Connect with us
tesla employee tesla employee

Investor's Corner

Tesla’s growth story continues in manufacturing and not autonomy: Morgan Stanley

(Photo: Tesla)

Published

on

Tesla’s (NASDAQ: TSLA) growth story has leaned on the potential of autonomous, self-driving vehicles revolutionizing the way everyday transportation is performed. While Tesla has developed its Autopilot and Full Self-Driving suites with relative success in the past several years, Morgan Stanley analysts are not convinced that autonomous driving programs will continue to fuel the automaker’s growth story and continuing expansion. Instead, Tesla’s bread and butter, which is vehicle manufacturing, along with other strengths like material sourcing, supply chain, and infrastructure development, is where the financial firm is putting its money.

It is no secret Tesla has fallen short with its FSD and Robotaxi plans, as CEO Elon Musk has predicted since 2018 that the automaker would complete its venture into fully-autonomous vehicles. However, each year has gone by with a new set of challenges, whether they would be based on manufacturing or the supply of necessary parts, further delaying the rollout of a “feature complete” FSD suite or a rollout of the planned Robotaxi fleet. This has led to some skepticism about whether the electric car company will really continue its monumental pace of growth through that medium, and not another, which Tesla has already proven to be well-versed in: manufacturing.

Tesla manufacturing prowess, stock split plans indicate ‘massive position of strength:’ Wedbush

A new note to investors from Adam Jonas and other analysts at Morgan Stanley seems to indicate the latter, that Tesla’s true road to continuing expansion and increased valuations is a focus on what it does best. For the past several years, Tesla has focused intently on increasing manufacturing efficiency and accuracy, and it has ultimately led to a streak of nine consecutive quarters of growth in vehicle deliveries. While that streak may be in jeopardy due to the shutdowns of its most-productive factory, which is in Shanghai, there is still evidence to suggest that Tesla’s best way to continue growing is through its production prowess.

“With respect to Tesla, we think attributes like AI, autonomous, and EV are fully, if not over-appreciated here,” the analysts wrote in their note. “In fact, we believe Tesla’s more ‘gritty’ capabilities in terms of manufacturing, material sourcing, supply chain, and infrastructure will drive the next leg of growth to the story.”

Advertisement

Tesla will trade with increased volatility in the coming weeks and months, Morgan Stanley predicted in the new note. The company’s focus on its autonomy may be dragging down expectations for the stock, as Tesla continues to push its belief that FSD and Level 4 to Level 5 autonomy will be arriving by the end of the year. The analysts see this as a major issue in Tesla’s outlook moving forward:

“Firstly, we think the core auto margin is too high at this point, as it does not fully reflect input cost inflation. Secondly, we believe expectations of full autonomy or FSD ‘flipping’ into a major near-term margin boost are overestimated. In fact, we believe L4/L5 autonomy at scale is well over a decade away. It will come folks, but it’s too darn difficult.”

In reality, Tesla has made major strides in its FSD program through the Beta fleet, and Autopilot is coming off of one of its safest years in history when compared to nationwide accident data from the NHTSA. But whether Tesla will solve full autonomy by the end of the year as Musk expects truly remains to be seen.

Musk remains confident with Tesla’s development of FSD and said earlier this year that he would be “shocked” if the company cannot effectively develop major improvements and complete the suite by the end of 2022. Meanwhile, Tesla’s Robotaxi fleet will likely come with a dedicated vehicle design in the coming years, based on predictions from company executives during its most recent earnings call. While Tesla’s outlook on Robotaxis was previously about owners making money from the operation of the ride-sharing service, the automaker has shifted to another perspective, which aligns more with its focus on sustainability. Read more about that here.

Jonas still holds a $1,300 price target on Tesla stock with an ‘Overweight’ rating.

Advertisement

Disclosure: Joey Klender is a TSLA Shareholder.

I’d love to hear from you! If you have any comments, concerns, or questions, please email me at joey@teslarati.com. You can also reach me on Twitter @KlenderJoey, or if you have news tips, you can email us at tips@teslarati.com.

Joey has been a journalist covering electric mobility at TESLARATI since August 2019. In his spare time, Joey is playing golf, watching MMA, or cheering on any of his favorite sports teams, including the Baltimore Ravens and Orioles, Miami Heat, Washington Capitals, and Penn State Nittany Lions. You can get in touch with joey at joey@teslarati.com. He is also on X @KlenderJoey. If you're looking for great Tesla accessories, check out shop.teslarati.com

Advertisement
Comments

Investor's Corner

Shareholder group urges Nasdaq probe into Elon Musk’s Tesla 2025 CEO Interim Award

The SOC Investment Group represents pension funds tied to more than two million union members, many of whom hold shares in TSLA.

Published

on

Credit: xAI/X

An investment group is urging Nasdaq to investigate Tesla (NASDAQ:TSLA) over its recent $29 billion equity award for CEO Elon Musk. 

The SOC Investment Group, which represents pension funds tied to more than two million union members—many of whom hold shares in TSLA—sent a letter to the exchange citing “serious concerns” that the package sidestepped shareholder approval and violated compensation rules.

Concerns over Tesla’s 2025 CEO Interim Award

In its August 19 letter to Nasdaq enforcement chief Erik Wittman, SOC alleged that Tesla’s board improperly granted Musk a “2025 CEO Interim Award” under the company’s 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. That plan, the group noted, explicitly excluded Musk when it was approved by shareholders. SOC argued that the new equity grant effectively expanded the plan to cover Musk, a material change that should have required a shareholder vote under Nasdaq rules.

