Investor's Corner
Sorry Jim Chanos, but the Tesla Model 3 is definitely not ‘looking to be a lemon’
A lot of Tesla’s immediate future is tied to the Model 3. Elon Musk said as much in an interview last July, when he accurately described the Model 3 ramp as a “bet-the-company” situation. This means that if the Model 3 proves a success, Tesla could take a definitive step towards Elon Musk’s Master Plan; but if the vehicle fails, it would be catastrophic for the company.
The Model 3’s failure is something that Jim Chanos, arguably the most high-profile of Tesla’s short-sellers, is looking forward to. Chanos has taken an aggressive stance against the electric car company, never hesitating to express his belief that TSLA stock is worth $0. Over the years, the prominent short-seller has frequently attacked the electric car maker, pointing out Elon Musk’s alleged fraudulent activities and Tesla’s weaknesses as a company.
So far, Chanos’ bet against Tesla has not been paying off. His hedge fund, Kynikos Capital Partners, has not done very well since 2015, a time in which he held a short position against Solar City, and not long before he announced that he was shorting Tesla. Including a 9% loss through July of this year, Kynikos exhibited a net annualized return of 4.86% since 2015, compared with the S&P 500’s return of 12.17% during the same period.
Considering the high-stakes bet that Tesla took with the Model 3, the success of the electric car is something that would not do any favors for Kynikos’ already-embattled year. Chanos, for his part, noted in a recent interview with Institutional Investor that he still likes his odds on Tesla. He does, for one, believe that Elon Musk “handcuffed” himself by promising profitability during the second-half of 2018. He also believes that there are inherent problems with the Model 3, as shown in its production slowdowns in August and alleged issues with the vehicle.
“It’s looking to be a lemon,” Chanos said.
As the third quarter draws to a close, the prominent short-seller’s thesis against Tesla would be put to the test. The electric car maker, after all, has set aggressive targets for itself this Q3, aiming to build 50,000-55,000 Model 3 during the quarter while attaining profitability. Whether Tesla could accomplish its ambitious objectives remains to be seen, but there is one thing that is starting to become evident — the Model 3 does not seem to be a lemon at all.
The electric car’s production issues are well-known, and the teething problems that Tesla exhibited in the vehicle’s initial run were evident, as shown by the first observations of teardown specialist Sandy Munro when he started tearing down an early-production Model 3. But even Sandy Munro eventually admitted that behind the inconsistent panel gaps and imperfect fit and finish issues of the early production Model 3 he tested, he was thoroughly impressed with Tesla’s battery technology, electronics, performance, and ride quality. Tesla’s fit and finish on the Model 3 has improved since the car that Munro tested rolled off the assembly line, and the vehicle has only gotten more praise since then.
The electric car, particularly the Model 3 Performance, has practically garnered unanimous praise from professional auto reviewers. Various auto journalists, from the Wall Street Journal to Car & Driver to Road & Track (to name a few), have praised the vehicle, with the consensus being that it is a car that can disrupt the high-performance sedan market dominated by longtime legends such as the BMW M3.
-
- The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
-
- The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
-
- The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
The Tesla Model 3 gets crash tested by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. [Credit: NHTSA]
The Model 3 was given a flawless 5-Star safety rating by the Highway Traffic Safety Administration as well, garnering perfect scores in all categories and subcategories. Videos of the vehicle’s frontal crash, side crash, and rollover crash depicted the electric sedan providing ample protection for its driver and passengers during collisions. With the Model 3’s rating, all of Tesla’s vehicles currently in production now have the distinction of having 5-Star safety ratings from the NHTSA.
Recent reports from the Tesla community in both the United States and abroad also indicate that the company has adopted an aggressive delivery schedule for reservation holders, with centers reportedly conducting handovers until 10 p.m. Other reports further suggest that Tesla’s delivery centers are handing over up to 100 cars per day.
