Connect with us

News

Spy shots suggest Tesla was testing its automatic emergency braking system at a naval base

Published

on

Newly found video appears to show Tesla testing or calibrating their automatic emergency braking system prior to the official release of the refreshed Model S. With several recent stories involving alleged failures of the system, the video of the test session is of particular interest.

The video appears to have been shot while Tesla engineers were evaluating automatic braking systems on a runway at the Naval Air Station in Alameda, California. Tesla has long used the facility for testing  as it is a mere 30 mile jaunt from the Fremont factory (you may recall the first sighting of the Model X test mule was also on a runway at Alameda).

https://youtu.be/-r4hJ8-hJDg

Despite the video’s misleading title promising a Model 3, the  video actually shows two Tesla Model S test cars accompanied by a full-sized pick-up truck that has a soft target on a long arm. The target is typical of tests involving vehicle collision detection and crash mitigation systems. Inflatable tubes and foam panel bodies are mounted on a metal frame and then covered in vinyl. Any potential system failure during testing that leads to impact will result in minimal damage to the test vehicle.

 

Advertisement

The vast acreage of the runway is ideal for this sort of test and the Tesla engineers are able to do multiple attempts on each pass. Below is a Google Maps satellite view showing runway 25 at the Naval Air Station in Alameda, Calif., site where the tests took place.

Though posted to YouTube on March 31st, the red car in the video is clearly equipped with the recently introduced rear valance and painted rocker panels. The headlights also appear to have the more even pattern of the new daytime runnings lights, though the black nose suggests either the front fascia was not new or is marked to mimic the legacy bumper.

Tesla Model S spied testing emergency braking system against soft target

Tesla Model S with painted rear valence rockers

Tesla Model S with painted rear valence rockers

Tesla didn’t officially reveal the refreshed Model S until April 12th, meaning this prototype was captured nearly 2 weeks earlier. The proximity of the test to the release might suggest that last minute calibrations were being verified or that software was being adjusted to maximize the system’s effectiveness with the new sensors’ placement, especially those that were moved behind the fascia itself.

black mule front

The darker colored car appears to be an older P85.  It isn’t captured on the uploaded video doing any of the tests itself. HOV lane stickers on the rear fascia and the older non-LED headlights are clearly visible, reinforcing the likelihood that it was not a subject in this test session.

looking back

The Model S’ driver appears only to be observing the movements of the red test car, following it along the runway. At one point, the driver of the pick-up truck with the test rig stops to confer with the person in the darker Model S– even nodding in the direction of the helicopter shooting the video– before resuming test runs.

Advertisement

While automatic emergency braking is part of Tesla’s Autopilot suite of features, it alone isn’t unique. Twenty automakers representing the entirety of the US market have already agreed to make automatic emergency braking systems standard in all new cars and light trucks by the 2022 model year. The agreement was jointly announced in mid-March (about two weeks before this video was posted) by federal regulators with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. The IIHS estimates vehicles with  the systems are 40% less likely to cause a rear-end crash.

 

Elon Musk

Tesla fends off new attack that will hurt consumers more than anyone else

Consumers stand to be hurt the most by a new bill that aims to take away Tesla’s Direct-to-Consumer licensing

Published

on

tesla
Credit: Tesla

Tesla is likely going to be forced to fend off a new attack that is much different than the petty vandalism, arson, and domestic terrorism it has faced from those who oppose the company and its CEO Elon Musk. It would hurt consumers more than anyone else.

Over the past several months, we have reported numerous instances of vandalism against Tesla. No victim is too big or too small to be a potential target, as everything from keying vehicles to having Molotov cocktails thrown at showrooms is sufficient in the eyes of perpetrators.

However, the latest attack appears to be politically motivated and could hurt Tesla, its consumers, and even other automakers, and it seems to be some form of retaliation against Musk due to his affiliation with President Trump.

The White House, Public domain, via Wikimedia Commons

President Donald J. Trump purchases a Tesla on the South Lawn, Tuesday, March 11, 2025. (Official White House Photo by Molly Riley)

Lawmakers in New York state are now attempting to shut down Tesla showrooms in a move that would force the company to sell through dealer franchises, complicating the sales process and making the direct-to-consumer platform the company has used for years obsolete.

The New York Times reported that New York State Sen. Patricia Fahy is one of several lawmakers that is looking to hit Tesla where it hurts the most: its accessible and stress-free showrooms.

The problem is that this will hurt consumers more than Tesla.

Advertisement

Sen. Fahy said in March that the ease-of-sales platform Tesla uses has to be taken “from Elon Musk,” because “he’s part of an effort to go backwards.”

The licenses Tesla uses in the state allow it to sell cars directly to consumers instead of going through the traditional dealership model. These licenses, in Sen. Fahy’s perfect world, would be revoked from Tesla and given to other EV manufacturers. At one time, she was a proponent of Tesla and supported the company operating its D2C sales, stating it would cut emissions.

Now, Sen. Fahy believes Musk’s association with the Trump Administration is counterintuitive, as she says it is “killing all the grant funding for electric vehicle infrastructure, killing wind energy, killing anything that might address climate change.”

Tesla could face New York store ban under this legislation

She continued by stating:

Advertisement

“The bottom line is, Tesla has lost their right to promote these when they’re part of an administration that wants to go backwards. Elon Musk was handed a privilege here.”

