News
Tesla Model S owner reminds us of ‘Active Hood’ pedestrian safety feature
A relatively unknown Tesla safety feature called ‘Active Hood’, designed to reduce head injuries to pedestrians in the event of a frontal collision, was brought to light in a recent Model S owner’s video that attempts to capture Tesla’s Automatic Emergency Braking (AEB) in action. Active Hood which exists on European and Australian Model S vehicles uses pyrotechnics to raise the rear of the hood by several inches in order to soften the impact of a pedestrian and cyclist against a windshield during frontal impact.
Model S owner and Tesla Motors Club forum member Carspotter Daily posted a video that attempts to simulate a vehicle-pedestrian interaction. The vehicle was a first generation Autopilot vehicle under Firmware 8.0. It’s unclear whether CarSpotter was intentionally trying to trigger Tesla’s Active Hood feature or whether they were looking to test the AEB system, but despite not being able to trigger either feature the end result revealed, once again, Autopilot’s ability to detect humans. Another Tesla owner YouTuber KmanAuto first detected the pedestrian alert last November when he put a friend in front of of his moving Model S.
This type of granular detection of objects allows the vehicle to respond to potential collisions in the most appropriate way, with the objective to reduce collisions entirely. Though Active Hood was mentioned in the trailing notes at the end of the recent video, it’s not clear if the vehicle used in the video is a U.S. spec Model S or a European/Australian version that was included with that safety feature.
ALSO SEE: DIY Tesla Model S Pedestrian Alert: ‘Horn’ for the Oblivious
Active Hood is not a new feature but the fact that it has only been implemented on Tesla vehicles in select markets that mandate the technology has kept it largely under the radar. The technology was built into Tesla vehicles to comply with Euro NCAP Pedestrian Safety requirements that mandate vehicle manufacturers to maintain clearances between the hood and structural components underneath, to protect pedestrians in the event of a low to medium speed collision. These accidents often prove fatal to the pedestrian, as collisions at low to medium speeds typically cause the pedestrian’s body to fold over the hood with the head hitting the windshield.
The system was put to use in real world conditions in Australia in 2015 when someone driving a Tesla Model S collided with a kangaroo which caused the system to deploy. From what they saw after the accident, it looked like the adolescent ‘roo had a broken leg but was conscious enough after the accident to limp away which seems to indicate that it was successful in preventing immediate head trauma.
Tesla had a special challenge when designing Active Hood since the front trunk of a Model S is sealed to keep water out whereas hoods to internal combustion engine vehicles are generally vented. US Patent Application US20130076076 A1 details the specific challenges and solutions developed to allow the hood to pop up in response to an imminent collision with a pedestrian.
The English European version of the Tesla Model S manual lays out the technology in a much more user friendly format:
Active Hood
With Active Hood technology only existing on vehicles destined for the European and Australian markets, and Tesla being so aggressive about implementing safety features, the natural question is “why hasn’t Tesla made this a standard global safety feature?” An early Euro NCAP crash test video showed that Tesla began working hard at doing everything it can to avoid the accident in the first place. After all, avoiding a collision in the first place is far better for all parties involved than just mitigating what happens afterwards.
Tesla’s long-standing saga regarding its door handles and a manual release has entered its latest chapter, and as a result, a big change is coming.
On Friday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) denied Tesla’s petition that was seeking a defect investigation into roughly 180,000 Model 3 vehicles for an issue involving the emergency mechanical door release.
🚨 The NHTSA denied a petition from Tesla that would have thrown out concerns regarding its door handles.
NHTSA said Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect warranting an investigation. The agency said a rulemaking process would be a better strategy. pic.twitter.com/j6PzUBM1mT
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 24, 2026
NHTSA said that Tesla’s petition did not present evidence of a safety-related defect in the door handles or their emergency releases. Instead, the agency determined that it would rather solve the issue of the lack of labeling or location of emergency mechanical door releases and the federal safety rules that govern them.
Essentially, the NHTSA wants to create and enforce rules that would require automakers to make emergency door latch releases more clearly labeled in a car. Despite a Tesla having manual door releases on all four passenger doors, many people do not know they exist or how they work.
Tesla addresses door handle complaints with simple engineering fix
In recent times, Tesla has faced some criticism involving its door handles, specifically because some occupants have reported that they are unable to exit their vehicles after losing power. The door handles on a Tesla are electronically operated, but in the event that the 12V battery dies, there is a manual release that can be used.
The NHTSA only identified a single complaint involving the mechanical door releases: a 2022 Model 3 owner said the release was concealed and unlabeled after the vehicle lost power after a front-end collision. It has also already started to create a separate rulemaking process to make emergency door-egress systems more obvious.
