY 2020 earnings call, everyone! Tons of new info have been shared over the call, and considering what was discussed, it seems like 2021 would be a pretty exciting year once more. With that said, thanks for joining us this time once more for our live blog. We’ll see you in the Q1 2021 earnings call!
16:31 PT – Gene Munster from Loup Ventures asks about the Semi and if the vehicle is the first to achieve full autonomy considering that its routes are extremely predictable. Musk responds that this will indeed be the case. No retraining would be needed to adapt FSD for the Semi, the CEO explained, though some adjustments would need to be made.
16:28 PT – Emmanuel Rosner from Deutsche Bank asks about the cost efficiencies of the 4680 battery cell, as well as the company’s affordable car. Musk notes that three or four years would be a good timeframe to reach such goals. Baird, on the other hand, asks about X (Elon Musk’s possible umbrella company). Musk notes that he expects to be with Tesla for the next years. “I expect to be CEO of Tesla for several years in the future,” Musk said, though he noted that nobody should be CEO forever. “It would be nice to have more than free time in my hands,” Musk remarked, but “the mission is not over yet and there’s still a long way to go before we can make a dent in the world’s acceleration to sustainable energy.” The same is true for solar and stationary storage. There’s still so much work to be done.
16:23 PT – RBC Capital Markets asks about the electric van market. “Tesla is definitely going to make an electric van at one point,” Musk said, though he reiterates that the constraint lies in battery supply. He mentions the Semi, which uses a lot of cells. Musk notes that the Semi would make sense to produce once Tesla addresses its battery constraint. Simply put, when the 4680 is produced in volume, the Semi will come. Musk also talks about Tesla’s next-generation computer. He notes that Tesla’s next-gen chip would be 3x more powerful than the company’s current custom hardware, which is still not being utilized to its full potential today. “We’ve not been rushing the V2 computer. It’s coming along,” Musk said.
16:18 PT – Alex Potter from Piper Sandler asks about Tesla’s intention to increase its battery supply from its suppliers, and if suppliers need to produce 4680 cells. Musk notes that it does not. “It is not required,” Musk said, adding that even the new Model S still uses the 18650 form factor. He noted that Tesla will be retiring its old battery form factors in due time, but it’s better to have some flexibility. “Over time, it would make sense to have a consistency with battery form factor,” he adds. As for Tesla’s growth rate, Elon notes that Tesla poised to massive growth. “We do think we can maintain a growth rate of 50% for many years to come,” he said.
16:15 PT – Dan Levy from Credit Suisse asks about regulatory credits. Kirkhorn highlights that regulatory credit sales are difficult to forecast. He notes that most of Q4’ regulatory credit sales were not forecasted at all. They are simply not predictable. That being said, Tesla is not dependent on it nor does it rely on regulatory credits.
16:12 PT – Analyst questions begin. First up is from Oppenheimer asking about FSD regulations. Tesla notes that it will be all about reliability. There’s a slowdown in Europe, while China’s shown an interest in Level 4 or even Level 5 autonomy. As for the US, it will be all about how reliable autonomous software will be. As for the supply chain, Jerome Guillen notes that there are still challenges related to COVID, though work is underway to address this.

16:10 PT – As for Cybertruck development and 2021 deliveries, Musk stated that Tesla is finished with the vehicle’s engineering. Tesla has the necessary designs to make the Cybertruck work. Tesla will be using 8,000-ton press for the Cybertruck, which is more formidable than the Giga Press used for the Model Y, which is a 6,000-ton press.
16:08 PT – Elon also discusses Tesla’s China operations and its success, though he notes that FSD take rate in the country is conservative. He notes that Tesla has to work hard in ensuring that FSD and Autopilot work well in roads outside North America. As for Tesla’s long-term earnings being tied to profit per unit of battery capacity, Musk responded that this is indeed the case. EV makers can’t grow faster than their battery capacity. “Fundamentally, growth is dependent on cell production,” Musk said, noting that Tesla’s efforts to produce its own cells is to produce more batteries, not to compete with its suppliers. “Our goal with making our own cells is not to intimidate our suppliers. It is to supplement our suppliers,” Musk said.
16:04 PT – Addressing an inquiry from an institutional investor about Tesla’s possible plans to license its software like Autobidder to third party or OEMs. “We’re very open to licensing our software to other OEMs,” Musk said, adding that Tesla is in talks to license Autopilot to other companies. “We’re more than happy to license that to other car companies, and the same goes for Autobidder,” the CEO noted. He also mentions that the Supercharger Network will be fine for sharing too.