The bill is with the Senate and Assembly Finance committees.

Continue Reading

News

Tesla posts Semi factory update, shares new Semi logo design

As per Priestley, there are a lot of exciting things coming to the Semi factory and the Tesla Semi itself.

Published

on

Credit: Tesla Semi/X

Tesla has posted an update video on the construction of its Semi factory near Giga Nevada. 

The electric vehicle maker also shared the new logo of its Class 8 all-electric truck, which is pretty slick and classic Tesla at the same time.

Semi Factory Update

In the video, Tesla Semi program lead Dan Priestley stated that the last few months were spent building the factory shell of the facility, from its walls to its columns to its concrete floors. With the Semi factory shell completed, it is now time to equip the facility with the necessary equipment that would allow it to mass produce the Tesla Semi. The Tesla executive also shared the facility’s target output.

“This factory is designed with an annual capacity of 50,000 units a year. So over the next several quarters, we’re going to be industrializing the factory, installing the equipment, and preparing for high volume production. First units are set to be on the line by the end of this year, and we’ll be ramping the factory through 2026,” Priestley stated in the video. 

The Tesla Semi is arguably Tesla’s most underrated product, with the vehicle operating in real-world fleets over the past years. As per Priestley, there are a lot of exciting things coming to the Semi factory and the Semi itself. These things, the Tesla executive noted, would prove that electric trucking is ready to scale.

Advertisement

New Tesla Semi Logo

The end of the Tesla Semi factory update video featured a logo for the vehicle that had not been shared by Tesla before. Similar to the Cybertruck, it appears that Tesla will be giving the Semi its own stylized logo. Unlike the Cybertruck’s graffiti print, however, the Class 8 all-electric truck’s logo features the word “Semi” written in a futuristic, thin font. Interestingly enough, the “E” in the word “Semi” was written with three horizontal lines, similar to the Tesla Model 3’s original logo.

Below is the Tesla Semi’s new logo.

Credit: Tesla Semi/X

Continue Reading

News

Berlin Senator calls Tesla “Nazi” cars, pisses off Brandenburg because Giga Berlin is a giant employer

Kiziltepe’s comment garnered so much negative attention that she ended up deleting her post.

Published

on

Credit: Cansel Kiziltepe/X

It is no secret that Elon Musk is a lightning rod for controversy today, especially with his work with the Trump administration’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). But as could be seen in Germany’s reactions to a Berlin Senator’s post on X, you can criticize the man, but you do not go for the thousands of people that Tesla employs.

Strike Against Tesla

As noted in an rbb24 report, Berlin’s Labor Senator Cansel Kiziltepe (SPD) ended up pissing off a lot of people, especially in Brandenburg, after she dubbed Teslas “Nazi” cars on social media platform X. In her post, Kiziltepe wrote, “Who wants to drive a Nazi car?” She also shared a news article that highlighted Tesla’s decline in Germany in the first quarter, titled “Electric Car Manufacturers Experience Sales Boom—Apart from Tesla.”

Kiziltepe’s Tesla comment garnered so much negative attention that she ended up deleting her post. She did, however, share a follow-up which explained that her sentiments against CEO Elon Musk do not extend to the thousands that Tesla employs, especially in Germany. 

“Tesla is currently experiencing a sales slump because customers attribute the right-wing extremist positions of its shareholder Elon Musk, who holds around 13% of the company. I explicitly stand by my assessment of Elon Musk. Of course, this does not mean that I hold Musk’s employees or customers responsible for his political positions,” the senator wrote in her post on X.

Brandenburg Backlash

A lot of the anger that resulted from Kiziltepe’s post came from other officials, such as Brandenburg’s Minister of Economic Affairs and SPD party colleague Daniel Keller. The official’s sentiments are understandable considering that Tesla Gigafactory Berlin is the largest employer in the region, providing jobs to thousands of people in the area. 

Advertisement

“Such a Nazi comparison hurts the people who work there and is completely inappropriate for a labor senator. I expect the labor senator to retract her historically unacceptable comparison and return objectively to the major economic and labor market policy challenges that Berlin and Brandenburg should tackle together.

“Everyone can have their own personal opinion about Elon Musk. But it’s important to me that we don’t forget the people behind the Tesla factory in Grünheide. 11,000 people from 150 nations work here – more than half of the employees live in Berlin… Brandenburg and Berlin benefit from this in terms of employment and value creation,” Keller noted, highlighting that Giga Berlin provides well-paying, permanent jobs.

Equally Pissed Off

In a comment to the BZ newspaper, Brandenburg’s Minister-President Dietmar Woidke (SPD) stated that Kiziltepe’s comments were out of place, because in addition to the numerous Berliners who work at Giga Berlin, people from about 150 nations also work at the plant. Berlin CDU parliamentary group leader Dirk Stettner was more direct, stating that the Berlin Senator’s post was a “dangerous relativization of Nazi terror and thus also of the Holocaust.” 

The Berlin-Brandenburg Business Association (UVB) shared their frustrations with the senator as well, with General Manager Alexander Schirp stating that Kiziltepe’s comments were unbecoming of someone who sits at the Berlin Senate. Schirp also stated that the comments were an affront to Tesla employees. “This will not increase the manufacturer’s chances of investing in the capital. Statements of this magnitude do not bode well for the election campaign,” Keller stated.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending