Tesla’s next-generation Roadster is designed to be the halo car that outperforms the world’s top supercars in speed, power, and range while shattering world records in the making. But beyond its promised vertigo-inducing performance specifications, the vehicle’s looks competes with the best exotics with its low profile, wide stance, and sleek, aerodynamic lines.
The Silicon Valley electric carmaker appears to have one working prototype of the next-generation Roadster that’s painted in a rich, blazing red. It’s not quite the signature red paint job featured in Elon Musk’s personal Tesla Roadster that was sent on a journey to Mars, but the paint scheme of the prototype is unmistakable and eye-catching. Tesla also appears to have two to-scale models of the next-gen Roadster as well — a midnight silver-esque one featured during the unveiling last November and a white multicoat Roadster that was unveiled in the 2018 Annual Shareholder Meeting.
Considering the next-gen Roadster’s design, there’s arguably not a single color that wouldn’t be jaw-dropping on the all-electric supercar. Graphic designer Miguel Castro exhibited some creativity after the vehicle’s unveiling by envisioning how the Roadster would look in several colors, including “Electric Blue”.
Teslarati‘s very own Reese Wilson also reimagined the 2020 Roadster in a menacing matte black. But matte-colored Teslas won’t be making their way to the factory paint shop anytime soon.
YouTuber and renown tech reviewer Marques Brownlee, and devout fan of matte black everything, digs deeper to find out why Tesla might be sticking to the more traditional glossy paint. In his recent tour of Tesla’s Fremont factory with CEO Elon Musk, Marques asked Musk if Tesla would ever offer a matte black option for its vehicles, particularly since the company did showcase a matte Model 3 prototype when the electric sedan was initially unveiled. Elon Musk’s response was encouraging, at least for the future.
“I actually like the aesthetics of matte. It’s really tricky to repair matte. With gloss, you can polish it out. With matte, if you get like a little ding, it’s really hard to then rematch so it looks like an even matte. We’d like to do matte in the future, but right now, for example, the paint shop is really operating at full tilt, so adding any complexity to the paint shop would not be wise right now, but I think it will be a cool thing to do in the future,” Musk said.
One of the areas that Tesla has struggled in with regards to the Model 3 production ramp was the Fremont factory’s paint shop. In the Q2 2018 earnings call, Musk noted that Tesla is “figuring out how to make the paint shop a lot simpler and general assembly a lot simpler” as the company starts producing the Model 3 in even higher volumes. Tesla’s appears to have made progress with its paint shop improvements since then, as evidenced by the company uploading a rather lighthearted video of a cow udder-like robot used for painting the Model 3.
There is a pretty good chance that Tesla would not be offering matte black as an option for the next-gen Tesla Roadster. Nevertheless, some owners of the all-electric supercar who are fond of the color would likely use wraps as a way to make their vehicles more unique. One of these is Unplugged Performance’s Burnt Orange wrap for the Tesla Model S, which is pretty eye-catching in its own right.
The next-gen Roadster would most likely shatter a lot of competition when it starts rolling out to customers in 2020, especially since the vehicle’s insane specs announced by Musk during its unveiling is true only for the supercar’s base model. Musk has since mentioned another trim for the next-gen Roadster, and that would be even crazier in terms of raw power and speed. That trim is the SpaceX option, a variant of the Roadster that would literally feature rocket tech from SpaceX, Musk’s private space venture. To boost the vehicle’s performance, Musk plans on using Composite Overwrapped Pressure Vessels (COPV), which are used in SpaceX’s first-stage rocket boosters during re-entry and landing.
News
Tesla Sweden appeals after grid company refuses to restore existing Supercharger due to union strike
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons.
Tesla Sweden is seeking regulatory intervention after a Swedish power grid company refused to reconnect an already operational Supercharger station in Åre due to ongoing union sympathy actions.
The charging site was previously functioning before it was temporarily disconnected in April last year for electrical safety reasons. A temporary construction power cabinet supplying the station had fallen over, described by Tesla as occurring “under unclear circumstances.” The power was then cut at the request of Tesla’s installation contractor to allow safe repair work.
While the safety issue was resolved, the station has not been brought back online. Stefan Sedin, CEO of Jämtkraft elnät, told Dagens Arbete (DA) that power will not be restored to the existing Supercharger station as long as the electric vehicle maker’s union issues are ongoing.
“One of our installers noticed that the construction power had been backed up and was on the ground. We asked Tesla to fix the system, and their installation company in turn asked us to cut the power so that they could do the work safely.
“When everything was restored, the question arose: ‘Wait a minute, can we reconnect the station to the electricity grid? Or what does the notice actually say?’ We consulted with our employer organization, who were clear that as long as sympathy measures are in place, we cannot reconnect this facility,” Sedin said.
The union’s sympathy actions, which began in March 2024, apply to work involving “planning, preparation, new connections, grid expansion, service, maintenance and repairs” of Tesla’s charging infrastructure in Sweden.