The $29 billion package was designed to replace Musk’s overturned $56 billion award from 2018, which the Delaware Chancery Court struck down, prompting Tesla to file an appeal to the Delaware Supreme Court. The interim award contains restrictions: Musk must remain in a leadership role until August 2027, and vested shares cannot be sold until 2030, as per a Yahoo Finance report.

Even so, critics such as SOC have argued that the plan does not have of performance targets, calling it a “fog-the-mirror” award. This means that “If you’re around and have enough breath left in you to fog the mirror, you get them,” stated Brian Dunn, the director of the Institute for Comprehension Studies at Cornell University.

Advertisement

SOC’s Tesla concerns beyond Elon Musk

SOC’s concerns extend beyond the mechanics of Musk’s pay. The group has long questioned the independence of Tesla’s board, opposing the reelection of directors such as Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch. It has also urged regulators to review Tesla’s governance practices, including past proposals to shrink the board. 

SOC has also joined initiatives calling for Tesla to adopt comprehensive labor rights policies, including noninterference with worker organizing and compliance with global labor standards. The investment group has also been involved in webinars and resolutions highlighting the risks related to Tesla’s approach to unions, as well as labor issues across several countries.

Tesla has not yet publicly responded to SOC’s latest letter, nor to requests for comment.

The SOC’s letter can be viewed below.

Nasdaq+Letter Tsla Socig Final by Simon Alvarez

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Tesla investors may be in for a big surprise

All signs point toward a strong quarter for Tesla in terms of deliveries. Investors could be in for a surprise.

Published

on

(Credit: Tesla)

Tesla investors have plenty of things to be ecstatic about, considering the company’s confidence in autonomy, AI, robotics, cars, and energy. However, many of them may be in for a big surprise as the end of the $7,500 EV tax credit nears. On September 30, it will be gone for good.

This has put some skepticism in the minds of some investors: the lack of a $7,500 discount for buying a clean energy vehicle may deter many people from affording Tesla’s industry-leading EVs.

Tesla warns consumers of huge, time-sensitive change coming soon

The focus on quarterly deliveries, while potentially waning in terms of importance to the future, is still a big indicator of demand, at least as of now. Of course, there are other factors, most of them economic.

The big push to make the most of the final quarter of the EV tax credit is evident, as Tesla is reminding consumers on social media platforms and through email communications that the $7,500 discount will not be here forever. It will be gone sooner rather than later.

It appears the push to maximize sales this quarter before having to assess how much they will be impacted by the tax credit’s removal is working.

Delivery Wait Time Increases

Wait times for Tesla vehicles are increasing due to what appears to be increased demand for the company’s vehicles. Recently, Model Y delivery wait times were increased from 1-3 weeks to 4-6 weeks.

This puts extra pressure on consumers to pull the trigger on an order, as delivery must be completed by the cutoff date of September 30.

Delivery wait times may have gone up due to an increase in demand as consumers push to make a purchase before losing that $7,500 discount.

More People are Ordering

A post on X by notable Tesla influencer Sawyer Merritt anecdotally shows he has been receiving more DMs than normal from people stating that they’re ordering vehicles before the end of the tax credit:

It’s not necessarily a confirmation of more orders, but it could be an indication that things are certainly looking that way.

Why Investors Could Be Surprised

Tesla investors could see some positive movement in stock price following the release of the Q3 delivery report, especially if all signs point to increased demand this quarter.

We reported previously that this could end up being a very strong rebounding quarter for Tesla, with so many people taking advantage of the tax credit.

Whether the delivery figures will be higher than normal remains to be seen. But all indications seem to point to Q3 being a very strong quarter for Tesla.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

Tesla bear Guggenheim sees nearly 50% drop off in stock price in new note

Tesla bear Guggenheim does not see any upside in Robotaxi.

Published

on

tesla showroom
Credit: Tesla

Tesla bear Guggenheim is still among the biggest non-believers in the company’s overall mission and its devotion to solving self-driving.

In a new note to investors on Thursday, analyst Ronald Jewsikow reiterated his price target of $175, a nearly 50 percent drop off, with a ‘Sell’ rating, all based on skepticism regarding Tesla’s execution of the Robotaxi platform.

A few days ago, Tesla CEO Elon Musk said the company’s Robotaxi platform would open to the public in September, offering driverless rides to anyone in the Austin area within its geofence, which is roughly 90 square miles large.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk confirms Robotaxi is opening to the public: here’s when

However, Jewsikow’s skepticism regarding this timeline has to do with what’s going on inside of the vehicles. The analyst was willing to give props to Robotaxi, saying that Musk’s estimation of a September public launch would be a “key step” in offering the service to a broader population.

Where Jewsikow’s real issue lies is with Tesla’s lack of transparency on the Safety Monitors, and how bulls are willing to overlook their importance.

Much of this bullish mentality comes from the fact that the Monitors are not sitting in the driver’s seat, and they don’t have anything to do with the overall operation of the vehicle.

Musk also said last month that reducing Safety Monitors could come “in a month or two.”

Instead, they’re just there to make sure everything runs smoothly.

Jewsikow said:

“While safety drivers will remain, and no timeline has been provided for their removal, bulls have been willing to overlook the optics of safety drivers in TSLA vehicles, and we see no reason why that would change now.”

He also commented on Musk’s recent indication that Tesla was working on a 10x parameter count that could help make Full Self-Driving even more accurate. It could be one of the pieces to Tesla solving autonomy.

Jewsikow added:

“Perhaps most importantly for investors bullish on TSLA for the fleet of potential FSD-enabled vehicles today, the 10x higher parameter count will be able to run on the current generation of FSD hardware and inference compute.”

Elon Musk teases crazy new Tesla FSD model: here’s when it’s coming

Tesla shares are down just about 2 percent today, trading at $332.47.

Continue Reading

Trending