News
How Tesla capitalizes on four components of great consumer experience
Tesla may have the edge over other automakers as they make the transition to autonomous vehicles, machine learning, and cloud-based engineering. That’s because Tesla doesn’t sacrifice the thrill of driving for the ease and entertainment of mobility technology.
A new study by Group XP indicates that automakers may be failing to maintain relevance as consumer expectations turn to constant influxes of fresh engagement moments. The report, which was produced by a partnership among Brand Union, FITCH, SET, and SET Live, explores innovations in design, connectivity, and service as the key imperatives that prompt success for mobility brands. The consulting group says that consumers today feel that their lives are defined by experiences, and now, more than ever in our consumer-driven society, people are as demanding of an experience as they are of a purchase.
Businesses that have responded to this shift in expectation are flourishing, and automakers who fail to produce a vehicle that helps consumers “completely re-imagine the process of how we get from A to B” may fall significantly behind in the industry. With cars projected to transform “from being single-serving modes of transport into hyper-customizable, seamless extensions of living space,” an automaker like Tesla has been well ahead of others with its all-electric car’s visual appeal, the company’s fervent fanbase, the records for performance and quality, and for technology innovations like the Autopilot function.
How does Tesla perform according to four components of great experience brands?
The Group XP Experience Index ranks what has been called the most important marketing metric going forward: Share of Experience. Let’s see how Tesla performs.
They must stand for something unique. Tesla has never been just a carmaker, and its broad business goals make it stand apart from other automakers. The company will “build the machines that build the machine” through Gigafactory 1 in Nevada. It is a company that also builds Supercharger networks, solar roofs, battery packs for residences and businesses, and maybe even tunnel boring. No other automaker has the extensive business outreach of Tesla.
Aerial photos of Gigafactory 1 from March, 2017 reveal newly completed sections
They must deliver on our most important needs. In our high tech and often stress-filled society, people crave reliability and simplicity alongside careful construction and design. Consumers want to turn to a company that has mastered faultless execution to become a default platform brand that inspires and returns trust. Tesla knows and respects the needs of its customers and creates relationships that are amazingly personal for such a huge company. Part of that relationship-building comes from delivering a product that is exceptional in the marketplace and assertively visionary. It also offers a car that retains the traditional desired elements of suspension, acceleration, and torque.
They must provide us with exemplary content. Tesla’s user interface revolutionized the way that drivers interact with an automobile. Instead of a traditional reliance on analog buttons and switches, Tesla has provided its customers with an incredibly different interior design. Their approach has had a disruptive influence on the auto industry. The 17″ center stack touchscreen, “Easter eggs” that spark curiosity, an operating system that gets frequent wireless updates, frequently upgraded Autopilot system: all provide Tesla customers with a level of content they’ve come to expect from their smartphones.
Tesla Easter Egg transforms the vehicle into the James Bond 007 Submarine
They must utilize a higher brand purpose to make all of our future lives better. The overarching purpose of Tesla has always been to “help expedite the move from a mine-and-burn hydrocarbon economy towards a solar electric economy” as a primary sustainable solution to the planet’s warming. A Tesla driver who travels less than 350 miles per week is “energy positive” with respect to personal transportation, actually putting more energy back into the system than is consumed in transportation. Tesla co-markets sustainable energy products from other companies along with their car. All of these and more create a company who business model exceeds profitability and will have a lasting impact on our world.
As transportation becomes less intrusive, some automotive brands risk innovating themselves out of the brand equity due to their inability to meet the four elements of shared experience that today’s customers expect. Tesla, instead of adapting a metal exterior to a series of tech applications, has integrated sustainability into performance and identity. It’s an equation that other automakers are hurrying to emulate.
Tesla shared a striking video showcasing the decommissioning of the original Model S and Model X assembly line at its Fremont Factory in Northern California. Completed in just 46 days, the teardown involved heavy machinery dismantling concrete pits, removing robotic arms and conveyors, and clearing the space for new production.