Tesla Sweden has argued that reconnecting an existing facility is not equivalent to establishing a new grid connection. In a filing to the Swedish Energy Market Inspectorate, the company stated that reconnecting the installation “is therefore not covered by the sympathy measures and cannot therefore constitute a reason for not reconnecting the facility to the electricity grid.”
Sedin, for his part, noted that Tesla’s issue with the Supercharger is quite unique. And while Jämtkraft elnät itself has no issue with Tesla, its actions are based on the unions’ sympathy measures against the electric vehicle maker.
“This is absolutely the first time that I have been involved in matters relating to union conflicts or sympathy measures. That is why we have relied entirely on the assessment of our employer organization. This is not something that we have made any decisions about ourselves at all.
“It is not that Jämtkraft elnät has a conflict with Tesla, but our actions are based on these sympathy measures. Should it turn out that we have made an incorrect assessment, we will correct ourselves. It is no more difficult than that for us,” the executive said.
Elon Musk
Music City Loop could highlight The Boring Company’s real disruption
The real story behind the tunneling startup’s Nashville tunnel project is the company’s targeted $25 million per mile construction cost.
Recent commentary on social media has highlighted what could very well prove to be The Boring Company’s real disruption.
The analysis was shared by tech watcher Aakash Gupta on social media platform X, where he argued that the real story behind the tunneling startup’s Nashville tunnel project is the company’s targeted $25 million per mile construction cost.
According to Gupta’s breakdown, Nashville’s 2018 light rail proposal was priced at roughly $200 million per mile. New York’s East Side Access project reportedly cost about $3.5 billion per mile, while Los Angeles Metro expansion projects have approached $1 billion per mile.
By comparison, The Boring Company has stated it can construct 13 miles of twin tunnels in the Music City Loop for between $240 million and $300 million total. That implies a cost near $25 million per mile, or roughly a 95% reduction from industry averages cited in the post.
Several technical departures from conventional tunneling allow the Boring Company to lower its costs, from its smaller 12-foot diameter tunnels to its fully electric Prufrock machines that are designed to mine continuously with no personnel inside the tunnel and their capability to “porpoise” for easy launch and retrieval.
Tesla and Space CEO Elon Musk responded to the post on X, stating simply that “Tunnels are so underrated.”
The Boring Company has seen some momentum as of late, with the company recently signing a construction contract in Dubai and the Universal Orlando Loop progressing. Recent reports have also pointed to tunnels potentially being constructed to solve traffic congestion issues near the Giga Nevada area.
While The Boring Company’s tunnels have so far been used for Loop systems publicly for now, Elon Musk recently noted that the tunneling startup’s underground passages would not be limited only to ride-hailing vehicles.
In a reply to a post on X which discussed the specifications of the Music City Loop, Musk clarified that “any fully autonomous electric cars can use the tunnels.” This suggests that vehicles potentially running systems like FSD Supervised, even if they are not Teslas, could be used in systems like the Music City Loop in the future.
Elon Musk
SpaceX IPO could push Elon Musk’s net worth past $1 trillion: Polymarket
The estimates were shared by the official Polymarket Money account on social media platform X.
Recent projections have outlined how a potential $1.75 trillion SpaceX IPO could generate historic returns for early investors. The projections suggest the offering would not only become the largest IPO in history but could also result in unprecedented windfalls for some of the company’s key investors.
The estimates were shared by the official Polymarket Money account on social media platform X.
As noted in a Polymarket Money analysis, Elon Musk invested $100 million into SpaceX in 2002 and currently owns approximately 42% of the company. At a $1.75 trillion valuation following SpaceX’s potential $1.75 trillion IPO, that stake would be worth roughly $735 billion.
Such a figure would dramatically expand Musk’s net worth. When combined with his holdings in Tesla Inc. and other ventures, a public debut at that level could position him as the world’s first trillionaire, depending on market conditions at the time of listing.
The Bloomberg Billionaires Index currently lists Elon Musk with a net worth of $666 billion, though a notable portion of this is tied to his TSLA stock. Tesla currently holds a market cap of $1.51 trillion, and Elon Musk’s currently holds about 13% to 15% of the company’s outstanding common stock.
Founders Fund, co-founded by Peter Thiel, invested $20 million in SpaceX in 2008. Polymarket Money estimates the firm owns between 1.5% and 3% of the private space company. At a $1.75 trillion valuation, that range would translate to approximately $26.25 billion to $52.5 billion in value.
That return would represent one of the most significant venture capital outcomes in modern Silicon Valley history, with a growth of 131,150% to 262,400%.
Alphabet Inc., Google’s parent company, invested $900 million into SpaceX in 2015 and is estimated to hold between 6% and 7% of the private space firm. At the projected IPO valuation, that stake could be worth between $105 billion and $122.5 billion. That’s a growth of 11,566% to 14,455%.
Other major backers highlighted in the post include Fidelity Investments, Baillie Gifford, Valor Equity Partners, Bank of America, and Andreessen Horowitz, each potentially sitting on multibillion-dollar gains.
Tesla Sweden appeals after grid company refuses to restore existing Supercharger due to union strike
Music City Loop could highlight The Boring Company’s real disruption