16:00 PT – Tesla service issues are addressed. Automotive Director Jerome Guillen notes that Tesla is looking to improve service amidst the company’s efforts to reduce service needs as possible. The executive noted that mobile service will play a huge part in this, with 40% of service needs in the US are now done through mobile. In terms of service appointments, Guillen notes that Tesla has 140 service centers in North America, with customers getting an appointment within 10 days. The pace of opening centers in North America is ramping, with Tesla planning on opening dozens in the first half of this year. He also explains that in terms of app vs phone support, apps are more robust. He notes that Tesla is investing everything it can on the app. “Our emphasis is on the app… It’s the way of the future,” he said.
15:57 PT – As for Tesla’s run rate for 4680 cell production, Elon Musk noted that the company is installing capacity to produce 200 GWh per year around 2022. Drew Baglino adds that with the S-curve of production, one could be off a bit, but Tesla is progressing through this S-curve as fast as possible.
15:52 PT – The second Say question from a retail investor is asked. FSD transfers. Elon notes that Tesla is not looking into this at this time. He mentions FSD’s price increases, and the fact that the market is undervaluing FSD considering its potential. He did note that Tesla will be offering subscriptions within the next month or two, which should help with pricing. As for the dry coating of the battery electrode for 4680 cells, VP of Technology Drew Baglino notes that the challenges are being addressed today. Tesla’s Roadrunner site in Fremont is getting better with its dry electrode process and its 4680 cell manufacturing. The setup for a 10 GWh annual production rate is there already. It’s only a matter of time.

15:49 PT – The first questions from Say are asked. First up, “What is currently holding Tesla back from being the market share leader in solar?” Musk notes that Tesla does indeed plan on being the market share leader. He explains that attention is now being put on solar, which should improve its ramp. “It won’t be long before Tesla becomes the leader in solar.” Kirkhorn also highlights that having industry-leading pricing is pivotal in dominating the solar industry. This is something that Tesla is doing right now.
15:45 PT – CFO Zachary Kirkhorn takes the floor. He highlights Tesla’s strong free cash flow, which secures the company’s funds for its programs. He also mentions that Tesla relies less on debts now, especially as the company establishes its momentum with its sixth consecutive profitable quarter. He also explains automotive margins in Q4, noting that it was affected by the changes in the Model S and Model X line for the refresh, as well as the deployment of machines like the Giga Press in Fremont.
15:43 PT – Musk talks about how to justify Tesla’s high valuation. He explains that FSD will play a huge part in this. In conclusion, Musk noted that 2020 was just the beginning in terms of profitability. “It will be exciting,” he said. Provided that 2021 is relatively normal (unlike 2020), Musk is optimistic that Tesla can reach new heights. “We think 2021 will be more exciting…it’s going to be a great year for Tesla. Many new great products coming out,” he said.
15:40 PT – Musk also talks about the FSD beta rollout. “We have made massive improvements to FSD Beta,” he said. He adds that there are almost 1K people testing the software at this point. “It’s very common to have no interventions in drives to places that I’ve never been to,” Musk said, sharing some of his experiences with the FSD beta.
15:38 PT – Tesla Model S and Model X production is ongoing now. Model S Plaid will start deliveries next month. Model S Plaid will come a bit later. “It’s really a tremendous improvement over the prior version.” The Model S will be the first production car ever that will be able to go from 0-60 mph in under 2 seconds. “This is a luxury sedan that can go 0-60 in less than 2 seconds, and it will have the capability to seat seven people with its third row seats,” Musk remarked. More details to come later this week.
15:35 PT – Elon’s opening remarks. He recaps 2020, calling it a defining year for Tesla, especially when as the company accomplishes its target of delivering and producing half a million cars. That’s despite the challenging year. Free cash flow is healthy despite spending quite a lot of money. Simply put, Tesla has enough funds for its ambitious projects. Elon notes that Model 3 and Model Y are ramping in Shanghai and Fremont, and the heat pump is also rolled out to all vehicles. He also talks about Giga Berlin, Texas, and the Roadrunner site in Fremont.
15:32 PT – And it begins! Martin Viecha Senior Director of Investor Relations takes the floor. He introduces Elon Musk and Zachary Kirkhorn and a number of Tesla executives.

15:25 PT – Last few minutes guys. Here we go.
15:21 PT – Ok, guys, homestretch here. Who has bets on the earnings call starting on Elon Time? Then again, the earnings results are positive, so Tesla may be quite excited.
15:20 PT – I also just realized that the Model S and Model X refresh’s 17″ display is probably identical to the one used in the Cybertruck. Now I’m wondering if the Semi will use two of these screens. Kinda makes sense, doesn’t it?
15:15 PT – Also noteworthy is that the Model S and Model X refresh is now taking the fight to the world’s best luxury sedans with in terms of comfort as well. As could be seen in Tesla’s online configurator, both flagship vehicles are now equipped with a 22-speaker system with new microphone setup, which paves the way for active noise canceling tech. We reported on this recently, as could be seen here.