It should be noted that all Teslas have mechanical emergency door releases, but they are placed in various locations as the vehicles have aged and been redesigned from year to year. Refer to the safety manual for your vehicle if you have any confusion about where the emergency releases are and how they work.
News
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 faces wrath of the Texas skies
SpaceX pushed Starship Flight 13 to Friday, blaming weather instead of the previous engine issues.
SpaceX called off Thursday’s launch attempt of Starship Flight 13, pushing the mission to Friday because of weather tied to Tropical Storm Bertha. The company confirmed the delay on X, noting “Now targeting Friday, July 24 for Starship’s thirteenth flight test, due to weather. A key objective for the flight test is to get clear imagery from the ground of Starship’s heatshield as it flies at a higher dynamic pressure during ascent, which won’t be possible with today’s weather conditions.”
This is the second delay for Flight 13 in two weeks. SpaceX first tried to launch the mission on July 16, but the countdown ended in an automated abort at T-0 when four of Super Heavy Booster 20’s 33 Raptor engines failed to ignite. Musk said at the time that two Raptors would need to be removed and replaced, as Teslarati reported. The company spent the following week destacking Ship 40 and Booster 20, swapping engines, and running leak checks before restacking the vehicle on Pad 2 Wednesday night, according to Spaceflight Now’s live coverage.
Unlike the engine problem, Thursday’s delay has nothing to do with the hardware. SpaceX wants clean footage of Starship’s heat shield captured from the ground as the vehicle flies through max dynamic pressure, something the storm’s cloud cover over South Texas would not allow. The company said visibility should improve for Friday’s attempt, with the same 90 minute window opening at 5:45 p.m. CT.
Flight 13 will be the second outing for the V3 versions of Starship and Super Heavy, following their debut on Flight 12 in May. The mission carries 20 production Starlink V3 satellites, the first time SpaceX has flown operational satellites rather than mass simulators on Starship. Six of those satellites are fitted with cameras to inspect the heat shield from a different angle during ascent, giving engineers a second data source beyond the ground imagery the weather is currently blocking.
Booster 20 will attempt a boostback burn and a splashdown landing burn in the Gulf of America, while Ship 40 follows a suborbital trajectory toward a landing in the Indian Ocean. The flight plan largely mirrors Flight 12, though the booster will run a more aggressive ascent burn after max Q this time, and the ship’s heat shield includes load sensing tiles meant to measure stress at the higher dynamic pressure SpaceX is targeting.
If Friday’s attempt succeeds, Flight 13 could be the last suborbital test in the program. SpaceX is already looking to push for an orbital flight on Flight 14.
Tesla stock (NASDAQ: TSLA) endured one of its sharpest single-day declines in years on July 23, tumbling approximately 14.5 percent and closing near $320 after opening the session around $374. The drop erased more than $140 billion in market value amid heavy trading volume and left the shares at multi-week lows.
The sell-off followed the company’s second-quarter 2026 results, released the previous evening. Tesla reported record revenue of $28.2 billion, up 26 percent year over year, driven by a Q2-record 480,126 vehicle deliveries. Energy storage deployments also rose strongly.
Tesla (TSLA) Q2 2026 earnings results: miss on EPS, beat on revenue
Yet profitability disappointed sharply. Operating income fell 57 percent to $398 million, compressing the operating margin to just 1.4 percent. Non-GAAP earnings per share came in at $0.33, well below the roughly $0.53 analysts had expected. Free cash flow turned negative by $1.1 billion as capital expenditures surged 142 percent to $5.8 billion, largely tied to accelerated spending on artificial intelligence, robotics, and autonomous systems.
The losses on capex were expected, as Tesla said it would be spending heavily in 2026.
Investors also reacted to lingering uncertainty surrounding key product timelines. During the Earnings Call, management reiterated ambitions for Robotaxi deployment and the Optimus humanoid robot, but offered limited new concrete milestones, renewing questions about execution pace that have long accompanied Tesla’s ambitious roadmap.
The magnitude of the decline places it among Tesla’s more severe one-day percentage losses since its 2010 initial public offering. Historically, the two largest single-day drops (split-adjusted) remain September 8, 2020, when shares fell 21.1 percent amid broader market volatility and valuation concerns, and January 13, 2012, with a 19.3 percent plunge during the company’s early growth struggles.
Other notable declines include an 18.6 percent drop on March 16, 2020, at the onset of pandemic-related market turmoil. Thursday’s move ranks roughly ninth on the all-time list but stands out as the steepest in more than a year.
Despite the short-term pain, Tesla’s long-term trajectory has repeatedly recovered from such volatility. The latest results underscore both the strength of its core automotive and energy businesses and the near-term costs of heavy investment in next-generation technologies.
Tesla door handle saga gets its latest chapter and a big change is coming
SpaceX Starship Flight 13 faces wrath of the Texas skies
