Connect with us

Lifestyle

From Tesla shareholder to startup CEO: How Robert Bollinger is bringing utility to the EV market

(Photo: Bollinger Motors)

Published

on

On a rather chilly morning a few days before Christmas, Bollinger Motors CEO Robert Bollinger indulged my request for a short interview about his longtime support for electric vehicles. Speaking through FaceTime, Robert animatedly talked about Bollinger Motors’ highly anticipated Sports Utility Truck, his thoughts about other EV makers targeting the trucking segment, and even his experiences as a Tesla shareholder.

Robert Bollinger graduated from Carnegie Mellon University with a degree in Industrial Design. After working for a series of ad agencies, he started a 15-year stint at John Masters Organics, where he served as COO and CMO. Later on, Robert co-started a grass-fed cattle farm, and while working in the fields, he saw the need for a better truck — one that is not being made by the world’s premier carmakers.

Years before he started Bollinger Motors in 2014, Robert Bollinger found himself very impressed by a small startup electric car company from Silicon Valley. Having had a soft spot for EVs for years, his attention was immediately piqued by the release of the original Tesla Roadster and the Model S sedan. That said, his work on the fields meant that a sedan or a sports car did not really fit his needs. Nevertheless, he opted to support Tesla, just in another way.

“When Tesla first came out, when they had the Roadster and Model S, I was hoping to buy one. I didn’t have a car — I had my truck. (The Roadster and the Model S) never quite fit my particular needs, but I bought (TSLA) stock soon after they went public. Over the years, I just kept buying,” he said.

Being a shareholder of Tesla, Robert is all too familiar with the activities of the company’s critics, particularly those of short-sellers. When asked how he handled the stream of negativity consistently being thrown towards Tesla, Robert simply remarked that he “just kept buying.” Against the noise from the company’s most passionate naysayers, “I just kept riding it up,” he said.

Robert Bollinger and his team with their first vehicle, the B1 Sports Utility Truck. (Photo: Bollinger Motors)

Advertisement
-

With Tesla disrupting the automotive industry, Robert decided in 2014 to start his electric vehicle startup. Operating under the name Bollinger Motors, the startup opted to create a vehicle that is designed and built around utility. It would be, in a lot of ways, the truck that Robert always wanted when working in the fields. It would be tough, it would operate in rough terrain, and most of all, it would be all-electric.

“I always believed in electric. If you want to start a startup now, it has to be electric.”

The result of Robert and his small team’s work is the Bollinger B1, a vehicle the company dubs as a “Sport Utility Truck.” The B1 is arguably the most utility-focused EV that has been unveiled so far, with its Land Rover Defender-esque panels, its 33-inch tires, and its 15-inch ground clearance. The interior of the B1 echoes the design of classic utility vehicles too, with analog gauges dominating the dashboard. The company is also planning the B2, a pickup truck it intends to unveil in the near future. Overall, Robert notes that the B1 and B2 are created to push the envelope on utility vehicles, particularly as SUVs and trucks nowadays are mostly focusing on factors such as luxury and comfort.

“Compared to sedans, SUVs and pickup trucks, they haven’t really evolved that much. They get more luxurious, but they never get drastically more capable. For example, their ground clearance generally has not improved. It’s not really until you go drastic such as going electric that you see how much you can do,” Robert said.

While the B1 has attracted a notable amount of interest since it was unveiled earlier this year (there are now around 28,000 reservations for the vehicle), other electric car companies are breaching the pickup truck market as well. Fellow EV startup Rivian, for one, recently unveiled the R1T pickup truck and the R1S SUV, and Elon Musk has mentioned on Twitter that he is “dying to make” Tesla’s pickup truck. Musk even noted that a prototype of the upcoming vehicle might be unveiled as early as next year.