Tesla’s capability to become profitable is linked to the Model 3, which would comprise the majority of its sales this quarter. A vote of confidence for this came in the form of analyses from a German teardown firm and Detroit’s Munro and Associates, both of which concluded that Tesla could make a profit with the Model 3. Munro, for one, noted after his teardown of the Long Range RWD Model 3 that the vehicle could give Tesla a 36% profit. More expensive trims, such as the Long Range Model 3 AWD and the Model 3 Performance, are likely even more profitable.
The third quarter is not yet finished, and much of Tesla’s production and delivery progress remains unknown. But all things considered, Jim Chanos’ bet against the Model 3 as a vehicle could very well end up being a disappointment for the esteemed short-seller.
Investor's Corner
SpaceX IPO is coming, CEO Elon Musk confirms
However, it appears Musk is ready for SpaceX to go public, as Ars Technica Senior Space Editor Eric Berger wrote an op-ed that indicated he thought SpaceX would go public soon. Musk replied, basically confirming it.
Elon Musk confirmed through a post on X that a SpaceX initial public offering (IPO) is on the way after hinting at it several times earlier this year.
It also comes one day after Bloomberg reported that SpaceX was aiming for a valuation of $1.5 trillion, adding that it wanted to raise $30 billion.
Musk has been transparent for most of the year that he wanted to try to figure out a way to get Tesla shareholders to invest in SpaceX, giving them access to the stock.
He has also recognized the issues of having a public stock, like litigation exposure, quarterly reporting pressures, and other inconveniences.
However, it appears Musk is ready for SpaceX to go public, as Ars Technica Senior Space Editor Eric Berger wrote an op-ed that indicated he thought SpaceX would go public soon.
Musk replied, basically confirming it:
As usual, Eric is accurate
— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) December 10, 2025
Berger believes the IPO would help support the need for $30 billion or more in capital needed to fund AI integration projects, such as space-based data centers and lunar satellite factories. Musk confirmed recently that SpaceX “will be doing” data centers in orbit.
AI appears to be a “key part” of SpaceX getting to Musk, Berger also wrote. When writing about whether or not Optimus is a viable project and product for the company, he says that none of that matters. Musk thinks it is, and that’s all that matters.
It seems like Musk has certainly mulled something this big for a very long time, and the idea of taking SpaceX public is not just likely; it is necessary for the company to get to Mars.
The details of when SpaceX will finally hit that public status are not known. Many of the reports that came out over the past few days indicate it would happen in 2026, so sooner rather than later.
But there are a lot of things on Musk’s plate early next year, especially with Cybercab production, the potential launch of Unsupervised Full Self-Driving, and the Roadster unveiling, all planned for Q1.
Investor's Corner
Tesla Full Self-Driving statistic impresses Wall Street firm: ‘Very close to unsupervised’
The data shows there was a significant jump in miles traveled between interventions as Tesla transitioned drivers to v14.1 back in October. The FSD Community Tracker saw a jump from 441 miles to over 9,200 miles, the most significant improvement in four years.
Tesla Full Self-Driving performance and statistics continue to impress everyone, from retail investors to Wall Street firms. However, one analyst believes Tesla’s driving suite is “very close” to achieving unsupervised self-driving.
On Tuesday, Piper Sandler analyst Alexander Potter said that Tesla’s recent launch of Full Self-Driving version 14 increased the number of miles traveled between interventions by a drastic margin, based on data compiled by a Full Self-Driving Community Tracker.
🚨 Piper Sandler reiterated its Overweight rating and $500 PT on Tesla $TSLA stock
Analyst Alexander Potter said FSD is near full autonomy and latest versions showed the largest improvement in disengagements, from 440 miles to 9,200 miles between critical interventions pic.twitter.com/u4WCLfZcA9
— TESLARATI (@Teslarati) December 9, 2025
The data shows there was a significant jump in miles traveled between interventions as Tesla transitioned drivers to v14.1 back in October. The FSD Community Tracker saw a jump from 441 miles to over 9,200 miles, the most significant improvement in four years.
