Investor's Corner
Debunking the story that Elon Musk “kept cash” from the recent stock offering
On Monday May 23, 2016, Tesla Motors e-mailed to TSLA registered investors a link to Elon Musk’s Form 4 SEC Filing, a.k.a. the Statement of Changes in Beneficial Ownership, detailing the transactions that are part of the recent stock offering that relate to Elon Musk.
Source: Tesla Motors
The Form is available also at Tesla Motors Investors website.
I will go through the major details shown in the form to understand how the transactions were executed. For the inquiring minds, the various SEC codes listed in FORM 4 can be found here.
First an assumption: prior to the offering and the changes in beneficial ownership of the listed securities, Elon Musk held 29,579,342 shares of stock in TSLA.
The first and second transactions (Table I, column 1, line 1 and 2) report the exercise of stock options (options that were awarded to Elon in previous years as part of a Non-Qualified Stock Options plan) to acquire 5,503,972 shares of Tesla’s common stock (2,147,986 + 3,355,986 shares). The options were originally awarded at $6.63, and Elon paid $36,491,334 or about $36 million to exercise them. After this purchase, Elon owned at total of 35,083,314 shares (Table I, column 5, line 2).
While the original offering was supposed to be priced at about $204 per share, the eventual offering price was raised to $215 per share. At the $215 stock value at the time of the offering, the value of the acquired shares was a whopping $1.18 billion!
Before actually paying for the option exercise transactions, Elon did two things.
First it disposed of 1.2 million shares as a “bona file gift to charity” (Table I, line 3 and Explanation of Responses (3)). This gift reduced Elon’s shares down to 33,883,314 shares (Table I, column 5, line 3).
-
Second, Elon disclosed that he intended to sell 2,782,670 of the purchased shares in the “registered offering solely in order to pay income tax related to these stock option exercises” (see Explanation of Responses (2) in FORM 4). The sale reduced Elon’s shares further down to 31,100,644 shares. At $215 / share, Elon Musk’s Tesla shares are worth a bit over $13 billion.
Interestingly, if these were Incentive Stock Options (ISO), the ones usually awarded to Executives, vs. Non-qualified Stock Options (NSO), usually awarded to regular employees, these options would have received special federal tax treatment, and there would be no taxable event reported at exercise, except for any exercised shares that were sold immediately after the exercise. But as one can see in Table II, Elon received “non-qualified stock options” like any other employee, that do not qualify for special tax treatment.
The gain or “bargain element” in a stock option exercise is calculated by subtracting the exercise price ($6.63) from the market price ($215) of the company stock on the date the option is exercised. So the gain per share is $208.70. The total bargain element (gain) in the options exercise transactions is $1,148,679,000 or about $1.14 billion, which is the “taxable gain.”
For the 2,782,670 shares that Elon sold in the registered offering, Elon collected $598,274,050 or about $580 million after accounting for the price paid for the shares. Since these shares were sold immediately after exercise, the gain will be reported as a short-term capital gain and will be subject to tax at ordinary income tax rates. Assuming 39.6% ordinary federal income tax rate, and a 12.30% top individual rate for California, Elon would have to pay $596 million in tax, or 51.9% of the “taxable gain.”
Notice that the $580 and $596 million numbers above are close enough for the company to state in the FORM 8-K filing that “Mr. Musk will owe a significant amount of taxes from exercising these stock options and will fund this task obligation by selling only the amount of shares needed to do so.”
But we are not done. The rest of the stock exercised by Elon Musk, 2,731,302 shares, can be treated as long-term capital gain (with better tax treatment, likely at the 20% long-term capital gain rate, rather than at the 39.6% personal income tax rate) if the stock is held for 12 months after exercise. Assuming that Elon is smart (I think he is), he will wait, to get a combined Federal + California 32.3% tax rate, resulting in an additional $184 million in taxes (2,731,302 times $208.70 times 32.3%).
Finally, we need to consider the gift of 1.2 million shares of Tesla’s common stock given to charity (Table I, column 1, line 3). By donating shares, Elon avoids paying the capital gains tax, which would have to be paid if the shares were first sold and then the cash proceeds donated to charity.
-
Moreover, Elon can get a tax deduction for the current fair market value of the gifted shares. In general, the amount of the deduction is limited to 20%-30% of the adjusted gross income, but one can carry forward amounts above that for up to five years. Without knowing Elon’s adjusted gross income, it is difficult to guess what the deduction would amount to. The fair market value of the donated shares is $250 million. That would be the best case scenario for a charitable deduction, which is extremely unlikely, while 20% of the taxable gain is more likely ($218 million).