The Bollinger B1 is designed from the ground up as a utility vehicle. (Photo: Bollinger Motors)

Despite the emergence of pickup trucks and SUVs from larger, more established competitors, the Bollinger Motors CEO stated that he believes the market will be large enough for everyone. Even with legacy carmakers shifting their trucks to hybrids or all-electric vehicles, Robert believes that there will be consumers whose needs would be fulfilled perfectly by the B1 and the B2. In this light, the EV enthusiast notes that he welcomes the arrival of more electric and electrified trucks.

Advertisement
-

“At some point, there will be electric jeeps. There will be electric trucks from many carmakers. When we’re creating our own version of the vehicle, we have our own DNA; we have our own setup and specs. A lot of the legacy companies, when they finally come towards electric, they’re gonna have EV versions of what they have now. The first hybrid F-150 will have the existing architecture.

“Rivian’s extremely different than us. It’s more mainstream, more luxury — and that’s great. That’s their market, but it’s not ours. I’m sure when Tesla comes out with their pickup truck, it’ll be great. But we’re still going to be different. I’m just happy that there are more electric cars. I applaud them for doing a great job, and I believe that we can co-exist very nicely.”

One of these differences is in the way Bollinger is going about the manufacturing of the B1 and the B2. Tesla, for one, is developing and creating much of their vehicles’ components in-house. This, according to Robert, is strategic for Tesla considering the company’s size. For a much smaller startup like Bollinger, though, Robert noted that another approach was needed.

“Tesla and everybody else is going about things differently than we are. They raised hundreds of millions of dollars to acquire what they need. Whereas, we are more coming from the angle of hand-built, small team, low overhead. We’re growing from the handcrafted side of things if you will. We’re growing more organically, growing as we need to grow. We’re at a small space for prototyping right now because that’s what we need,” he said.

The Bollinger B1 echoes the design elements of classic off-road vehicles like the Land Rover Defender. (Photo: Bollinger Motors)

So far, Bollinger has moved to a larger headquarters in Detroit. Robert notes that this was a strategic decision since it allows the company to be close to vendors and a healthy talent pool. The B1 is also being refined as the company prepares to start producing the vehicle. When asked if he thinks Bollinger will experience its version of “production hell” once it begins manufacturing the B1, Robert candidly remarked that he is saving all the hell for 2019, when things will likely go really crazy.

Advertisement
-

With his background as a longtime EV supporter and TSLA shareholder, I asked Robert if he opted to use any of Tesla’s open-sourced patents when Bollinger Motors was developing the B1. The CEO notes that they didn’t find a need to tap into Tesla’s patents since Bollinger is not making its own electric motors or batteries. Due to the company’s size, Robert notes that he and his team are not trying to reinvent all the components of electric vehicles. Instead, it is more preferable for the company to rely on partnerships with vendors instead, particularly as there’s less overhead.

That said, the Bollinger B1 and Bollinger B2 do have similarities with Tesla’s Model 3 in terms of battery technology. Robert remarked that he and his team talked with about five battery providers to evaluate and test which types of cells would be best for the B1 and B2. After a long list that included pouch cells and prismatic cells from several manufacturers, Robert noted that they ultimately decided to settle on 2170 cells.

“Long list of battery scenarios, the 2170 cell just rose to the top. It just gave the most energy density,” he said.

The Bollinger B1 in its natural habitat. (Photo: Bollinger Motors)

Just like Tesla’s electric cars, most of the Bollinger B1 and B2’s components are locally produced. Robert admits that there are critical components for his electric vehicles that are made elsewhere, but Bollinger is attempting to get them licensed for production in the United States. Once produced, Bollinger aims to bring its vehicles to customers across the globe. Robert noted that an RHD version of the B1 and B2 could be produced without much complexity too, thanks to the vehicles’ straightforward design.

The Bollinger B1 and B2 are equipped with J1772 and CCS ports. Back in August, and not long after Elon Musk mentioned that Tesla is not restricting other EV makers from accessing its charging infrastructure, Robert posted a tweet to Elon Musk, asking if Bollinger’s vehicles can use the Supercharger Network. The CEO noted that he didn’t really expect a response since he asked through social media, but as the B1 and B2 close in on production, there is a good chance that he might request Elon Musk for Supercharger access once more.