15:00 PT – Another thing that’s particularly notable is Tesla’s subtle, continued efforts to kill the FUD against electric cars. The Model S and Model X refresh are both equipped with a heat pump, which should enable the flagship vehicles to perform five times as many high-speed quarter-mile runs as before. Repeatability? Check.
14:45 PT – Several things stick out from the Q4 FY 2020 Update Letter. I’m particularly impressed with the company’s performance in its Energy business. Tesla Energy has long been underrated, and it’s always pushed to the background by the company’s auto business. But every quarter, Tesla Energy is becoming more and more prominent. In 2020, energy battery deployment surpassed 3 GWh for the first time. That’s some serious momentum.
14:30 PT – Well, well, well, looks like I’m early this time around. Please do check back in a bit as we will be covering the entire Q&A session. There’s usually a ton of interesting tidbits of information that get shared in Tesla’s earnings calls. Some analysts’ questions are also usually unforgettable.
14:15 PT – Good day, everyone, and welcome to another live blog of Tesla’s earnings call! While Tesla missed Wall Street’s EPS estimates, the company did post a huge profit and its war chest is very formidable now. But all the exciting financials aside, there’s very little doubt that the EV community is currently most excited about the Model S and Model X refresh. The wait for these vehicles has been significant, but boy oh boy, are they worth it.
Don’t hesitate to contact us for news tips. Just send a message to tips@teslarati.com to give us a heads up.
Investor's Corner
Tesla Optimus Gen 3 shows off a cleaner, factory-ready design in new app discovery
Renders hidden inside Tesla’s Android app show Optimus Gen 3’s design before any official reveal.
Tesla may have accidentally given a first look at its newest Optimus Gen 3 humanoid robot when photos were found in the Tesla smartphone app.
Design files tucked inside a recent Android version of the Tesla app appear to show the third generation humanoid robot next to the older Gen 2.5 prototype. The assets were extracted from the app package by Tesla community member @wholemars, who posted the renders on X late Tuesday night before deleting them. The Tesla Newswire reshared the side by side comparison on Wednesday, and the images have circulated widely since.

Tesla Optimus Gen 2.5 vs Gen 3 comparison via @WholeMars on X
The files are labeled “gen3” and were built as models for Tesla app’s own interface, as validated directly by Grok to be official.
The comparison shows a robot that looks built for a factory line rather than a lab bench. Gen 2.5’s exposed mechanical linkages and gold plating on the knees and shins are gone. In their place, Gen 3 uses matte black fairings on the lower legs, paired with a more contoured champagne gold body. Flexible covers now seal the joint where the torso meets the upper thighs, keeping bearings and moving parts sealed from debris and unnecessary contact.
The body panels fit more tightly, and the hands, which Tesla has said carry 22 degrees of freedom, look far more refined than those on earlier units.
This most recent leak fills a gap Tesla has left open for most of the year. Elon Musk said on March 31 that Optimus 3 was walking around but needed “some finishing touches” before it could be shown, a delay Teslarati covered when Tesla missed its first quarter reveal target. Musk later said Tesla would hold the design back until closer to production, partly to keep competitors from copying it. No reveal date has been announced.
The app itself has been preparing for Optimus for months. In July, code in the Tesla app pointed to a dedicated robot phone key, a consent screen for collecting video and spatial data while Optimus works inside a home, and an alert system for low battery and mechanical faults. Finished 3D models of Gen 3 suggest the interface owners will eventually use is moving past placeholder code toward something Tesla intends to ship.
Manufacturing is moving in parallel. Tesla tore out the original Model S and Model X lines at Fremont this summer to make room for Optimus production, with a planned capacity of one million robots a year. At Giga Texas, the steel frame of a dedicated Optimus factory is nearing completion ahead of a targeted 2027 start, with Musk pointing to an eventual output of 10 million units annually.
Elon Musk
X changed how everyone gets paid, and this lawsuit shows why
X sued a Bitcoin account network over fake payouts as its creator pay model shifts
Elon Musk’s X has taken a Bitcoin-focused engagement ring to court, and the case doubles as a receipt for how differently the platform pays creators today. The company filed suit in the High Court of England and Wales against Vivek Kumar Sen and Zamyang Sherpa, alleging the pair ran six accounts, including @Vivek4real_, @Bitcoin_Teddy and @TrendingBitcoin, as one coordinated operation to fake the kind of engagement that used to translate directly into money.