The post, captioned “End of an era,” captured both the end of a historic chapter and Tesla’s aggressive pivot toward its next major initiative, Optimus.
End of an era: Decommissioning the original Model S & X assembly line in just 46 days pic.twitter.com/kGEdfhl62h
— Tesla Manufacturing (@gigafactories) July 10, 2026
The decision to retire the Model S and Model X originated during Tesla’s Q4 2025 Earnings Call in late January 2026. CEO Elon Musk announced that production of the company’s flagship sedan and SUV would wind down by the end of Q2 2026, describing it as bringing the programs to an “honorable discharge.”
Custom orders ceased around early April 2026, with the final vehicles rolling off the line in early May. A special signature delivery ceremony on May 20 marked the emotional close for these vehicles, which had defined Tesla’s early success and luxury EV segment since the Model S launch in 2012.
The primary reason for tearing down the lines was to repurpose the valuable factory floor space for high-volume production of Tesla’s Optimus humanoid robot. Musk had indicated on Earnings Calls that the Fremont S/X line would be replaced by a dedicated Optimus manufacturing line targeting a capacity of one million units per year.
This move aligns with Tesla’s broader strategic shift from traditional vehicle manufacturing toward robotics and artificial intelligence, leveraging the company’s expertise in autonomy, AI training, and high-volume production.
Optimus, Tesla’s general-purpose humanoid robot, is designed to perform repetitive or dangerous tasks in factories, warehouses, and eventually homes. Powered by Tesla’s AI and Neural Networks, it aims to be a versatile, affordable platform. Production of Optimus Gen 3 is already underway in limited form at Fremont, with full-scale output on the converted line expected to begin in late July or August.
Tesla is targeting rapid scaling, with internal ambitions pointing toward tens or even hundreds of thousands of units annually by the end of 2026.
Longer-term, Tesla is constructing a much larger second-generation Optimus facility at Giga Texas, with potential capacity reaching millions of units per year. The company views Optimus as a transformative product that could eventually surpass its automotive business in scale and value, enabling widespread deployment of useful robots across industries. CEO Elon Musk has even predicted it would be the most popular product of all-time.
As one era closes at Fremont, another is rapidly taking shape.
Elon Musk posted a candid admission on his social media platform X on June 9, declaring that he had been “clearly wrong” about Anthropic. The statement marked a notable reversal from his earlier skepticism toward the AI company.
In September, Musk had written, “Winning was never in the set of possible outcomes for Anthropic,” reflecting his view at the time that the startup had lacked the foundation or even the trajectory to succeed in what is an incredibly intense race for advanced artificial intelligence.
Musk’s latest post came amid discussion of Anthropic’s reliance on external compute resources. He praised the company’s progress, stating that Anthropic is “obviously currently the leader in AI” and that “no company has released a model as good as Mythos/Fable,” with expectations of a strong follow-up in Mythos 2.
The tone shifted dramatically from dismissal to acknowledgement of superior performance.
I was clearly wrong about Anthropic. They are obviously currently the leader in AI. No company has released a model as good as Mythos/Fable and they will undoubtedly have Mythos 2 ready soon.
And I would never cut them off in a way that hurt them badly, even as a competitor.…
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) July 9, 2026
The context of Musk’s comments added significance. Anthropic has been operating under a recent compute deal with SpaceXAI, Musk’s AI infrastructure-focused venture. The pair entered a short-term GPU lease agreement initiated in May, providing Anthropic access to critical computing power for training and deploying its frontier models.
SpaceXAI signs agreement with Anthropic for massive AI supercomputer access
Some observers had speculated that Musk could leverage this dependency to disadvantage a rival. Musk directly addressed the possibility, writing, “I would never cut them off in a way that hurt them badly, even as a competitor. That’s not my style.”