Advertisement
-

“I only asked them through a tweet, so I didn’t really expect a response. But as we finalize more things, we might come back to that. But we got so many people, Tesla fans, that were rooting for us. I appreciate that,” he said.

Simon is an experienced automotive reporter with a passion for electric cars and clean energy. Fascinated by the world envisioned by Elon Musk, he hopes to make it to Mars (at least as a tourist) someday. For stories or tips--or even to just say a simple hello--send a message to his email, simon@teslarati.com or his handle on X, @ResidentSponge.

Advertisement
Comments

Lifestyle

Police sergeant recounts his Neuralink journey with Elon Musk’s brain chip

Published

on

By

neuralink-patient-registry-volunteers

A former Vancouver police sergeant with ALS accounts his journey to become a patient for Elon Musk’s Neuralink wireless brain-computer interface technology.

“I’m texting you from my brain right now.” That was the first message Lee Marten sent after waking up from Neuralink surgery, five hours and one migraine after dozens of threads were stitched into his motor cortex.

Marten, a former Vancouver police sergeant, is one of the first Canadian ALS patients to receive Neuralink’s N1 brain implant, and the 26th recipient overall. He tells his story in a first-person account published by Maclean’s.

Marten recounts how he was a healthy, athletic Vancouver police sergeant until April 2022 when symptoms of muscle twitching and balance loss, were followed by a bad fall that broke his leg. He would eventually be diagnosed with ALS in early 2025 at the age of 47. ALS, also known as Lou Gehrig’s disease, is a fatal neurodegenerative disease that progressively destroys the motor neurons controlling voluntary muscle movement, eventually taking away a patient’s ability to walk, speak, swallow and breathe. There’s no cure, and most patients live two to five years after diagnosis.

He describes the devastation of the diagnosis and how he began preparing for it while connecting with other young ALS patients through a WhatsApp group called Young Guns. Through that group he learned about a Neuralink clinical trial at Toronto Western Hospital and, after a roughly seven-month vetting process (physical assessments, psychiatric evaluation, a final interview with the Neuralink team), was accepted this past April as the trial’s 26th recipient and the first Canadian ALS patient to get the N1 implant. He recounts the May surgery in detail, including the robotic system that stitched 64 threads into his brain, and describes the app, Link, translating his neural signals into cursor control, which he was using within hours of waking up.

Marten walks through what daily use looks like, including weekly “brain training” exercises, a real-time neural-activity display, charging the implant via a beanie-mounted MagSafe charger, and using the implant for emailing, texting, social media, and gaming via a “Magic Box” that connects it to other devices. He also gives brief context on brain-computer interface history and quite candid about Musk, calling him “divisive” but saying he found him “easy to admire.

Advertisement
-

The piece closes on a heavier note, with Marten seeking to pursue medical assistance in dying as his symptoms progressed, noting that he’ll be able to communicate his final words to his family through Neuralink rather than facing a silent decline. He expresses hope the data from his case will help future ALS patients, even without a cure in his own lifetime.

Continue Reading

Investor's Corner

Tesla Robotaxi gets a massive upgrade in Nevada

Nevada regulators just approved a massive expansion of Tesla’s robotaxi fleet across the entire county.

Published

on

By

Concept art of a Tesla Cybercab in Las Vegas Strip as rendered via Grok

Tesla’s robotaxi footprint in Nevada just grew by roughly 500 times in a single regulatory vote.

The Nevada Transportation Authority approved Tesla’s full Autonomous Vehicle Network Company permit on Thursday, clearing the way for the company to deploy up to 5,000 driverless vehicles across Clark County over the next 12 months. The decision came during a four hour general session meeting that Tesla investor Sawyer Merritt watched live and reported on X, noting the vote replaces the interim order that had limited Tesla to just 10 robotaxis on a narrow stretch of the Las Vegas Strip.