According to the filing, first reported by Gizmodo, the accounts posted near identical “BREAKING” crypto headlines seconds apart, in one case 11 seconds, then had three more handles like, reply to and repost the material to manufacture what X called “a false appearance of genuine, human communication and interaction.” X says the scheme pulled in at least £207,384, about $278,000, and pegs its own investigation and remediation costs at another £75,000. The accounts were suspended August 18. X general counsel James Burnham announced the case on X last weekend, writing that the company “will act forcefully to protect our platform and the earnings of genuine creators.” Musk’s own reaction, posted shortly after, was three words: “Don’t mess with 𝕏.”
Don’t mess with 𝕏 https://t.co/HSmd5hL6aQ
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) September 21, 2026
The timing lines up with a a recent update to how X pays its creators. The program these accounts allegedly gamed, Creator Revenue Sharing, launched in mid 2023 and paid out based on how much a post got engaged with. Originality was never part of the formula, which is exactly how the platform ended up flooded with recycled clips, copy pasted “BREAKING” posts and replies engineered purely to farm reactions from paying subscribers.
X tried patching the model more than once, including an April cut to aggregator payouts and a March regional weighting change that Musk personally paused hours after it was announced. X retired Creator Revenue Sharing for good on September 7 and opened its replacement, Original Content Rewards, the next day.
Today, we’re launching Original Content Rewards.
The reality is that Revenue Sharing had reached a point where its incentives were misaligned. Creators should be focused on bringing net new content to the platform instead of maximizing payouts. We could have kept adding more… pic.twitter.com/VJIxqlPrjm
— Allegra Jacchia (@allegrajacchia) August 7, 2026
The new math is stricter. Payouts now come only from qualified impressions, meaning unique Home Timeline views from Premium subscribers where at least half the post is visible, and replies no longer count toward eligibility at all. Copied posts, reuploaded media and reposts without meaningful changes are explicitly excluded. Allegra Jacchia, senior product manager for Creators at SpaceXAI, which now runs X’s product and AI work following xAI’s acquisition of the platform, put it bluntly, saying the goal is to reward creators who bring original ideas and perspective, “not those who have become best at gaming the system.”
Read that way, the lawsuit isn’t really about six crypto accounts. It’s X putting a dollar figure on what the old incentive structure cost, then suing to collect it right as the new one goes live. For live updates on how the case and the new rewards program shake out, follow @Teslarati on X.
Elon Musk
Why automakers keep turning down Elon Musk’s Tesla Full Self-Driving offer
Elon Musk confirms no automaker has ever accepted Tesla’s offer to license Full Self-Driving software.
Elon Musk gave a brief answer on X Monday that confirmed that Tesla’s standing offer to license Full Self-Driving to other automakers still has zero takers. Sawyer Merritt wrote that “Tesla has for years openly invited other automakers to license FSD. None of them have accepted,” responding to a prediction from Boom Supersonic founder Blake Scholl that Tesla would eventually open FSD the way it opened its Supercharger network to rival brands. Musk’s reply to Merritt was one word: “Exactly.”
It is not the first time Musk has made this point. He said something similar in November, when he called legacy automakers reluctance to adopt FSD “crazy,” and Tesla has floated the offer publicly since at least 2021. Scholl’s prediction touches on something real. Once NACS became the de facto charging standard, adoption from Ford, GM, Rivian and others followed within about a year. FSD licensing was supposed to work the same way once Tesla built enough of a lead that switching made sense for everyone.
Tesla has for years openly invited other automakers to license FSD. None of them have accepted. https://t.co/kgz4idpoUM
— Sawyer Merritt (@SawyerMerritt) September 22, 2026
The case for licensing now is stronger than it was two years ago. Waymo and Zoox are logging hundreds of thousands of unsupervised autonomous miles, along with Tesla’s own Robotaxi fleet. Every automaker still selling driver assist systems that lag FSD has given the robotaxi conversation to Tesla, Waymo and Zoox by default. Licensing FSD would let a GM or a Ford compete on the same field without spending a decade and billions of dollars building a stack from scratch, the same argument Tesla made when it opened the Supercharger network to bring more EVs onto its chargers.
But FSD is not a connector standard. As one reply to Musk’s post pointed out, licensing FSD is not a software license the way NACS was a plug spec. It requires adopting Tesla’s eight camera layout and its onboard compute architecture, meaning a licensee’s cars would effectively become Tesla hardware wearing someone else’s badge. That is the visible obstacle. The less visible one is data. A licensed FSD stack would report back the same telemetry Tesla collects from its own fleet, giving Tesla a continuous read on how a competitor’s cars are actually driven, where they struggle, and how often drivers intervene. For an automaker trying to build its own autonomy program, or simply trying to keep its build quality and safety record private, handing Tesla that visibility could be a bigger cost than the hardware bill. It is the reason the Supercharger comparison only goes so far. Opening a charging plug cost Tesla very little. Opening FSD would cost a rival something it cannot get back.