Summarizing the transactions:
- Cost of exercising options: $36 million
- Taxes on short-term capital gain for shares sold at offering: $596 million
- Taxes on long-term capital gains for shares held 12-months: $184 million
Total outlay: $ 816 million
- Registered offering sale: $580 million
- Gifted shares tax deduction (max): $250 million, (likely): $218 million
So after all is said and done, Elon will still owe Uncle Sam between $18 and $236 million. I have seen reports from “TSLA bears” (or TSLA haters, same thing) indicating that Elon would actually “keep cash” on this sale.
Obviously he does not, and I would expect that he would eventually have to sell a portion of the remaining $1.5 million (to be exact 1,521,302 shares) from the offering that Elon is not selling or donating to charity, to cover the additional tax, unless he’s got cash in the bank to pay for it.
This offering dilutes the total outstanding shares of TSLA with an additional 1.4 million from Tesla Motors and the 5.5 million from Elon Musk (for a total on 6.9 million new shares diluting the TSLA public pool of shares), while Elon adds about 1.5 million to his total, ending with about 31 million shares (to be exact 31,100,644). So Elon adds some shares but loses a bit in Tesla ownership percentage, from 26.2% to 22.7%.
Technical Analysis
Looking at this week TSLA action, we are now after my predicted breakout, looking at bullish pay-day-cycles (6 consecutive green Heikin Ashi bars), the MACD gone positive, and the MACD moving averages “crossed to the bulls”.
Source: Wall Street I/O
We are coming close to an important point: the stock price is advancing toward the 200-day moving average (around $221.90), which will act as “resistance”. If the stock fails to cross the 200-day moving average, it would usually move down and fast afterwards (“bounce” off the average); this morning it traded as high as $220.75 and “bounced”. If otherwise it eventually crosses the 200-day moving average, we will have an additional bullish indicator and the stock will be header for new tops.
I entered my option trades last week (Sept. 215 calls), before the breakout and have added and cashed in already once to take profits. I have also progressively moved up my conditional stop from 205, to 210 and 215, to protect my profits, and will likely move it even higher as the stock approaches the 221 level and tests the resistance. If the stock crosses the 200-day moving average, I will add again to my TSLA calls holdings, as I will have 4 bullish indicators flying high. Obviously not a good time for short sellers in $TSLA.
-
In a new note to investors on Tuesday, Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew Percoco said that Tesla has one big financial question to answer for investors regarding its Robotaxi rollout, Full Self-Driving software, and Optimus.
Percoco said in the note that, for the most part, investors are still very positive about the direction the company is headed. However, there are some things the firm would like to see, and they have to do with financials.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Tesla bulls are more than convinced that the company’s Full Self-Driving software is proof it can develop physical AI. Financially, however, there are still some questions, especially on elevated spending, which CEO Elon Musk said would occur as the company works to roll out Robotaxi faster and continue developing its Optimus robot.
The latter two are where Tesla will have to prove progress to investors, as Percoco writes that both projects “will require clearer evidence that Robotaxi is scaling and more tangible Optimus proof points to support the ROI on elevated capex.”
Percoco said the second quarter earnings call did not change his long-term thesis of where Tesla is positioned in the AI race, which is out in front. However, there are concerns that weaker gross margins and higher R&D spend will stress financials, and that has “sharpened our (and investors’) focus on measurable progress across Robotaxi and Optimus.”
Additionally, Robotaxi still needs to be proven with more operation in existing cities while maintaining safety but improving how many rides it gives in any given time, he said. For Optimus, Percoco wrote that he is “still looking for evidence beyond commentary around SOP.”
-
Morgan Stanley put Percoco in charge of covering Tesla after long-time analyst Adam Jonas transitioned to the automotive side.
Currently, Morgan Stanley has a $415 price target on Tesla and a ‘Hold’ rating on the stock. It is trading at around $330 at the time of publication, which was 2:30 P.M. on the East Coast.
SpaceX’s massive investment in AI will make it a big winner, Argus Research said after the company’s successful earnings call last week.
The firm also upgraded shares to a Buy from Hold and set a $160 price target.
SpaceX (NASDAQ: SPCX) is currently recovering from its heavy AI infrastructure investments, as it spent nearly $16 billion in Q2 alone. The company did this primarily by monetizing high-demand GPU compute capacity at a much faster pace than traditional data center economics would suggest.
Company CFO Bret Johnsen said that SpaceX would be able to pay back anything on new deployments within a year.