That earlier cap, covered here after it surfaced on August 13, came with restrictions that looked stricter than what Tesla runs in Austin: a 45 mph speed ceiling, no airport pickups, and a geofence confined to the Strip corridor. The new approval extends Tesla’s operating authority to all of Clark County, with room to request an even wider geofence across the state.

Advertisement
-

Tesla representatives at the meeting said they have no intention of putting 5,000 cars on the road right away. Commercial rides are expected to start within 30 days, pending vehicle inspections, insurance filings, and fare approval, the standard steps every robotaxi operator in Nevada has had to clear.

Tesla’s own Robotaxi account replied to the news with a short line, The golden future is upon us.

The timing lines up with Tesla’s broader robotaxi push this month. The company is preparing to open Cybercab rides to the public in Austin as soon as this month, and it opened a sweepstakes for riders to win a seat at the launch event. Tesla filed its original application for a 5,000 vehicle Nevada fleet back in June, a request regulators trimmed to 10 vehicles when they issued the interim order in July. Thursday’s vote effectively grants the number Tesla asked for from the start.

Zoox, the Amazon owned robotaxi operator, has run in Nevada since 2025 and was capped at 100 vehicles before Thursday’s decision. Tesla’s new ceiling puts it well ahead of that comparison on paper, though the company has said its actual fleet size will depend on how quickly FSD v15 rolls out, the software update executives have called the gateway to scaling unsupervised robotaxi operations nationwide.

Continue Reading

Elon Musk

India tells Elon Musk’s X to “Follow the Law” in latest censorship update

Elon Musk says X now exposes government censorship, but India’s secrecy laws complicate that promise.

Published

on

By

Elon Musk’s promise to make government censorship requests on X “clearly visible” is running into a wall in India, where the law forbids the very disclosure Musk is promising.

On August 15, Musk responded to an update from X’s open-source algorithm team by writing “Any censorship required by governments is now clearly visible.” The claim referred to a change X pushed two days earlier to its public xai-org/x-algorithm repository, which now includes a controversial filter written directly into the code. The filter suppresses posts from 665 accounts flagged by Brazil’s Superior Electoral Court from appearing in the For You feed of any viewer located in Brazil, unless the viewer already follows the account. The election tied to the filter is scheduled for October 4.

India’s government wasn’t as impressed, and responded on Monday that “X will have to follow the law of the land,” in response to Musk’s transparency push covered by the Times of India. The problem is structural rather than political. India issues content blocking orders under Section 69A of its IT Act, and Rule 16 of the accompanying 2009 Blocking Rules requires those orders to stay confidential. Publishing an India equivalent of the Brazil filter, naming specific accounts and citing specific government orders, would itself violate Indian law. Government use of Section 69A has grown from roughly 6,000 orders a year between 2018 and 2023 to about 24,300 in 2025, according to a Tech Times report.

Elon Musk shares details on X vs. Brazil conflict

The contrast puts Musk’s transparency pledge in an odd spot. It works largely as advertised in Brazil, where electoral law requires disclosure and X can point to specific account IDs and a specific court order in public code. It cannot work the same way in India, where the law requires the opposite. X users in India will keep seeing content disappear from search and their feeds without any public accounting of why, even as X tells the rest of the world that its censorship compliance is now inspectable.

This isn’t the first time X’s fights with a national government have shaped how the platform operates. Brazil’s Supreme Court ordered X to suspend the accounts of sitting lawmakers and journalists in 2024, a standoff that cost X its Brazilian revenue for months and froze Starlink’s local accounts before the investigation into Musk and X was closed in March with no evidence of wrongdoing found. X also sued California over a state law requiring moderation disclosures, arguing the mandate itself violated the First Amendment.

Advertisement
-

Whether India’s government pursues anything beyond a public statement remains to be seen. For now, the mismatch between what X can legally publish and what different governments legally allow it to publish is the real story behind Musk’s seven word claim.

Continue Reading