Interestingly, there was a slight dip in the miles traveled between interventions with the release of v14.2. Piper Sandler said investor interest in FSD has increased.
Full Self-Driving has displayed several improvements with v14, including the introduction of Arrival Options that allow specific parking situations to be chosen by the driver prior to arriving at the destination. Owners can choose from Street Parking, Parking Garages, Parking Lots, Chargers, and Driveways.
Additionally, the overall improvements in performance from v13 have been evident through smoother operation, fewer mistakes during routine operation, and a more refined decision-making process.
Early versions of v14 exhibited stuttering and brake stabbing, but Tesla did a great job of confronting the issue and eliminating it altogether with the release of v14.2.
Tesla CEO Elon Musk also recently stated that the current v14.2 FSD suite is also less restrictive with drivers looking at their phones, which has caused some controversy within the community.
Although we tested it and found there were fewer nudges by the driver monitoring system to push eyes back to the road, we still would not recommend it due to laws and regulations.
Tesla Full Self-Driving v14.2.1 texting and driving: we tested it
With that being said, FSD is improving significantly with each larger rollout, and Musk believes the final piece of the puzzle will be unveiled with FSD v14.3, which could come later this year or early in 2026.
Piper Sandler reaffirmed its $500 price target on Tesla shares, as well as its ‘Overweight’ rating.
Tesla received a price target boost from Morgan Stanley, according to a new note on Monday morning, but there is some considerable caution also being communicated over the next year or so.
Morgan Stanley analyst Andrew Percoco took over Tesla coverage for the firm from longtime bull Adam Jonas, who appears to be focusing on embodied AI stocks and no longer automotive.
Percoco took over and immediately adjusted the price target for Tesla from $410 to $425, and changed its rating on shares from ‘Overweight’ to ‘Equal Weight.’
Percoco said he believes Tesla is the leading company in terms of electric vehicles, manufacturing, renewable energy, and real-world AI, so it deserves a premium valuation. However, he admits the high expectations for the company could provide for a “choppy trading environment” for the next year.
He wrote:
“However, high expectations on the latter have brought the stock closer to fair valuation. While it is well understood that Tesla is more than an auto manufacturer, we expect a choppy trading environment for the TSLA shares over the next 12 months, as we see downside to estimates, while the catalysts for its non-auto businesses appear priced at current levels.”
Percoco also added that if market cap hurdles are achieved, Morgan Stanley would reduce its price target by 7 percent.
Perhaps the biggest change with Percoco taking over the analysis for Jonas is how he will determine the value of each individual project. For example, he believes Optimus is worth about $60 per share of equity value.
He went on to describe the potential value of Full Self-Driving, highlighting its importance to the Tesla valuation:
“Full Self Driving (FSD) is the crown jewel of Tesla’s auto business; we believe that its leading-edge personal autonomous driving offering is a real game changer, and will remain a significant competitive advantage over its EV and non-EV peers. As Tesla continues to improve its platform with increased levels of autonomy (i.e., hands-off, eyes-off), it will revolutionize the personal driving experience. It remains to be seen if others will be able to keep pace.”
Additionally, Percoco outlined both bear and bull cases for the stock. He believes $860 per share, “which could be in play in the next 12 months if Tesla manages through the EV-downturn,” while also scaling Robotaxi, executing on unsupervised FSD, and scaling Optimus, is in play for the bull case.
Will Tesla thrive without the EV tax credit? Five reasons why they might
Meanwhile, the bear case is placed at $145 per share, and “assumes greater competition and margin pressure across all business lines, embedding zero value for humanoids, slowing the growth curve for Tesla’s robotaxi fleet to reflect regulatory challenges in scaling a vision-only perception stack, and lowering market share and margin profile for the autos and energy businesses.”
Currently, Tesla shares are trading at around $441.
Tesla updates Cybertruck owners about key Powershare feature
Tesla’s northernmost Supercharger in North America opens