There are plenty of ways the company can do this:
Leasing excess compute capacity through contracts
SpaceX has already built Colossus and Colossus II, largely for its own model training. However, much of that capacity is already rented out to third parties. It already has major deals with Anthropic, Google, and Reflection AI. These partnerships are adding billions per month to SpaceX’s spreadsheet.
-
High utilization driven by industry-wide scarcity
The demand for advanced AI training and inference capacity continues to exceed what is available for use. SpaceX can fill new racks quickly after they come online, so the capital deployed converts into revenue with minimal idle time.
Additionally, management and outside observers have described the new compute capital as behaving more like a cost-of-goods-sold than traditional multi-year capex, especially because of this rapid monetization pattern.
Capacity has already scaled from ~0.4 GW a year to 1.4 GW annually by the end of Q2. There are targets of more than 2 GW by year-end.
High incremental margins on the rental business once capacity is online
GPU cloud providers often operate at strong gross margins. SpaceX can monetize capacity that was already partially built or can be added efficiently. This means that incremental EBITDA margins on the rental revenue are usually high. This accelerates cash recovery relative to the gross capital outlay.
Parallel monetization of its own AI software and applications
Beyond pure infrastructure rental, SpaceX also generates revenue from Grok through subscriptions and usage, from X through ads, data, and other related services, enterprise APIs, and the planned integration of the Cursor coding tools acquisition.
These application layers ride on the same compute infrastructure and provide additional high-margin streams that could offset build-out costs. AI-segment revenue overall rose sharply to about $2.6 billion in Q2, according to Motley Fool. This was driven primarily by the infrastructure contracts, but the software side is also partially responsible.
Efficient, large-scale deployment and vertical integration advantages
SpaceX has emphasized the rapid construction of power and cooling infrastructure and favorable cost-per-megawatt economics relative to industry benchmarks in some disclosures.
-
Combined with its ability to scale capacity aggressively and the fact that many contracts start generating revenue within months of capacity coming online, the effective payback compresses dramatically compared with more conventional multi-year data-center projects.
SpaceX’s dominant near-term recovery path will turn the AI clusters into a hyperscale-style compute rental business for other leading AI companies while still using a portion for internal models.
Elon Musk
Another Tesla SpaceX merger prediction by ARK Invest has Elon Musk talking
Elon Musk again denies a Tesla China split as new SpaceX merger speculation resurfaces quickly.
Elon Musk restated that Tesla has no plans to separate its China business from the rest of the company, responding to a new round of merger speculation from ARK Invest.
On the firm’s “Brainstorm” podcast, Cathie Wood’s team, including chief futurist Brett Winton and research director Nick Grous, argued a Tesla and SpaceX combination remains likely, with an announcement possible before the end of the year even if the deal itself would not close that quickly. Winton called Tesla’s Shanghai operations a “small ish wrinkle” for a merger rather than a real obstacle, since SpaceX’s national security work with the U.S. government sits uneasily next to Tesla’s manufacturing base in China.
Musk pushed back on the framing directly. “China is awesome. I strongly encourage people to visit,” he wrote on X. He also repeated language he first used in late July, when the Wall Street Journal reported that Tesla executives had been told to prepare for a possible spinoff, sale, or closure of the China business ahead of a SpaceX tie up. Musk called that report “absurdly fake news” at the time, adding that a separation had “never even come up in a discussion ever,” a line he echoed again this week.
The repeated denial has not settled the underlying question, because Shanghai’s role in Tesla’s business is exactly what makes a merger complicated. Gigafactory Shanghai still ships more than half of Tesla’s global deliveries and functions as the company’s main export hub for Europe and Asia. Teslarati previously reported on Musk’s initial denial, and the merger conversation itself has been building since SpaceX’s IPO gave it public shares to use as acquisition currency.
Wedbush’s Dan Ives has pegged the odds of a Tesla SpaceX merger at 80 to 90 percent by early 2027, and ARK’s prediction of a year end announcement adds another data point to that timeline, even as Musk keeps rejecting the specific mechanics reporters have described. Neither position rules out the other. Musk can deny a China spinoff was ever discussed while analysts still expect some form of combination to move forward, since ARK and Ives are both describing convergence at the corporate level, not necessarily the internal restructuring the Journal described in July.
For now, Tesla’s China business remains intact, and Musk’s comments this week make clear he has no interest in publicly walking that position back, no matter how often the merger question resurfaces.
-
Tesla has one big financial question to answer for investors: Morgan Stanley
SpaceX AI investment gamble will make it a big winner, firm says