To support his commitment to ethical competition, Musk referenced concrete examples from his other companies. Tesla famously open-sourced its entire portfolio of electric vehicle patents in 2014. The move was designed to accelerate the global adoption of sustainable transportation technology rather than protect proprietary advantages.
Tesla also made its Supercharger network available to competing electric vehicle manufacturers, transforming what could have remained an exclusive charging ecosystem into a shared infrastructure that benefits the broader industry and reduces barriers for EV adoption.
Musk further pointed to SpaceX’s practices, noting that the company launches satellites for competing commercial systems “with no increase in price or use of unfair terms.” He extended the principle to his social platform, observing that “even my worst enemies attack me on this platform,” underscoring preference for open discourse over retaliation.
These examples have illustrated Musk’s long-standing philosophy that long-term technological progress is best served by open competition and infrastructure sharing rather than leveraging market power to stifle rivals. In the fast-evolving AI sector, where compute resources and model capabilities determine leadership, Musk’s stance suggests a willingness to compete on innovation and performance alone.
Musk’s admission arrives as SpaceXAI itself advances its own frontier models while maintaining business relationships across the ecosystem. By publicly correcting his earlier assessment and reaffirming principles of fair play, Musk highlights a model of competition that prioritizes advancement of the field over short-term tactical advantages.
A Tesla analyst believes the company’s Full Self-Driving suite is close to an “inflection point,” where people will finally realize that it is more than what it appears, similar to how many view the iPhone.
Pierre Ferragu, an analyst who has covered Tesla for many years at New Street Research, says the Full Self-Driving suite is one piece of evidence supporting the view that a Tesla is more than a car. He compared it to the iPhone and noted that the high price tag seemed like a lot for a phone early on. Then people realized the iPhone was more than just something you make calls with. It made their lives simpler.
🚨 Analyst @p_ferragu says Tesla Full Self-Driving is at an “inflection point” in a recent commentary:
“A Tesla is not a car, the same way an iPhone was not a phone. As a tool that gets you to work peacefully every morning, it is not expensive. Give us 2 more quarters to see… pic.twitter.com/tm6xFrjVPV
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) July 10, 2026
Suddenly, that price tag was justified.
Tesla offers several models under the average transaction price for a new vehicle, which was above $49,000, according to Kelley Blue Book. However, that does not take into account that many people can still not afford a $35,000 vehicle. Ferragu offers his thoughts:
“Remember when the addressable market of the iPhone was 10 million units? Then people realized how good it was, and now, nearly 250m are sold every year.
A similar evolution for Tesla is still on the table. A Tesla is not a car, the same way an iPhone was not a phone.
A model 3 at $35k + $100 per month is too expensive for most, but only as a car, the same way a $600 iPhone was too expensive for most, until most realized it was much more than a phone.
As a tool that gets you to work peacefully every morning, it is not expensive.”
This point is valid, especially considering the iPhone’s impact on the cell phone market. There are still a handful of players, but most people you know have an iPhone. The iPhone ties into Apple’s other ecosystem of products.
This is how Tesla plans to infiltrate the automotive market, and once the company offers a fully autonomous suite, or something that can allow for unsupervised self-driving, more and more people will flock to Tesla.
Ferragu believes Tesla needs two additional quarters of development before things will truly change. He didn’t elaborate on what will happen in two quarters, but he said it will give us all time to “see where this is heading.”
It is really quite interesting to see people’s reactions when they find out what a Tesla is capable of. Full Self-Driving is a great tool for taking stress out of travel; I use it daily, and it has made it really difficult to consider taking any other car on a drive of practically any length.
To me, it is really hard to believe that people will not at least seriously consider a Tesla as their next car if they experience Full Self-Driving. This is a major point for those who argue that Tesla should advertise in some way.
Tesla shows rapid teardown of Model S and X lines, paving the way for Optimus at Fremont
Elon Musk admits he was ‘clearly wrong’ about Anthropic
